Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Middle East crisis live: oil spill warning after tanker attacked in Dubai; explosions in Tehran and Jerusalem amid wave of attacks

Japan and Indonesia have agreed to step up coordination on energy security, Japanese prime minister Sanae Takaichi said on Tuesday. “In light of the Iran situation, the strategic importance of resources and energy security is once again being recognized globally. Indonesia is a major resource-rich nation,” Takaichi said alongside Indonesian president Prabowo Subianto after they met for talks in Tokyo. The summit came as the US-Israeli war on Iran squeezes oil and gas supplies vital to Asia. Indonesia is the world’s biggest exporter of thermal coal for power generation, supplying about half of global exports, Reuters reports. It is also a major liquefied natural gas exporter, with roughly a quarter of its shipments bound for Japan.

picture of article

Oil set for record monthly gain – as it happened

This blog is closing now but our live coverage of the Iran war continues in a new blog here, including a recap of the latest developments. Thanks for reading.

picture of article

Manila’s transport workers struggle to make ends meet as Philippines feels force of oil crisis

Jayson Naga is a tricycle taxi driver on the streets of Manila. In a normal day he brings home P500 (US$8) to feed his four children. But these days he is struggling. He requires four litres of gasoline a day to ferry his passengers around the city and the 60% surge in fuel prices has wiped out nearly a third of his take home pay. “If gas prices go up any further, there will be nothing left for us,” he told the Guardian. His family’s only luxury – driving to air-conditioned malls on weekends to escape the heat – was the first to go. The Philippines imports almost all of its crude oil from the Middle East. The government became the first in the world to declare a national energy emergency over the oil crisis triggered by the war in the Middle East, and public outcry over the response to soaring fuel prices and supply issues has spilled into the streets. Transport workers are facing the immediate brunt of the oil crunch. Hogan Ruben, also a tricycle driver, has to spend an extra five hours on the road to earn enough. “What we do now is we head out early and stay out until twelve midnight or one in the morning, just so the income we bring home is enough,” he said. “We have no choice but to keep grinding,” Ruben said. After admitting challenges to securing supplies to replenish its inventory, President Ferdinand Marcos on 27 March said the government has secured enough crude oil for domestic processing to last until 30 June. This assurance comes as he scrambles for alternative sources, including a recent shipment from Russia. But anger at the government is palpable. Last week, transport groups held two-day nationwide transport strikes to call for oil price rollbacks by scrapping fuel excise taxes and the oil deregulation law. President of the transport group Piston, Mody Floranda said Marcos was “inutile.” “Hardship persists not only for transport but for the entire public. How can workers survive on low wages while fuel prices keep climbing?” he said. It is a human rights crisis as well as an economic crisis, said Edgardo Cabalitan, a NGO worker, who joined a noisy barrage in front of the country’s largest gas station on Friday. Passing jeepneys and motorcycle riders blared their horns in a show of solidarity. “The oil crisis is not just an issue of rising costs. It is an issue that directly strikes at human rights. As oil prices rise, the cost of goods follows, affecting not only the livelihoods of drivers but also our very access to basic needs,” Cabalitan said. Jan Carlo Punongbayan, an assistant professor at the University of the Philippines School of Economics, said the crisis will only get worse, with estimations that the global price of crude oil could reach as much as $200 dollars per barrel. “It’s going to be quite bad, especially the indirect effects of inflation. The [government] is looking at double digit inflation rates by May. We haven’t seen that level of inflation for many many years, not even during the pandemic,” said Punongbayan. Food price pain on the horizon Food prices are next. Punongbayan said the current harvest season has so far tempered the impacts, but he expects food prices to start going up rapidly in the coming weeks, after the harvest season and with higher transport costs. While crowds in malls have thinned, the grocery stores are packed. Shoppers are filling baskets with basic necessities, in a manner reminiscent of pandemic-era panic buying. On social media, users are discussing solar panel installations and the viability of electric vehicles.The desperate situation has brought out the worst in people. At a gas station in Quezon City, a pump attendant had to shoulder a nearly $100 bill after a driver of an SUV sped away without paying for his full tank. Local police promised to search CCTV footage to trace the perpetrators. But back on Maginhawa street in Quezon City, donations of food packs from members of the public began arriving last week at the corner where drivers like Naga and Ruben wait for passengers. On Sunday, they each grabbed a pack of rice, some eggs, noodles, canned goods, and a sandwich. The community pantries are back, a community-led project which the Maginhawa neighbourhood initiated during the pandemic, this time offering a lifeline to transport workers. More than a dozen similar community pantries have popped up nationwide. “When we saw that the community pantry was back, it gave us drivers a sense of hope again,” said Naga.

picture of article

Ukraine war briefing: allies asked Kyiv about reducing attacks on Russian energy sector, Zelenskyy says

Some of Ukraine’s allies have sent Kyiv “signals” about the possibility of scaling back the country’s long-range strikes on Russia’s oil sector as global energy prices have surged, Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Monday. The Ukrainian president said he was ready to reciprocate if Russia stopped attacking Ukraine’s energy system, and that Kyiv was open to an Easter ceasefire. “Recently, following such a severe global energy crisis, we have indeed received signals from some of our partners asking about how to reduce our responses in the oil sector and the energy sector of the Russian Federation,” Zelenskyy said in a WhatsApp briefing with journalists. A Reuters source familiar with the situation said US officials had conveyed this message to their Ukrainian counterparts as part of their regular conversations, adding that the initial “signals” appeared to have come from Moscow. The US state department and the Russian embassy in Washington didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. Fresh from a four-day visit to the Middle East, Zelenskyy said he had reached agreement with some countries in the region to provide energy support to Ukraine. Over the weekend, he said he had reached a deal on diesel deliveries for a year to Ukraine, without providing further details. Ukraine has signed a 10-year defence agreement with Bulgaria, a major arms manufacturer, covering production of drones and other weapons, Zelenskyy announced. The Ukrainian president said he was “very pleased” with the deal, signed during a visit to Kyiv by Bulgaria’s interim prime minister, Andrey Gyurov. The agreement covers “joint production, on the territory of our countries, of various types of weapons, including drones”, he said at a press conference. The length of the accord should make it possible to “systematise” security cooperation, Zelenskyy said, in particular keeping up with the rapid pace of drone technology, a key weapon in Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s invasion. Bulgaria, now a member of Nato and the EU, was part of the communist bloc during the cold war, and for decades produced ammunition and weapons to Soviet standards, which are also used by the Ukrainian army. Sofia has sent large quantities of weapons to Kyiv. Gyurov hailed the accord as the “result of long preparation”, adding: “This is not a mere formality, but a joint commitment to our Euro-Atlantic security.” Russian attacks on central and northern Ukraine on Monday killed two people and injured more than 20, regional officials said. Near the central city of Poltava, falling debris from drones killed one person, injured three and damaged a high-rise apartment building, the regional governor Vitaliy Diakivnych said. Drone attacks and artillery strikes killed one person in the adjacent Dnipropetrovsk region near the town of Nikopol, regional governor Oleksandr Ganzha said. Two people were injured in the town and 12 throughout the region. Russian forces launched two strikes with glide bombs in the Sumy region near the Russian border, injuring 13 people, including a six-year-old, regional governor Oleh Hryhorov said. Fifteen homes were damaged. The US on Monday extended a deadline for the fourth time for companies to negotiate with Russia’s Lukoil about buying its foreign assets after Washington imposed sanctions on the energy company in 2025. The US Office of Foreign Assets Control extended the deadline by a month to 1 May for companies interested in buying the foreign assets that are worth about $22bn. Washington imposed sanctions in October on Lukoil, Russia’s second-largest oil producer, and Rosneft, its top producer, to reduce Moscow’s ability to pay for its war on Ukraine. Interest in the assets has been shown by the US private equity firm Carlyle, the US oil majors Exxon Mobil and Chevron Corp, the Abu Dhabi conglomerate International Holding Company, and the Austrian investor Bernd Bergmair, the former majority owner of an adult entertainment group that includes the website Pornhub. Vladimir Putin’s position has not been significantly weakened by sanctions on oligarchs or specific products or sectors, the exiled Russian billionaire Mikhail Khodorkovsky has said. Politicians wanted to “impress their electorate” with sanctions against goods and trade, but in practice these were “unrealistic” to enforce, he added. Khodorkovsky said the west’s belief that sanctions against Russian oligarchs would motivate them to put pressure on Putin to end the war in Ukraine was based on “erroneous” understanding of the relationship between wealthy businessmen and the Kremlin. “I have been saying for the past 20 years that there are no oligarchs in Russia,” he said. “How can you reconcile oligarchy with dictatorship? If you have money without any weapons, you are just food for somebody else.”

picture of article

Vanuatu Indigenous leaders raise concerns over plans to build resort for cruise tourists

Indigenous community leaders in Vanuatu have raised concerns over plans by the cruise operator Royal Caribbean to build a private beach club on the island of Lelepa, arguing environmental impact assessments by the company are “incomplete” and “misleading”. The community leaders outlined the issues in a letter sent to Royal Caribbean on 26 February, which has been seen by the Guardian. The leaders also said the development could harm fragile ecosystems and a nearby Unesco world heritage site. Royal Caribbean has leased parts of Lelepa, a 5km-long island home to about 500 people in Vanuatu – to develop a resort capable of hosting up to 5,000 visitors a day. The project is due to open in 2027. Cruise ships will take passengers from Australia to the resort in Lelepa, as part of a tour of the Pacific. Construction has not yet commenced, but Royal Caribbean’s promotional material said the development will have 10 bars, two eateries and two private beach resorts, including an adults-only area. “There needs to be lots of consultation so every person here understands what they are doing and can approve the work to go ahead,” Lelepa’s paramount chief Ruben Natamatewia III said. Natamatewia III is the highest-ranking customary leader on the island and a signatory to the letter. In the letter, Lelepa’s council of chiefs, which represents several customary landowners on the island, criticised an environmental impact assessment (EIA) commissioned by Royal Caribbean. They said the report was inadequate and local communities had not been properly consulted as part of the process. “The current EIA is incomplete, misleading, and does not meet the standards required under Vanuatu law,” the letter said. The chiefs are calling for construction work not to go ahead until outstanding assessments and consultations are accepted by the chiefs and customary owners, the letter states. The council has also called for a cultural heritage assessment to ensure customary sites are not affected by Royal Caribbean’s plans. Chiefs raised concerns with the Guardian about Fels Cave, a culturally significant world heritage site to the island’s south that contains ancient rock art. Natamatewia III said the Royal Caribbean project was “a good thing”, but worried the environmental assessment was not “realistic”. “There needs to be more consultation with the communities,” he told the Guardian. Natamatewia said he was unhappy that the island had been advertised as a private beach resort despite these outstanding issues. Chief Tungulman Albert Solomon Peter Manaure, an Australia-based representative of the council, said while landowners broadly supported tourism development many remained concerned about the potential impact of the resort on turtle nesting sites and fishing grounds. Manaure, who also owns a tourism business on Lelepa, said: “The ocean and the land are our bank – that’s where we harvest our resources, where we turn it into food or into cash. “If Royal Caribbean wants to do this project on Lelepa, we want to make sure it is done in the right way, with the environment properly protected,” he said. In response to questions from the Guardian, Royal Caribbean initially said it had submitted its EIA and “ensured it complies with Vanuatu environmental regulations”, adding that its development was “at the opposite end of the world heritage site”. After further questions, Royal Caribbean said it was still incorporating feedback from public consultation “into the final EIA ahead of submission”, and that this would include “matters related to environmental protection and waste management”. “Royal Caribbean is progressing all necessary permits in relation to the EIA to support and advance the Royal Beach Club Lelepa development,” a spokesperson said. The company said it was working with government, chiefs, environmental organisations and local people to “ensure the natural environment is protected”. Royal Caribbean said it would “prioritise the protection of Lelepa’s natural ecosystems”, and that it worked closely with the government and custom landowners to secure leases for the development. Lelepa has been a regular stop-off port for Royal Caribbean cruise ships, with passengers ferried ashore to take part in beach visits, hikes and cultural activities as part of its Pacific tour. The company has been in discussions with local landowners since at least 2018 about establishing this permanent tourism facility on the island, similar to its exclusive beach clubs in the Bahamas. Vanuatu’s government was contacted for comment but did not respond to the Guardian’s questions. The environmental impact of cruise ship travel has come under greater scrutiny in recent years, with several European port cities introducing restrictions on cruise ships amid concerns over pollution and overtourism. Nevertheless, the sector is booming, with more Americans travelling on cruise ships in 2025 than in any other year on record. Joseph Cheer, a professor of sustainable tourism and heritage at Western Sydney University, said developments of this scale often highlight the tension small island nations face between attracting tourism and protecting local environments and communities. “Cruise tourism is often criticised for its adverse environmental impacts, questionable economic impacts and the way it wields power and influence over small island countries,” Cheer said. “With good governance of the sector, it is possible to overcome evident friction points.”

picture of article

The ‘Third Front’: China resurrects Mao’s military capabilities

Dotted across the mountainous roads of Sichuan and just a few hours’ drive from some of China’s most bustling cities, the crumbling ruins of an abandoned military experiment are eerily quiet. Top secret factories that once housed thousands of workers are now overgrown with vegetation; nearby villages, empty of young people who were once shipped in from across the country to build China’s future, are plastered with advertisements for hearing aids and, in once case, a bundle deal on coffins. Millions of workers were deployed to these remote mountain locations as part of a huge defence program that stayed secret for over a decade. The factories in south-west China were once part of its grandest industrial strategy project to date. Launched by Mao Zedong in 1964, the ambitious national defence program mobilised 15 million people to fortify China’s defences against the possibility of an attack from its cold war enemy, the United States, or from the Soviet Union, whose relationship with China was becoming increasingly strained. It attracted more than 200bn yuan of government investment, and took place nearly entirely in secret for around 15 years. The project was called the Third Front. Mao’s idea was to create a third line of national defence facilities that were less exposed than the “first front” of factories on China’s east coast and the “second front”, which referred to smaller inland cities behind the first front. The Third Front project placed factories in remote, mountainous regions of Sichuan province, as well as in other inland provinces such as Gansu and Ningxia, far from the reach of any potential invading forces. In Sichuan, many of the factories are shielded by the natural fortress of the Huaying mountain range, whose peaks crest in the distance. After Mao’s death in 1976, and as relations with the US warmed, the factories were gradually abandoned. In 1985, China’s leader Deng Xiaoping declared: “There will be no large-scale war for a fairly long time … after analysing the general trends in the world and the environment around us, we have changed our view that the danger of war is imminent.” Fearing a war with either the Soviet Union or the US, Mao’s program mobilised 15 million people to fortify China’s defences. Now, as relations between Beijing and Washington sour, Deng’s words seem quaint. China is once again turning to its Third Front heartlands to build a national defence program capable of foiling any US attack. In some areas of military strength, China may already be ahead. Recent reports based on satellite imagery show that China appears to be building up its nuclear arsenal near the old factories. In July 2024, the Communist party leadership passed a resolution to “develop China’s strategic hinterland and ensure backup plans for key industries,” a reference to using China’s remote inland provinces to boost the country’s resilience against the threat of invasion or isolation from international markets. Xi Jinping, China’s most powerful leader since Mao, has put national self-resilience at the core of his ideology. In 1964, the year that Mao launched the Third Front, China conducted its first nuclear weapons test. Now it is estimated to have 600 warheads, with the US government expecting that number to more than double in the next decade. Much of that nuclear build-up is taking place in the remote regions that once hosted the Third Front. Although China still spends significantly less on its military than the US does, the gap is shrinking. According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, in 2012, the year that Xi took power, China’s defence spending was one-sixth that of the US’s. By 2024, that figure had risen to a third, at $317.6bn. “The thing that’s different than before is that China is in such a stronger position than it was before,” says Covell Meyskens, a China historian at Naval Postgraduate School, a US Navy funded university, who has written a book about the Third Front. “They’re trying to build up their ability to make sure they have a second strike capability against the United States. Before, they had no strike capability”. Second strike capability refers to the ability of a nuclear-armed state to respond to a nuclear attack with a counterstrike. In the 1960s, China was “a very poor third world country”. Now, at least in the western Pacific, “China is a peer. They could fight us either to win or stand still,” Meyskens says (his comments do not represent the view of the US Navy). A key difference between 2026 and 1964 is how intertwined the US and Chinese economies are, something that should in theory reduce the risk of a conflict erupting. But as a trade war has seen both sides, especially Beijing, leverage the export of vital commodities such as rare earths, policymakers in Beijing and Washington have been working on disentangling their supply chains, reducing the mutual dependence. In Sichuan, many of the factories are shielded by the natural fortress of the Huaying mountain range, whose peaks crest in the distance. Millions of workers were deployed to these remote mountain locations to help fortify China’s defences. One man who still lives near the empty ruins of Huaguang instrument factory, which made military lasers, says that “very few” people are left in his neighbourhood; most of the apartments in the dilapidated buildings are empty. “Back in 1990s, it was prosperous, a lot of people were here,” he says. “People have more money now, so they’re all heading to the cities.” Hongguang instrument factory is now carpeted in rows of cabbages and canola. Nearby, Hongguang instrument factory, which opened in 1966, was built to manufacture fighter jets and housed nearly 2,000 workers. Now it is carpeted in rows of cabbages and canola, harvested by an elderly farmer who carries his crop in a traditional woven basket. It is as if the slingshot of China’s industrial ambition briefly flew the locals into the future, before they ricocheted back to a slower, pastoral, existence. An elderly farmer carries his crop in a traditional woven basket. Despite the huge levels of investment, the factories were largely abandoned or transformed into civilian operations in the 1970s, as relations with the west warmed. China no longer feared being attacked, and started focusing on economic development. “Why would you have a car factory in a cave 300 miles away from any sort of major city? It [didn’t] make any sense economically,” says Meyskens. Xi has prioritised self-sufficiency and greatness on the world stage. His rhetoric echoes Mao’s dreams of making China a global superpower, but at a time when that dream can become a reality. China’s arms imports fell by more than 70% between 2021–2025 compared to the previous five years, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, thanks to increased domestic capacity. Six decades on, the ideas behind the Third Front are being revived, along with, some fear, the geopolitical environment. “It’s definitely going back to the hostile,” says Meyskens. “We’re in some sort of cold war”. The goal, he says, is to keep the war cold. Better to have munitions factories that are crumbling than cranking out new supplies. Additional research by Lillian Yang

picture of article

Trump threatens to ‘obliterate’ Iran’s energy grid if ceasefire not reached ‘shortly’

Donald Trump has threatened to “obliterate” Iran’s power stations and fresh water plants if Tehran does not agree to peace terms “shortly”, even as he claimed diplomatic progress in ending the war that was instigated by the US and Israel. Tehran has remained defiant during the month-long conflict, describing US peace proposals as “excessive, unrealistic and irrational” and firing waves of missiles at Israel. The risk of further escalation, including a US ground operation to seize Kharg Island, continued to send tremors through financial markets. Oil prices are on course for a record monthly rise. In a post on his Truth Social network, Trump expressed confidence that a negotiated settlement would soon be reached, adding that the US was in “serious discussions” with what he characterised quixotically as “a more reasonable regime” in Tehran. But he said if a deal was not struck – including to reopen the strait of Hormuz shipping lane – US forces would destroy “all of their Electric Generating Plants, Oil Wells and Kharg Island (and possibly all desalinization plants!)”. Destroying civilian infrastructure such as power and water facilities would be illegal under international humanitarian law and would probably constitute a war crime. Later on Monday, the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said Trump would be willing to ask Arab countries to help foot the bill for the Iran war. “I think it’s something the president would be quite interested in calling them to do,” she told reporters. “It’s an idea that I know that he has.” The proposal adds a striking new dimension to the warfare, suggesting Washington may seek to offload war costs on to the very Gulf states now scrambling to broker a peace deal. The US president’s social media post and indications from the White House press team came amid continued garbled messaging. In an interview with the Financial Times, Trump said his preference would be to “take the oil in Iran”, which analysts believe would require using US troops to seize Kharg Island, the terminal through which nearly all of Iran’s oil exports pass. Esmail Baghaei, the Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, on Monday acknowledged Tehran had received a 15-point proposal from the Trump administration after talks on Sunday between the foreign ministers of Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. However, he said there had been no direct negotiations with Washington, adding that the US demands were “excessive, unrealistic and irrational”. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran’s parliamentary speaker, dismissed the talks in Islamabad as cover for more US troops being brought to the region, adding that Iranian forces were “waiting for the arrival of American troops on the ground to set them on fire and punish their regional partners for ever”, according to state media. Human rights groups criticised Trump’s threat of punitive strikes on civilian infrastructure. Erika Guevara-Rosas, Amnesty International’s senior director for research, advocacy, policy and campaigns, said: “Intentionally attacking civilian infrastructure such as power plants is generally prohibited. Even in the limited cases that they qualify as military targets, a party still cannot attack power plants if this may cause disproportionate harm to civilians. “Given that such power plants are essential for meeting the basic needs and livelihoods of tens of millions of civilians, attacking them would be disproportionate and thus unlawful under international humanitarian law, and could amount to a war crime.” While Trump officials, most prominently Pete Hegseth, his bellicose defence secretary, have sneered at conflict law, Washington’s conduct of its joint war with Israel against Iran has had serious diplomatic ramifications. Spain announced on Monday that its airspace was closed to US planes involved in the conflict. Keir Starmer, the UK’s prime minister, reiterated: “This is not our war and we are not going to get dragged into it.” And in an unusually forceful intervention, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, the Egyptian president, called on Trump to end the Middle East war, now in its second month. “I say to President Trump: no one will be able to stop the war in our region, in the Gulf … Please, help us to stop the war, you are capable of it,” Sisi said at a press conference in Cairo, underlining the growing international discomfort. There is a lack of clarity over the status of Pakistan’s efforts to mediate talks aimed at ending the war, which is threatening to plunge the global economy into recession and trigger shortages of food and pharmaceuticals. Oil rose to almost $117 a barrel, close to the $119.50 a barrel figure reached earlier in March, before easing back. Brent crude is now on track for its largest ever monthly gain. It is up by 54% since the start of March, beating the previous record of 46% in September 1990 after Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. The International Monetary Fund said “all roads lead to higher prices and slower growth worldwide” should the conflict in the Middle East continue to throttle flows through the Gulf. Amid weekend reports in the US media that the Pentagon was preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran, Tehran appeared to be calling for volunteers for a so-called Janfada – “sacrificing life” – operation, recalling the human wave of assaults from the Iran-Iraq war of 1980 to 1988, which included young volunteers. Experts have warned that a US ground operation would probably push the conflict towards an ever deepening regional war. Maziyar Ghiabi, the director of the Centre for Persian and Iranian Studies at the University of Exeter, said: “As the US president prepares for a ground invasion – even though it may be limited to Iranian islands in the Persian Gulf – the trajectory of the war is moving towards a point of no return.” Ghiabi warned of the risk of “a full regional conflict involving Yemen and the Bab-el-Mandeb strait, Iraq, as well as Lebanon, which is already going through an Israeli ground invasion. The effects of this turn of events will be unpredictable and very long-lasting in terms of humanitarian as well as economic outcomes.” Meanwhile, Tehran struck a critical water and electrical plant in Kuwait and an oil refinery in Israel, while Israel and the US launched a new wave of strikes on Iran. Fighting continued to spread in Lebanon as Israel moved to seize more territory in the country’s south. At the weekend, Yemen’s Houthi rebels fired missiles at Israel for the first time since the war began. The UN peacekeeping mission in Lebanon said two of its personnel were killed on Monday in the second deadly incident in 24 hours in the country’s south. The UN interim force in Lebanon (Unifil) said two Indonesian peacekeepers were killed “when an explosion of unknown origin destroyed their vehicle”. Two other peacekeepers were wounded, one of them seriously. Unifil said it had launched an investigation into Monday’s deaths, which came a day after another Indonesian peacekeeper was killed and three others wounded by a projectile, also of unknown provenance, that exploded near a Unifil position. Elsewhere, Syria’s military said a large-scale drone attack had targeted its bases near the border with Iraq, in the latest such incident since the outbreak of the war. It was not immediately clear who had launched the attack.