Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Middle East crisis live: Iran launches missiles towards Israel after Lebanon airstrikes

Barak Ravid, correspondent for Axios, said Trump told him during a phone call Sunday: “The Iranian missile fire didn’t hit anyone. I hope Israel doesn’t respond. If Bibi attacks them back, it’ll just drag on like it has for the past 47 years, or the past 3,000 years.” “We’re very close to a final deal with Iran. It’ll be a good deal. I don’t want it to blow up because of what’s happening now,” Trump added. He also said: “I’m about to call Bibi right now and tell him not to respond. Both of them have already done their part. Israel had its strike and Iran had its strike. We don’t need another one.”

picture of article

Iran launches missiles at Israel in response to strikes on Beirut

Iran launched missiles at Israel on Sunday in response to Israeli strikes on Beirut’s southern suburbs, shattering a fragile ceasefire and marking the most serious escalation since April, after 100 days of war. A senior Iranian official has promised a “decisive and painful” response to Israel’s airstrikes on the southern suburbs of Beirut and, a few hours later, sirens sounded across northern Israel. The Israel Defense Forces said it had so far intercepted all the Iranian ballistic missiles, as US president Donald Trump called Israeli prime minister Bejamin Netanyahu urging him ‘‘not to strike back, adding he was ‘‘not happy about it’’ and that it would “not help” negotiations with Tehran. After the Israeli attack in the Dahieh district of Beirut, Ebrahim Rezaei, the spokesperson for the Iranian parliament’s foreign policy and national security committee, wrote on X: “We will give a decisive and painful response to the Zionist regime’s attack on the suburbs … Watch the sky of the occupied territories tonight.” Iran considers Israel to be occupied Palestine. The speaker of Iran’s parliament and top negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, said US bases and assets in the region had become “legitimate targets” after the Israeli strike. “They are neither committed to a ceasefire nor believe in dialogue, and through the naval blockade and violation of agreements regarding Lebanon they showed that they only understand the language of power,” Ghalibaf said in a post on X. On Sunday night, the IDF said missiles had been launched from Iran towards Israel and it was also preparing for attacks after its Beirut strike. Iran launched about 10 ballistic missiles at northern Israel. All the missiles were intercepted or struck open areas, according to the military. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said: “This operation is not a passing event, but rather the beginning of a full week of continuous strikes.” In a statement it added: “Waves of missiles and drones will continue to be launched around the clock for the next seven days until the enemy is deterred and ceases its crimes. “Any targeting of Iranian territory will be met with a devastating and overwhelming response beyond all expectation.” Last week, Tehran threatened that any Israeli attack on Beirut would be considered a violation of the US-Iran ceasefire and would be met with an attack on Israel. Israeli media said on Sunday that a limited attack on Israel’s territory by Iran and Hezbollah was anticipated after the strike. The attack on the southern suburbs of Beirut, a Hezbollah stronghold, hit two apartments in two separate buildings, Lebanon’s state news agency reported, killing two people and wounding 11, according to an initial toll. The Israeli prime minister’s office said the Israeli military had struck “terrorist headquarters” in the southern suburbs “in response to Hezbollah’s firing at Israeli territory”. Israel said it had intercepted Hezbollah rocket fire at northern Israel on Sunday morning, though the armed group did not claim responsibility for the attacks. The strikes showered the streets in rubble and caused a wave of people to flee the southern suburbs in fear of further strikes. After Iran’s missile attacks on northern Israel, Trump urged Tehran to return to the negotiating table. “What I would suggest to Iran: you’ve shot your missiles, that’s enough. Get back to the table and make a deal,” the US president told Fox News in a phone interview, adding how he was not happy with Israel’s strikes on the southern Beirut. “It’s certainly not going to help negotiations,” Trump said, adding, “We’re very close. I would say an agreement would be signed on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday of this coming week. And now this takes place.” Trump also told Axios: “If Netanyahu strikes (Iran) back, it’s just gonna keep going like the last 47 years, or last 3000 years.” He also said the US was “very close” to a peace deal with Iran, adding: “I don’t want it to blow up because of what is happening now”. The strikes on Beirut came just days after Hezbollah rejected a ceasefire proposal agreed by the Lebanese government and Israel. Washington had previously asked Israel to not strike Beirut, though Israeli media reported that the US had been informed before Sunday’s strike. Fighting in Lebanon started on 2 March when Hezbollah launched rockets at Israel in retaliation for the killing of Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei, triggering an Israeli invasion. Israeli strikes have killed more than 3,613 people in Lebanon, while Hezbollah has killed at least 30 Israeli soldiers in Lebanon and three Israeli civilians. The skirmishes in Lebanon have been an obstacle for Iran-US negotiations, as Tehran insists that Lebanon be included in a broader ceasefire deal. On Sunday, Donald Trump told NBC News he was not demanding that Lebanon be part of any peace deal with Iran, claiming again that such an agreement, which has so far proved elusive, was near. “I think they’d like to see it, but I’m not demanding,” the US president said in the interview recorded on Friday. He added: “We’re very close to a deal, or I’m going ‌to ⁠blow the hell out of them [Iran].” Before the strike on Sunday, Israel had issued a forced evacuation order for most of the city of Tyre, one of the largest cities in southern Lebanon, which is hosting thousands of people displaced from villages in the surrounding area. Plumes of smoke were later seen rising from the city. Israel also carried out airstrikes across the south of Lebanon, while Hezbollah claimed responsibility for rocket and artillery barrages against Israeli troops in the Nabatieh area. Fighting has been concentrated around the city of Zawtar al-Sharqiya after Israel took Beaufort Castle along the route to Nabatieh, a large city in south Lebanon that it has been encircling. On Saturday, the Israeli military killed two Lebanese army soldiers and an army captain in a strike on their vehicle. The Lebanese army is not party to the Hezbollah-Israel war. The government of Lebanon and Israel are negotiating directly in Washington in an attempt to reach a comprehensive ceasefire. Hezbollah, which is the party fighting with Israel, is not participating in talks and in recent days has said it will not agree to any ceasefire deal that does not include a withdrawal of Israeli troops from Lebanon and an end to Israeli strikes across the country, not just in Beirut. It is unclear how negotiations in Washington will be affected by Israel’s latest strikes on Beirut. Israelis are bracing for a possible attack by Iran, reviving fears of a conflict that appeared to have subsided after the temporary ceasefire was reached in April. At the same time, Israeli forces continue to carry out strikes across Gaza, where a fragile truce brokered last October has done little to halt military operations in the besieged territory. On Sunday, Israeli strikes on a Hamas-run police station and a vehicle in the Gaza Strip killed at least nine people and wounded 20 others, health officials said, as mediators began new efforts to salvage the truce. One strike hit a police post adjacent to a large tent encampment of displaced families in Khan Younis, in the south of the territory, killing five people and wounding 16 others, medics said. Earlier in the morning, Israel was confronted with violence at home after an Arab Israeli gunman opened fire at a petrol station near the town of Kokhav Yair, located on the Israeli side of the boundary with the occupied West Bank, killing one person and wounding five others before being shot dead by police, authorities said. The attack came amid heightened tensions across Israel and the occupied West Bank, days after a series of settler attacks on Palestinian communities and the fatal shooting of a Palestinian baby that further inflamed an already volatile situation. Police identified the gunman on Sunday as a resident of the predominantly Palestinian city of Taybeh, in central Israel. His motives were not immediately clear. Authorities initially feared that the shooting might be part of a coordinated attack. However, investigators later concluded that the incident involved the gunman and a single accomplice. The second suspect was arrested after allegedly attempting to stab police officers responding to the incident.

picture of article

Zelenskyy meets key allies in London aiming to build on strikes on Russia

Volodymyr Zelenskyy met his staunchest allies at Downing Street on Sunday night, hours after a Russian drone strike damaged a storage centre for spent nuclear fuel nine miles from the Chornobyl nuclear power plant. Keir Starmer welcomed Zelenskyy, Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz for a meeting to discuss ongoing support for Ukraine as the country seeks to capitalise on a series of strikes on key Russian positions. The leaders of the so-called E3 group of nations – the UK, France and Germany – gathered after a week of heightened hostilities and after Vladimir Putin rejected Zelenskyy’s proposal of face-to-face talks on Moscow’s war. The UK and France are leading a “coalition of the willing” initiative to provide security guarantees for Ukraine as part of a peace process. Before the meeting, Zelenskyy vowed that Ukraine would not “silently die”. He told Sky News: “We will respond. We will be stronger and stronger each day.” He said talks would focus on support for Ukraine and cooperation on air defence “for the security of all of Europe”. Zelenskyy, who will meet King Charles on Monday, thanked the UK and Ukraine’s other allies, who he said in a social media post were “helping us strengthen the protection of life and increase pressure on Russia for its aggression”. The meeting followed a series of devastating Ukrainian strikes on targets inside Russia, including Vladimir Putin’s home city of St Petersburg. Long-range Ukrainian drones hit an oil terminal and a nearby naval port this week, sending black smoke billowing into the sky. The attacks began hours before the start of the city’s international economic forum. Speaking at the event on Friday, Putin rejected an offer made in an open letter by Zelenskyy to hold face-to-face talks. He said his war goals were unchanged and there was “no point” in holding peace negotiations. Zelenskyy described Putin’s response as “weak”. He said Ukraine’s deep strikes would continue against targets in Russia. The letter, the first Zelenskyy has publicly written directly to Putin since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, was fiercely critical of the Russian leader’s 26 years in power. He acknowledged shifting US priorities, saying it would be wrong to wait for the Trump administration to return its attention to ending the Ukraine war while it remained heavily focused on the Iran war. “The world has not grown tired of Ukraine, as you long hoped it would. But there is growing fatigue with Russia,” Zelenskyy wrote to Putin. The mood in Kyiv is increasingly optimistic. On the battlefield, Russia’s advance appears to have stalled. Ukraine claims Moscow is losing more men than it can recruit, with more than 30,000 killed and injured a month. Russia’s air defences are seemingly unable to shoot down Ukrainian drones capable of flying more than 620 miles (1,000km) from the frontline. On Saturday, Ukraine struck St Petersburg again, reportedly targeting an ammunition dump and oil terminal in nearby Kronstadt. The city’s governor, Alexander Beglov, said three people sustained minor injuries. He told residents to stay indoors. Ukraine’s special operations forces released footage of overnight strikes on fuel storage facilities in occupied Crimea. The attacks took place in the towns of Lenine and Feodosia. Drones also knocked out a bridge connecting the peninsula with the Chonhar crossing point, a gateway into Russian-controlled southern Ukraine. It connects with a key supply road that was shut this week after repeated strikes on lorries and tankers. The attacks have led to severe fuel shortages in Crimea, with the crisis beginning to spread to other areas including southern Russia. Zelenskyy called Sunday’s attack on a storage facility near Chornobyl “extremely vile” and stressed that it did not lead to a spike in radiation. A fire in the building was quickly extinguished. Large amounts of nuclear fuel were stored a few metres away, the International Atomic Energy Agency said. “An extremely critical infrastructure facility – and an extremely vile Russian strike,” Zelenskyy wrote on X, adding that Russia had used an Iranian-designed Shahed attack drone. “As of now, there are no readings exceeding normal background radiation levels. But there is certainly an increase in Russia’s brazenness, which long ago went off the charts.” Four people were killed by Russian aerial bombs. They included two people waiting at a bus stop in the village of Balabyne, in the southern Zaporizhzhia region, and a 56-year-old minibus driver whose vehicle was targeted nearby. An attack in the neighbouring Dnipropetrovsk oblast killed a 59-year-old man, the region’s governor posted on Telegram.

picture of article

Russian drone hits building storing spent nuclear fuel near Chornobyl

A Russian Shahed drone has substantially damaged a building used to store spent nuclear fuel close to the disused Chornobyl nuclear power plant, in what Ukraine’s president described as a deliberate and “extremely vile” attack. While the structure – the reception building of the spent fuel storage facility – was empty of containers at the time, the targeting of the sensitive site appeared to be direct messaging from Moscow amid an intensifying battle of long-range aerial strikes in which high-profile locations on both sides have been hit. “As of now, there is no heightening of radiation safety limits. But there is clearly a heightening of Russia’s already sky-high arrogance,” Volodymyr Zelenskyy said after the attack, which took place at about 2am (midnight UK time). “It was [a] critical infrastructure facility. And an extremely vile Russian attack.” Zelenskyy was due to meet Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz on Sunday at a summit in London to discuss the continuing conflict. Andrii Sybiha, Ukraine’s foreign minister, posted on X: “This is not the first time Russian forces are putting Ukrainian nuclear facilities at risk. Russia’s nuclear blackmail and threats to nuclear safety are systemic, deliberate, and unacceptable.” The spent fuel storage facility is located about 9 miles from the Chornobyl plant that in 1986 was the scene of the world’s worst nuclear accident. A fire covering about 40 square metres broke out after Sunday’s strike and was extinguished. No personnel were injured. Energoatom, the state nuclear power operator, said radiation levels at the site remained within normal limits. The International Atomic Energy Agency said its experts were preparing to visit the site and that although the strike had caused significant damage, radiation levels at the site remained within established levels. The facility is designed to provide long-term storage for spent nuclear fuel from Ukraine’s nuclear power plants. On Saturday a long-range Ukrainian strike targeted the historic naval town of Kronstadt, near St Petersburg, as the city’s high-profile economic forum was winding up. Russia’s defence ministry said on Sunday its air defences had downed 500 Ukrainian drones in the past 24 hours, Interfax news agency reported. The Kremlin has threatened to escalate systematic attacks on key sites including decision-making centres in Ukraine. Russia has not publicly commented on the attack on the Chornobyl facility. In February 2025, a Russian attack drone damaged a containment arch over the Chornobyl reactor that was destroyed in the 1986 explosion and meltdown. Russia denied responsibility. Energoatom said: “The strike on a nuclear infrastructure facility has once again shown the world the true face of the Kremlin regime, which deliberately poses threats to nuclear and radiation safety.” Kyiv and Moscow have also traded accusations of attacking the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant – Europe’s largest – in south-eastern Ukraine. Also this weekend, Russian bombardment of a public transport stop in the Zaporizhzhia region killed at least two people, while a nearby drone strike killed a 56-year-old minibus driver, authorities said on Sunday. A separate attack on Dnipro in central Ukraine killed a 59-year-old man, the region’s governor, Oleksandr Ganzha, posted on Telegram.

picture of article

Michael Boddington obituary

My father Michael Boddington, who has died aged 84, was an agricultural and environmental consultant. He later turned his attention to charitable causes, setting up Power International to work with amputees and people with severe disabilities in Laos Born near Ambleside in the Lake District, Mike was the son of Lilian (nee Olivia) and Michael, a hill farmer and RAF Spitfire pilot during the second world war. Educated at the King’s school, Worcester, Mike went on to take an agriculture degree at Newcastle University, then in 1967 worked at Wye College in Kent as a lecturer in agricultural economics before founding Rural Planning Services (RPS), an agricultural and environmental advisory consultancy, in 1972. He ran RPS until 1982, when he sold up and founded Michael Boddington Associates (MBA) which he headed until 1991, when it was acquired by Travers Morgan. His consultancy work took him to many countries, delivering agricultural development advice in the Middle East, South and Central America, and south-east Asia. In 1995 Mike established Power International and often visited Laos, where civilians continue to be killed and maimed by unexploded American bombs that were dropped during the Vietnam war. He also created partnership organisations in Laos working on rehabilitation, and established the Cooperative Orthotic and Prosthetic Enterprise (COPE) in 1997, specialising in the manufacture of professionally fitted prosthetics and the rehabilitation of disabled people. COPE today is managed by Laos staff and treats about 1,500 patients annually. Having moved to Vientiane, the capital of Laos, in 2001, Mike stepped back from his from his charitable work in 2016. He then built a guest house and let it out through Airbnb. Guests from all over the world appreciated his knowledge, engagement, storytelling and hospitality, especially the pint-sized gin-and-tonics he served. In 2010 he was appointed MBE. He was married three times; his first two marriages, to Ruth (nee Barlow) and Jane (nee Parr), ended in divorce. He is survived by his third wife, Xoukiet Panyanouvong, whom he married in 2003, four children, James and Christopher from his first marriage, and Louise and me from his second, and six grandchildren.

picture of article

Calls to ban the Sikh kirpan are irrational | Letter

As a judge, I wrote a scenario for a recruitment exercise for a judicial appointments commission where candidates had to adjudicate between a Sikh boy who wanted to wear the kirpan and his Church of England faith school that wanted to exclude it (Sikhs wary of UK backlash as they condemn ‘moment of madness’, 2 June). It was based on my advice to a school that wanted to ban it. When I advised the school that it permitted cricket bats and balls and pointed dividers, all of which had been used as weapons, a compromise was reached enabling pupils to wear a swaddled kirpan under clothing. The Sikh community has condemned the illegal use of the kirpan. A Sikh would no more think of using it as a weapon than other faith group would think of using their religious symbols as weapons. The suggested review of the wearing of the kirpan would presumably have to include the wearing of the sgian-dubh , which I wear when kilted, the swords worn by serving and retired military personnel at service events, or the short sword I wore when dressed as a Roman soldier at a Christian festival. It is irrational to seek to ban the kirpan much in the same way as it would be irrational to ban the sale of kitchen knives, like the one that virtually severed my right thumb from my hand during a robbery. Hugh Howard (retired judge) Bourne End, Buckinghamshire • Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

picture of article

A priceless book of Yiddish songs from the Holocaust lay in a Sydney cupboard for decades – now it has been rescued

Even under conditions of extreme inhumanity, humanity has the capacity to find solace in creative expression. In the concentration camps and ghettoes of Europe under the Nazi regime, music became a sanctuary, a way to preserve Jewish identity, process trauma and maintain a historical record. A small chapter of this vast record, which resurfaced in Sydney, represents one of the earliest printed collections of Holocaust songs. Australia became home to one of the world’s largest populations of Holocaust survivors outside Israel after the second world war. The influx of refugees fundamentally shaped the postwar multicultural fabric of Sydney and Melbourne, importing deep, intergenerational trauma along with extraordinary stories of endurance and survival. It was into this postwar environment that one survivor quietly brought a small Yiddish songbook, that then lay concealed for almost six decades. Printed on fragile acid paper, the poignant lyrics and musical notes of Mima’amakim (Out of the Depths) – a collection of 20 songs written by ghetto inhabitants, camp prisoners, people in hiding and partisan fighters between 1939 and 1944 – lay pressed between the pages of an old music score locked away in a Sydney cupboard. One of only five known surviving copies in the world from an original print run of 500, it narrowly missed being thrown in the recycling bin after its owner, Olga R, died at the age of 98 in 2013 (her family requested that her full name be withheld). Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads But there was something about the cover of this manuscript that her family, who did not speak Yiddish, thought looked too unusual to ignore. It was the Russian constructivist look of it, the Soviet-style geometric shapes, diagonal lines, and stark black-and-red palette, that prompted Olga’s daughter to send a photograph to a Jewish music academic at the University of Sydney, Dr Joseph Toltz. He forwarded the image to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington DC, where its cultural value and rarity was immediately recognised. Thirteen years on, Toltz and Associate Prof Anna Boucher, a public policy expert and global migration scholar at the University of Sydney, have completed the first English translation of Mima’amakim and tracked down descendants of its contributors scattered throughout the Jewish diaspora. Survival stories The origins of the songbook lay in postwar Bucharest, the Romanian capital that served as a key transit hub for Jewish refugees. Up to 100,000 refugees crossed through Hungary and Ukraine into Romania in the months following liberation, but because very few countries were willing to repatriate survivors or facilitate their safe passage, the city became a major processing site where organisations discreetly coordinated undocumented and illegal migration routes to Palestine. It was in this transient environment, at a refugee processing house on Calea Moșilor 128, that a survivor named Yehuda Eismann established an office to document Nazi war crimes. Working alongside three secretaries, Eismann transcribed close to 1,000 wartime survival stories, a collection known as the Bucharest Protocols. Olga R, who would arrive in Australia 11 years later, was one of those secretaries. She had survived the German occupation of Poland by completely discarding her Jewish identity, using false identity papers under a non-Jewish name to pass herself off as a Polish Roman Catholic woman. She memorised Christian customs and prayers, which later saved her life when she was detained by the Gestapo in Kraków and was forced to recite them during a two-week interrogation. As refugees moved through the processing office, Eismann discovered that many had carried the songs they had created and sung in the forced labour camps and ghettoes of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Ukraine. Believing these songs captured a raw psychological dimension of the Holocaust that formal legal testimonies could not, he gathered 20 of the works and categorised them into three distinct emotional arcs: Yiesh (Despair), Bitokhn (Hope/Safety), and Kamf un Nitsokhn (Battle and Victory). When Eismann left Europe for Palestine in October 1945, he gave a copy of the manuscript to Olga. Eismann’s handwritten dedication, penned in Polish on the book’s title page, reads: “To a beloved and friendly co-worker, a token of memory and sympathy from the publishing house and author on the occasion of his departure to Palestine. Bucharest, 20 October 1945. Engineer J. Eismann.” To unlock the personal history behind each song, Boucher and Toltz combed through the records of the International Tracing Service, verified names on gravestones and navigated postwar displaced persons registries. To identify living relatives, they cross-referenced historical data with entries in Yad Vashem’s Hall of Names, tracing descendants through the testimonies written by survivors of exterminated families. One of those survivors was Ayzik Flaysher, who was just 13 when he composed the song Der Driter Pogrom (The Third Pogrom). After witnessing the murder of his parents and all 10 of his siblings in Ukraine, the teenage orphan survived by hiding in a self-dug dirt pit in a forest for two years. He stayed completely concealed during the daytime to avoid Nazi patrols and emerged only under the cover of night, surviving by eating cooked potato leftovers meant for farmers’ pigs. The prolonged confinement in total darkness severely deformed his bones, leaving his physical growth permanently stunted. He eventually walked to Bucharest, escaped to Palestine as a ship stowaway in 1945, and built a successful life as an Israeli factory manager despite his severe physical disabilities. “He would sing his song every single morning,” his son Fredi told Boucher. When asked why he sang all the time, he replied that he had only two choices: “Sing all the time, or cry and die. He preferred to sing.” The global tracking yielded a surprising level of cooperation from the families of the contributors, Boucher says. Many readily opened private archives and gave deeply emotional interviews. Eismann’s grandchildren possessed some knowledge of his postwar escape from a family batmitzvah scrapbook, but other families were entirely unaware of their ancestors’ creative legacies or underground resistance efforts. The researchers were also able to record a face-to-face interview in Jerusalem with the last living contributor, the internationally renowned concert pianist Alexander Tamir. As an 11-year-old boy named Aleksander Wolkowyski in the Vilna ghetto, Tamir had anonymously submitted his composition called Ponar into a ghetto music competition. Picked by a panel of celebrated adult musicians who were blind to his age, the childhood melody, later known as Shtiler, Shtiler (Quiet, Quiet), evolved into one of the most widely performed hymns of Holocaust remembrance in Israel. Gallows humour Many of the other songs in Mima’amakim have remained silent since 1945. Unlike later, more polished anthologies, the unedited raw trauma and at times dark gallows humour – the mocking of camp guards set to upbeat marches, the mourning of a beloved wife’s murder set to a popular interwar tango rhythm – make the Mima’amakim unique. By preserving the musical notations and the raw text, the translation reveals that music inside the camp structure was frequently used by prisoners to build emotional resilience. It is a historic collection that carries direct, practical relevance for contemporary immigrants and refugees dealing with displacement, Boucher says. The findings have been shared with the Refugee Advice and Casework Service, whose caseworkers tell her that clients fleeing current conflict zones continue to use music to process severe trauma. Navigating the painful aftermath of the Bondi Beach massacre, a population already carrying deep intergenerational trauma has been deeply shaken, she says. “I think the Jewish community in Sydney right now needs healing. Maybe we need a bit of the strength of these Holocaust survivors.” Later this year, the researchers will bring the rediscovered song back to the public stage at a dedicated live performance at the Bondi Pavilion, a location they hope can provide a unique space for reflection. “This book channels the incredible resilience of people who lost everything but still chose to save their songs. It says something about how humans have the capacity to juxtapose complete beauty against utter horror, and that’s something that we need right now.” So why did Olga keep the book a secret for so many decades? Boucher has several theories, including the possibility of a love affair with Eismann. “But with a lot of these things, people didn’t really understand the significance … they were in the process of surviving, creating, and they just made these things because they felt compelled to, out of a need to be creative in times of utter despair, and they didn’t reflect on how significant they were.” • Out of the Depths: The First Collection of Holocaust Songs, by Joseph Toltz and Anna Boucher, is available through Manchester University Press

picture of article

Pete Hegseth’s D-day speech on immigration condemned as ‘grotesque stupidity’

The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, has been accused by historians and rights campaigners of “grotesque stupidity” and desecrating the memory of the soldiers who stormed the beaches of Normandy after he sought to link immigration to the D-day anniversary, saying Europe was facing a different “invasion” of its shores. Speaking in north-west France on Saturday to mark the 82nd anniversary of the D-day landings, Hegseth seized on the moment marking the wartime liberation of Europe to reiterate the US administration’s longstanding attack on European immigration policies. “Sadly, today, different European beaches are stormed by different, dangerous ideologies,” Hegseth told those gathered at the American military cemetery in Colleville-sur-Mer. “Beaches in Spain, Italy, Greece and Bulgaria, boats and men arrive. When will European capitals do something about that invasion, or is it too late? I pray not, and I believe not,” he said. “The men who fought and died here restored freedom to Europe,” added Hegseth, a former Fox News host. “That freedom must be maintained by this generation of leaders and war fighters, or what they fought for was merely temporary.” The remarks were swiftly condemned on social media. The English historian, author and television presenter Simon Schama described them as a “special kind of loathsomeness: a blend of historical deafness, grotesque stupidity and comically ludicrous self-importance”. Schama added: “As if the little people’s rage against immigration somehow is superior to the war against the 3rd Reich and entitles this comic book nobody to lecture the actual heroes.” From Jerusalem, the Israeli human rights lawyer Daniel Seidemann also weighed in. “This is an obscene desecration of the memories of those who stormed the beaches of Normandy, and especially of those who fell,” he wrote. Anders Åslund, a Swedish economist and former senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, contrasted the comments with Hegseth’s later remarks on the US standing alongside its allies. “So much nonsense,” he wrote on social media. “‘We stand by our allies!’ No you don’t. You just attacked them. Immigration policies are internal matters.” Åslund said Hegseth’s comments were particularly “clueless” given his recent decision to skip a key Nato meeting and Donald Trump’s vows to cut the number of troops in Europe. “Doesn’t Hegseth know that the most unreliable ‘ally’ by far is the US?” he said. Hegseth’s outsized focus on EU migration echoes comments made by other American officials, including Trump, who have consistently sought to criticise the impact of migration on the continent, despite the US having a higher proportion of foreign-born residents than the EU. Hours before Hegseth’s speech, the US vice-president, JD Vance, also waded into the matter with a social media post that blamed immigration for the killing of Henry Nowak, an 18-year-old British student stabbed in the UK. Nowak’s killer, a British-born Sikh, was convicted of murder and jailed for life with a minimum of 21 years. On Sunday, the UK justice secretary and deputy prime minister, David Lammy, said he had had an “agreeable” conversation in which he had sought to set the record straight with Vance. “This has got nothing to do with mass migration. This young man was a Brit,” Lammy told Sky News. “Let’s be clear about that. And I said: ‘Look, Mr Vice-president, you’re wrong about this.’” In the days before Hegseth’s visit to France, the plans had stirred up controversy, with one residents’ association calling for the trip to be cancelled. “This individual promotes values that go against democracy, human rights and peace,” the Langrune en Commun association, which advocates for environmentalism and solidarity among the village’s residents, said in a press release last week. Speaking to the broadcaster BFMTV, one member of the association cautioned against acting as though everything was normal. “What’s happening with the Trump administration isn’t business as usual. The fact that Pete Hegseth is challenging all the international organisations that emerged from the second world war isn’t business as usual,” said Chantal Richard. “The words must be spoken, he must be called out for who he is, for the values he represents: colonial, warmongering, racist, far-right values,” she added. “Silence seems to us to be the worst thing we can do on these issues.”