Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Former Mexican governor charged in case of 43 students who vanished in 2014

The former governor of Guerrero state in Mexico has been formally charged over his alleged involvement in the disappearance of 43 students in 2014, a case that has become a symbol of the country’s brutal cartel violence and government impunity. Ángel Aguirre, who was arrested last week, is accused of forced disappearance and obstruction of justice for ordering the destruction of surveillance tapes that may have shed light on what happened to the students from the Ayotzinapa teacher training college on the night of 26 September 2014. On Wednesday, a judge ruled Mexico’s attorney general had presented enough evidence to formally charge Aguirre with forced disappearance and ordered that he remain in a maximum security prison awaiting trial. A lawyer for Aguirre denied his client’s wrongdoing. Guillermo Baradas told reporters: “We presented evidence demonstrating a high-level meeting attended by Mr Ángel Aguirre at the time the videos were allegedly handed over to him.” Aguirre’s indictment is the biggest breakthrough in the Ayotzinapa case since the 2022 arrest of Jesús Murillo Karam, who served as Mexico’s attorney general at the time of the students’ abduction. The brutality of the case rocked Mexico and continues to haunt the country more than a decade on. With the remains of only three students identified, it is not known what happened to the 40 others. On the night that they were abducted, the students from the Raúl Isidros Burgos teacher training college in the village of Ayotzinapa had commandeered several buses in the city of Iguala to get to a protest in Mexico City. But before they could leave Iguala, in Guerrero state, the students were attacked by a local criminal gang working with municipal police. A years-long international investigation determined that federal forces, both police and military, were also involved either by participating directly or failing to intervene as the students were taken away and presumably killed. The government at the time orchestrated an elaborate coverup, attempting to place blame for the attack solely on the criminal gang and local police. Suspects were tortured into giving false confessions and crime scene evidence was manipulated. Meltión Ortega, a spokesperson for the 43 students, said: “We want no more deception; we want to be told the truth and for those responsible to be punished. The victims from Guerrero deserve to have the actual perpetrators and the masterminds punished, rather than just seeing a charade, as has happened in serious cases of human rights violations.” Mexico’s president, Claudia Sheinbaum, has vowed to get to the bottom of what happened to the students and formed an investigative unit to dig into the case last year. “I’m going to put all my effort, all my energy, all my willpower [towards obtaining truth and justice],” she told reporters at a news conference last week.

picture of article

Greenland forces Trump-linked US oil firm to delay drilling

Greenland authorities have forced a US oil company connected to Donald Trump to postpone drilling wells in the Arctic territory, defying claims by the US president’s envoy that Americans could be extracting crude by next year. Amid Trump’s imperialist threats, tensions have been rising on Greenland’s eastern coast after the oil company brought drilling equipment ashore in July without permission, drawing a “strong warning” from the government. Just week before Greenland Energy intended to sink its first wells into the tundra, the government said on Thursday: “The necessary regulatory process cannot be completed, and the necessary approvals cannot therefore be obtained before the planned start of drilling.” It said that during talks Greenlandic officials had expressed concern that the timetable was too tight to assess the environmental and social impact. The authorities will have to decide whether to sanction drilling in a protected wetland that is home to rare birds and the muskoxen on which local hunters depend. At the earliest, drilling could now commence in the winter of 2027, the government and the company said. That is a long way off the prediction made as recently as May by Jeff Landry, the hard-right Louisiana governor whom Trump named as his envoy to Greenland. He said after a visit that oil supposedly lying under Greenland could ease the energy crisis caused by the US attack on Iran. Landry, whose stated goal is to “make Greenland a part of the US”, said: “We could have those barrels on production within 10 months or so.” Robert Price, the Greenland Energy chief executive, who maintains that oil worth $1tn could lie under the remote Jameson Land region, said: “Greenland Energy remains committed to advancing its oil exploration programme responsibly and in accordance with Greenland’s regulatory process, and in full compliance with Greenlandic authorities.” Price added: “We will use this time to refine our plans and deepen relationships with local communities, strategic partners and relevant authorities.” Since a rich friend put the idea of acquiring Greenland in Trump’s head during his first term, the president has threatened to do so by buying it from Denmark, seizing it with military force or cutting a deal. Shareholders in Greenland Energy had been hoping for a “Trump pump”, a presidential endorsement that could send the New York-listed stock rocketing. But on Wednesday the price fell by more than a third after the drilling delay was announced. Price had said a ship bringing 300 containers of drilling kit would set sail from Canada for Greenland in September, with a first well to be sunk the following month. He told a community meeting – falsely – that Greenland had granted permission for the company to start landing equipment. Greenland Energy’s British partner 80 Mile said in an update for investors on Wednesday that the delay was due to the need to “complete the permitting and regulatory approval process”. 80 Mile holds exploration licences granted before Greenland stopped issuing them in 2021, citing the climate crisis. Greenland Energy, formed last year, has announced plans to spend $60m (£44m) raised from investors to fund drilling in exchange for a majority stake in the project. Its representatives have said its oil venture is “not related to American annexation”, yet the company has established multiple connections to the Trump administration. Phil McGraw, better known as the chatshow host Dr Phil, has a deal with Greenland Energy to “capture the mission of these modern-day wildcatters” for a documentary series to be broadcast on television and social media. He recently appeared in the Oval Office alongside Trump, having served on the president’s religious freedom commission. A US navy veteran who is working on Golden Dome, the missile defence plan for which Trump says controlling Greenland is “vital”, sits on Greenland Energy’s board. And Kenneth Griffin, a Wall Street billionaire who gave $1m towards Trump’s second inauguration, bought 9% of Greenland Energy’s shares in April. Rod McIllree, 80 Mile’s boss, said: “While we are disappointed that the timing of the Jameson drilling programme has been impacted, the company remains fully committed to advancing this highly prospective project.”

picture of article

Zhu Rongji obituary

Zhu Rongji, who has died aged 97, was the fifth premier of the People’s Republic of China and one of its most effective administrators and economic reformers following its foundation in 1949. In 1991, Zhu was summoned to Beijing, in the footsteps of the then president and party secretary Jiang Zemin, and in the aftermath of the 1989 uprisings in Beijing and the collapse of the Soviet Union. As vice premier in the state council, and governor of the People’s Bank of China (1993-95), Zhu was put in charge of China’s economy at a time of immense turbulence, with many fearing that the country would once more turn inward as it had under Mao Zedong. Zhu implemented contentious and tough reforms to straighten out the highly inefficient state-owned sector, and to modernise China’s infrastructure. By the end of the decade, Zhu could rightly declare that the country had become “the factory of the world”, a status that in many ways it maintains. A straight-talking and forceful figure, he was famously harsh on corruption, once sacking a governor of Heilongjiang province on the spot for failing to meet growth targets. This laid the foundation for his popularity within China generally, and the high regard with which he was held abroad. He seemed to come close to the ideal image of a Chinese leader possessed of moral dignity. Alone among high-level politicians of his period, he attempted to reach out to the population at large, and speak to them as an equal. Nor was he willing to stand on ceremony. As he stated in 1998: “I have prepared 100 coffins here – 99 for corrupt officials and one for myself,” according to the party newspaper People’s Daily. This gained him the nickname of “the Boss”. His most significant achievement as premier was to secure China’s entry to the World Trade Organization (WTO). What had begun in 1986 as negotiations over entry into the General Agreement on Tariffs and Taxes (Gatt), had spanned out over a decade, involving an epic series of agreements with both the EU, the US and dozens of other countries. In 1999, the deal with the US, which was the most contentious and important, was almost completed. Zhu was on a visit to Washington, expecting to sign this off, but it was pulled by President Bill Clinton at the time because of domestic problems following the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Aiming some of his famous sharpness and temper at the Americans, Zhu reportedly told his officials that he was in awe of Washington’s incompetence and lack of foresight. The final deal was signed in 2001. It can be seen as a watershed moment in China’s attempts to modernise, and to internationalise its economy, with strong growth and a doubling of the Chinese economy over the next five years. Zhu retired after one term in power, in 2003, and was replaced by his protege, Wen Jiabao. For all the successes of his time in power, these did not come as easy gifts. In the 1990s, the state sector, which comprised most of the key enterprises, was riddled with debt, inefficiency and poor management. To address this, the whole social welfare and public sector framework had to be changed. Up to 60 million workers were laid off, some of them never employed again. Unrest was a striking feature of this period, with one commentator calling it a period of “ferment”. Even WTO entry offered no panacea, with the agricultural and manufacturing sector going through painful adjustments. Zhu was an obstinate and hard-eyed man: he had to be, to deal with the issues he faced. Much of this toughness came from his early years. Born in Changsha, the capital of the central Hunan province – Mao’s home province, too – Zu was orphaned when young and brought up by two of his father’s brothers. He enjoyed a typically technocratic education, joined the Communist party in 1949, and graduated in electrical engineering from the elite Qinghua University in Beijing in 1951. His career through the 50s and into the 70s was rocky. He worked largely in the state development and planning commission (in charge of national implementation of the various five year plans), as an engineer, dealing with the typical duties of resource allocation in a command economy. But his criticism of what he saw as the inefficiency of Maoist policies during the infamous Hundred Flowers campaign of 1956-57, where intellectuals and officials were invited to offer their opinions on the party, led to his being branded a “rightist” and sent to the countryside to be a teacher. His rehabilitation back into the central government in 1962 was short lived. Once branded with the stigma of being politically unreliable in Maoist China, suspects were never fully rehabilitated. In 1969, in the depths of the Cultural Revolution, which Mao started to wage war against what he called “bureaucratism and capitalist tendencies” in the CCP, Zhu was once more sent to one of what were euphemistically called “7 May schools” named after the central decree that had set thousands of them up across the country. In effect, they were mini-concentration camps. There he languished until 1975, when he was sent to Beijing for a third time to work at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, as an economist. A spell from 1979 to 1982 in the state economic commission, at the start of what has come to be known as the reform and opening up period, led to him being appointed as a vice minister. This marked his full transition from engineering to economics. It was as an economist that he was to have the greatest impact on China in the years ahead. Zhu’s first step towards national and international prominence came in 1987, when he replaced Jiang Zemin as mayor of Shanghai. Shanghai was then at the dawn of its extraordinary growth, starting to build a foundation as the commercial centre of China, a position it had ironically enjoyed before the revolution, in the 20s and 30s. He was instrumental in making the city one of the special economic zones, in 1990, joining places such as Shenzhen, adjoining Hong Kong, and Xiamen, on the coast facing Taiwan. He also steered the city successfully through the trauma following the 4 June massacres in Tiananmen Square, Beijing, in 1989. Shanghai was largely to avoid the turbulence and recriminations that this event led to elsewhere. Zhu was frequently called the “Gorbachev of China”, though it was an epithet he disliked. Despite his suffering in the past, he remained resolutely committed to the Communist party and its continuation in power, and his economic reforms were targeted at ensuring that this happened. He did not propose, or support, political reforms, and regarded Mikhail Gorbachev with something approaching contempt, for the way in which his policies had effectively led to the fall of the Soviet Communist party, and the break up of the USSR. Zhu’s fundamental objective, which he achieved, was to ensure that the PRC remained stable, and that it continued to deliver economic growth. He spent his retirement largely uninvolved in politics, appearing only from time to time at high-level party congresses, the last of which was in 2017. The last image of him appeared while he was in hospital in 2020. There is no record of what he made of the leadership of Xi Jinping, or of whether he shared the view that, after Mao and Deng Xiaoping, he was the person who had contributed most to China’s current economic success. He is survived by his wife, Lao An, a retired business executive, and a son and a daughter. • Zhu Rongji, politician and economist, born 23 October 1928; died 12 August 2026

picture of article

Breakfast, lunch and natmad in Denmark – Scandinavian mealtimes explained | Letters

Confusion over the names of mealtimes (Letters, 2 August) also reigns in Scandinavia. Breakfast in Norway/Sweden is frokost/frukost, but morgenmad (morning food) in Denmark. Lunch in Norway/Sweden is lunsj/lunch, but frokost in Denmark. At least they can all agree on the main meal of the day, which is middag (midday/noon) but served in the early evening. If attending a wedding party or function in Denmark, don’t be surprised to be served natmad (night food) around midnight. It is used as a friendly indication that the event has come to an end, hence its colloquial name of skrub af mad (fuck-off food). Gary Calder Chandler’s Ford, Hampshire • On the Titanic, dinner for first- and second-class passengers was the meal served in the evening. For third-class passengers the meal called dinner was served in the middle of the day; later in the day they had tea and supper. Interestingly, there was no iceberg lettuce on the menus. Dr Paul Brown West Bridgford, Nottinghamshire • Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

picture of article

Israel deliberately starting wildfires in southern Lebanon, firefighters say

Firefighters and residents of south Lebanon have accused the Israeli military of lighting wildfires in the region, as forested areas burned down in blazes sparked by Israeli bombing. Environmental groups said the fires in recent weeks were part of a longstanding Israeli practice of targeting Lebanon’s natural environment. On Tuesday, the Israeli military dropped flares in a wooded area outside Khiam, in south Lebanon, sparking blazes. When firefighters attempted to extinguish the flames, a drone struck close by, forcing them to withdraw, said the head of the civil defence in the Nabatieh region, Hussein Fakih. “Most of our missions are now related to fires,” Fakih said. “There are enormous areas of woodland that have burned, I don’t have the exact figures, but in the areas close to the [frontline], around 30-40% of the land has been affected by fires.” The Israeli military has caused fires across south Lebanon, in particular in olive groves and on agricultural land, according to videos and testimony from emergency services, in the nearly two-months since the 17 June ceasefire that mostly ended fighting between Hezbollah and Israel. “They started doing this right after the ceasefire, and there have been incendiary bombs every day,” Fakih said. “Small drones come out and drop incendiary materials, [white] phosphorus shells are fired at the woodlands, in addition to illumination flares that they drop during the daytime so the vegetation catches fire.” Firefighters and residents of other areas in south Lebanon describe similar blazes being started by Israeli munitions and drones in dry scrub and woodlands. On Friday, Israeli munitions created large wildfires in two heavily forested areas, in Kfarchouba, close to the border, and between Jezzine and the western Bekaa valley. The civil defence station chief in the area, Samir Hardan, said a fire was started near Kfarchouba on Friday afternoon after a drone dropped a munition in woodlands. After battling blazes overnight and extinguishing them on Saturday, a second drone started another fire on Sunday, Hardan said. Firefighters are required to coordinate their movements with the Lebanese army, which relays their request to a “deconfliction” group that includes the Israeli military. They were given permission to fight the fires at only two spots, and not other areas where fires were raging. According to environmental groups, the fires are part of a pattern of Israeli attacks against Lebanon’s environment that threaten the country’s woodlands and the biodiversity they support. Hisham Younes, the founder of Green Southerners, a Lebanese conservation organisation, said: “These are long-established woodlands, dominated by productive stone pine alongside oak. They perform critical functions. The wider area is also an important passage and resting ground for migratory birds.” Younes called the Israeli attacks an ecocide. “It is not about any single fire or attack, but a pattern of destruction that progressively erodes the ability of ecosystems to function, regenerate and sustain life. When those cascading effects also undermine livelihoods and people’s ability to return to and remain on their land, environmental destruction becomes inseparable from the wider transformation of the territory itself.” Since fighting started on 8 October 2023 when Hezbollah launched rockets at Israel in solidarity with the Hamas-led attack a day earlier, Israel has repeatedly targeted Lebanon’s woodlands. The Israeli military has said in the past that Hezbollah used these forested areas as cover for its fighters and its tunnels. Ecologists and rights groups have said fires and other forms of widespread environmental destruction will have wider effects on civilian populations. Asked for comment on each of the recent wildfire incidents, the Israeli military said its operations were “conducted while taking precautionary measures to mitigate harm to civilians and the environment”. It is not the first time Israeli forces have been reported to have set fires deliberately. In the summer of 2024, Israeli troops used trebuchets – medieval catapults – to fling flaming debris over its border wall with Lebanon, while the Lebanese army published photos of Israeli drones that carried hoses that doused forests in flammable materials. Health and environmental experts raised the alarm in February when Israeli planes dropped herbicides linked to cancer on farms in south Lebanon. Besides the environmental and health consequences of these fires, residents of south Lebanon have mourned the loss of the green spaces in the villages where they grew up. On 1 August, displaced residents of the border village of Yaroun found their olive and fruit groves, as well as their homes, had been set ablaze by occupying Israeli troops. People living in the nearby Christian towns of Rmeich and Aïn Ebel, among the few villages near the border not emptied out by the Israeli military, sent pictures of the fires. Hafez Ghasham, the mayor of Yaroun, said: “They had already bulldozed the whole village. Then they set fire to the trees. What remained in this particular area were the olive trees – large groves, with very old olive trees. They started there, then the fire spread along the outskirts of the village.” People in Yaroun had already watched in previous months as all but 20 of the 900 houses in the village were bulldozed by the Israeli military. They pooled resources to buy expensive satellite imagery of the village during their displacement. Ghasham said: “Many of these trees, most of them, in fact, were inherited from our grandparents and parents. They have enormous sentimental value. The trees were also an important source of income for the people of the village. “They are trying to make the land uninhabitable. They are erasing our entire history, our entire culture, all our memories. Maybe the idea is that after some time, it will look as though nobody had ever lived here.”

picture of article

Canadian airline WestJet agrees to settle flight attendants’ sexual harassment class action

The Canadian airline WestJet has agreed to pay C$4.5m (£2.4m) to settle a decade-long sexual harassment class action lawsuit levelled by its female flight attendants, who alleged the company failed to maintain a safe workplace. The suit followed allegations by Mandalena Lewis, a former flight attendant, that a pilot had sexually assaulted her and a colleague, but that WestJet kept the pilot flying, thereby putting other employees at risk. A British Columbia judge on Monday approved the terms of the settlement, which were finalised on 22 June after months of negotiation. The payment will be distributed among the 3,452 flight attendants in the class action after expenses are removed, including legal fees. WestJet agreed to hire a third-party to conduct a workplace inquiry that will examine the prevalence of harassment, the extent of underreporting and how reporting systems can be made more effective. The suit had called on WestJet to implement mandatory anti-harassment training for pilots, along with an admission of wrongdoing and an admission of a breach of employee contract. None were included in the settlement. Lewis filed the initial class action against the airline in April 2016. She said she was dismayed by the results, especially given that two years ago WestJet paid out $12.5m in a baggage fee class action, nearly three times the amount agreed to in the sexual harassment suit. “I’m glad it’s over … but I’m just exhausted. I’m shaking my head,” she said, adding that she was advised the amount was the most that could be achieved given that legal expenses were piling up. Under BC law, the suit included all female flight attendants who worked for the company between 4 April 2014 and 28 February 2021, because Lewis’s suit alleged that all of them had their contracts violated by WestJet during that period because its employee policy promised that the workplace would be free from harassment. The suit claimed WestJet broke its policy by not taking enough steps to address reports of assault or to prevent harassment in the first place. Lewis said she was sexually assaulted by a WestJet pilot while on a layover in Hawaii in 2010 when she was 25 years old. In court documents, she said the same pilot had also assaulted another flight attendant in 2008. Though she reported the assault to WestJet, the pilot remained at the company and Lewis was eventually fired in 2016 for “gross insubordination”, according to court documents submitted by WestJet that year, which she and her legal team allege was retaliation for trying to hold the airline accountable internally. She said she abandoned an individual civil claim and instead created the class action after learning other flight attendants had also experienced harassment. Lewis said she reported the assault to police in Maui but alleges WestJet rerouted the pilot so he would not face questioning in Hawaii. She said fellow members of the class action suit were also disappointed with the result. Eight of them had already asked the province’s supreme court not to approve the settlement in February when some of the details first emerged, citing a low payout and a lack of accountability by WestJet. “We didn’t get justice here,” said Lewis. The case garnered national attention for exposing pilot behaviour toward female flight attendants and the vulnerability of the scores of young women who have historically been the target demographic for the job. A 2018 survey of more than 3,500 flight attendants by the US Association of Flight Attendants found that 68% had experienced sexual harassment in their careers while only 7% had reported an incident to their employer. WestJet did not respond to questions about Lewis’s claims of assault, and the allegations that it failed to keep the workplace free of harassment and does not properly investigate alleged sexual assaults. In a statement, the company said it was “pleased to have reached a mutually agreed upon settlement”. It said: “We are committed to strengthening our operations and training, focused on the safety and wellbeing of all WestJetters and we are focused on advancing a culture of empowerment.”

picture of article

In Venice, it’s not politics as usual as film-makers aim to recapture our attention

Europe is in an economic crisis that, unlike the eurozone downturn at the beginning of the millennium, cannot be measured in ratings downgrades and borrowing costs. For metrics, try engagement depth and consumer trust instead. The unedifying spectacle of the European Union’s falling out over the Ceuta crisis looks like the latest symptom of Europe’s shrinking attention economy. When more than 70,000 people crossed over from Morocco to the Spanish enclave of Ceuta at the start of the month, Rome hastily reintroduced air and sea border checks with Spain for one month; Madrid retaliated with spot-checks on travellers to Italy. Politicians were falling over themselves to match the wildfire speed of social media, for this was a geopolitical flashpoint that appears not just to have been engineered but also politically processed via short video clips online. The crossings were reportedly triggered by viral videos suggesting that Spain’s border with Morocco was opening, while their framing as an “assault” or “invasion” was amplified by accounts with links to the Russian military, as Aisha Down reported. Platforms such as Instagram, Facebook and TikTok are built to reward content that instantly hooks in viewers – three seconds long is the golden rule. How can lawmakers ever keep up? Yet what if, paradoxically, our attention economy is both shrinking and expanding at the same time? I’ve found it hard to shake that impression after perusing the lineup at the forthcoming Venice film festival, opening on 2 September. This year at the Lido, you can watch a three-hour film about the Italian Communist party sending a camera team to the Soviet Union (Imperium, by Ukrainian auteur Sergei Loznitsa); a four-hour documentary about Elon Musk (Musk, by American director Alex Gibney); or a more than five-hour video diary about Russian dissident journalists in exile (Julia Loktev’s My Undesirable Friends: Part II). Too short for you? Then, get tickets for Luca Guadagnino’s Joie de Vivre, a lengthy analysis of the films of compatriot Bernardo Bertolucci. It clocks in at seven hours. For the most part, these are surprisingly politically forthright titles at a film festival that in the recent past has focused on glitz and glamour. Loznitsa’s documentary seeks to shatter the remnants of the left’s illusions about the Soviet Union; Loktev gives a voice to the journalists silenced by Putin; Gibney’s Musk film has already been preemptively dismissed by the far-right tycoon as a “hit job”. But are they trying to stretch out attention spans so much that they risk playing only to a gallery of cinephiles? *** On the topic of impactful film-making … Perhaps there is a point between both extremes to capture people’s imaginations and attention. That’s what the Guardian is hoping to prove, in collaboration with Franco-German culture channel Arte. We are inviting film-makers to propose short-form documentaries exploring democracy in Europe today. The winning submission will be presented at the DOK Leipzig film festival at the end of October, and subsequently receive funding, editorial support and distribution through Guardian Documentaries and Arte platforms. The deadline for submissions is 14 September. Crucially, they should be no longer than 20 minutes – a length that Jess Gormley, the Guardian’s executive producer of documentaries, argues “encourages participation and debate”. She points to recent Guardian documentaries such as Liane Aviram and Louis Hollis’s 23-minute short The Oath, about a Palestinian doctor in Israel’s healthcare system, which led to its protagonist being invited to speak in front of the UK parliament – a film that held, rather than overwhelmed our attention. • To receive the complete version of This Is Europe in your inbox every Wednesday, please subscribe here.