Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Habermas and the lessons of history | Brief letters

One thing missing from most of the commentaries following the death of Jürgen Habermas (Editorial, 18 March) was his use of the expression “history as a learning process”. That he took the idea seriously was understandable, given that he was born in Germany in 1929, but the sad truth is that politicians keep making the same old mistakes even when the consequences of their actions are staring them in the face. Dr Charles Turner University of Warwick • “Testing of water from Lough Neagh, which has a surface area 26 times bigger than Windermere” (Report, 14 March). I am in Ohio and I don’t know the size of Windermere. I reckon it is about 26 times smaller than Lough Neagh. Mary Jo Hanlon North Royalton, Ohio, US • We are doing our bit to uphold the existence of pointless units of measurement (Letters, 18 March). Every year we have gooseberry shows in the area, in which the fruit is weighed in pennyweights and grains (me neither). Geoff Holman Knutsford, Cheshire • On children’s first fibs (Letters, 16 March), when my third child was two he insisted that his hands weren’t red because he’d been playing with red ink, but because he’d been holding a red asteroid that had fallen from the sky. Elli Woollard London • My sister has never been allowed to forget that when I, as a newborn, suddenly began to cry, she rushed up to my mother and said: “He’s crying for his feed, Mummy. I didn’t bite his toe.” Allan Wilcox Beverley, East Yorkshire • Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

picture of article

Viktor Orbán refuses to agree to €90bn loan for Ukraine as EU leaders accuse him of betrayal

EU leaders have failed to convince Viktor Orbán, Hungary’s prime minister, to drop his opposition to a vital €90bn (£78bn) loan for Ukraine. They have accused him of betrayal and acting in bad faith but have not persuaded him to budge. In an unusual sign of public anger on Thursday, several leaders made plain their irritation with Orbán, who refused to sign off on the loan agreed last year because of a dispute with Kyiv over a damaged oil pipeline. Arriving at an EU summit, Kaja Kallas, the bloc’s foreign policy chief, said she was not optimistic about a solution before the Hungarian elections on 12 April, when Orbán faces the most serious challenge to his 16-year rule. Hungary had agreed to the loan and was now “taking [its] agreement back”, Kallas said, adding that Orbán was not acting in good faith, a foundational principle of the EU treaty. “The question for us is how can we really force the implementation of the agreement we made in December?” she said. Orbán and his ally Robert Fico, Slovakia’s prime minister, refused to sign a European Council statement “look[ing] forward” to the release of funds for Ukraine. Two EU sources said they did not expect a shift from Hungary at the summit. “Orbán didn’t move in the Ukraine session,” said one. EU leaders agreed in December that 24 member states would take out a €90bn loan for urgently needed military aid and government support for Ukraine. Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic approved the idea with the crucial caveat that they did not have to contribute to the loan. It was a hard-fought plan B after an alternative option of tapping Russia’s frozen assets for the funding failed to win the required unanimity. Orbán’s reneging on his agreement has infuriated EU leaders because it undermines EU decision-making at a moment when Ukraine is running out of money. EU officials want the first tranches of cash to be available to Kyiv from early April. Petteri Orpo, Finland’s prime minister, said Orbán was using Ukraine “as a weapon” in his election campaign, adding: “I think that he betrayed us and we need to find a solution how to go forward.” Bart De Wever, the prime minister of Belgium, who blocked the option to freeze Russia’s assets, played a central role in orchestrating the loan deal, including negotiating with Orbán. He said: “It’s unacceptable to decide with the leaders and then after say: ‘But I’m not ready to execute what I decided.’” António Costa, the European Council president, told leaders – in Orbán’s presence – that Hungary’s behaviour was “unacceptable”, according to an EU official. Costa used the same word to describe comments by Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian president, who, while speaking about Orbán, said he would “give this person’s address to our armed forces”. The remark prompted a rare rebuke from EU officials. Arriving at the summit, Orbán showed no sign of compromise. He said: “We would like to get the oil which is ours from the Ukrainians and which is … blocked by the Ukrainians. I will never support any kind of decision here which is in favour of Ukraine [as long as] the Hungarians are not able to get the oil which belongs to us.” The dispute centres on the Soviet-era Druzhba pipeline, which brings Russian oil to Hungary and Slovakia via Ukraine. Ukraine said the pipeline had been damaged in a Russian air attack, but Orbán has accused Kyiv of stalling on repairs. Hungary and Slovakia’s Kremlin-friendly governments are also blocking the EU’s 20th package of sanctions against Russia, which was meant to have been agreed by the fourth anniversary of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine last month. The EU statement, adopted by 25 member states on Thursday, calls for the “swift adoption” of that package and further pressure on Russia. This week Zelenskyy agreed to accept EU financial and technical support to repair the pipeline. But the decision does not appear to have swayed Orbán, who is running an anti-Ukraine, anti-EU election campaign. It depicts his centre-right opponent, Péter Magyar, as an agent of Brussels and Kyiv, who wants to drag Hungary into the war in Ukraine. Arriving at his first EU summit as prime minister of the Netherlands, Rob Jetten said: “It is obvious that Ukraine needs our full support to win this war against Russian aggression. There has been decision-making here on the European level so I expect everyone to respect that.” Zelenskyy, who addressed the leaders via video link, said before the summit he hoped the EU would stand by its promise. “We are really counting on the countries and the EU to find ways to resolve this issue,” he said on Wednesday. The Ukrainian president told EU leaders this week that Ukraine was “undertaking all possible efforts to repair the damage and restore operations” to the pipeline. Hungary and Slovakia are the only two EU countries that benefit from Druzhba, having secured a temporary exemption from the EU’s import ban on Russian oil, introduced after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The summit in Brussels was meant to be dedicated to fine-tuning a long-term agenda to revitalise Europe’s waning competitiveness against the US and China. But it has been overshadowed by the dispute with Hungary and the war in the Middle East, which has sent energy prices soaring and increased the strain on the transatlantic relationship.

picture of article

Concerns raised over ex-Putin interpreter’s key role in monitoring Hungary vote

Hungarian rights groups have raised concerns over the appointment of Vladimir Putin’s former interpreter to a key role in an international election monitoring mission, amid fears of Russian interference ahead of Hungary’s crucial vote next month. Daria Boyarskaya, who worked for many years for Russia’s foreign ministry and interpreted in numerous high-level meetings including one between Putin and Donald Trump, is now a senior adviser at the parliamentary assembly of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE-PA), based in Vienna. She is coordinating the body’s mission to monitor next month’s parliamentary election in Hungary. The vote could end the nationalist leader Viktor Orbán’s grip on power after 16 years in charge. Orbán is the EU’s most pro-Russian EU leader and he has made criticism of Ukraine and its president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a key pillar of his election campaign, as well as blocking EU loans to Ukraine. There have been numerous allegations that Russia has been deploying assets to boost Orbán’s chances in the vote. Over his long years in charge, Orbán has frequently targeted civil society groups and independent media, and in a number of recent speeches he has referred to them as “bugs” who need to be cleansed or quashed. Given this chilling climate, and the close relations between Orbán and Moscow, some worry about sharing their concerns with a figure with clear links to the Kremlin. Boyarskaya invited representatives of civil society organisations to a closed-door meeting next week in Budapest to share their concerns about the Hungarian political landscape. The delegation will be led by the British Labour MP Rupa Huq and Sargis Khandanyan, an Armenian MP, and is meant to lay the groundwork for a much larger monitoring mission made up of MPs from OSCE member nations that will travel to Hungary around the time of the vote. “Such meetings often involve the exchange of highly sensitive information concerning political pressure, electoral manipulation risks and threats faced by human rights defenders and journalists,” wrote Márta Pardavi, a co-chair of the Hungarian Helsinki Committee, in a letter sent earlier this month to various OSCE officials and seen by the Guardian. Whether or not Boyarskaya retained links with Russian official bodies, she said, “even the perception that confidential exchanges could be accessed by malign external actors” would prevent rights activists from speaking freely. Pardavi therefore requested that the OSCE-PA should consider “immediately removing Ms Boyarskaya from all her tasks related to the election observation mission in Hungary, and ensuring that Ms Boyarskaya does not have access to sensitive election-related information or civil society interlocutors going forward”. In a strongly worded response to Pardavi also seen by the Guardian, Roberto Montella, the Italian secretary general of the OSCE-PA, claimed her letter had a “slandering nature”. He said he had personally selected Boyarskaya to take part in the mission to Hungary and said she enjoyed his “full trust and confidence”. He suggested an external auditor had looked into Boyarskaya in 2023 and made the “unequivocal” conclusion that allegations against her were unfounded. Boyarskaya has worked with the OSCE on and off for more than a decade and was hired full-time in 2021. There is no evidence she has any relationship with Russian intelligence or shares information with the Russian government. In an emailed response to questions, she said she abided by OSCE rules by which “all staff members are explicitly prohibited from accepting instructions from their national authorities”. Unlike many OSCE employees who are seconded by their governments, Boyarskaya is directly hired by the body. Nat Perry, a spokesperson for the OSCE-PA, said: “The Russian government does not pay Ms Boyarskaya’s salary, nor has it done it so in the past.” Security sources say international bodies such as the OSCE-PA are a target for Russian and other intelligence services. Andrei Soldatov, an author who has written extensively on Russian intelligence networks and is currently a visiting fellow at King’s Centre for the Study of Intelligence in London, said: “Organisations like this are a prime target for Russian intelligence penetrations: it’s international, has access to sensitive information and is in the centre of Europe, which is now elevated to Moscow’s primary target.” As an interpreter for Putin, Boyarskaya would almost certainly have come under the view of the Russian security services. “With that level of access to the ‘first person’, she would need to have the highest-level clearance, which usually includes understanding of the needs of the security services, if they would ask something,” Soldatov said. Fiona Hill, Trump’s national security adviser on Russia during his first term, has claimed that in a 2019 meeting in Osaka, Putin swapped in Boyarskaya at the last minute as a means of distracting Trump with an attractive female translator. “There had been somebody else on the list, a man, intended to translate for that particular session, and at the very last minute the Russians swapped out for that translator,” Hill said in a 2021 interview with Good Morning America. “It was clearly intended to draw attention because President Putin made a big point of introducing President Trump to the interpreter, which is something he didn’t normally do,” Hill said, although she added that Boyarskaya proved to be an “excellent translator”. In late 2022, Poland declared Boyarskaya persona non grata ahead of an OSCE-PA meeting in the country, saying her presence would “pose a threat to state security”, according to media reports at the time. Travel records available in leaked Russian databases show she has continued to visit Russia regularly since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Additional reporting by Pjotr Sauer

picture of article

No breakthrough on Hungary’s veto of EU’s €90bn loan to Ukraine – as it happened

… and on that note, it’s a wrap for today! EU leaders have failed to convince Viktor Orbán, Hungary’s prime minister, to drop his opposition to a vital €90bn (£78bn) loan for Ukraine as they have accused him of betrayal and acting in bad faith (15:11). Orbán’s decision to renege on his agreement has infuriated EU leaders, because it undermines EU decision-making, at a moment when Ukraine is running out of money (15:21). Several EU leaders made their frustration with Orbán clear (9:43, 9:56, 10:10), including the new Dutch PM Rob Jetten making his EUCO debut (9:48), but could not get him to change his mind. European Union experts have arrived in Ukraine to assess the condition of the Druzhba oil pipeline, state energy firm Naftogaz said, in a bid to reassure Orbán about the EU’s intent to restore oil flows (10:15, 14:29). But Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed his frustration with the further delay in unblocking the €90bn loan for Ukraine and related sanctions and accession files (15:53). Orbán refusal to drop his opposition is widely seen in the context of the upcoming parliamentary election in Hungary (13:03), with US vice-president JD Vance expected to endorse the nationalist prime minister as he fights for his political survival (16:29). In other news, Several EU leaders also expressed concerns about the impact of the Middle East crisis on Europe, and in particular on energy prices (9:56, 11:09, 11:17, 11:33). The European parliamentary trade committee has voted to progress legislation to ratify last summer’s trade deal with Donald Trump ending months of delays and paving the way for a plenary vote on the agreement (10:45). Germany’s parliament is taking unusual action to curb fuel prices in the wake of a spike from the Iran war, proposing that petrol stations will only be able to raise prices once a day, at 12 midday (12:30). If you have any tips, comments or suggestions, email me at jakub.krupa@theguardian.com. I am also on Bluesky at @jakubkrupa.bsky.social and on X at @jakubkrupa.

picture of article

Denmark reportedly flew blood bags to Greenland in preparation for a US attack

Denmark reportedly readied itself for potential attack from the US in January – flying bags of blood to Greenland and explosives to blow up runways in case of a battle with its former closest ally. During the tense days when Donald Trump threatened to take over Greenland – a largely autonomous territory that is part of the Danish commonwealth – “the hard way”, Copenhagen was so shaken that it started preparing for US invasion, according to Danish public broadcaster DR. When, in January, Danish soldiers were flown to Greenland, they were reportedly carrying explosives to destroy runways in the capital, Nuuk, and in Kangerlussuaq, a small town north of the capital, to prevent US aircraft from landing in the event of an invasion. They also carried supplies from Danish blood banks to treat wounded people in the event of battle, according to DR, which had spoken to sources from across the Danish government, authorities and intelligence services in Denmark, France and Germany. Denmark reportedly started seeking political support from European leaders in a series of secret talks that started soon after the 2024 US election. The 3 January US attack on Venezuela was a crucial turning point, many of the sources told DR. The following day, Trump said the US needed Greenland “very badly” – renewing fears of a US invasion. The following day, Frederiksen said that an attack by the US on a Nato ally would mean the end of both the military alliance and “post-second world war security”. According to DR, there was already reportedly a plan for Danish and European forces to send soldiers to Greenland later in they year, but this was rapidly brought forward. An unnamed top French official told DR that the unprecedented situation had brought Europe closer together. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realised once and for all that we need to be able to take care of our own security,” the source said. Although Copenhagen wanted to avoid escalation with the US, it did not want to do nothing in the event of a US attack. An advance command of Danish, French, German, Norwegian and Swedish soldiers touched down in Greenland, followed by a main force including elite soldiers. Danish fighter planes and a French naval vessel were also sent in the direction of the North Atlantic. The aim was reportedly to have as many different nationalities of soldiers as possible to force the US to take a significant hostile action if it was to occupy Greenland. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” a Danish defence source told DR. The Danish ministry of defence and the offices of the Greenlandic prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, and Danish prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, declined to comment.

picture of article

Oman claims Israel pushed US into Iran war when deal was possible

Oman’s foreign minister has claimed the US has “lost control of its own foreign policy” and accused Israel of persuading Donald Trump’s administration to go to war with Iran – a conflict he described as a “catastrophe” and a “grave miscalculation”. Writing in the Economist, Badr Albusaidi, the Omani minister who mediated the latest nuclear talks between Iran and the US, offered an unusually damning assessment of events leading up to the US and Israel’s bombing of Iran and the war it has triggered across the Middle East. “It was a shock but not a surprise when on 28 February – just a few hours after the latest and most substantive talks – Israel and America again launched an unlawful military strike against the peace that had briefly appeared really possible,” Albusaidi wrote. Of all the Gulf countries, Oman was the most vocal and publicly proactive in trying to halt a US attack on Iran, although other states – including the UAE and Qatar – also worked hard to find diplomatic solutions and warned Trump that a war would be devastating for the region. According to Albusaidi, Iran and the US had been on the “verge of a real deal” in nuclear negotiations held in Geneva in February, describing the talks as “substantive”. As revealed by the Guardian this week, a similar assessment had been made by the UK’s national security adviser, Jonathan Powell, who attended the final stages of the nuclear talks. According to sources, he had been surprised at the significant progress towards a permanent, substantive nuclear deal and judged that it was enough to halt a war between the two sides. The US negotiating team consisted of Trump’s special envoy, the real estate developer Steve Witkoff, and his son-in-law Jared Kushner. They reportedly brought no experts with them. Sources said the Iranians had agreed to highly significant concessions including a reduction and pause on their enrichment of uranium and also offered the US the chance to participate in a future civil nuclear programme, in exchange for a lifting of sanctions and unfreezing of assets. A final phase of negotiations had been planned for the following week in Vienna, but 48 hours after the talks finished, the US and Israel began their strikes on Iran. Albusaidi blamed “Israel’s leadership” for persuading Trump to join the war on the false basis that Iran’s regime would offer an “unconditional surrender” after the assassination of its supreme leader Ali Khamenei. “The American administration’s greatest miscalculation, of course, was allowing itself to be drawn into this war in the first place,” he wrote. “This is not America’s war, and there is no likely scenario in which both Israel and America will get what they want from it.” Albusaidi described the war, and its wider impact on the Gulf region which has borne the brunt of Iran’s retaliation, as a “catastrophe”, with neither side showing any willingness to negotiate. He called for an end to the conflict and a return to bilateral negotiations, arguing: “For Israel to achieve its stated objective will require a long military campaign to which America would have to commit troops on the ground, opening a new front in the forever wars which President Donald Trump previously vowed to end.” As the war in the Middle East has dragged on with no clear end in sight, Oman has stood out from other Gulf states in its increasing willingness to condemn and criticise the US, the closest and most important ally for the Gulf countries, accusing it of being a proxy for Israeli interests in the region. In comments to reporters last Thursday, Albusaidi said the US was intent on causing irreversible damage to international law and helping Israel re-order the Middle East to its own benefit. “Oman’s view is that the military attacks against Iran by the United States and Israel are illegal and that for as long as they continue to pursue hostilities, those states that launched this war are in breach of international law,” he said.