picture of article

Death toll in Hong Kong tower block fire rises to 36 with 279 reported missing

The death toll from a huge fire that has engulfed several residential tower blocks in Hong Kong has risen to 36, with a further 279 people reported missing, the city’s leader John Lee said in the early hours of Thursday morning. A taskforce has been set up to investigate the cause of the fire, which broke out on Wednesday afternoon at the Wang Fuk Court residential complex in Tai Po, in the northern New Territories. The complex is made up of eight 31-storey towers containing about 2,000 flats that house about 4,800 people. Lee said 29 people remained in hospital, seven of whom were in a critical condition, and that the fire was “coming under control”. Authorities declared the incident a five-alarm fire, the highest emergency rating, and at least 128 fire engines and almost 800 firefighters were dispatched to fight the blaze. Roads including major highways near the towers have been closed. Shortly after the fire broke out, Derek Armstrong Chan, the deputy director of Hong Kong’s fire services operations, said: “The temperature inside the buildings concerned is very high. It’s difficult for us to enter the building and go upstairs to conduct firefighting and rescue operations.” At least one firefighter named as Ho Wai-ho, 37, was among the dead. Videos from the scene show flames spread across the towers and visible on every floor, flaring out of windows. Dozens of shocked residents, many sobbing, watched from nearby pavements as smoke funnelled up from the complex. “There’s nothing that can be done about the property. We can only hope that everyone, no matter old or young, can return safely,” a Tai Po resident who gave their surname as So told Agence France-Presse near the scene of the fire. “It’s heartbreaking. We’re worried there are people trapped inside.” A resident who gave their surname as Wong, 71, broke down in tears, saying his wife was trapped inside one of the buildings. The Wang Fuk Court towers are among the tallest in Tai Po, , which, like much of Hong Kong, is among the most densely populated areas in the world. Many residents are elderly, according to 2021 census data reported by CNN. The Hong Kong government said all departments were coordinating to assist the response effort and affected residents. China’s leader, Xi Jinping, expressed his condolences for the victims, China’s state broadcaster said late on Wednesday. Officials were reported as saying the fire had started in some of the external bamboo and mesh scaffolding that encased the towers before spreading inside them, but the exact cause of the is still not known. Building standards in Hong Kong are relatively high and vastly improved in recent decades, but the Association for the Rights of Industrial Accident Victims expressed deep concern about fires associated with scaffolding, noting similar incidents in April, May and October. Bamboo scaffolding is a ubiquitous sight across Hong Kong’s construction and renovation sites, though the government has said it was being phased out for safety reasons. The Tai Po district authorities have opened up shelters in local community halls, at least one of which local media reported was full by Wednesday night, and police have set up a casualty hotline. Several forums and campaign events related to 7 December elections that had been scheduled for the coming days have been cancelled.

picture of article

Putin trying to negotiate an end to Ukraine war as he cannot win it on battlefield, says EU’s Kallas – as it happened

… and on that note, it’s a wrap! The EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, has cautioned that “Putin cannot achieve his goals on the battlefield so he will try to negotiate his way there,” as she called for further support for Ukraine and pressure on Russia after a meeting of EU foreign ministers (14:17, 14:23, 14:26) Earlier, the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, has also warned against “the unilateral carving up of a sovereign European nation”, as Europe scrambles to assert influence over a US effort to end the war in Ukraine (9:24, 9:24, 9:24, 9:26, 9:29, 9:33, 13:14). The German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, said that Germans “have to get used to the idea again that peace and freedom do not come for free,” as he spoke about the country’s 2026 budget, and said that “Putin must realize that he has no chance of winning this war at the expense of the European order of freedom and peace.” (9:54). At the same time, Russia welcomed some “aspects” of the new US plan to end the war, while saying it still required further analysis (13:53), and rejecting Europe’s “meddling” in the talks (10:56). Meanwhile, speculations were swirling over where the leaked conversations involving US peace envoy Steve Witkoff and Kremlin’s senior aide Kirill Dmitriev, published by Bloomberg, may have leaked from (11:02, 15:55). In other news, Moldova displayed a Russian drone that fell on its soil outside its foreign ministry as it summoned Moscow’s envoy over the crash, in an overt criticism of Russia’s war in neighbouring Ukraine (17:09). The former French president Nicolas Sarkozy has been convicted of illegal campaign financing in his failed 2012 re-election bid, after the country’s highest court rejected his final appeal (14:44). Poland said it was expecting 44bn from the European Union’s SAFE programme to spend on defence projects, including drones, space defence, AI, cyber and cryptosecurity, and equipment for its army and border guards, becoming the largest beneficiary of the scheme (12:40).

picture of article

Guinea-Bissau military takes ‘total control’ amid election chaos

Soldiers in Guinea-Bissau have announced they are taking “total control” of the west African country, three days after elections that both the two main presidential contenders claim to have won. Military officers said they were suspending Guinea-Bissau’s electoral process and closing its borders, in a statement read out at the army’s headquarters in the capital Bissau and broadcast on state TV. They said they had formed “the high military command for the restoration of order”, which would rule the country until further notice. Earlier on Wednesday, shots were heard near the election commission headquarters, presidential palace and interior ministry, although it was not clear who was responsible. The military takeover is the latest in a string of coups and attempted coups in Guinea-Bissau since it gained independence from Portugal in 1974. The average yearly income in the country of 2.2 million people was just $963 (£728) in 2024, according to the World Bank. The UN labelled Guinea-Bissau a “narco state” in 2008 because of its role as a hub for the global cocaine trade. Situated between Senegal and Guinea, its coastline features numerous river deltas and the 88 islands of the Bijagós archipelago, which experts said had provided the natural, discrete drop-off points used by Colombian drug cartels. The incumbent president, Umaro Sissoco Embaló, had been vying to become the first president to win a second term in power in three decades. Both he and his main rival, Fernando Dias, claimed they won in the first round of elections, held on Sunday. Earlier on Wednesday, a spokesperson for Embaló claimed the shots were being fired by gunmen affiliated to Dias. But a Dias ally blamed Embaló for trying to simulate a coup attempt so that he could declare an emergency and retain power. Neither provided any evidence for their claims. The election commission was due to announce provisional results in the presidential and parliamentary elections on Thursday. There have been at least nine coups in Guinea-Bissau between independence and Embaló taking office in 2020, according to Reuters. Embaló claimed to have survived three coup attempts during his first term in office, the most recent in October. However, critics claimed Embaló had fabricated the putsch attempts, using them as an excuse to repress opposition. In December 2023, gunfire was heard for hours in Bissau, which Embaló said was an attempted coup. He dissolved parliament and Guinea-Bissau has not had a properly functioning legislature since. Agence France Presse and Reuters contributed to this report

picture of article

Von der Leyen warns against ‘carving up’ of Ukraine amid crunch US-led talks

The European Commission president has warned against “the unilateral carving up of a sovereign European nation” as Europe scrambles to assert influence over the US’s attempt to end the war in Ukraine. Speaking to European lawmakers in Strasbourg on Wednesday, Ursula von der Leyen said Russia showed “no signs of true willingness to end the conflict” and continued to operate in a mindset unchanged since the days of Yalta – the much-criticised and misunderstood 1945 summit to settle the postwar order. “So we need to be clear that there cannot be unilateral carving up of a sovereign European nation, and that borders cannot be changed by force. If today we legitimise and formalise the undermining of borders, we open the doors for more wars tomorrow, and we cannot let this happen.” The US continues to push for an end to the conflict. Donald Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff – who was exposed for coaching the Kremlin on the best way to win the US leader’s favour – is expected to meet Vladimir Putin in Moscow early next week, while the US army secretary, Dan Driscoll, will meet the Ukrainian side. Von der Leyen welcomed Trump’s efforts to find peace, describing them as “a starting point”, but made clear that Europe had many concerns about the details outlined in the original 28-point US-Russian plan. Some of the maximalist Russia-friendly demands have since been removed, Ukraine has said, and the US president has rowed back on his Thursday deadline tied to the US holiday of Thanksgiving amid little sign of progress on key sticking points. Describing the situation as volatile and dangerous, von der Leyen said she saw “an opportunity here to make real progress”, adding: “So far we have seen no signs from Russia of true willingness to end this conflict. So we have to keep up the pressure on Russia.” In a hastily arranged video call on Wednesday, EU foreign ministers “reaffirmed our shared principles”, according to Europe’s foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, referring to sovereignty, independence, territorial independence and “Ukraine’s inherent right to self-defence”. Kallas, a former prime minister of Estonia, said everyone welcomed the US push for peace, before setting out an analysis of the conflict that vastly differed from the worldview informing the 28-point plan. “Right now we see zero indication that Russia is ready for a ceasefire,” she said. “We still need to get from a situation where Russia pretends to negotiate to a situation where they need to negotiate. We are getting there.” Kallas referred to the “failed” Russian summer offensive and the impact of western sanctions on Russia’s economy. “The notion that Ukraine is losing is also flat out false. If Russia could conquer Ukraine militarily, it would have already done so by now. Putin cannot achieve its goals on the battlefield, so he will try to negotiate his way there.” She said that in the last century Russia had attacked more than 19 countries, some three or four times. “So in any peace agreement, we have to put the focus on how to get concessions from the Russian side that they stop the aggression for good and do not try to change borders by force.” EU officials also argue against limits on Ukraine’s armed forces. Such a restriction would “leave the country vulnerable to future attacks”, von der Leyen said, adding that Ukraine also needed “robust, credible and long-term security guarantees”. In a leaked recording, Witkoff told a senior Kremlin official last month that achieving peace in Ukraine would require Russia gaining control of Donetsk and potentially a separate territorial exchange. The original 28-point plan called on Ukraine to cede the entire Donetsk region to Russia, including areas under Ukrainian control. According to a Reuters report citing three sources, the US 28-point plan was drawn from a Russian report submitted to the White House in October. A senior Kremlin aide, Yuri Ushakov, told state TV that Moscow had seen the latest version of the US plan, saying: “Some aspects can be viewed positively, but many require special discussions among experts.” The Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, said on Wednesday that it was premature to speak about striking a peace deal in the near future, Reuters reported. Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said he had thanked von der Leyen for her messages of support. “We see eye to eye: as long as Russia continues to rebuff all peace efforts, sanctions against it must be tightened and defence and financial assistance for Ukraine must continue.” Von der Leyen also promised that the European Commission would present a draft legal proposal on using Russia’s frozen assets to fund Ukraine in 2026 and 2027. EU leaders failed to endorse the idea last month because of legal doubts from Belgium, which hosts about €183bn of assets, most of Russia’s sovereign wealth in the EU and two-thirds of the worldwide total. Trump’s proposal for the US to take 50% profits on a US-led venture to “rebuild and invest in Ukraine” based on $100bn from the Russian frozen assets is adding to pressure on European leaders to resolve the issue. The US also wants Europe to contribute $100bn to the reconstruction investment fund. Von der Leyen reiterated her support for the frozen assets plan – an EU loan to Ukraine secured on the assets and the idea that Russia would pay reparations to Kyiv – saying: “I cannot see any scenario in which the European taxpayers alone will pay the bill.” EU leaders will discuss the frozen assets question next month as they try to nail down a 2026-27 funding deal for Kyiv, which is expected to run out of money next spring. Von der Leyen said another European priority was the return of Ukrainian children forcibly deported to Russia. She said: “There are tens of thousands of boys and girls whose fate is unknown, trapped in Russia by Russia. We will not forget them.” Ukraine’s government has identified nearly 20,000 children who have been unlawfully deported or forcibly transferred to Russia since the full-scale invasion in 2022. A Ukrainian organisation working on the issue, Bring Kids Back, has said 1,835 children have returned from deportation, forced transfers and occupied Ukraine. Putin is wanted for alleged war crimes by the international criminal court over the abductions. The original 28-point plan proposed a full amnesty for the actions of all parties involved in the conflict.

picture of article

As France prepares military expansion, how is Europe beefing up its armies?

France will this week become the latest EU country to set out plans to expand its army, with Emmanuel Macron expected to announce on Thursday that military service will be restored – albeit on a voluntary basis – nearly 30 years after the end of conscription. In the face of Russia’s military threat and uncertainty over the US’s commitment to defending its transatlantic allies, Europe is rushing to bolster its defence industry and its deployment capability after radically cutting them back since the cold war. Despite significant losses in its war on Ukraine, Russia is perceived by European militaries as a potential direct threat within two to five years. Meanwhile, Washington has made it clear that it expects its EU allies to take care of much more of their own defence. But if the issue of defence industry investment is chiefly economic, the question of how to significantly expand the number of full-time armed services members is also very much societal – and is leading to heated debates across several countries. Fabien Mandon, France’s top general and chief of staff of the armed forces, prompted media and political uproar last week by saying the country must be ready “to lose its children” since Russia was “preparing for a confrontation with our countries by 2030”. The International Institute for Strategic Studies thinktank wrote in a recent report: “Most European armies struggle to meet their recruitment targets and retain trained personnel, as well as to generate a sufficient reserve.” Sophia Besch, a defence specialist at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said “growing military personnel shortfalls” were forcing more and more western European countries to explore various kinds of conscription models. “Training cycles will also need to be intensified for reservists, which some countries need to reactivate in large numbers,” Besch said. “For countries without a tradition of military preparedness, all this poses a politically and socially sensitive challenge.” Several EU countries have some form of conscription, led by the Nordics and Baltics where “total defence” underpins military thinking and draft intakes are widening. Finland has one of the world’s largest reserves, based on universal male conscription. Sweden reintroduced selective conscription – with mandatory registration for men and women, but a strict selection process that takes into account several factors including physical fitness and youths’ “willingness to serve” – in 2018. Denmark’s conscription system was extended to women and lengthened to 11 months from four in June. Estonia has universal male conscription, while Latvia and Lithuania, like Denmark, select conscripts by lottery if there are not enough volunteers. Elsewhere, Croatia, which abolished mandatory military service 18 years ago, recently restored conscription, while Poland is working on a plan to prepare large-scale military training for every adult male in an effort to double the size of its army. While recent polls have found that majorities in several European countries, including Germany, France and Poland, support some form of mandatory military service, other countries have so far steered clear of conscription. Germany’s government this month decided against a system of compulsory military service after a bitter debate, opting for a voluntary model instead – but if that fails to find the numbers, it will reconsider a compulsory nationwide call-up. France’s proposed scheme is unlikely to include reintroducing the mandatory military service abolished in 1997. Several countries offer perks such as cash bonuses, preferential access to public sector jobs and higher education places to military service volunteers. Army leaders generally say that volunteers are more professional and motivated than conscripts, but volunteer armies are expensive. Conscripts not only make up the numbers of active service personnel, but provide a large pool of potential reservists. Compulsory military service, however, is no panacea and can be counterproductive. “In countries where there is domestic resistance, mandatory conscription could even undermine public resolve to shore up the national defences,” Besch argued. “Most successful European conscription models now rely on a strong degree of volunteerism – but instilling a willingness to serve in a population that does not have a recent history of military service takes time and sustained domestic debate.”

picture of article

Can Europe prevent an unjust ‘peace’ in Ukraine – and what is at stake if it fails?

With Ukraine’s future back on the geopolitical carving block, Europe is facing its own moment of truth. Is it ready to defend Kyiv against the imposition of a lopsided “peace” that rewards Vladimir Putin and undermines the entire continent’s security? Not for the first time, European governments were left in the dark about secret US-backed proposals to end Russia’s war. Leaked to the media last week, the latest incendiary 28-point plan was so slanted in Russia’s favour that there are suspicions it was partly drafted in the Kremlin (complete with clunkily translated Russian syntax). The terms of this shockingly punitive plan would freeze battle lines but require Kyiv to cede swathes of territory that it still controls; drastically curb the size of its army; accept amnesty for Russian atrocities and war crimes; and stay out of Nato for good. No wonder President Zelenskyy told his compatriots that it left them facing one of the most difficult moments of their history. Nonetheless, in a hurry to claim credit for peace – seemingly at any price – Donald Trump gave Ukraine an ultimatum: sign off on Russia’s shopping list by Thanksgiving or, it was implied, risk losing US intelligence and military aid: a not-so festive deadline. The days since have felt like a repetition of August, when Trump rolled out the red carpet for Putin in Alaska and left sidelined European leaders dashing to the White House en masse, flanking Zelenskyy, to limit the damage. This time, despite Trump upbraiding the Ukraine president for “zero gratitude”, emergency talks in Geneva have reportedly tweaked the plan to “uphold Ukraine’s sovereignty”. Trump has softened his language (and deadline), claiming that negotiations with Ukraine are bearing fruit and his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, will soon be back in Moscow. If a more palatable deal is in the offing, it may be because France, Germany and the UK have helped Ukraine to push back. It is not only about solidarity: these countries may be required to put “boots on the ground” to uphold an eventual deal. *** Foot in the door There is, however, no reason to believe that Moscow will buy into any plan that doesn’t involve Kyiv’s capitulation – or even that Russia seeks to end the war. “Putin sees no problem with continuing the war,” Tatiana Stanovaya, of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, told the Guardian’s Russian affairs reporter, Pjotr Sauer. At such a perilous moment then, the onus is more than ever on Europe to demand that Ukraine gets a just peace – both morally and out of self-interest for the security of Ukraine’s European neighbours. But how can Europe prevent a US stitch-up, particularly if Moscow maintains its most unreasonable territorial demands and Trump loses patience with Zelenskyy? Getting ahead of any Trump/Putin summit is key, say analysts. Ukraine’s European backers need be clearer with Trump that Ukraine’s security is Europe’s security. “Europeans complain about not being at the table, but they have agency,” Jana Kobzova, a Ukraine expert with the European Council for Foreign Relations, said on the thinktank’s podcast. “They can put their foot in the door and say these are the things that we are not going to tolerate.” Europe is already shouldering most of the cost of Ukraine’s resistance, even if it has been too hesitant, divided, or complacent to give Kyiv the negotiating cards it needs. *** Rouble roulette The most game-changing piece of European leverage could turn out to a neuralgic (and Belgium says legally iffy) EU plan for a €140bn “reparations loan” for Ukraine, secured on billions in Russian central bank deposits, frozen in the west by EU sanctions. The confiscated assets (mostly held in a repository in Belgium) could transform Ukraine’s near-bankrupt status and help it win the war. But the proposal also stipulated using $100bn of these Russian assets for investment, with the US keeping 50% of the profits. Now the EU must urgently decide if it wants to move on the assets first, or dig deep to find alternative cash. Brussels suspects that Russia’s economy is in a worse state than it will acknowledge, thanks to such measures as a new EU ban on Russian gas imports. “They [Moscow] want us to believe they can continue this war for ever. This is not true,” Kaja Kallas, the EU high representative and former Estonian PM, told the BBC. The stakes are perilous for Europe if Moscow gets away with changing borders by force. “If Ukraine capitulates as per Russia’s plan, war in the rest of Europe is one step closer, and Europeans understand this. So it’s not out of the goodness of their heart that they would stick with Ukraine, but because they understand that their own security is at stake,” Nathalie Tocci, director of the Italian Institute for International Affairs and a Guardian Europe contributor, told me. For Tocci, the most likely medium-term scenario is not Ukrainian surrender, but one in which the US and Russia (egged on by US hawks, including JD Vance) reach a bilateral deal, leaving Europe to stick with Ukraine. “In this scenario, Europeans should stop deluding themselves that they can work with Trump on Ukraine. They should warmly thank the US president and persuade him to step aside and place his bets on another conflict to get his Nobel peace prize. Either way, the war goes on for now”. To receive the complete version of This Is Europe in your inbox every Wednesday, please subscribe here.

picture of article

Trump threatens Venezuela’s Maduro with ‘the easy way … or the hard way’

Donald Trump has warned Nicolás Maduro he can “do things the easy way … or the hard way” as Venezuela’s authoritarian leader responded to the growing US pressure campaign by urging followers to prepare to defend “every inch” of the South American country. Clad in woodland camouflage fatigues, Maduro told a rally in the capital, Caracas, it was their historic duty to fight foreign aggressors, just as the Venezuelan liberation hero Simón Bolívar did two centuries ago. “We have to be capable of defending every inch of this blessed land from any sort of imperialist threat or aggression, wherever it comes from,” Maduro declared in his Tuesday address to “the revolutionary people of Caracas”. “I swear before our Lord Jesus Christ, that I will give my all for the victory of Venezuela,” Maduro said, vowing to protect the skies, mountains and plains of his country. Speaking on Air Force One as he flew to Florida, Trump declined to explain the precise purpose of his four-month campaign against Venezuela, although many suspect it is designed to overthrow Maduro, who is widely believed to have stolen last year’s presidential election. Officially, the huge US military deployment in the Caribbean Sea is part of a crackdown on Latin American drug traffickers “flooding” the US with drugs. Washington has accused Maduro of leading one narco “cartel” – the “Cartel of the Suns”, which was this week designated a foreign terrorist organization – although many experts say the group does not actually exist. “I’m not going to tell you what the goal is. You should probably know what the goal is,” Trump said of his crusade, indicating he “might” talk to Maduro. “If we can save lives, if we can do things the easy way, that’s fine. And if we have to do it the hard way, that’s fine too,” the US president told reporters. Trump’s future plans for South America’s sixth-largest country – and the nation with the world’s largest proven oil reserves – remain shrouded in mystery. “Maduro and most of his cohorts view the US military threats as a bluff,” a source with regular contact with top Venezuela officials told the Wall Street Journal this week. “Maduro believes that the only way the US can oust him is by sending troops to Caracas,” that person added. Given Trump’s reluctance to send US troops into combat overseas, that looks highly unlikely. But many observers suspect that, after conducting more than 10 deadly airstrikes targeting supposed drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean Sea, Trump’s next step will be US strikes on Venezuelan soil. “I think that we’re going to start blowing things up. I think we have to do something because there’s too big a force there [in the Caribbean] to not do something,” said Douglas Farah, a national security consultant and Latin America expert who advised the US government on Venezuela during Trump’s first term. Farah said his biggest fear was that – even if the US did launch some kind of attack, perhaps targeting a major Caribbean port out of which cocaine was smuggled – that would fail to topple Maduro, just as Trump failed to topple him in 2019. “[If that happens] Maduro will feel empowered. He’ll say: ‘Yeah, I defeated the United States,’” Farah said. And any chance of the Venezuelan dictator leaving power “in some sort of orderly fashion will be gone again for another 10 years”.

picture of article

‘Fearing for our lives’: Australians tell of Chilean mountain horror where five hikers perished

About 100 metres below the most challenging summit in a remote nature reserve in Chilean Patagonia, Australian woman Emily Dong was among a group of hikers who thought they were going to die. Less than a day later, five hikers would be confirmed dead in the Torres del Paine national park after winds hit 190km/h and temperatures plummeted to –5C. Taking into account wind chill, it felt like –20C. Dong, a keen hiker from Sydney, remembers crawling across an ice sheet on all fours, the wind howling around her. She was unable to put on her spikes because of the freezing conditions. The 24-year-old had walking poles, but every step she took the wind “battered you from left to right”, forcing her on to her knees, she says. “I remember holding my hands over my head because that’s how heavy the storm was, that’s how bad the wind was, and it was impossible to move forward. “In my head I was just thinking, ‘I need to get to the next hut, I need to get to that hut so I can finally rest.’ After speaking with other hikers, it became clear many of us were fearing for our lives.” But the next hut was locked, Dong later found out. That was despite the hikers having been told by staff who operate the private campsites in the national park that they could stop there for lunch and to warm up before pushing on to the next campsite. There were no rangers in that area of the park due to mandatory voting in Chile’s presidential election that day, Mauricio Ruiz, the regional director of Conaf, Chile’s national forestry corporation, told local news media later. It was one of a series of communication failures that survivors believe may have contributed to the deaths of a British woman, a German couple and a Mexican couple, who all succumbed to hypothermia during the snowstorm on Monday 17 November. Dong was among a group of about 30 people, including 13 Australians, who tried over several hours to save them on the O Circuit trail at Torres del Paine, a popular spot that attracted 367,000 travellers last year. Police and emergency services would not arrive until the following day – by then it was too late. Survivors are now asking why the trail was open if the rangers were absent and the weather was so severe. ‘They were screaming at staff’ On the Monday morning hikers planned to set out from Los Perros campsite on their fourth day of a week-long trail circling the Paine massif in the national park. The 15km hike to the next campsite, Grey, includes the most strenuous climb of the trail over the John Garner Pass which reaches an altitude of 1,220 metres. When Dong and her partner had asked staff whether the conditions would be safe before heading out, they told them: “It’s just Patagonia, hikers have done the pass in much worse conditions.” About 30 hikers set off in small groups between 6am and 6.30am. As conditions deteriorated during the day, they slowly converged under informal leadership of groups at the front of the trek, including an Australian couple, Sid Bildmann, 33, from Brisbane, and Renae Casini, 36, from Melbourne, who have more than a decade of experience in the ski industry. They made the difficult decision to turn the group back before reaching the summit. Later, they found out their two friends who had completed the trail days before them had warned staff at the Grey campsite to shut the pass. “They were screaming at staff on the other side, ‘You need to close this, we’re lucky to be alive,’” Casini says. “Because they didn’t have internet the whole time, they weren’t able to get in contact with us … and that message was never received. “The pass was still open, even though camp attendants on the other side were warned.” Bildmann says if they had known how severe the weather conditions would be, including how much snow had amassed and compacted over several days, there is no way they would have pushed forward. As it turned out, their GPS device would later show they were within 50 metres of the summit when they turned around. “The wind was so high you couldn’t directly look into it to see where you’re going,” he says. “We thought: if we’re struggling climbing the first part of the trail, what’s to follow? “But we all know descending is worse than ascending. The wind was now on our backs, pushing on the ice.” As they descended to return to Los Perros, people started to fall, including Dong’s friend, who slid about 50 metres down an icy slope, “disappearing into nothing”. “I couldn’t see her and I didn’t know if she was alive or not until I made it down to the bottom. She had lacerations on her face from hitting the rock … people were literally just slipping down,” she says. “At some point I had no idea where we were … the trail markers weren’t visible in the storm. I remember just looking at people’s packs thinking, ‘I need to keep going because if I don’t see them any more, I’m going be lost on this mountain.’ “It was terrifying. Every single one of us was so grateful to be alive when we got down.” ‘We were in shock’ When the hikers made it back to the Los Perros campsite at about 12.30pm, some suffering from frostbite, hypothermia and cuts, they had to demand access to the campsite’s staffroom, which they turned into a makeshift medical area. They were initially charged for additional sleeping bags and food, they say. “We were in shock,” Bildmann says. “People would return at different times, and whenever they did, the tears started falling uncontrollably.” It soon became clear people were unaccounted for. The alarm was first raised over Victoria Bond, a British woman who failed to return to camp with her four friends. A distress post was issued via an SOS function at 2pm, and a group of volunteers headed out – a friend of Bond’s and a group of Canadians who had chosen not to make the ascent that day and weren’t fatigued or in shock. One staff member accompanied volunteers back up the mountain, but otherwise no assistance was given, they say. Soon they came across Cristina Calvillo Tovar, a Mexican citizen, and her partner, Julián García Pimentel. He was dead, and Tovar was suffering from hypothermia. Backup was requested to camp via Garmin watches, and Bildmann put his wet gear back on and ascended the mountain for a second time. Over the next five hours, the group of volunteers attempted to transport Tovar back to camp using a makeshift stretcher constructed from trekking poles, duct tape and rope. Among them were two medical practitioners from Australia, who monitored Tovar’s vitals and attempted CPR when they were within 150 metres of camp. “They did everything they could to try and get a response,” Bildmann says. “We pushed as hard as we could. But unfortunately, after about an hour, they had to call the time of death.” Bildmann had spent more than 10 hours exposed to the elements. ‘It’s a huge systemic failure’ About two hours later, rangers finally arrived in response to the SOS call and informed the survivors that the pass was closed. Their campsite’s hut was opened, revealing a stretcher that had been behind a locked door the whole time. It wasn’t until the following afternoon that police and additional backup made it on the scene – about 24 hours after an SOS was first issued. The five bodies were found scattered over a 2km area near the pass, with Bond the highest up, partially sheltered by rocks, and the German couple, Nadine Lichey and Andreas Von Pein, behind her. A collective statement written by the hikers who survived the blizzard said it was a “terrible, avoidable tragedy”. They questioned why no rangers were present to support hikers during the trek or subsequent rescue efforts until it was too late, forcing them to act as their own first responders. Twenty-seven people required medical treatment after the disaster. “Nobody should have been allowed, let alone encouraged to attempt the pass that day,” the statement said. “There’s been a lot of victim blaming, but hikers were encouraged to head out in extremely dangerous conditions, and told there would be rangers present … it’s a huge systemic failure.” The group called on the Chilean government, parks administration (Conaf) and Vertice, the private operator within the national park, to introduce essential safety measures to avoid future “senseless loss of life”, including a hiker log at each campsite and access to medical equipment. Vertice did not respond to detailed questions. Conaf said it had ordered an internal investigation “to determine any potential liability” and would “review the safety and communication protocols in the park’s circuits … with the aim of strengthening prevention and emergency response capacity”. Bildmann and Casini were flown out of the park by helicopter on Wednesday 19 November. A week later, the 130km O Circuit remained closed for investigation. Casini still fears people may be unaccounted for due to the absence of sign-in sheets or tracking. “It was hard to leave the camp,” she says. “You could see the people, the faces that were still on the hill … We wanted to do more to help. It plays in my mind.”