picture of article

Teacher in Hungary facing criminal charges for organising Pride event

A rights campaigner in Hungary has been placed under investigation and is facing potential criminal charges after organising a peaceful Pride march, in a case that campaigners have described as “unprecedented and dangerous” for the EU. In early October, thousands flocked to the southern city of Pécs to take part in Pride. It was the fifth year that the march was held – the only other annual Pride gathering in the country besides that of Budapest – and was becoming a showcase of the city’s commitment to freedom, diversity and the coexistence of minorities. This year, however, politics loomed large. In March the country’s prime minister, Viktor Orbán, and his rightwing populist party had voted to ban Pride events and allow the authorities to use facial recognition technology to identify and potentially fine those in attendance, a move Amnesty International described as a “full-frontal attack” on LGBTQ+ people. Even so, in June tens of thousands of people defied the ban to march in Budapest after Pride was rebranded as a municipal cultural event. Months later, Pécs Pride also attracted record numbers, with as many as 8,000 people, including several members of the European parliament, taking part despite the police and the country’s highest court confirming that the event was banned. For the organiser Géza Buzás-Hábel the nightmare began soon after. “We decided to hold Pécs Pride, despite the ban, because Hungary must remain a European country,” the Romani LGBTQ+ activist said. “Freedom of assembly is a fundamental human right, and we cannot allow political decisions to limit our community’s visibility or self-expression.” Organised by the Diverse Youth Network, a group co-founded and led by Buzás-Hábel, the march had taken on wider meaning in recent years as the Hungarian authorities took aim at LGBTQ+ people through a series of discriminatory measures. “If we don’t stand up for ourselves here, then where?,” he said. “Pride is not just a march – it is a message: queer people exist even when others try to silence or ban us.” Days after the march, he was summoned by police for questioning. Soon after, his case was forwarded to the prosecutor’s office with a recommendation to press charges including organising and calling for participation in a prohibited assembly, he said. Prosecutors are deciding on the next steps; Buzás-Hábel said he could be facing a suspended prison sentence of up to three years. The consequences have already wreaked havoc on his life. In recent weeks, he was dismissed from his state job as a teacher after almost a decade teaching Romani language and Roma culture. He was also dismissed from the music centre where he had worked as a mentor for five years. “That experience broke me far more than the current criminal proceedings: losing my community, my students, and my colleagues was an enormous pain,” he said. “I never imagined, even in my worst nightmares, that such violations of rights could happen in a country that has been an EU member state since 2004.” If charges are formally brought, he would be permanently barred from returning to teaching, he said. Campaigners in Hungary and beyond have sounded the alarm about the case. “This is the first known case in the European Union where a human rights defender faces criminal prosecution for organising a Pride march – a step until now only seen in Russia or Turkey,” four Hungarian human rights organisations noted in a joint statement in October. The case is a “dangerous shift” in Hungary’s long campaign against LGBTQ+ people and civil society, they said, as well as a “test for Europe”. They called on the European Commission to take action. “If a teacher in an EU member state can face prison for organising a Pride march, it is not only Hungarian democracy that is at stake, but the credibility of the European Union itself,” the statement noted. “A gay Roma teacher in southern Hungary should not have to risk going to prison to remind the EU what its values mean.” The sentiment was echoed by the European Roma Rights Centre. “Hungary’s case is unprecedented and dangerous,” it said. “No one should be criminalised for organising a peaceful Pride march. Not in Hungary. Not anywhere in Europe.” Others described the case as a glimpse of the vulnerability of activists and organisations in Hungary, with Buzás-Hábel’s persecution seen as a bid to scare off Hungarians from exercising their right to peaceful assembly and from standing up for the values that matter to them. The European Pride Organisers Association called on Hungary to drop the case. “Our message is simple: Pride is peaceful, legitimate, and protected,” it said in a statement. “Criminalising organisers is unacceptable.” Buzás-Hábel said it was part of a much wider process playing out across Hungary. “This is not really about me. In the eyes of those in power, I am just a speck of dust,” he said. “This is directed at my broader community, and the goal is to intimidate the people around me. They are using me as a tool to set an example for the entire country.” He spoke to the Guardian before a trip to Brussels, where, as a board member for Europe’s largest Roma youth network, he was set to take part in a ceremony recognising Roma youth-led projects. The visit would also afford him the chance to meet with EU decision-makers and politicians interested in his case and the situation in Hungary, he said. “The real question is whether the European Union is ready to stand up for the principles it claims to represent,” he said. “If, in an EU member state, someone can face criminal prosecution simply for organising a peaceful Pride march – and the EU does not respond firmly – it sends the message that European values only matter until defending them requires real political courage.” Despite the uncertainty that now plagued his life and career, he said he had no regrets. “I have already experienced the personal cost of this system: I lost all my jobs, I was placed under secret service surveillance, and I now face potential criminal charges,” he said. “But none of this changes the fact that I would organise Pride again in exactly the same way – and I will do so next year as well,” he added. “For me, it is not just an event, but a stand for all those who need visibility and courage in such a hostile environment. Freedom sometimes comes at a high price, but the only thing I would truly regret is failing to stand up for my community.”

picture of article

Trump says he will make a call to end hostilities as Thailand and Cambodia ‘at it again’

US president Donald Trump said on Tuesday that he will make a call regarding reignited hostilities on the Thai-Cambodia border, where fighting has resumed less than two months after a ceasefire he brokered between the two nations collapsed. Speaking at a rally in Pennsylvania, the US president reiterated his global peacemaking skills, proclaiming that “in ten months I ended eight wars”, before listing hostilities between Kosovo and Serbia, Pakistan and India, and Israel and Iran. Acknowledging that clashes have again erupted in the disputed border region in south-east Asia, Trump suggested he would again step in to calm tensions. “I hate to say this one, named Cambodia-Thailand, and it started up today and tomorrow I’ll have to make a phone call,” he told the crowd. “Who else could say, ‘I’m going to make a phone call and stop a war of two very powerful countries, Thailand and Cambodia.’ They’re going at it again.” Fatal clashes escalated along the disputed border this week as both sides have sought to cast blame on the other for the fighting and vowed to defend their territories. More than 500,000 people have fled their homes to safety in Thailand and Cambodia since the start of the reignited conflict. Both sides have accused each other of violating a US-backed ceasefire deal brokered by Trump in July and signed in his presence six weeks ago. Tensions have simmered since Thailand suspended de-escalation measures in November after a Thai soldier was maimed by a landmine that Bangkok said was newly laid by Cambodia, a claim that Cambodia denies. In a sign that neither side was willing to back down, Thai prime minister Anutin Charnvirakul said on Tuesday that Cambodia had not yet contacted Thailand about possible negotiations and the fighting would continue. “We’ve got to do what we’ve got to do,” he said. “The government will support all kinds of military operations as planned earlier.” Earlier this week he said that military action was necessary to safeguard the nation’s sovereignty and ensure public safety. In a statement posted to Facebook and Telegram, Cambodia’s senate president and former longtime prime minister Hun Sen claimed that his country had refrained from retaliating Monday, but overnight began to fire back at Thai forces. “Cambodia wants peace, but Cambodia is forced to fight back to defend its territory,” Hun Sen wrote. As of Tuesday night, Cambodia’s defence ministry said nine civilians had been killed since Monday and 20 seriously injured, while Thai officials said four soldiers had been killed and 68 had been injured. With Reuters and Associated Press

picture of article

What’s behind the Thailand-Cambodia clashes – explained in 30 seconds

Stretching across more than 817km (508 miles), the shared land border between Thailand and Cambodia has been marred by conflict for more than a century. Sovereignty has been contested since France, which occupied Cambodia until 1953, first mapped the border in 1907. However, tensions have worsened significantly in 2025. In May, clashes in the area that killed a Cambodian soldier sparked nationalist sentiment on both sides, and saw both governments retaliate. Thailand imposed harsh border restrictions, while Cambodia banned the broadcast of Thai films, and the import of Thai fruit, vegetables, gas and fuel. Then in July, the worst clashes in a decade erupted during five days of fighting after a Thai soldier stepped on a landmine in a disputed area. At least 48 people were killed and more than 300,000 forced to flee their homes. The clash was exacerbated by a fallout between two political former leaders of Cambodia and Thailand. The five-day war ended with a fragile peace deal brokered by US president Donald Trump, which was signed in Malaysia in October. But tensions have remained high. In November Thailand suspended the ceasefire when a border landmine blast injured another Thai solder. A clash occurred two days later that killed one and wounded three Cambodian civilians. Thailand has since launched airstrikes along the border, reigniting fighting that has spread along the border, with seven civilians killed and 20 wounded in Cambodia, and three Thai soldiers confirmed dead. Both sides accuse each other for breaking the ceasefire.

picture of article

Zelenskyy ‘ready for elections’ after Trump questions Ukrainian democracy

Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said he is ready to hold a wartime election within the next three months, if Ukraine’s parliament and foreign allies will allow it, after Donald Trump accused him of clinging on to power. Zelenskyy, clearly irritated by Trump’s intervention, said that “this is a question for the people of Ukraine, not people from other states, with all due respect to our partners”. However, he promised to explore avenues for holding a vote in the coming months. “Since this question is raised today by the president of the United States of America, our partners, I will answer very briefly: look, I am ready for elections,” Zelenskyy said on Tuesday evening. “Moreover, I am asking … the United States to help me, possibly together with European colleagues, to ensure security for the elections, and then in the next 60 to 90 days Ukraine will be ready to hold the elections. I personally have the will and readiness for this,” he added. Trump made the comments in a rambling interview with Politico published earlier on Tuesday. “They haven’t had an election in a long time,” said the US president. “You know, they talk about a democracy, but it gets to a point where it’s not a democracy any more.” Zelenskyy’s five-year term expired in May last year, but the Ukrainian constitution prohibits elections in wartime, and even his political opponents have said repeatedly that the security and political considerations do not allow for holding an election during wartime. “It would only cause harm,” said Serhiy Rakhmanin, an MP from the opposition Holos party. “He’s the commander-in-chief, and the country is in a position where we don’t have that luxury, whatever issues we might have with him. It would only help the enemy,” he added. Zelenskyy said the two key questions to solve would be the logistical one of how soldiers, the millions of displaced people, and those living under occupation would be able to vote, and secondly, how to hold elections legally, given martial law is in effect. He asked for advice from allies regarding securing the elections, and from MPs on how to amend the law to allow for elections. “I am waiting for proposals from partners, I am waiting for proposals from our MPs, and I am ready to go to the elections,” said Zelenskyy. Zelenskyy was speaking while returning to Ukraine after a diplomatic tour of European capitals that has come as the White House has increased pressure on Kyiv to sign up to a peace deal. Responding to questions from reporters on Tuesday, Zelenskyy said Ukraine would do whatever it can to organise a high-level meeting with the US within the next two weeks on a peace deal. He also said Kyiv was ready for an energy ceasefire if Russia agrees. Over the weekend, Trump’s son Donald Jr said at a conference in Doha that Zelenskyy was prolonging the war because he was worried he would otherwise lose power. He also suggested Trump might “walk away” from Ukraine if the war does not end soon. “It’s not correct. But it’s not exactly wrong,” said Trump, when asked about his son’s claim. The US has indicated that Ukraine should give up the Donbas region to achieve peace, a move which would be highly unpopular in Ukraine. There is also no sign that Russia is ready to agree to a deal, even one which would appear to be beneficial to Moscow.

picture of article

Honduras president alleges ‘electoral coup’ under way amid Trump ‘interference’

Honduras’s president, Xiomara Castro, has alleged that an “electoral coup” is under way in the country’s presidential election, which she says has been marked by “interference from the president of the United States, Donald Trump”. The leftist president also said that “the Honduran people must never accept elections marked by interference, manipulation and blackmail … Sovereignty is not negotiable, democracy is not surrendered.” Since Hondurans went to the polls on 30 November, the vote count has dragged on, with repeated interruptions and outages on the electoral council’s website. Two rightwing candidates have been neck and neck ever since and, with 99.4% of tally sheets counted in the preliminary results, Nasry “Tito” Asfura is ahead with 40.52%, followed closely by Salvador Nasralla on 39.48% – a margin of only 42,000 votes. A construction magnate and former mayor of the capital, Tegucigalpa, Asfura received open backing from Trump, who said the US would support the next government only if he won. On the eve of the vote, the US president also announced a pardon for the former president and Asfura ally Juan Orlando Hernández, who was sentenced to 45 years in prison for allegedly creating “a cocaine superhighway to the United States”. He was released last week. At a press conference on Tuesday, Honduras’s president “condemned” Trump’s “interference … when he threatened the Honduran people that if they voted for a brave and patriotic candidate of the Liberal party, Rixi Moncada, there would be consequences”. A former finance minister under Castro, Moncada was chosen by the president to run in her place, as Honduras’s constitution does not allow re-election. Before the vote, Trump had claimed Moncada was a communist and that her victory would hand the country to the Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro – the target of an escalating US military buildup – “and his narco-terrorists”. Moncada is in third place in the preliminary count, with 19.29%. President Castro said that Trump’s statements “violated the most sacred principle of our constitution. Sovereignty resides in the people, exclusively in the Honduran people.” She also referred to Hernández’s release: “Conservatives in Washington have decided to ally themselves with drug trafficking and organised crime.” After a lengthy investigation that had key developments under Trump’s first administration, Hernández was convicted in the US last year. He governed Honduras from 2014 to 2022, and Manhattan prosecutors alleged that, under his government, the country served as a crucial transit point for cocaine entering the US from South American countries including Colombia and Venezuela. On Monday, the Honduran attorney general, Johel Zelaya – an ally of Castro’s government – ordered the immediate execution of an international arrest warrant for Hernández, whose whereabouts have been unknown since his release from a federal prison in West Virginia last week. Still speaking about the current elections, Honduras’s president said on Tuesday that the vote had been marked by “threats, coercion, manipulation of the TREP [the results transmission system] and the adulteration of the popular will”, although she presented no evidence. She added: “These actions constitute an ongoing electoral coup that we will denounce before the United Nations, the European Union, CELAC [Community of Latin American and Caribbean States], the OAS [Organisation of American States] and other international bodies.” The runner-up, Nasralla, claimed a “monumental fraud” was under way and demanded a recount “tally sheet by tally sheet”. Shortly afterwards, the president of the electoral council, Ana Paola Hall, said: “I cannot tamper with the results, neither to help nor to harm anyone – and you know something, even if I could, I still wouldn’t.” Despite Asfura’s lead in the preliminary count, roughly 14.5% of the tally sheets, containing thousands of votes, showed “inconsistencies” and must be reviewed. The electoral council has until 30 December to announce the official result.

picture of article

Brigitte Macron criticised after using sexist slur against feminist protesters

French celebrities and politicians on the left have expressed outrage after Brigitte Macron was filmed using a derogatory and sexist slur to describe feminist protesters at a theatre show in Paris. A video filmed on Sunday showed France’s first lady in discussion backstage at the Folies Bergère theatre in Paris with Ary Abittan, a French actor and comedian previously accused of rape, before a performance he was about to give. The previous night, feminist campaigners had disrupted his show with shouts of: “Abittan, rapist!” Before Sunday’s performance, Macron asked him how he was feeling. When he said he was feeling scared, she referred to the protesters as “sales connes” (dirty or stupid bitches) and adding that if they reappeared, “we’ll toss them out”. Her office said in a statement that she had been trying to calm his nerves: “As the video shows, Mrs Macron’s only intention was to reassure an artist who, in his dressing room before going on stage, had just told her: ‘I’m scared’ because his show had been disrupted the previous evening. “In no way is she attacking a cause. She does, however, disapprove of the radical methods used to prevent an artist from performing on stage, as was the case on Saturday night.” The feminist campaign group Nous Toutes (“All of Us”) said its activists had disrupted Abittan’s show to protest against what it described as “the culture of impunity” around sexual violence in France. Magistrates terminated the investigation of the 2021 rape allegation against Abittan in 2024 due to lack of evidence, a decision confirmed on appeal in January this year, according to French media. In a statement on Instagram, Nous Toutes said: “We denounce venues that roll out a red carpet for men accused of rape, normalising sexist and sexual violence. It is a public insult to the victims. Victims, we believe you. Rapists, we do not forgive you!” Politicians on the left criticised the use of a sexist slur and some said Brigitte Macron should apologise. The former Socialist president François Hollande told RTL radio: “There’s a problem of vulgarity.” The Green leader, Marine Tondelier, said the comments were “extremely serious” and should not have been made by a first lady. Several celebrities voiced support for the feminist campaigners by adopting the insult for themselves with the hashtag #salesconnes. The actor and director Judith Godrèche, a leading voice in France’s #MeToo movement who has filed complaints against two film directors for sexually assaulting her when she was a teenager, posted on social media: “Me too – I’m also a salle conne (dirty, stupid bitch) and I support all the others.” The singer and actor Camélia Jordana posted a picture of herself with #saleconne across her forehead. The Green senator Mélanie Vogel posted on social media: “And a very good day to all the stupid bitches of our country,” while the secretary general of the moderate CFDT trade union, Marylise Léon, said the comments were “inappropriate and crude”. On the French far right, however, the National Rally lawmaker Jean-Philippe Tanguy said Brigitte Macron’s comments had been made in private. “If each of us were filmed backstage saying things with friends, I think there would be plenty to comment on,” he told the broadcaster BFMTV. “All of this is very hypocritical.”

picture of article

Member of UK armed forces killed in ‘tragic accident’ in Ukraine, says MoD

A member of the UK armed forces died on Tuesday morning after an accident in Ukraine, believed to be the first time a serving member of the British military has been killed in the country since the full-scale Russian invasion. The victim was not immediately named, though the Ministry of Defence said their family had been notified, after an incident that appears to have taken place during a weapons test at a site away from the frontlines. A spokesperson for the MoD said: “It is with deep regret that we must announce that a member of the UK armed orces died in Ukraine this morning, Tuesday 9 December. “He was injured in a tragic accident whilst observing Ukrainian forces test a new defensive capability, away from the frontlines.” British military personnel are present in Ukraine in small numbers in support of the country’s armed forces, and to guard the British embassy, though their presence has been acknowledged only in limited and careful disclosures. There was no further detail on what had happened, other than to say that the fatal incident was not the result of hostile fire. The MoD said it would not be commenting further on Tuesday. The prime minister expressed his “deepest sympathy and condolences”. Keir Starmer said on X: “My deepest sympathy and condolences to the family of the member of our armed forces who sadly lost their life today. Their service and sacrifice will never be forgotten.” A Ukrainian memorial produced by the Kyiv war museum has counted that 40 Britons have died defending Ukraine, a higher number than previously thought. None are known to have been serving in the British military at the time of their death. Starmer has said the UK would be willing to deploy “boots on the ground and planes in the air” as part of a multinational peacekeeping mission in the event of a durable cessation of hostilities in Ukraine, but there is little immediate sign of Russia agreeing to a ceasefire. In a post on X, the defence secretary, John Healey, said: “Devastated by the death of a UK service person in Ukraine. My thoughts are with their family, friends and colleagues as they grieve for a loved one. Our hearts go out to them.” The shadow defence secretary, James Cartlidge, said: “I am deeply saddened to hear the tragic news that a member of the UK armed forces died this morning in Ukraine. My sincere condolences to his family and friends at this difficult time.”

picture of article

US puts sanctions on network said to funnel Colombian mercenaries to Sudan

The United States has sanctioned four people and four companies accused of enlisting Colombian mercenaries to fight for and train a Sudanese paramilitary group accused by Washington of committing genocide. Announcing the sanctions on Tuesday, the US treasury said the network was largely composed of Colombian nationals and companies. Hundreds of former Colombian military personnel have travelled to Sudan to fight alongside the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which has committed horrific war crimes including ethnically targeted slaughter and large-scale abductions. The Colombians’ involvement first emerged last year, when an investigation by the Bogotá-based outlet La Silla Vacía found that more than 300 former soldiers had been contracted to fight – prompting an unprecedented apology by Colombia’s foreign ministry. Colombian ex-soldiers have long been considered among the world’s most sought-after mercenaries due to their extensive battlefield experience gleaned from the country’s decades of civil war, knowledge of Nato equipment, and high-level combat training. In Sudan, the Colombians have reportedly trained child soldiers, taught fighters to pilot drones, and fought directly on the frontlines. One of the mercenaries told the Guardian and La Silla Vacía in October that he had trained children in Sudan and fought in the siege of the city of El Fasher. He said training the children was “awful and crazy” but added that “unfortunately that’s how war is”. Among those targeted was Álvaro Andrés Quijano Becerra, a dual Colombian-Italian national and retired Colombian military officer based in the United Arab Emirates. The treasury accused him of playing a central role in recruiting and deploying former Colombian soldiers to Sudan. His wife, Claudia Viviana Oliveros Forero, was also sanctioned. Also on the sanctions list was Mateo Andrés Duque Botero, a dual Colombian-Spanish citizen who the treasury said managed a business accused of handling funds and payroll for the network that hired the Colombian fighters. “In 2024 and 2025, US-based firms associated with Duque engaged in numerous wire transfers, totalling millions of US dollars,” the treasury statement said. Colombian national Mónica Muñoz Ucros was the fourth individual to be sanctioned, with the company she managed accused of carrying out wire transfers linked to Duque and his businesses. “The United States again calls on external actors to cease providing financial and military support to the belligerents,” the treasury said in a statement. Elizabeth Dickinson, senior analyst at the International Crisis Group, described the sanctions as a “very significant” milestone, saying that “calling out those who are doing the contracting is the right way to go”. She added that Colombia also recently passed a law ratifying the International Convention Against the Recruitment and Use of Mercenaries, aiming to curb decades of Colombian involvement in foreign conflicts and transform national security policy. Sean McFate, an expert on mercenaries, urged more caution, saying that “sanctions are necessary but insufficient for dealing with rampant mercenarism”. “It’s an illicit economy and based out of Dubai, which is relatively sanction-proof,” he said. The UAE has been widely accused of arming the RSF, an accusation it has denied. “Expect more Colombian mercenaries,” McFate warned.