Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

UK marks 10 years since the Brexit referendum – Europe live

A generation of young Britons who were locked out of the 2016 EU referendum because of their age now believe that Brexit has failed, with a majority demanding a fresh vote to rejoin the EU, exclusive polling shows. Gen Z Britons show deep dissatisfaction with the UK’s departure from the EU, according to new polling of 18- to 28-year-olds conducted by the thinktank More in Common and shared with the Guardian. The data reveals that 60% of this cohort would vote to rejoin the bloc if given the opportunity, compared with 9% who would vote to stay out. When filtering the results to focus solely on those likely to cast a ballot in a hypothetical second referendum, the margin becomes a landslide, with the pro-EU Remain/Rejoin camp capturing 81% of the vote against just 19% for remaining outside.

picture of article

Europe heatwave live: UK temperatures forecast to reach 38C; French PM to hold crisis meeting after heat deaths

London Fire Brigade (LFB) said it had responded to around 400 calls overnight, including two house fires believed to be caused by lightning strikes and flooding of homes. Thunderstorms following soaring temperatures caused flash flooding in the capital, the LFB said as it urged drivers not to drive through flooded areas.

picture of article

Whistleblower investigating Ecuadorian president’s family business was murdered, activists say

Campaigners in Ecuador say a Polish anti-corruption activist who investigated allegations against the family business of the country’s rightwing president was murdered to silence her. Monika Silva Koniuszek, 41, was found dead in her home in Montañita, a coastal town in Ecuador’s Santa Elena province. The single mother of daughters aged four and nine, was found on the floor with a noose around her neck on 8 June. A day after her death, and before autopsy results had been released, Ecuador’s interior minister John Reimberg said that the initial hypothesis was that it was a suicide: “The necessary evidence to reach that conclusion was found at the scene,” he told local media. However, on Friday, a postmortem in Guayaquil found that the cause of death was a blow to the head and strangulation. “Based on the forensic reports, we are certain that this was a violent death; therefore, the alleged suggestion that it was a suicide falls apart,” said attorney Lita Martínez, director of the Ecuadorian Centre for the Promotion and Action of Women. Silva Koniuszek had spent the last decade denouncing environmental crimes and corruption on social media, and working with local journalists. She stated in her social media profiles: “You don’t need to be born in Ecuador to love it and defend what is right.” “Monika was the bravest person I have ever met,” said Beth Pitts, 47, a British author and fellow activist who collaborated with her in local campaigns. “She was often a lone voice, publicly and vociferously denouncing corruption and environmental crimes when everyone else was too afraid to speak out,” said Pitts, who has lived in Ecuador for 13 years and lived near Silva Koniuszek in a neighbouring village. “Beyond her activism, she was a dedicated single mother and a wonderful friend. Even when she was receiving death threats, she would still take the time to ask how I was doing and offer her support,” she added. Colleagues say Silva Koniuszek had begun to investigate Noboa Trading, the fruit conglomerate belonging to the family of the rightwing president, Daniel Noboa. They said she had been pursuing allegations that several tonnes of cocaine had been seized in Noboa Trading banana containers, but high-ranking Ecuadorian judicial officials were stalling the investigations. Shortly before she was killed, she told friends that she had delivered a dossier of allegations to the US embassy in Quito. She had also investigated allegations that politically connected figures in Santa Elena province were implicated in a massive land-trafficking ring. Friends say Silva Koniuszek was facing judicial harassment and explicit death threats, allegedly linked to the same crime networks that assassinated a fellow activist, local journalist Robinson del Pezo, in November 2025. Silva Koniuszek’s death made headlines in her native Poland, with scepticism over early reports suggesting she took her own life. Her friend, Joanna Cuper, told the Polish broadcaster TVP Info that the activist had claimed she was “followed and observed”. “None of us believe she killed herself,” she said. “She said that the cartels had put a price on her head. Three years ago, her then husband took the children to Brazil because she was receiving threats that she and her children would be murdered,” Cuper added. The Polish prosecutor’s office confirmed last week that it had requested mutual legal assistance from the Ecuadorian authorities probing her death, and suggested it would want to be closely involved in the investigation. The Polish embassy in neighbouring Peru said it hoped “the competent authorities will conduct a swift, thorough, independent and transparent investigation” to “clarify the circumstances of the case and ensure accountability”. It pointedly added: “The embassy of the Republic of Poland emphasises the importance of protecting human rights defenders, journalists, social activists and all individuals engaging in civic life.” The community in Montañita created a shrine to Silva Koniuszek, with photos and flowers, and kept candles burning for several days. Local street artists painted a mural, with neighbours renaming a street after her.

picture of article

Tuesday briefing: How might Andy Burnham bring his Makerfield magic to Westminster?

Good morning. It seems inevitable that Andy Burnham will become the UK’s seventh prime minister in a decade, after Keir Starmer announced his resignation on Monday morning and, hours later, Burnham’s most likely challenger, Wes Streeting, rowed in behind the former mayor of Greater Manchester. Starmer leaves office barely two years after his landslide victory that swept Labour into power on a mandate of change. Six weeks after the party’s humiliation at the hands of Reform across English councils, and historic defeats to progressive nationalists in the Welsh Senedd and Scottish parliament, Burnham offered the country another “change moment”: winning an emphatic victory over Reform in last week’s Makerfield byelection, cementing the view that he can defeat the hard right at the next general election. As it looks increasingly likely that Burnham will be elected uncontested as Labour leader and hence become prime minister by mid-July, I spoke to our correspondents across the UK about the challenges he’ll face from day one in the job. First, this morning’s headlines. Five big stories UK politics | A generation of young Britons who were locked out of the 2016 EU referendum because of their age now believe that Brexit has failed, with a majority demanding a fresh vote to rejoin the EU, exclusive polling shows. Northern Ireland | Former DUP leader, Jeffrey Donaldson, has been found guilty of 18 sexual offences against two victims who were children at the time of the abuse more than 30 years ago. Heatwave | Met Office forecasters have issued a rare red weather warning for Wednesday and Thursday in the face of extreme heat and humidity, while a red heat health alert has been issued in England indicating “a risk to life for even the healthy population”. Middle East | Iran has agreed to allow UN nuclear inspectors back into the country as part of an agreement under which Washington will lift sanctions on Tehran’s oil exports and the strait of Hormuz will reopen, the US vice-president, JD Vance, has said. UK news | The Metropolitan police is to expand its use of live facial recognition (LFR) technology, first into London’s West End by Christmas and then into a further six areas next year. In depth: Burnham ‘has to be very, very careful the sort of messages he sends’ Just after 9.30am yesterday, Keir Starmer stood before staff and supporters on Downing Street and confirmed that, after a weekend of intense pressure from Labour MPs and cabinet ministers, he had offered his resignation to King Charles. There was bitter irony that the section of his brief resignation speech he must most have wanted his critics across the country to hear, where he set out his achievements in office, was almost drowned out by the EU anthem Ode to Joy, blasting from the notorious anti-Brexit campaigner Steve Bray’s massive speaker beyond the Downing Street gates. While Starmer’s remaining allies spoke of his sense of profound unfairness at being booted out by a mayor with only a byelection mandate, he offered a dignified public face, saying he would do “everything I can” to ensure an orderly handover and offering his successor “my full and unequivocal support”. As he made his final thanks to his “beautiful children” and “fantastic wife Vic”, Starmer came close to tears. It was a reminder that politicians are not characters in a soap opera, but real people, however flawed, who still have to go home and tell the dog to get off the sofa for the umpteenth time and sit with all of this noise. The merciless spotlight then moved on to Burnham, who was flexing his selfie arm in Westminster Hall with over 200 Labour MPs who had assembled to greet the new MP for Makerfield after he was officially sworn in. (I do find it boggling that Burnham and Streeting both announced their intentions variously to stand and not to stand for Labour leadership on X, considering rising concerns about how that platform has amplified misinformation, including about the current government.) With a Burnham coronation now most likely, he has just under a month to pick his cabinet and confirm his policy priorities. *** The economy and cost of living During the Makerfield campaign, we heard ambitious long-term plans from Burnham to bring water and energy into public control, and radically overhaul the property tax and social care systems, alongside more immediate cost-of-living interventions on rent and energy levies. But there’s a big difference between spitballing on the stump and navigating the Treasury’s tight fiscal rules – which he’s already signed up to. “He has limited room for manoeuvre realistically,” says Heather Stewart, our economics editor, noting that the UK government is due to borrow £250bn this year, inflated by the long tail of bank bailouts and Covid. Heather thinks he has some wriggle room, “but it means he has to be very, very careful the sort of messages he sends”. “It’s one thing for the markets to lend you money because you want to do a long-term project with long-term returns,” she says. “It’s another for the market to think that you can’t control your day-to-day spending and they’re lending you money that’s going straight out the door for benefits.” During the campaign, Burnham was pressed repeatedly on previous remarks that politicians were “in hock” to the bond markets, saying they had been misinterpreted by his opponents and that his argument was about politicians retaking control of fiscal levers. And while his Makerfield win failed to prompt the bond market panic that Rachel Reeves’s backers had warned of, as Heather sets out in her column this week, she believes Burnham would be wise to set clear expectations about tax and spend, and be upfront about the fact that not everyone can be a winner. During the campaign he claimed he was “not squeamish” about reducing welfare spending to fund defence. But there are options for tax increases, she says, “that don’t step on the live wire of Labour’s manifesto pledges” – capital gains tax again, for example, a bank tax or increasing the tax on high-value homes, due to come into force in 2028. “Announcing a wealth tax would be a powerful symbol of intent, too, though the practicalities are challenging”. *** Europe and the world Foreign policy is widely acknowledged as an area in which Burnham is inexperienced and one of his first challenges in office is likely to be a reset summit with the EU on 22 July. The UK’s relationship with Europe has “immeasurably improved” since the Tories left government, our Europe correspondent, Jon Henley, tells me on a video chat from Paris. Glowing tributes from figures like Canadian premier, Mark Carney, who said yesterday “the world is safer and allies are more united” because of Starmer’s efforts, are testament to the international respect he earned for his leadership on Ukraine, managing the vicissitudes of US president Donald Trump. But there remains a degree of frustration among EU countries, Jon adds that for all of Starmer’s warm words about closer ties, “there are the famous red lines in Labour’s manifesto” on the single market, customs union and free movement, which Burnham will be boxed in by, too. Burnham was accused of reversing his position in favour of rejoining the EU, as he campaigned in Leave-voting Makerfield. He later clarified that, while he respects the result of the Brexit referendum, “I’d like to see us rejoin in my lifetime.” “The problem is there’s very little Burnham can do to improve relationships with Europe that doesn’t involve a major about-turn on those red lines,” says Jon. *** The north and devolution In his victory speech in the wee hours of Friday morning, Burnham said the people of Makerfield had “voted for more power for the north and everywhere forgotten by Westminster”. “We’ve heard all this before with Boris Johnson and levelling up,” our northern correspondent, Hannah Al-Othman, tells me when I catch her driving through Northumberland, “and the consensus here is that those areas have further declined. But with Burnham it does feel more authentic.” She reminds me that Burnham lives in the Leigh area, next to the constituency he’s been elected to represent and a similar sort of place. “There is a sense that he’s lived it and he knows what its issues are.” With growing numbers of regional leaders wielding different levels of power, Hannah wonders whether Burnham might effect some standardisation, devolving further responsibilities. “He has strong relationships with the other regional mayors. I imagine they’ll have his ear and will be holding him to account.” *** Telling Labour’s ‘story’ A perennial criticism of Starmer was that he was too much the technocrat, unable to draw together the threads of incremental progress into a narrative powerful enough to convince a public whose trust had been eroded by decades of austerity, stagnation and broken promises. We know Burnham’s story so far: it’s called Manchesterism, and it means a more interventionist approach to the economy, bringing essential assets such as transport, water and energy into greater public control, a closer partnership between the state and business to spread the proceeds of wealth, and a major expansion of devolution. That’s the ambition, and what Labour MPs are excited about this morning. But how realistic are they, given Burnham’s constraint by manifesto commitments and the economy? Much will depend on who Burnham picks as his chancellor. A briefing war has already broken out between advocates for Streeting and those close to Ed Miliband. Senior political correspondent Peter Walker, who was on Downing Street to watch Starmer at the podium, recalls Burnham’s campaign launch in Makerfield: “The message very much was, ‘If I become PM, I can’t really go beyond what the manifesto said because I haven’t got a mandate to do that.’ And the sheer state of public finances means there’s not much he can do, unless he wanted to significantly change taxation, which he said he’s not going to do.” And that, says Peter, leaves a problem many Labour MPs fear: “Is Burnham just going to be Starmer with a slightly more human presentation style?” What else we’ve been reading Patrick Barkham has written an extraordinary piece about volunteers in Somerset who were trained to experience the world as otters, salmon and other native wildlife in a bid to understand the risks of human-dominated landscapes. Patrick Guardian correspondents revisited Brexit bellwether constituencies 10 years on for this cracking read, which I enjoyed in no small part because I remember the original Scottish commission. Libby I loved reading about how Laura Evans set herself a target of dead lifting 100kg and changed her relationship with her body in the process. Patrick World Cup 2026 On the pitch Argentina 2-0 Austria | Lionel Messi has become the leading goalscorer in World Cup history after scoring in Argentina’s group game against Austria. France 3-0 Iraq | Kylian Mbappé scored twice and Ousmane Dembélé added another as France cruised to a win over Iraq that was delayed for two hours at half-time. And the rest | Erling Haaland scored twice as Norway battled to a 3-2 win over Senegal, while Algeria beat Jordan 2-1, keeping alive their hopes of reaching the World Cup ⁠knockout rounds. Off the pitch Mexico | Merlin, the pet duck in a mini Mexico shirt who has ⁠become a viral sensation and an unofficial mascot of the World Cup, waddled onto the stage of the president’s morning press conference. Sportswashing | This week’s edition of our Hotspot newsletter looks at how Aramco, Saudi Arabia’s state-owned oil company, embedded itself in the World Cup. Say cheese | Jonny Weeks has produced a great behind-the-scenes photo essay from the World Cup’s official portraits. Today’s fixtures • Portugal v Uzbekistan, 6pm BST on ITV • England v Ghana, 9pm BST on BBC • Panama v Croatia, 12am BST on BBC • Colombia v DR Congo, 3am on ITV The front pages “Starmer bows out”, is the Guardian’s front page today, while the Times’ is “Burnham angles for power”, and the Telegraph’s take is “Burnham set for coronation”. The i Paper writes “Prime minister in three weeks: Burnham arrives for coronation”, and the FT leads with “Starmer’s exit clears way for Burnham”. The Mail calls the potential PM “‘Messiah’ without a mandate”, and the Mirror, alongside a picture of Starmer, writes “Out of time”. The Sun says “He thinks it’s all over … and it definitely is for Starmer”. Metro has “Keir’s tears … Andy’s crown”. And lastly, the Express pleads “Give us a proper Brexit”. Today in Focus: The Latest Starmer resigns: who will replace him and when? Keir Starmer has announced he is standing down as prime minister after days of intense pressure from Labour MPs, including cabinet ministers, following Andy Burnham’s byelection victory in Makerfield. Wes Streeting has ruled himself out of the running, so will it be a coronation for the ‘king of the north’ or could another candidate emerge? Lucy Hough speaks to senior political correspondent Peter Walker – watch the full episode on YouTube here. Cartoon of the day | Ben Jennings The Upside A bit of good news to remind you that the world’s not all bad Compensation paid to a deceased Windrush victim has been transformed into the £10,000 Windrush prize, for British Caribbean playwrights over 18. “I wanted something positive to come out of it,” says founder Shereener Browne, the artistic director of Orísun Productions, who set up the prize in memory of her late father, Myron Brown. Aiming to support underrepresented British Caribbeans in theatre, the scheme will also see the winning play staged at London’s Arcola theatre and published by Methuen Drama. Through the prize, Browne hopes to establish a pathway for British Caribbeans theatre makers. More broadly, Orísun Productions has set out to support young writing talent through workshops, seminars and networking events. “There isn’t just one British Caribbean experience,” she says, a narrative she hopes to the scheme will help to change. Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday Bored at work? And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply

picture of article

EU faces fierce criticism over plans to host Taliban in Brussels

EU officials are facing fierce criticism over plans to host the Taliban in Brussels on Tuesday, with rights campaigners and MEPs warning that the meeting risks normalising a regime that has banned girls from school beyond the sixth grade and sought to erase women from public life, while its ranks include two leaders accused of crimes against humanity. The Belgian foreign ministry said on Monday it had issued five single-day visas to a Taliban delegation to attend a meeting in Brussels. Sources told the Guardian the meeting was expected to take place on Tuesday. The meeting comes weeks after the commission confirmed that it has been in talks with the Taliban since January to discuss how to scale up the deportation of Afghan migrants. The willingness of EU officials to cooperate with the Taliban – who in 2024 banned women from speaking or showing their faces outside their home – contrasts sharply with the messaging of the European parliament, where MEPs have repeatedly backed resolutions condemning the regime, said the Socialist MEP Juan Fernando López Aguilar. “I’m appalled,” he said. “It’s absolutely an outrage and a total loss of faith and the credibility of the European Union that it can hold such a double standard.” Two senior Taliban leaders are subject to arrest warrants issued by the international criminal court, which has accused them of crimes against humanity for the persecution of women and girls. The EU has imposed sanctions on several individuals associated with the regime. In May, a spokesperson for the European Commission said the meeting with the Taliban had been coordinated with Sweden after 20 member states had called for concrete pathways to deport Afghans without legal residence permits or who are deemed a security risk. The talks would be focused on how to return those who “pose a security threat” to the EU, said the spokesperson. The rationale was rejected by López Aguilar, who instead accused the EU of allowing the far right and its rhetoric around immigration to set the agenda. “We’re 450 million people all together. There’s no reason to panic when you talk about a certain number of migrants fleeing from despair or from a lack of opportunities. Let alone persecution, which is grounds for them to seek international protection,” he said. “Migration is not a threat, not even a crisis. It’s a constant fact of the history of mankind.” Since the Taliban returned to power in 2021, hundreds of thousands of Afghans have sought asylum in Europe. Across the continent, the lives they have carved out have become increasingly precarious as the discourse on migration hardens, with many EU member states seemingly ready to overlook the risks of carrying out deportations to a country in the grips of a humanitarian and human rights crisis. About 40% of the population in Afghanistan is affected by hunger, according to the International Rescue Committee. The situation of women in the country is particularly precarious as they wrestle with systematic barriers to education, employment and health care. Lisa Owen, the organisation’s Afghanistan country director, said: “Deporting Afghans back to a country where almost half of the population cannot feed themselves is not a migration policy; it is a decision that could cost lives.” The message was echoed in an open letter, in which 83 Afghan and international human rights groups expressed grave concerns about the EU’s intentions. “Afghanistan is currently one of the most dangerous places in the world to be a woman, and forced return would expose many to persecution, violence and severe deprivation of rights,” it noted. While the EU has said that the meeting in no way constitutes a recognition of the Taliban, what is playing out is something far worse, said Shagofah Ghafori, of the Brussels-based Centre for European Policy Studies. “What Brussels is offering instead is something more insidious: normalisation,” Ghafori wrote this month. “And normalisation doesn’t require a signed treaty. It happens incrementally, through granting visas, meeting rooms and the quiet replacement of principle with transaction.” A report published by the UN last year found that many Afghans who were returned to the country, most of them by Pakistan and Iran, experienced arbitrary arrest, detention, torture and ill treatment at the hands of the authorities. The finding suggests that deportations to Afghanistan could trample on the EU’s obligation, under international law, to refrain from sending people back who are at risk of facing persecution or torture. This risk was laid bare in a charter flight, coordinated with Qatar, that left Germany in August 2024 carrying 28 Afghan citizens, said Ghafori. “Once a plane lands, there’s no credible oversight and reports indicate that returnees were detained and interrogated, with at least one later killed,” she said. “If the EU proceeds with deportations, it would be doing so with full knowledge that many returnees will end up in torture cells or mass graves.” Germany is believed to have deported more than 100 since August 2024, while Austria has also begun deportations. While the European Commission has argued that cooperation with the Taliban is necessary to deport convicted criminals back to Afghanistan, Reshad Jalali, a senior policy analyst with the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, said this could just be the starting point. “The real risk is that once deportation is normalised and resumed between the EU and the Taliban de facto authorities, this would create a path for a wider deportation of Afghans without criminal convictions.” Earlier this year, an investigative report by the German broadcaster ZDF alleged that the deportations to Afghanistan, while prioritising those convicted of crime, had also targeted single Afghan men who had not broken any laws. Jalali called on the EU to instead work with the international community to hold the Taliban accountable. “The priority from the EU should be protecting Afghans and defending international law, rather than creating pathways that risk legitimising one of the world’s most abusive regimes.” The deportations to Afghanistan were not only a humanitarian failure but also a strategic mistake, Hannah Neumann, a German Green MEP, said on social media. “If Europe returns young Afghan men into poverty and hopelessness, many will end up dependent on the only structures still offering shelter and food: Taliban networks and madrassas.” Every return was a potential boon to the Taliban, she said. “This is how authoritarian systems hold power. Not only through violence, but through dependency, social control and enforced loyalty,” she said. “By deporting people into desperation, we are not weakening the Taliban. We risk strengthening the very structures that keep them in power.”

picture of article

Can I get sick from bird flu? What are the symptoms, and are chicken and eggs safe to eat?

Australia was the only continent free of H5N1 bird flu until last week, when a brown skua with the virus was found in Cape Le Grand national park in Western Australia, about 700km from Perth. Within days, authorities identified at least 16 other dead birds. Bird flu can rarely spread to humans in close contact with infected birds or animals and has the potential to cause severe illness. More than 100 human H5N1 cases have been reported around the world since late 2020, mostly in the US and Cambodia. The risk in Australia is low. H5N1 is still a bird virus and can’t spread easily to humans or from human to human. How H5N1 bird flu came to Australia The H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b arose in 2020 and spread rapidly around the world, infecting bird species that previously weren’t major carriers. This includes charadriiformes – the group of sea birds skuas belong to. Once it spread to Antarctica and then to Heard Island, 4,000km from Perth, it was a matter of time before it reached Australia. Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email H5N1 is typically carried by wild birds, which may then infect poultry, cattle or other animals. In poultry, the virus is highly pathogenic, meaning it will kill most infected birds. This is why the standard response is to cull infected birds. At this stage, H5N1 has not affected other Australian wildlife, humans or farming. Australia has strong biosecurity and experts hope our farms can be protected. We’ve had outbreaks of H7 bird flu – but not the H5N1 strain We have had increasing outbreaks of H7 bird flu affecting poultry farms in Victoria and New South Wales. This is also a strain of bird flu but it has had a less severe impact on poultry globally. The H7 outbreaks were controlled by culling infected birds. How can humans catch bird flu? Human infections may occur in people with close contact with sick or dead birds or animals. Infected birds will typically be dead or severely ill. Cattle, unlike birds, do not look severely ill. In the US, the infection was noticed when their milk became yellow and thick. Historically, about half of people who acquire H5N1 from birds or animals die of the infection. But the current H5N1 strain has had a lower fatality rate in the US, killing two of 71 infected people. What happens when humans get bird flu? Signs and symptoms in humans include eye redness (conjunctivitis), feeling feverish and flu-like symptoms: sore throat, cough, running nose, body aches, headaches and fatigue. Less-common symptoms may present including diarrhoea, nausea or vomiting. What about poultry and eggs? Chicken, eggs and other poultry products are safe to eat in Australia. There are no outbreaks in poultry farms, nor is the virus widespread in Australian wildlife. If the virus became widespread, cooking would kill it but handling contaminated poultry products would pose a risk. Australia has had success in rapidly controlling H7 bird flu outbreaks in commercial poultry farms. But back-yard poultry and eggs may pose a greater risk as these are not subject to the same stringent controls. People with chickens who notice dead or sick birds should not touch them, and should notify authorities. What about other animals? Cats on farms overseas have been infected and develop severe neurological illness – staggering and having seizures. The US has suffered widespread infection in dairy cattle and poultry, with most cases from clade 2.3.4.4b, the strain that has spread globally. Human cases have mostly been in farm workers. The virus struck US dairy cattle in 2024 and spread through the country by the trade and movement of infected cattle across state lines, as well as contaminated milking equipment and feed. In the US, cattle feed may contain poultry byproducts but this is not allowed in Australia. Some studies showed fragments of H5N1 could be found in about 20% to 30% of commercial milk samples. Pasteurisation should kill the virus, so only raw milk would pose a risk. While the virus concentrates in mammary glands and milk, it is not typically found in beef. What might happen next? If the virus continues to spread in Australia, it may affect our poultry and dairy farms. Infected chickens would need to be culled. In France, the poultry industry was so severely affected it turned to vaccines. These are only partially effective and didn’t stop the outbreaks but vaccines are being used now because the scale of the problem is so great. Shortages of eggs and chicken may occur in the event of severe outbreaks. Why doesn’t bird flu spread between humans? We have different virus receptors in our upper respiratory tract to those in birds, which is why H5N1 cannot easily take hold or transmit in humans. There have been mutations in the virus that signal some adaptation to mammals, including humans, dogs, cats, dairy cattle, foxes, minks and marine animals. Mutations that suggest human adaptation of the virus have been detected in several animal species. The more opportunities the virus gets to be in contact with humans, the greater the risk of a mutation arising from reassortment of genetic material from bird flu and seasonal flu. The virus can reassort all by itself in a pig, which has human- and bird-type receptors. If the virus mutates further to bind easily to human receptors or to evade our immune system, a pandemic may occur. While there are no human vaccines for the latest bird flu strain, there are H5 vaccines which may provide partial protection. Finland became the first country to offer such a vaccine to farm workers. Meanwhile, the flu vaccine protects against seasonal flu. Reducing its burden may help reduce the opportunities for the H5N1 to mutate. C Raina MacIntyre is a professor of global biosecurity and head of the biosecurity program at the University of New South Wales’ Kirby Institute. Pan Zhang is a PhD student in the biosecurity program. This article first appeared in the Conversation

picture of article

Ukraine war briefing: ‘Our patience is not endless’ – Kyiv signals peace offer may expire

Ukraine may revise its ceasefire offer to Russia if the UN security council fails to pass a resolution urging a full and ⁠unconditional end to ⁠the hostilities, Kyiv’s envoy to the UN has warned. Ukraine had changed the dynamic in the war with recent strikes, said Andrii Melnyk, adding that some 40% of Russia’s oil refineries had been damaged. Melnyk told a security council session that Ukraine stoody ready for direct negotiations with Russia but “our patience is not endless”. “If the security council would further choose a wait-and-see approach, I cannot exclude that Ukraine may recalibrate and modify its offer. Ceasefire along the de facto ‌front line is already a great compromise.” The envoy’s statement reflects growing confidence that Ukraine’s war effort is on the front foot, with Russian cities starved of fuel supplies and a “middle strike” campaign seriously disrupting supply lines to Moscow’s occupying forces. The campaign’s success has prompted Russian-held Crimea to halt civilian gasoline sales, Pjotr Sauer writes. All summer camps in illegally annexed Crimea on Monday stopped accepting children and new bookings until 1 September for security reasons, said Sergei Aksyonov, the Russian-installed governor of the illegally occupied peninsula. Aviation authorities temporarily closed Moscow’s four airports on Monday as air defences battled a wave of Ukrainian drones. Ukraine’s military said it ⁠hit a plant producing electronics for missiles in Russia’s border Voronezh region on Monday and the Russian region’s governor said five people ⁠were killed and ⁠dozens injured in the attack. The Ukrainian general staff said precision air-launched cruise missiles hit the facility, which ⁠it described as a “critical component” in Russia’s defence production, making parts for missiles including the Iskander. Russia’s Dubna satellite communications ⁠centre ⁠in the Moscow region was also hit, the Ukrainian general ⁠staff said. Russia’s state-run Tass news agency reported “a massive drone attack by the Ukrainian armed forces”. A top Ukrainian drone maker, General Cherry, meanwhile said that one of its factories had been hit – a rare disclosure. In the early hours of Tuesday the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, was put on air raid alert as authorities told people ⁠to seek shelter. Two people sought medical ⁠help after Russian forces struck the south-eastern region of ‌Zaporizhzhia, said the governor, Ivan ‌Fedorov. Three more ‌people were wounded in Sumy, in the north, late on Monday, emergency services said. A drone attack on Ukraine’s second-largest city of Kharkiv left one woman wounded, ‌said the mayor, Ihor Terekhov. Earlier a Russian drone strike on Sumy in north-eastern Ukraine killed three members of one family, including a 13-year-old boy. “Their home was destroyed,” said Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian president. “An ordinary home – not a military target whatsoever.” The attack also wounded two others, regional military head Oleh Hryhorov said on Monday. A Russian nighttime drone strike also killed a woman and wounded three people, including an 11-year-old boy, in the south-eastern Ukrainian city of Zaporizhzhia, regional head Ivan Fedorov said on Monday. Russia has continuously targeted Ukrainian civilian areas with drones and missiles, and the UN reports more than 16,000 civilian deaths in the war. Recent attacks have increased civilian casualties, with May seeing the highest monthly total since April 2022: at least 274 civilians killed and 1,763 injured. A Russian drone attack hit a ship in the Black Sea, starting a fire and killing its Egyptian cook, said the Ukrainian deputy prime minister Oleksii Kuleba. Eight other sailors, including citizens of Turkey and India, abandoned ship on a life raft while the vessel “sustained significant damage and lost seaworthiness”, Kuleba said.

picture of article

Montreal mayor calls for end to random police checks amid racial profiling investigation

Montreal’s mayor has called for a halt to random police checks as the city’s police force grapples with an internal investigation into racism and racial profiling by 16 officers. Mayor Soraya Martinez Ferrada told reporters last week that her husband, who is Black, had been repeatedly stopped by police while driving. “Like many other Black people in our city and the racialized people this happens too many times,” she said. The checks have happened at least five times within the last year for “no reason at all”, she said. Those revelations followed a late-night press conference from the city’s police chief to announce that more than a dozen officers had been reassigned or relocated while investigators investigate claims that officers – most of whom are young men with less than five years on the force – disproportionately targeted Black and Arab residents. Two more officers have been suspended and two cases have submitted to Quebec’s director of criminal and penal prosecutions to determine whether criminal charges should be laid. “I was extremely surprised. I didn’t think it was possible in 2026. This is how deeply, deeply hurt I am,” the police chief, Fady Dagher, said, describing the officers as “tarnishing our uniform”. Those officers are accused of cutting pieces of dreadlocks from people during police stops, as well as issuing tickets to people solely on the basis of their ethnic background. Quebec’s new premier, Christine Fréchette, called the alleged behavior by officers “unacceptable”. But, like her predecessor, Fréchette, pushed back on the idea that the behavior reflected systemic racism. “For me, it’s a small group that’s behind these organized, repeated action,” she said of the 16 officers under investigation. “That’s not systemic racism. If it’s a small group, it’s not necessarily systemic. For me, systemic means on a larger scale.” But allegations of racial profiling and systemic racism within the police force are nothing new for the province. In 2024, a Quebec judge awarded damages in a class-action lawsuit initiated by residents who were racially profiled and arrested without justification by Montreal police. She also awarded compensation for “physically racialized people” whose rights were violated by police but the evidence wasn’t recorded. In her ruling, the judge found that members of racialized groups were overrepresented in police stop and the “the plausible explanation for this disparity is the racial profiling that characterizes many arrests”. And in 2021, a Quebec coroner concluded that an Indigenous woman who was taunted by nursing staff as she lay dying in a Quebec hospital would probably be alive today if she were white, calling her treatment an “undeniable” example of systemic racism. Montreal’s mayor says the moratorium on random checks would be a good “first step” to repair relations with those affected by police behavior. “I think it is also a way to rebuild trust with citizens and it’s something that I think the police should be looking into,” Martinez Ferrada said, adding that body cameras were crucial to combating future instances. “This will not solve the problem. This is one tool that we have in our toolbox, but it will not solve the whole thing.”