Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

EU says ‘no indication’ intelligence sharing with Ukraine has stopped as Russian attacks leave 600,000 without power – Europe live

In the Bulgarian parliament, prime minister Rumen Radev has said that Russia was most likely behind drone attacks in the Black Sea that sank two ships, but that “we cannot prove it”. AP quotes Radev saying “There is no logic in Ukraine attacking its own ships and crews, given that the outcome of all these attacks favours Russia, and indeed, the logic points in that direction. The problem is that we cannot prove it.” The Russian ambassador to Bulgaria was summoned yesterday over the issue, and Bulgarian president Iliana Yotova has called for an immediate halt to hostilities in the Black Sea and a moratorium on drone attacks against commercial and civilian infrastructure.

picture of article

‘I wanted to change the stigma’: Nikita Hand on winning a civil rape case against Conor McGregor

Nikita Hand had a compelling reason to not pursue a civil rape case against Conor McGregor. She was, in her own view, an imperfect victim. The day of the assault, she had been partying with alcohol and cocaine before contacting McGregor, who took her to a Dublin hotel. Hours later, bruised and stunned, Hand made a report to police, but Irish authorities declined to pursue a criminal case against the mixed martial artist, saying there was no reasonable prospect of a conviction. That left the option of a civil case. But that would strip the hairdresser of anonymity, and pit her against a powerful celebrity who denied wrongdoing and had teams of lawyers and a vast online following. Hand went for it. “I’m not the perfect victim and I never portrayed myself to be,” she said in an interview in Dublin. “But I feel when victims are not perfect, they seem to get blamed. And I really wanted to try to change the stigma around people thinking you have to be a perfect victim to be believed or heard.” The cross-examination in the witness box at Dublin high court in 2024 felt like another violation, but Hand emerged victorious: the jury found that McGregor had assaulted her in 2018 and awarded nearly €250,000 in damages. “I felt vindicated. It was a really happy, special moment, but at the same time it was a really scary moment. It didn’t take away the fear and the anxiety – to this day I still live with the anxiety and the fear.” Hand, 37, has published a book, Not the Perfect Victim, that chronicles the assault and the aftermath of a case that continues to reverberate on both sides of the Atlantic. Jimmy Fallon triggered an outcry in June after hosting McGregor on The Tonight Show for a softball interview. Fallout from the case continued to play out on social media, said Hand. “I get so many beautiful messages online. And then I would get the odd hate message, from women and men, just calling me names, horrible names.” Hand’s appearance on the Irish bestseller list is the latest twist in a story that has put a spotlight on how the legal system, and popular culture, responds to allegations of sexual assault. Hand said she still struggled with being in the public eye, but was proud of the book. “I feel like I’m in control of my own story now, which I felt like I wasn’t for many years. The night of the assault, I wasn’t in control, another person was controlling my body.” Growing up in Drimnagh, a west Dublin suburb, Hand had acquaintances in common with McGregor, who was from nearby Crumlin. While he found fame and fortune in and out of the octagon, she worked in a salon as a colourist. In 2018 she had a partner, a five-year-old daughter and a new house. “Life was good. I was bubbly and loved going out with my friends.” At a Christmas work party she drank, took cocaine and, on a whim, messaged McGregor on Instagram, asking if he knew of any parties. He collected Hand and a friend on the morning of 9 December and took them to the Beacon hotel. Hand later testified that McGregor pinned her down on the bed, put her in a headlock and mock-choked her while raping her. Hand went to the home of her mother, who called an ambulance and insisted that Hand report the assault, regardless of McGregor’s status. “She didn’t care who it was. She just cared about her daughter. She’s seen the bruises on me, she’s seen the state I was in.” Hand was examined at a sexual assault treatment unit and gave a statement to police. When questioned, McGregor said the sex was consensual. In 2020 prosecutors decided to not press charges. After failing to reverse that decision Hand took a civil case. “I did want this person to go to jail for what he had done to me but I had no other option but to take up a civil case. Unfortunately, when you have a civil case and you win it, your perpetrator gets to walk free. But I knew I had to do everything in my power to get some sort of justice.” In June 2024, four months before the trial, three masked intruders broke into her home, smashed windows and stabbed her partner. Hand’s lawyers said they believed it was an attack by McGregor supporters, but that McGregor had nothing to do with it. The two-week trial in November 2024 drew intense media attention. The public gallery was packed and Hand was seated almost within touching distance of McGregor. The cross-examination was humiliating, she said. “I found it really degrading. I found it just as bad as the assault itself. Sometimes I feel like victims nearly are on trial rather than the perpetrators. That’s the way we’re kind of made to feel.” McGregor lost an appeal in July 2025. Last month a Dublin couple, Samantha O’Reilly and Steven Cummins, were charged with perjury after an investigation by police into evidence filed in McGregor’s appeal. Hand credits her mother, her partner and the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre with helping her to rebuild her life and to accept that the assault was not her fault. “The shame is leaving me but I do have my really bad days when I can’t leave my apartment. I have severe anxiety.” She is no longer a hairdresser. “I did try to go back to work and it just wasn’t the same. So it will be a complete career change for me. I’d love to work with victims and survivors and help them have a voice.” She wants her daughters – a teenager and a newborn – to grow up in a world where victims are not shamed or blamed. “It doesn’t matter what you wear or how much you drink or even take a drug. No means no and consent needs to be taken more seriously.” Hand said McGregor should not have been hosted at the White House in 2025 or on Fallon’s chatshow. “It’s really upsetting. I can’t understand how he’s still given such a huge platform.” She seldom mentions McGregor by name. “I don’t have any feelings for him. I don’t forgive him. I gave my evidence, he gave his and the jury made their decision. And that’s all there is to it.”

picture of article

Wednesday briefing: ​Why small boat crossings are here to stay ​

Good morning. You’d be forgiven for missing it. Earlier this month, the government quietly scrapped its “one in, one out” deal with France. The partnership was supposed to eliminate small boat crossings by deterring asylum seekers from making the treacherous journey across the world’s busiest shipping channel. The deal, which lasted just 423 days, was beset with problems, had a negligible impact, and now joins a long list of policies that have tried and failed to address highly visible, often tragic small boat crossings. This morning, the Home Office announced that it would be doubling the number of riot police along the French coast in lieu of the deal. Although small boat arrivals have actually decreased over the last year, the far right continues to weaponise these crossings. In its annual threat briefing yesterday, the head of MI5 warned that extremists with anti-immigration opinions are increasingly considering carrying out terrorist attacks. Today’s newsletter speaks to specialist reporter Diane Taylor and Daniel Trilling, author of If We Tolerate This, to situate the deal’s collapse within the wider context of policies that have exacerbated the sense of disorder they’re supposed to resolve – and asks what comes next. That’s after the headlines. Five big stories UK news | Extremists holding anti-immigration opinions are becoming increasingly likely to consider carrying out terrorist attacks against immigration centres and asylum hotels, the head of MI5 has warned. UK politics | Nigel Farage has denied that a Reform UK government would authorise lethal force against small boat crossings in the Channel. Ukraine | Andy Burnham will host Volodymyr Zelenskyy at Downing Street on Wednesday as the UK seeks to further underline its support for the Ukrainian president, in contrast to his difficulties with Donald Trump. US politics | Kimberly Guilfoyle is stepping down as US ambassador to Greece after weeks of reports that she sought payment from a Trump donor in exchange for access to administration officials. Pope Leo XIV | Pope Leo has lung cancer, the Vatican said late on Tuesday. Leo, 71, underwent an operation and had the lower lobe of his right lung removed, with tests confirming a diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma, the Vatican said. In depth: ‘I’ve never seen as much suffering caused to refugees by government policy’ The one in, one out policy that was announced in a joint press conference between Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron in July last year was supposed to render small boat crossings pointless. A person arriving in a small boat to the UK could be forcibly returned to France in exchange for another person who would be brought legally to the UK. “In effect,” Diane Taylor wrote in a moving piece about the scheme in September, asylum seekers were “used as reluctant human shields to protect our borders from others in the same predicament.” The scheme was always limited in scale; of the 40,000 people who arrived in small boats while it was active, just 1,500 – roughly 4% – were returned to France. A report by British Future, a thinktank that championed the policy, recognised that it would have to be expanded twenty-fold to close down routes as a viable way to claim asylum. But it’s doubtful that, even at this far larger scale, it would have ever been effective. Diane reported in August that nearly 50 asylum seekers deported under the scheme returned to the UK a second time, and an unknown number arrived undetected. The government would have liked the scheme to continue, and its official explanation was that it was scrapped because it couldn’t be effectively scaled up. But it seems likely that political concerns in France also played a role. “At a time when immigration is going to be a major issue in the French presidential election, France doesn’t want to be seen to be taking in more unwanted people from the UK,” Rajeev Syal, the Guardian’s home affairs editor, tells me. *** The other side of one in, one out The deal was partially founded on a recognition of the need for safer routes to claim asylum in Britain. Starmer acknowledged when announcing it that “it is right that we offer a haven to those in most dire need”. But this flicker of humanitarianism was outweighed by the scheme’s arbitrary cruelty. Nearly 100 children were misidentified as adults and wrongly detained under the scheme, while some asylum seekers deported back to France were beaten by people smugglers. “I’ve been writing about asylum seekers for 25 years and I’ve never seen as much suffering caused to refugees by a UK government policy,” says Diane. It was also accompanied by the government’s fortification of security measures along the French border. To some extent, these security measures help to explain the drop in small boat crossings this year, together with an overall reduction in arrivals of asylum seekers to Europe. But they have also encouraged people to make even more unsafe crossings. The increased police presence in northern France has led to more trips in larger “mega-dinghies”, which became a subject of panicked headlines this summer, as smugglers attempt to transport more people in single crossings. Increased security has also encouraged people to take longer routes across the channel, sailing from Normandy and Belgium rather than Calais. Earlier this summer, far-right protests spread to Portsmouth, where people arriving on small boats had sailed from Normandy. “In effect, while the security measures seem on the surface to be working, they also contribute to boat journeys becoming far more dangerous, again adding to the sense of spectacle,” Daniel Trilling tells me. *** Why are so many people still crossing in small boats? The right frames small boat crossings as a failure to control immigration. Crucially, though, they’re a manifestation of ever-more draconian attempts to crack down on people trying to claim asylum in the UK. Before people crossed the channel in dinghies, they hid in lorries, or took flights to the UK using false passports. “When I first started reporting in Calais in 2014, it was still possible for refugees to stow themselves away on lorries without paying smugglers for access,” Daniel recalls. “But the more security that was placed around ports, the harder that became, and the more refugees had to rely on smugglers who could get access to secure lorry parks.” In 2020, when the pandemic temporarily grounded traffic between Calais and Britain, small boat crossings spiked dramatically. By the following year, these crossings had more than doubled. “There used to be really, really small numbers of boats arriving in Britain, and nobody paid attention to them,” Diane says. “And obviously, you didn’t get far-right influencers live-streaming arrivals at border control in Heathrow, or standing on the hard shoulder of the M25 waiting to film asylum seekers for their YouTube.” *** What happens next Part of the calculation behind the government’s latest decision to double the number of riot police in northern France is that, now the deal has ended, it has limited time in which to strengthen its partnership with the French government. If Marine Le Pen is elected in April next year, it’s plausible that her government could refuse to take any asylum seekers from Britain, further politicising the issue and causing a rise in crossings that would play into the hands of the far right here. Yet the decision is also yet another manifestation of the tendency to treat migration as a security issue rather than a reflection of an increasingly unstable world. No matter the increase in security or threats of deportation, people will keep trying to claim asylum. “As long as we have wars, instability and persecution, people will be displaced, and we need to work out ways to respond to that, rather than pretending that a policy tweak here or extra security measure there will simply make it disappear,” Daniel says. “At some point, you have to make a political argument for why asylum isn’t just an act of generosity, but a necessary response to the world as it is.” What else we’ve been enjoying This illuminating read explains how charity shops are facing a crisis as they compete with secondhand resale sites such as Vinted, a problem with unexpected consequences. Crucially, she outlines how we can all donate better. Craille Maguire Gillies, newsletters team Reading Morwenna Ferrier’s pest I’ll never forget made me reconsider the humble pigeon – which she describes as having encountered with such awe, aged 11. Poppy Noor, newsletters team Whatever side of the “will AI destroy society” debate you stand, read Leyland Cecco’s conversation with AI computer scientist turned sceptic Geoffrey Hinton: uncertainty, Hinton argues, is not a reason for complacency. Craille I loved our gallery of French photographer Jean-Pierre Laffont’s work – he spent two decades capturing protests, clashes and countercultural gatherings in America, and the images to come out are stunning and empowering. Poppy When species of birds decline, passing on the skill of singing becomes harder, even affecting their ability to breed. Rebecca Ratcliffe has this fascinating and warming look at how scientists are helping birds remember lost songs. Craille Sport Football | Pablo Barrios struck after 53 seconds and Leny Yoro was shown red as Atlético Madrid added to Manchester United’s woes with a 2-0 victory. Athletics | Ruth Chepngetich’s failed doping test, five months after she obliterated the record in 2024, left the sport deeply uneasy but powerless to act. Formula One | Formula One has confirmed Rwanda will join the calendar, with the first race set for the early 2030s. It will mark the first time F1 has raced in Africa since 1993. The front pages “M15 warns of rightwing shift from anti-migrant opinion to terrorism,” is the splash on the Guardian on Wednesday. “M15 chief: Russia did not sway Brexit vote,” says the Telegraph. “Putin’s Russia is biggest threat to Britain, M15 chief confirms,” says the i. “M15 chief: UK must not ‘play into hands’ of Putin,” has the Express, while the Mirror runs with: “Red Alert.” “Tax fears eased in Burnham’s ‘pro-business’ pitch to bosses,” is the lead story over at the FT. “Online tax crackdown to boost the high street,” says the Times. “4 out of 5 new jobs went to foreigners in the past decade,” has the Daily Mail, while the Metro goes with “Toxic water spills surge.” Finally, the Star with: “Tiger’s victim a child actor.” The Latest ‘I will not be silenced’: Trump critic Ilhan Omar defiant after home raided Democrats have described a raid on the home of Congresswoman Ilhan Omar as “deeply disturbing” and a “rogue abuse of power” by the Trump administration. The Democratic representative for Minnesota has long been a target of highly personal attacks by Donald Trump, who claims he was not involved in ordering the raid. Lucy Hough speaks to Guardian US political reporter Shrai Popat – watch on YouTube. Cartoon of the day | Ben Jennings The Upside A bit of good news to remind you that the world’s not all bad Peter Lloyd spent most of his life unable to read or write, despite repeated attempts to learn. He struggled in school, left with no qualifications, and developed coping strategies that enabled him to work successfully as a lorry driver. During the Covid lockdowns, he found that it had become an overwhelming issue, particularly when he could not help home-school his son. Encouraged by his wife, he contacted the charity Read Easy and began lessons with a volunteer tutor. Over three years, he learned to read and now Lloyd serves as a Read Easy ambassador. Lloyd says: “I think it’s important to encourage others in my situation to seek help, especially men who might be too ashamed. I have three books on the go at the moment – I can’t believe how beautiful reading is!” Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday Bored at work? And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply

picture of article

Leaders of India’s Cockroach party jailed for violating ban on protest site

Two leaders of India’s youth-led Cockroach movement have been sent to jail for five days for violating a ban on protests at a site in central Delhi. A court ordered that Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das, leaders of the Cockroach Janata party (CJP) movement, spend five days in Delhi’s Tihar prison for jumping over police barricades, holding up slogans and waving the Indian flag at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar. CJP leaders said the action was taken to demonstrate against the brutal crackdown on youth protesters in Delhi over the weekend and the decision by the Delhi police to shut-down Jantar Mantar – a stretch of road surrounding an observatory in central Delhi – as the capital’s designated protest site, a status it has held for more than 30 years. “You cannot denotify the resistance,” said Abhijit Dipke, the founder of the CJP, in a social media post which showed three of his fellow leaders entering Jantar Mantar, before they were tackled and detained by police on Tuesday. On Saturday, the CJP – a pressure group with a substantial following among India’s youth – called for a protest in Jantar Mantar to demand the resignation of the election commissioner, Gyanesh Kumar, who is accused of overseeing the mass disenfranchisement of millions of Indian voters. The CJP, alongside the opposition political parties and student groups, have accused Kumar of revising India’s electoral roll to advantage the ruling Narendra Modi government, a charge his Bharatiya Janata party (BJP) denies. The election commission has denied favouring any party and said wrongly deleted voters ‌can re-enrol. Police denied permission for the protest on Saturday to take place and instead imposed a sweeping security crackdown. About 30,000 police and paramilitary were deployed to prevent the demonstration in Jantar Mantar, which was blocked with barricades. More than 7,000 people were detained, including the CJP leaders who were kept overnight. In the aftermath, the police declared that protests would no longer be allowed at Jantar Mantar and instead proposed three alternative venues – all much further away from parliament – which provoked outrage among the CJP leaders. Prior to his arrest, Das posted: “Why is Narendra Modi scared of Jantar Mantar? Jantar Mantar belongs to the people of India.” Ranka and Das ‌were among about a dozen people who jumped the barricades on Tuesday to enter the grounds of the Jantar Mantar to wave flags and chant slogans. In response to their sentencing, CJP founder Dipke accused the Modi government of resorting to “cowardly tactics” to “crush dissent”. The jailed CJP leaders were also given the backing of opposition leader Rahul Gandhi, who said the people of India would “reclaim Jantar Mantar”. “Waving the tricolour at Jantar Mantar in a peaceful protest is not a crime. Jailing youth for it is an act of cowardice,” said Gandhi. The response by the Modi government to the protests that have erupted nationwide – including the mass detentions – has drawn criticism from the UN human rights commissioner and human rights groups such as Amnesty. The Indian government hit back at the UN statement on the protests, calling it “an unacceptable interference in the internal affairs of the country”. The crackdown was also met with concern by a UK political delegation visiting Delhi, led by trade minister Jonny Reynolds who confirmed he had raised it with the Indian government. Kiran Stacey contributed to this report

picture of article

Ukraine is littered with landmines on a scale last seen in Vietnam. How can they be removed?

Crouched over on her hands and knees in a field of weeds, Olena Kabanova is digging into the ground. With a shovel and a steady hand, the 58-year-old digs out a neat square around the spot where a mine detector has sensed a suspicious object. Four years ago, this field in eastern Ukraine was occupied by Russian soldiers. Now back under Ukrainian control, it is littered with landmines. Civilians such as Kabanova are trying to make the land usable again. Landmines are a scourge of conflict zones. Littered across contested territory, they leave land unusable for years after a war has ended. Removing them is an expensive and dangerous job. And the use of long-range drones in Ukraine, which is often described as the most mine-contaminated country in the world, is increasing the scale of the problem. “What we’re now seeing is the massive increase in the use of drone-delivered munitions,” says Paul Heslop, senior mine action advisor for the United Nations in Ukraine. “What already was a very high-intensity battle area is now potentially, through the use of drones on both sides, becoming a much wider area of contamination and a scale that we haven’t seen since the Americans were dropping cluster munitions on the Ho Chi Minh trail.” The task of clearing landmines from Ukraine is replete with challenges. Drone and missile attacks make working outdoors unsafe; humanitarian workers are sometimes directly targeted. And newer, deadlier threats are also appearing. They include the POM-3, a small cylindrical mine used by Russian forces that could be mistaken for an abandoned vacuum flask. It is detonated by the vibrations of approaching footsteps. POM-3 mines mean there are “specific villages that we just completely avoid”, says Anda Riza, a unit commander of the Halo Trust, the largest international humanitarian demining organisation in Ukraine, which employs Kabanova in the field in Kharkiv. The types of landmines are “constantly developing and evolving”, says Valeriia Shumska, Riza’s colleague. But the technological innovation that is emerging from the conflict is also helping deminers to come up with new ways of working, which they hope are quicker and safer than the traditional hands-and-knees approach. The advances are being supported by the $1.5bn funding that has poured into Ukraine’s demining sector since the start of the full-scale invasion. Take Kabanova’s job. Digging out a patch of land could take up to 45 minutes. But a new machine can do it in five. Called the DMR-7, it is a small, tank-like vehicle fitted with a hosepipe that shoots out jet flows of compressed air. The tank is operated by a human using a remote controller who stands at a safe distance away. The operator manoeuvres the tank into place and then, with a loud mechanical whirring and plumes of dirt billowing skywards, the DMR-7 uses the force of compressed air to blast away a small patch of soil. It is a bulky, expensive alternative to a shovel, but it’s one that deminers hope can make one of the most dangerous parts of the demining process quicker and safer. The DMR-7 is just one of a host of new pieces of kit that the Halo Trust is experimenting with in Ukraine. Other technologies include AI-powered image analysis, ground-penetrating radar and devices that can detect explosive material, not just metal. Just as drones have transformed the battlefield, they have also created new opportunities for humanitarians. Before 2022, much of Halo’s surveillance work – looking for signs of explosives – was done with binoculars and maps. Now it is done with drones, and satellite imagery, which can be analysed with the help of AI. But war has also led to innovations in anti-drone technology. Drone jamming systems, used by both Russian and Ukrainian forces, can interfere with humanitarian work. Halo has lost several drones to jamming and spoofing attacks. And the advances in new technology are not spread equally between providers. In a field adjacent to one that Kabanova is working in, staff from the state emergency services are also clearing mines. Under the glare of the late summer sun, Mykyta Shulzhenko, the head of the mechanised demining unit, says his colleagues have started using drones for surveillance. But they are not yet able to use AI to analyse the drone-captured imagery. “I really hope this kind of technology will be implemented soon in our work,” he says. The Halo Trust alone spent nearly £50m in Ukraine in the year to 31 March 2025, dwarfing the state’s annual budget of £28.6m for a programme to clear agricultural land of mines and unexploded ordnance. And there are dozens of other demining organisations with overlapping responsibilities and approaches. Responsibility for the sector is split across multiple government agencies. Attempts to reform the country’s mine action law to bring it in line with international standards have faltered. Ihor Bezkaravainyi, a deputy economy minister who leads the country’s work on demining, wants to streamline the policymaking process to create one cabinet-level office to oversee the whole sector. But progress has been slow. Asked why, he offers a weary shrug: “Because, people.” “When we’re talking about a new law, it will mean that some government bodies will lose responsibility, and, they think, power,” Bezkaravainyi says. One person who has worked in Ukraine’s demining sector puts it more bluntly: “The biggest barrier to demining Ukraine is the government of Ukraine.” Bezkaravainyi says: “When we’re talking about an ordinary situation with mine action … the conflict has ended, and the government does not exist … in Ukraine, it’s the opposite situation.” That leads to a host of regulatory and bureaucratic barriers. For example, deminers are often prevented from using vehicles that are driven directly by a person, with health and safety standards requiring that the vehicles are operated remotely. Riza says: “We know for a fact that doing it remotely is much slower than having a person in the cab. That continues to be our biggest challenge.” Heslop argues that the Ukrainian authorities are overly broad in their categorisation of land as being contaminated by mines, an approach that risks wasting time and money on clearing land that wasn’t dangerous in the first place. “Just because it was occupied by the Russians doesn’t necessarily mean it was contaminated,” he says. “Land is only contaminated if it’s got fucking explosives in it.” But deminers across the sector agree that technological advances will accelerate their ability to release Ukraine’s richly fertile land for civilian use at a much faster rate than has been possible in the past. “This is the cutting edge of technology,” says Heslop. “This is where the humanitarian mine action sector is going through the biggest pivot in the last 30 years.” Additional research by Illia Dyadik and Artem Mazhulin • This article was amended on 14 October 2026. Paul Heslop is senior mine action advisor for the United Nations in Ukraine, not programme manager for mine action at the UN Development Programme in Ukraine as an earlier version said

picture of article

‘How do you explain the deletion of 130 million names?’: why Indian voters are on the streets

Born into a small village in West Bengal, Shahida Fakir had always taken her vote for granted. That was, until it was suddenly taken away. She presented officials with her Indian birth certificate and family land documents from the village going back to 1962. Both her parents had been on the electoral roll going back decades, so she showed proof of that too. But when the final revised voter list came out in April, Fakir was not on it. The 38-year-old migrant worker, born into a poor Muslim family, was not alone. Since last year, 130 million names – more than the population of Japan – have been removed from India’s electoral roll through a process known as SIR, or special intensive revision. In the nearly eight decades since India’s independence, never have the voter rolls shrunk by such a huge amount over such a short time. The Narendra Modi government has called SIR a legitimate exercise to clean up the electoral rolls. Overseen by the election commission, tens of millions of dead and duplicate names have been removed. Yet so have the names of millions of living Indian citizens. Critics allege that the pledge to “purify” India’s voter roll of illegal immigrants has instead been used for more sinister purposes – disenfranchising tens of millions of Muslims, other minorities, and poor and lower caste communities, who are largely not BJP voters. In a matter of weeks, nationwide anger at SIR has boiled up and spilled out on to the streets of India’s biggest cities, presenting a formidable challenge to the government. Over the weekend, Delhi was transformed into a high-security fortress of barricades, roadblocks and tens of thousands of police and paramilitaries who detained thousands of people, as they attempted to stop youth-led protests calling for the man who oversaw SIR, the chief election commissioner, Gyanesh Kumar, to step down immediately. On Monday, opposition parties – who have decried SIR as a “weapon for vote theft” by the Modi government – drew tens of thousands of supporters as they marched through the capital and presented a petition to the supreme court, demanding Kumar’s resignation. The youth-led Cockroach Janta party (CJP) movement, who were behind the call for Saturday’s action, have vowed to “fight on” in their protests against SIR. Opposition and civil society leaders allege that SIR has already given the BJP an electoral advantage in states such as Bihar and West Bengal, claims the party denied. Others say the exercise has had even more concerning implications: under changes to SIR unilaterally implemented by Kumar, the election commission has become the arbiter of Indian citizenship, a sweeping overreach of its remit. The consequences are already playing out in West Bengal, where Modi’s Bharatiya Janata party (BJP) recently came to power and began a crackdown on “illegal” immigrants, complete with several new detention centres. Civil society groups say Muslims excluded by SIR are being targeted. Fakir was among them. Just three months after the voter list was published – and while her hearing to challenge her exclusion was pending – she was picked up by police and accused of being an illegal Bangladeshi immigrant. In July she was pushed over the border to Bangladesh, a country she had never been to nor had any connection with, and remains stuck there. “I have all the documents to prove I am an Indian citizen,” she said in a tearful phone call from the Bangladesh border village where she has been sheltering. “I fell on their feet and begged the police not to send me to Bangladesh but they pushed me over the border.” A Bangladesh border guard officer confirmed Fakir’s account. “We checked all her documents and are convinced that she is an Indian citizen,” they said. In September, her family submitted a petition to the supreme court challenging her deportation. The Indian government was given a month to respond. “All I want is to return to my family and my home in India. I am waiting desperately for that day,” she said. The backlog of millions of voters in West Bengal challenging their exclusion means it could be years before Fakir’s case is heard. Those across West Bengal who have been stripped of their votes speak of their terror of being accused of being an alien in their own land. Some have had benefits taken away. Mohammad Hedayet Ullah Siddiqui, 80, from the North 24 Parganas district, said his grandfather had been a freedom fighter for Indian independence and three generations of his family were on the voter rolls. Yet after SIR, Siddiqui described his “humiliation” on finding his name gone. “With my name erased from the voter list, I am in constant terror. What if they send me to a detention camp?” he said. “I cannot bear to think about being separated from my children and grandchildren at this age, especially when all my ancestors have been buried in India.” Critics say the problems began in 2023, when the Modi government changed the process for appointing the three-body election commission, giving majority control to the government for the first time. Within a matter of months, the Modi-led panel had appointed Kumar as the election commissioner in spite of opposition objections. “For decades, the election commission was one of our more credible, independent bodies, but now that has been eroded,” said Ronojoy Sen, a senior fellow at the South Asian Studies Programme, National University of Singapore. By the following year, the new election commission body had begun SIR, starting in Bihar, where it immediately raised concerns among human rights groups after more than 6 million names were removed. Not long after the revisions, the BJP won a landslide victory in the Bihar state elections. Despite concerns over SIR rumbling on for months, it did not spark national protests until the Indian Express newspaper last month revealed that two members of the election commission had raised 14 objections to how voters were being excluded from the rolls, but they were unilaterally overruled by Kumar. “India has always been a flawed democracy but at least citizens felt they had the right to vote and that elections were regular and fair,” said Sen. “SIR has taken away that right. From how it has been conducted, it’s difficult to see how the motive was anything other than to enhance the election prospects of the BJP.” Three former election commissioners have openly criticised SIR as a “hostile exercise” that has undermined the sanctity of the country’s electoral rolls by focusing on the exclusion – rather than inclusion – of voters. OP Rawat, a former chief election commissioner, described changes to the voter registration form as “wrong and illegal”. Ashok Lavasa, who was an election commissioner between 2018 and 2020, called for the SIR to be scrapped. “An unfair procedure has been imposed on millions of people in the country, and you have the judiciary which has validated that,” he said last month. “How do you explain the deletion of 130 million names?” None have been more vehement in their opposition than SY Qureshi, who was chief election commissioner between 2010 and 2012. “This is a national harassment exercise designed to throw Muslims off the electoral roll,” he claimed. “The only way to restore the credibility of India’s elections is to restore those deleted voters.” The BJP has denied any political involvement or motive in the SIR process, accusing the opposition Congress party of “jealousy” over its recent electoral victories and saying any deleted voters can simply re-enrol. The BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi said the allegations were “disinformation” and part of an opposition campaign “being orchestrated to create an atmosphere of division and anarchy”. Nonetheless, the election commission has appeared to accept some flaws in the process. Late last week, it belatedly put a cap on the number of voter deletion forms – which allow people to submit objections on behalf of others – after incidents in which people submitted thousands of forms targeting legitimate Muslim voters. Public anger, meanwhile, has continued to build. In Delhi, where the SIR exercise left millions of people off the draft list, protests are expected to continue this week. A Delhi resident for 30 years, Prashant Tandon, 60, said he could not believe it when a notice came to his door, questioning his life as a voter. “If someone doubts my citizenship, they should produce evidence against me,” he said furiously, adding that he would be protesting alongside the young people. “I should not have to prove that I am an Indian citizen.” Additional reporting Aakash Hassan

picture of article

An eerie trip inside Thailand’s oldest amusement park, deserted after flooding

With its mouth agape, the giant lion’s head is frozen in a roar. No water rushes down the log flume that descends from its heights, while at ground level, the vast amusement park stands empty of noise and activity except for leaves blowing in a light breeze. Welcome to Siam Amazing Park, billed as the longest-running amusement park in south-east Asia, and certainly in Thailand. Up to a million people rush in every year for thrills on rides like the Boomerang, an orange rollercoaster that loop-the-loops at 80km/h (50mph), or to splash around under the tropical sun in one of the world’s largest wave pools. It now stands empty, after being closed late last month when it started raining in Bangkok and did not stop for days. It could take more than six months for the park to reopen. Managing director Wuthichai Luangamornlert sits in an airconditioned conference room at the park’s entrance. Below his office, rows of turnstiles stand empty where just days before, thousands of tourists and local visitors were eagerly pushing through. He was not too alarmed when the rains began at the end of September. The area on the outskirts of Bangkok has seen heavy rains before – the megacity itself is built on floodplains and has a network of muddy canals and pumps to drain water. “When it rains a lot, it will dry off and the water will go away by the next morning,” he says. But the next morning came and it was still raining, and the day after, it was still raining. “The water level keeps rising. So that’s when we knew that it was not normal.” After three days, the sewers filled up and much of the park turned into a giant lake, with the water level reaching around knee height. Many of the motors and electrical systems that power the rides were damaged. Buildings around the park are still marked with lines of silt – the markers a flood leaves behind. Wuthichai’s father, Chaiwat, who opened the park in 1980, is famous in Thailand for his rags-to-riches tale, and kept prices discounted so the average Thai family could afford a rare visit. The son is now managing things, and says it is odd how rapidly his mindset changed from that of little concern to the reality of having the park closed for six months, or longer. “It happened within a few hours,” he says. This story of unstoppable rising water is one told across the city, where the government declared a flood disaster across all 50 districts. For days, people were forced to use boats to get to their destroyed homes, and those who did not have boats used inflatable pool toys. Weeks later, only puddles are left, although many canals are full and the rainy season is not over. Climate scientists warn the world is indeed experiencing a slow-moving crisis as the planet bakes due to human-induced heating, although it is too early to attribute Bangkok’s rains to climate breakdown, and the picture is complicated by an abnormally strong El Niño, a cyclical weather pattern that brings violent extremes. In the water section of the amusement park, dry water slides drop directly into murky flood waters, while deck chairs stand abandoned. Small fish have entered the once-chlorinated waters, making their home in waters turned green with algae which were previously bright azure. The wider park – which was built to be bursting with children, laughter and blaring music – remains spectacularly eerie. Stalls offering rice and spicy meat as well as American-style food such as hotdogs stand empty, although their price boards remain outside. Wuthichai says the park’s primary concern was their several hundred staff. The business is not as strong as it was before the Covid pandemic, he says, when they were forced to close but did not make redundancies. Several rollercoasters are foreign-made and need specialised parts and labour from Europe or Japan that could take months to arrive. At least the double-decker carousel at the park entrance is bespoke and locally made, he adds. The owners expect the cost of repair, and the lost revenue from being closed, to reach millions of US dollars. Short of cash, they have asked for a debt holiday from banks, help from the government, and are also considering offers to buy the park. “There are people who are still interested, still making appointments all the time,” says Wuthichai, who sits next to his adult son, the third generation of the family business. “We have not made a decision yet.”