Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Russian warship fires flares at Danish helicopter as Nato jets shoot down drone over Lithuania

A Russian warship fired two emergency flares at a Danish helicopter in the Baltic Sea and an Italian Nato fighter jet shot down a drone carrying an explosive device over Lithuania in what the EU described as “reckless and dangerous” Russian behaviour. Poland also scrambled fighter jets “due to the activity of Russian jet-powered unmanned aerial vehicles conducting strikes on Ukrainian territory”, the day after Polish security forces retrieved a suspected Russian drone adrift in its waters. German authorities, meanwhile, were searching for more debris on Tuesday from a drone believed to have crashed on Monday near Lake Steinhude in the Hanover region, a little more than half a mile from the German Bundeswehr’s airbase in Wunstorf. The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said the incidents in Denmark and Lithuania were not isolated but “part of a broader pattern of Russian aggression and provocation against Europe testing our readiness and our resolve”. She added: “Russia will find our resolve only growing stronger.” The Danish prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, also condemned “reckless action from Russia towards Denmark’s military”, adding: “Russian actions are meant to intimidate and divide. They will not succeed. We will not waver.” Denmark’s armed forces said in a statement that one of its air force’s Fennec helicopters “was fired at with flares during a routine photographic operation of a Russian frigate” which was in international waters off southern Denmark. The frigate had fired “two flares towards the helicopter” on Monday, the military’s statement said. “One of the flares passed at close range to the helicopter.” No warning or radio contact was given before the flares were fired and they came within “a matter of metres” of the helicopter, the Danish defence minister, Jeppe ‌Bruus, said. He said the ‌helicopter had been following standard procedures to photograph the vessel, an operation carried out “many times” in the past. The Danish foreign minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, said on Tuesday he had summoned the Russian ambassador over the incident. “Russia is gradually shifting the boundary for what they consider acceptable behaviour,” he said. “This is completely unacceptable and could have put human lives at risk. That is something we cannot accept,” he said. The Danish straits are the main sea route in and out of the Baltic Sea for commercial and military shipping. Russia’s ambassador to Denmark, Vladimir Barbin, said it was “not the first time” Danish helicopters had “carried out dangerous manoeuvres near Russian warships”, accusing this one of “provocative actions” against the Russian frigate. The Lithuanian president, Gitanas Nausėda, said early on Tuesday a drone “that just entered Lithuanian airspace was destroyed by Nato fighter jets”, adding: “With Russia intensifying its aggression against Ukraine, such readiness is vital for our region.” The drone fell near the village of Pratkūnai, about 60 miles (100km) west of the capital, Vilnius, and near the Kaunas reservoir, and had most likely entered the country’s airspace form Belarus, Lithuania’s national crisis management centre said. The centre’s head, Vilmantas Vitkauskas, told LRT public radio the drone had remained in Lithuanian airspace for about 30 minutes and had flown along the outskirts of populated areas before being intercepted. Italy’s defence minister, Guido Crosetto, said it “most probably” came from Russia and his Lithuanian counterpart, Robertas Kaunas, said an explosive device had been “discovered and subsequently neutralised” during a search of the site, near a pumped-storage hydroelectric plant. Lithuania’s foreign minister, Kęstutis Budrys, said Nato allies had been informed about the incident and discussions were under way “both in the EU and Nato, because it is obvious that we all still have a lot of homework to do”. Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia – all of which are Nato members and share a border with Russia – have regularly reported drone incursions since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. A Nato fighter shot down a Ukrainian drone over Estonia in May. European officials have said Russia has been diverting Ukrainian drones meant to strike industrial facilities and oil terminals in the St Petersburg region on the Gulf of Finland. Poland said early on Tuesday it had launched “aviation operations” in its airspace because Russian jet-powered drones were “conducting strikes on Ukrainian territory”. The operations were “preventive” and concluded without any violation of Polish airspace being observed, it later said. They came after the country’s defence minister, Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz, said on Monday that the military had located ⁠and recovered a Russian drone from the Baltic Sea near the beach in Rusinowo, close ‌to the coastal town of Jarosławiec. Poland’s prime minister, Donald Tusk, has repeatedly said Nato countries should expect an increase in provocations from Moscow. A Russian drone hit ‌a passenger train on Ukraine’s border with Poland on Sunday, shortly after the former British prime minister Boris Johnson and other foreign diplomats had used the same line. In the Netherlands, train services were severely disrupted by deliberate ⁠acts of sabotage in more than 30 places around the country, the national rail infrastructure operator said, adding that it was not yet known who was responsible. The Dutch rail infrastructure operator, ProRail, said lengths of steel pipe had been “deliberately” attached to railway tracks in more than 30 locations, mainly in ⁠rural areas in the middle and the east of the country. “We are classifying this as sabotage of railway infrastructure,” ‌a ProRail spokesperson, Joke ‌van der Cruysen, said. All trains in the vicinity of the track blockages were halted, while there were also serious disruptions elsewhere, including to international services ‌to Germany. The Dutch intelligence agency, AIVD, said it was investigating the incidents, which were uncovered hours before King Willem-Alexander opened a ‌new session of parliament on Tuesday with a speech setting out the government’s 2027 budget plans. Angry farmers set hay bales and tyres alight alongside several main roads later on Tuesday, forcing authorities to close them and seriously affecting traffic. The militant Farmers Defence Force said it was not responsible for the railway sabotage, but could not rule out farmers taking action individually. Agence France-Presse and Reuters contributed to this report • This article was amended on 15 September 2026. Kęstutis Budrys is Lithuania’s foreign minister, not defence minister as stated in an earlier version.

picture of article

Explosive device found on drone shot down in Lithuania, says minister - as it happened

And, on that note, we will be closing the blog for today. A drone shot down in Lithuania last night was carrying an explosive device, Lithuanian defence minister Robertas Kaunas said (15:32). The drone crossed into Lithuanian airspace from Belarus (13:05) and was downed near a pumped-storage hydroelectric plant in Kruonis, minister confirmed. The drone was shot down by Italian fighter jets operating as part of a Nato mission (10:25), with the Italian defence minister saying it “most probably” came down from Russia (14:33). Meanwhile, Denmark summoned the Russian ambassador to Copenhagen after a Russian warship fired two emergency flares at a Danish army’s helicopter in the Baltic Sea in the latest of incidents attributed to Moscow (9:58). Russia denied responsibility for the incident, blaming Denmark (12:25, 12:45). The EU (15:07) and Ukraine (12:37) offered their support to Denmark. Separately, The Dutch authorities are investigating who could be behind a series of suspected sabotage attacks that disrupted the operation of its railways, including on a number key transport routes across the country (10:03, 11:40, 13:26). The final results of the Swedish parliamentary election are now not expected before Thursday, with a higher-than-usual number of votes yet to be counted (10:30). If you have any tips, comments or suggestions, email me at jakub.krupa@theguardian.com. I am also on Bluesky at @jakubkrupa.bsky.social and on X at @jakubkrupa.

picture of article

Imran Khan’s sons accuse Pakistani army chief of vendetta against imprisoned father

The sons of Imran Khan have accused Pakistan’s powerful army chief of a “personal vendetta” against the incarcerated former prime minister and expressed fears their father is being “slowly killed” in jail, as international pressure mounts over his prison conditions. Kasim Khan, 27, and Sulaiman Khan, 29, have become strong advocates for the release of their father, who has been held in Adiala prison in Rawalpindi since his arrest in 2023, and is serving a 14-year sentence on corruption charges. They have not been allowed to speak to Khan for more than six months and have been prevented from travelling from the UK to Pakistan to lobby for his release. On Wednesday, the supreme court will rule on a case alleging the Pakistan government has been in contempt of court by denying Khan private hospital treatment for a worsening eye condition and preventing family from visiting him or speaking with him in jail for more than six months, in violation of a court order. Khan is being held in solitary confinement, in a cell alleged to be 6ft by 8ft. Later this month, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) – the political party Khan founded in 1996, four years after retiring from international cricket – is planning a nationwide march demanding his release. Speaking to the Guardian from London, Khan’s sons – from his first marriage to Jemima Goldsmith – said they were “deeply, deeply concerned” about their father’s health, and that the conditions he was being kept in amounted to “a form of mental and physical torture”. “The reality is that he is locked in a tiny 6x8ft cell without human contact,” said Sulaiman. “He hasn’t been allowed new books for months and he’s not been allowed to see or speak to his family or a neutral doctor. He has an eye condition which was neglected for months and has meant he’s probably almost lost sight in one eye.” Late last month, Sky Sports aired an interview with Khasim and Sulaiman during its coverage of a test match between England and Pakistan. The Pakistan Cricket Board, which has close links to the government and whose chair is also the interior minister, made a formal complaint to Sky Sports after the broadcast and the Pakistani team threatened to refuse to return to the field after the lunch break. “It shows how out of touch they are with the rest of the world, that they thought they could silence media like they do at home,” Sulaiman said of the complaint. “It just exposed them for the authoritarian regime that they are.” The UN has said Khan’s prolonged detention violates international law and the UN’s special rapporteur on torture said his solitary confinement and detention conditions could amount to psychological torture. Sulaiman said the family had been told their father, 73, had also been diagnosed with high blood pressure. “More than anything, we just want to speak to him and make sure he’s OK,” he said. Khan’s sons said they were particularly concerned that the “cruel” treatment was being driven by a “personal grudge” by Asim Munir, Pakistan’s chief of defence forces and army chief. When Khan was the prime minister, he unceremoniously demoted Munir, and the bad blood between them was well known. When Munir was made army chief in 2022, the persecution of Khan increased notably. “It’s very clear this is being driven by personal grudge and that’s one of the reasons he’s being treated so harshly, on the orders of Asim Munir,” said Sulaiman. Munir’s powers expanded over the past year as he established himself as a close ally of Donald Trump, who referred to him as “my favourite field marshal”. Last month, the supreme court ruled that Khan should be taken to a private hospital for treatment for a blood clot in his retinal vein, believed to have destroyed 85% of the sight in his right eye because of a prolonged lack of medical attention. Khan was instead taken briefly to a government hospital, where he was given several injections and ruled fit to return to prison, prompting outrage from his family and political party. “There’s still been no light shed on our father’s real condition from an unbiased, neutral physician,” said Kasim. “We believe they’re trying to slowly kill him in there. Just as soon as there’s less pressure, we are sure they will put even harsher restrictions on him and try to finish him off. “The one with the real vendetta here is the army chief Asim Munir.” In a statement, the Pakistan government called the allegations around Khan “fake propaganda” and said he was being kept in adequate conditions, with access to home-cooked food, nuts, bottled water, exercise equipment, family visits and regular medical examinations. “The government of Pakistan categorically rejects allegations that the convicted prisoner is being subjected to punitive solitary confinement, cruelty or deprivation,” the statement said. It was widely acknowledged that Khan came to power in 2018 with the backing of Pakistan’s military, widely referred to as the “establishment”, which has long held an oversized role in the country’s governance. Khan had promised to build a “naya Pakistan” (new Pakistan), which would end corruption and follow the rule of law. However, his time in power was plagued by allegations of corruption, press censorship and persecution of his opponents. He was toppled in 2022 after falling out with his military benefactors. He then began a campaign calling for the generals to be kept out of government. By 2023, as his accusations against the military grew, Khan turned from alleged persecutor to the persecuted. He was arrested and charged with more than 100 crimes, including alleged corruption and sedition, which he claims are trumped up to keep him out of power. Despite his toppling and imprisonment, Khan still remains popular. “They want to do everything they can to sideline him and disappear him from public life,” Kasim said. Sulaiman said that while it was “clear the establishment think they can get away with it without any kind of repercussions”, it was also evident the government had been rattled by international coverage of Khan’s case. Khan’s sons said that while they were keen to travel to Pakistan, their visas had still not been granted more than nine months after applying. They emphasised they had no interest in entering politics in Pakistan or leading Khan’s PTI party in his absence. “We definitely don’t want to get involved in politics in Pakistan in the long term,” said Sulaiman. “Our father always said that one of the biggest problems with Pakistani politics is this dynastic nepotism; that power’s been held by just two families for the last 40 years. It’s a sign of what’s wrong with the political system in Pakistan.” Speculation has abounded on whether Khan would strike a deal with the military to secure his release. Khan’s closest aide, Zulfi Bukhari, said: “There is only one deal Khan would ever accept: the restoration of democracy, the rule of law and the people’s mandate in Pakistan. If they’re genuinely willing to do that, then fine – let’s talk.” Kasim and Sulaiman said they did not believe Khan would give up his politics to secure his release. “He’s a very single-minded person,” said Kasim. “I don’t think there’s a chance that he’d ever give it up.”

picture of article

Tuesday briefing: How to understand Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland’s joint call for change

Good morning. Back in May, the shape of British politics shifted dramatically. I’ll forgive you if you were too preoccupied refreshing Andrew Sparrow’s live blog for the latest speculation about Keir Starmer to notice, but since 7 May, centre-left nationalist parties that ultimately aspire to leave the UK have been in government for the first time simultaneously in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. This week sees the initial codification of that shift. In Cardiff yesterday, Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap Iorwerth, Scottish National party leader John Swinney and Sinn Féin vice-president Michelle O’Neill (who shares power with the Democratic Unionist party) affirmed their countries’ right to seek independence from the UK. Along with the leader of the opposition in Ireland, Mary Lou McDonald, they signed a memorandum of understanding that called on Westminster “to prepare, plan and facilitate constitutional change in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland”. And they posed for a fair number of group photos too. With each of the sister parties having a different timeline towards a referendum and its own domestic pressures, it’s tempting to dismiss this as spectacle over substance. However, these first ministers are not shouting into a vacuum. They are part of a cross-national conversation in which devolution is the defining project of the UK’s still newish prime minister. For today’s First Edition, I spoke to our Wales correspondent, Bethan McKernan, in Cardiff about why this agreement is more than a photocall, and checked in with colleagues in Scotland and Ireland for the view from there too. But first, the headlines. Five big stories Reform UK | Andy Burnham’s government could thwart Reform’s unprecedented £72m donations with retrospective restrictions on political donors that will include tough new residency requirements, ministers have announced. AI | Donald Trump has dismissed calls to increase controls on AI as a “sick conspiracy”, as stocks linked to the technology slumped after appeals from Anthropic, OpenAI and SpaceX leaders on the weekend for the industry to slow down. Nato | Nato fighter jets shot down a drone over Lithuania after an alert was issued in the ‌capital and surrounding region, while Poland scrambled fighter jets less than a day after retrieving a suspected Russian drone adrift in its waters. Middle East | Yemen’s Houthi rebels have seized two strategic islands in the Red Sea, reinforcing the Iran-backed group’s ability to control a key shipping route, as concerns mount that the world is facing a new oil supply crisis. Lucy Letby | Two leading experts have quit Lucy Letby’s defence team over concerns about the “scientific credibility” of some of its evidence. In depth: Can devolution hold the UK together? Listening to the leaders in Cardiff discuss the “growing recognition that Westminster is not working” and that “power genuinely needs to be brought closer to people and communities”, you might have thought Andy Burnham was in the room. The memorandum signed by all four stated that no Westminster government has the right to “block democracy” by refusing a referendum should the public demand it. At the morning press conference Swinney and O’Neill called for immediate referendums in Scotland and Northern Ireland; ap Iorwerth declined to give a timetable. Later that afternoon, the Scottish and Welsh first ministers signed the Cardiff Agreement, setting out shared priorities like child poverty and economic growth, and which Swinney described as “an important moment in the history of devolution”. Events in Cardiff were gifted extra salience by a series of unscripted interventions over the past week. On a visit to Ireland last weekend, Donald Trump told reporters that he would “love” to see a united Ireland and it “may as well happen now”, prompting swift rebuttal from unionists on the Stormont executive and the UK government, as well as a solid gold response from SDLP leader Claire Hanna, who said: “It turns out that he isn’t as orange as he looks”. Only weeks prior, Andy Burnham incensed Irish nationalists by declaring a reunification referendum was “off the table” – forgetting that it’s not his table, because the Good Friday agreement includes a provision for a border poll should it appear that the majority of Northern Irish voters want to leave the UK. In a constitutional one-two, Burnham said last week at PMQs that a second referendum on Scottish independence could be held if a “clear consensus” emerged in favour - but swiftly self-corrected, telling an eager Swinney that such a vote was “off-limits” while he focuses on growing the economy and tackling the cost of living. Nonetheless, says Bethan McKernan, “there is this sense that since Plaid Cymru won the Senedd elections in Wales in May, this is a new chapter in the Celtic struggle for independence – or breaking up the UK, depending on which way you look at it.” *** What this all means for Wales It was an acknowledgment of this momentum, then, that the meeting was held in Cardiff, where Plaid Cymru recently ended a century of Labour control of the Senedd. Latest polling puts support for Wales to leave the UK at 32%, but growing in strength, and ap Iorwerth has been explicit that he won’t push for a referendum this term. Nevertheless, says Bethan, Plaid Cymru are “very ambitious … part of their agenda is to put Wales on the world map and mark Wales out as a nation that can stand on its own two feet.” Now in power, the party is focusing on domestic issues, and also bracing for disruption with Reform winning more than a third of seats in the Senedd. It’s a similar scenario at Holyrood, where Reform is joint second largest party alongside Scottish Labour. Both ap Iorwerth and Swinney have been outspoken in their opposition to right wing populism and benefited at the ballot box. There are already clear signs that Plaid Cymru has been learning from the SNP: one of their early priorities has been the Cynnal, a £10 a week child poverty payment, which is closely modelled on the successful Scottish Child Payment. *** … and Scotland The SNP was returned to Holyrood in May for an unprecedented fifth term, following a lacklustre campaign that mirrored voter disengagement and an unusually high level of undecideds. As its programme for government earlier this month failed to ignite public enthusiasm, this agreement is an opportunity for the Nationalists to “move the conversation back to their overarching aim - and have another confrontation with London,” Patrick Greenfield tells me. (He’s now reporting from Edinburgh, after a memorable stint on this very newsletter). Patrick reminds me that, while support for independence continues to hover around the 50% mark, enthusiasm among younger cohorts is higher: there’s a sense of Swinney future-proofing support for the party as Yes voters drift away from the SNP. And there’s the convenient diversion of attention from domestic travails, Patrick adds: the lingering scandal after former SNP chief executive Peter Murrell was jailed for embezzling party funds, demands for action as Scotland slumped in international education rankings last week, or looming public sector cuts as his government anticipates a near-£5bn gap in its finances by the end of the decade. Ahead of the Holyrood elections, I can recall Swinney positively beaming at the “seismic” potential of three pro-independence administrations: now it has come to pass, his focus is thought to be on seeking an agreed mechanism for triggering a vote, although that wasn’t discussed yesterday. But there is longstanding disagreement within the SNP about whether its better to build support for independence by doing the day job well rather than get lost in the weeds of referendum process. *** … and Northern Ireland Sinn Féin can talk up the significance of the memorandum but its focus is very much on next year’s Stormont assembly elections, Rory Carroll tells me from Dublin. Like the SNP, Sinn Féin’s popularity has slipped in recent years as public services crumble and it fail to deliver on key infrastructure pledges – but it is likely to win out against a fragmented unionist opposition. With support for Irish unity at 36% in Northern Ireland, Brexit hasn’t moved the dial decisively in favour, Rory says, while the Good Friday agreement is “famously murky and vague” on a precise mechanism that would trigger a poll. Does a “majority in favour” refer to opinion polls, elections or some other measure? Stormont has also become “so dysfunctional” that the narrative is growing stronger that Northern Ireland simply doesn’t work, Rory says. “That surely has to be bad news for unionism. So longer term, all bets are off because the status quo cannot continue indefinitely.” *** A resolution on devolution With devolution his guiding principle, Andy Burnham finds himself in a philosophical quandary. He could ape the more muscular unionism of the Starmer era, with senior Labour figures in Scotland and Wales punting devolution to local authorities as a means to sidestep the parliaments now seen as “captured” by nationalists. Or he could follow a more incremental approach, relinquishing further powers within the current constitutional framework. Wales is pressing for the devolution of justice; SNP proposals for a Scottish work visa to combat migrant worker shortages were rejected by Burnham’s government last month. Burnham has said he understands there’s a difference between devolution at regional and national level, but he has yet to set out precisely what he means by that. “Burnham didn’t impress because he didn’t seem to get what it already looked like to people in Scotland and Wales,” says Bethan. “There’s a whole generation that has grown up with institutions like Holyrood and the Senedd”. The trouble is that, unlike No 10 in the North, a whole architecture of devolution already exists in the nations, that is essentially competing with Westminster over who gets to control what. After all, an independence referendum could be described as peak devolution. While Burnham still has to get to grips with this internal contradiction, the nationalist leaders have their eye on the arc of history. “I do think that maybe 20 years from now, we all might look back on this meeting in Cardiff and say that was an early step on a very clear path,” says Bethan. What else we’ve been enjoying For The Hotspot, our newsletter on climate and sport, John Duerden has a look at how irrepressible summer heat has South Korea considering moving their football season from summer to the winter. It’s a troubling sign of things to come. Charlie Lindlar, newsletters team Reporter Morgan Ofori has produced a terrific video explaining how Britain’s kings and queens powered the slave trade for the Guardian’s recent Enslaving Nation investigation. It’s worth watching. Hettie Phone signal is coming to the London Underground, and Lucy Pasha-Robinson wants no part of it, thanks very much. “What good comes from permanent online connectedness,” she asks. Charlie I enjoyed the book publisher Sean DeLone’s recent Substack essay on why the nonfiction market is tanking. He thinks it reflects a wider crisis not just for the men who (mostly) read these books, but for the authority of books as cultural objects. Hettie When Trump started building his ballroom, he said it would be “more beautiful” than Versailles. The Guardian’s architecture critic Oliver Wainwright finds that his chandelier-bedecked warehouse is more “The Blingpire Strikes Back”. Hettie Sport Football | VAR officials who allowed Erling Haaland’s winning goal in the Manchester derby on Sunday have been stood down from their responsibilities because of an “error of judgment”. Cricket | England’s new Test head coach Stephen Fleming will return to New Zealand to work as a commentator on the Black Caps’ Test and white ball series against India next month despite having formally started work. Formula One | A new track for the Spanish Grand Prix is set to change after driver condemnation of the Madring. The front pages “Ministers seek law change to make £72m donations to Reform illegal”, is the Guardian’s front page today, while the Times has “‘Enhanced’ checks may block £72m to Reform”. The Telegraph leads with “Villages join revolt over migrant camps”, on the same story the Express writes “‘This is for our children’”. Metro has “Post Office fraud blitz”, the i Paper says “ADHD not being overdiagnosed in the UK, major report set to find”, and the FT splashes “Ten-year Treasury yield tops 5% as inflation fears batter bond markets”. The Mail has “Harry and Meghan pull children out of their new school after just two days” and lastly, the Sun on Oasis’ next tour says “Definitely mayhem”. Today in Focus: The Latest Sydney Sweeney naked sports ad controversy: what’s she playing at? The actor Sydney Sweeney is under fire for ‘sexualising women’s sports’ in an ad campaign for US sports prediction company Novig, which features a series of images of her in various states of undress as she pretends to play different sports. The ad has been widely criticised by a number of sportswomen, including Olympic swimmer Ariarne Titmus who described it as ‘infuriating’ and a ‘kick in the teeth’ to women who have ‘spent decades perfecting their craft’. Sweeney has responded by saying the ad was about ‘embracing a fun idea’. Lucy Hough speaks to Guardian feature writer Elle Hunt. Cartoon of the day | Ben Jennings The Upside A bit of good news to remind you that the world’s not all bad Do birds actually enjoy flying? Or is it just a thankless journey they take from A to B, the ornithological equivalent of your morning commute? Jorg Massen, a behavioural biologist at Utrecht university, has an answer. In his study of 17 captive cockatoos kept in a bird park in the Netherlands, he found that the birds chose to fly on virtually every occasion. When they flew on consecutive days, they were more likely to display behaviours related to positive emotions, and become more “optimistic”. Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday Bored at work? And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply

picture of article

Houthis seize strategic Red Sea islands as analysts warn of impending oil crunch

Yemen’s Houthi militants have seized two strategic islands in the Red Sea, reinforcing the Iran-backed group’s ability to control a key shipping route, as concerns mount that the world is facing a new oil supply crisis. The seizure of the islands of Greater and Lesser Hanish is the latest in the militant group’s swift advance across Yemen’s Red Sea coast, after the capture of the port of Mokha and Perim island in the Bab al-Mandab strait. The islands lie 160km north of the strait which is a chokepoint that connects the Red Sea to the open ocean and Saudi Arabia’s key Asian markets. The speed of the Houthis’ advance has left Yemen’s Saudi-backed government trying to claw back territory captured by the militants in recent days, while Riyadh grapples with attacks on a critical oil pipeline by Iran-allied militants in Iraq. Threats from Houthis have left Saudi Arabia on high alert, with air alerts flashing across the country daily, while a series of attacks carried out by the militant group using ballistic missiles and drones wounded 13 civilians on Monday. Nearly 94,000 people in Yemen have fled their homes since fighting between the Houthis and government forces escalated this month, the International Organization for Migration said on Monday. About 200 schools have been converted to shelters in south-western Yemen to absorb an influx of families, the International Rescue Committee said. More than 2,000 people have reportedly fled across the sea into Djibouti. The Houthi advance puts them just 32km from a US military base in the tiny country on the Horn of Africa, on the other side of the Bab al-Mandab strait. On Monday, experts warned that the closure of Saudi Arabia’s east-west pipeline – which has been vital for Riyadh to move oil from the strait of Hormuz to the Red Sea export hub of Yanbu – will further pile pressure on its shipments and global oil supplies. Officials have estimated it could take weeks to fully repair it. “The big question for traders right now is the duration of the east-west ‌outage. Any prolonged disruption and the associated supply loss could easily push prices to the next level higher,” said Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade. Research company Rystad Energy said on Monday that since late August, an average 2.6m to 4m barrels of oil a day moved through the pipeline and out of the port of Yanbu – a volume it said was now at risk of “disappearing from the market”. Janiv Shah, vice-president of oil markets for Rystad Energy, noted the recent jump in Brent prices proved the market was already responding to “a significant loss of supply”. Saudi inventories could sustain exports in the coming days, but that could “change quickly,” Shah added. On Tuesday morning, Brent crude oil rose 1.17% to $106.92 a barrel. The average price of diesel in the US hit $6 per gallon for the first time last week, as the Iran war, combined with Ukrainian attacks on Russian refineries, squeezed supply. The Houthi leadership has said it is not seeking to block all commercial shipping in the Red Sea, only Saudi-linked ships. Supplies from Saudi Arabia, the world’s biggest exporter of oil, are vital to economies in Africa and Asia, which rely on oil imports from the Middle East and have been hit hardest by the disruption in trade. Experts say the stock buffers that existed in the system earlier this year, shielding the world from the worst effects of an oil shock by limiting price increases, have now largely disappeared. Since the war began in February, countries have released some crude stockpiles to the market, ⁠and the US also lifted restrictions on oil stored on ships floating at sea from countries under sanctions. Those buffers have now ‌been “played out”, Chevron CEO Mike ⁠Wirth said on Friday. “It’s harder to envision a scenario ‌where prices soften and quickly,” he said. “I think the risks remain to the upside over the next few months.“

picture of article

‘I believed the hype’: the white South Africans denied refugee status in the US

When Donald Trump announced in February 2025 that the US would accept Afrikaners from South Africa as refugees, many white South Africans who believed that they were victims of racism in their country thought that their prayers had been answered. However, in the past few months, dozens of applicants to the refugee programme have been rejected, with many left dismayed and confused as to why they would be left to face what Trump has falsely claimed is a “white genocide” in South Africa. After Trump’s February 2025 executive order announcing the resettlement programme, which was expanded to include members of a “racial minority”, the first group of 68 white South Africans arrived in the US that May. The US also shut down the refugee programme for anyone else fleeing war and persecution. Since then, more than 13,000 have moved to the US, according to state department figures. Arrivals are also accelerating, with more than 2,600 admitted in August. Afrikaners, descended from Dutch and French settlers, ruled South Africa during apartheid. The regime repressed the black majority, while keeping white people safe and wealthy. Since the end of apartheid more than 30 years ago, affirmative action policies have helped to create a black elite and middle class. But about 38% of black South Africans are unemployed, compared with 9% of white South Africans, according to official data. Meanwhile, the “black economic empowerment” policies, along with high crime rates that affect everyone, have fostered a feeling among some white South Africans that they are now the victims of racial discrimination. The racist far right has also long highlighted brutal murders of white South African farmers, claiming them as evidence of white people being targeted. Official crime data does not show farmers or white people experiencing crime at higher rates. That has not stopped Trump amplifying these claims, in the face of the South African government’s furious rebuttals. On 30 June, Facebook and WhatsApp groups for prospective and successful refugee applicants began to light up with news that people had begun to receive rejection letters. “We are writing to inform you that, following review, USCIS [US Citizenship and Immigration Services] found your application to be ineligible for continued processing for resettlement to the United States at this time. This cannot be appealed,” the letters said, according to multiple rejections seen by the Guardian. It is unclear how many have been found ineligible. USCIS did not provide data on the total number of refugee applications and rejections. One WhatsApp group set up to support rejects, called Hope beyond the Letter, had 311 members as of 10 September, according to one of the administrators, who noted that the membership fluctuated. While the ineligibility letters did not give reasons for rejection, some applicants were given more information after making Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. The WhatsApp group administrator, a 64-year-old freelance TV professional, who did not want his identity disclosed, found that his case was initially “recommended for approval”. However, the recommendation was reversed because his ex-girlfriend, whom he had applied with, had a marijuana conviction. “I cried like a baby,” he said, of receiving the rejection letter on 30 June, having finished the screening process in November. “It was something I actually believed was attainable. I believed the hype.” Pieter and Liesl (not their real names) were told they were “conditionally approved” as refugees last November. Both are Afrikaners who had a grandparent killed on a farm and were managing a farm when they applied to become refugees. Pieter said he was convicted of trespassing in 2014, for which he said he paid a fine and did not go to court. He was granted multiple temporary visas to work on farms in the US between 2011 and 2024. The couple’s youngest daughter was born in the US and is a US citizen. In the response to their FoI request, they noticed that USCIS had recorded her nationality as South African and incorrectly said that she would be left behind if they moved to the US as refugees. They had already sold their house, car and many of their possessions when they received a rejection letter on 24 July. “We have to start all over again,” Pieter said. Another applicant blamed not being able to speak in his native Afrikaans for what he claimed were misunderstandings that led to him and his wife being rejected. The reasons given in response to their FoI request were “crime involving moral turpitude” and “commission of acts of torture or extra judicial killing”. The 67-year-old had admitted to shooting at least one black person when working as a security guard in 1995, but said it was in self-defence while responding to the mass break-in of an alcohol shop. “I was thoroughly investigated by the authorities,” he said. “I was not charged, because I did not break the law.” In an emailed response that did not address specific cases, the USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler said: “The Department of Homeland Security is committed to resettling Afrikaner refugees who are being persecuted by the South African government. “[USCIS] reviews each refugee application on a case-by-case basis … [and] notifies aliens found ineligible for continued processing through the US Refugee Admissions Program, including those found ineligible for public safety concerns or criminal histories. This cannot be appealed. This administration will always prioritize the safety and welfare of the American people.”

picture of article

Panama canal traffic to be cut again as drought from El Niño worsens

The Panama canal plans to again cut maritime traffic due to worsening drought caused by the El Niño climate phenomenon, further choking up one of the world’s most important shipping lanes. The canal handles 5% of global maritime trade and about 40% of US container traffic; it is favoured by shippers because it usually reduces cost and transit times, especially for companies trading between China, Asia and the US. From October, an average of 29.5 vessels will be allowed to transit daily – down 18% from 36 in August, according to a draft plan submitted to Panama’s parliament. In September, officials cut daily transits from 36 to 32 because of the drought. The US and Israel’s war on Iran, and its disruption to the strait of Hormuz, has complicated logistics and added costs for shipping companies using the canal. In August, with vessels waiting 10 days to enter the canal – the longest since May – a container ship reportedly paid about $4m (£3m) to jump the queue. Maritime companies usually pay a flat fee to reserve a slot to transit the canal, but a daily auction allows shipowners to place bids to skip the queue. Bid prices generally rise during high demand. Shipping restrictions on the canal could yet worsen, with El Niño expected to peak later this year. The natural weather pattern that brings worldwide changes in winds, air pressure and rainfall patterns is forecast to be the strongest in four decades. The 82km-long canal, connecting the Caribbean Sea to the Pacific Ocean, relies on fresh water from rivers pouring into Lake Gatun to operate its system of locks. In September, officials said the watershed had received lower than forecast rainfall. The canal’s locks act like elevators, each filling with water to lift ships 26 metres (85 feet) from sea level to Lake Gatun and then back down to sea level on the other side. If lake levels are no longer safe for the largest ships to pass, the Panama Canal Authority imposes restrictions for safety and to preserve water. In 2023 the water level in the lakes feeding the canal was so low authorities cut daily transits from 38 to 22. Those restrictions led to a bottleneck of ships and sent companies scrambling to find alternative routes. El Niño has severely affected Central America and northern parts of South America, where nine countries have experienced their hottest June-August period on record this year. Fifty-two countries across all continents broke their seasonal temperature records for that period, according to an Agence France-Presse analysis of meteorological data from the European Copernicus programme. The extreme heat has taken many forms, from unprecedented heatwaves in Europe to devastating drought in Sudan and toxic smoke in Indonesia. More than a third of people experiencing the hottest northern summer months on record were in Africa, particularly in the Sahel and areas south of it. Eighteen African countries broke their seasonal records for the June-August period, from Mauritania and Sierra Leone in the west to Eritrea and Ethiopia in the east.

picture of article

‘This is seriously bold’: How China turned Taiwan tensions into a top-rating TV spy drama

After shaking off the people trailing her through a crowded market and emerging from a bathroom in disguise, the double agent appears to have escaped. But a sip of water on a plane eventually gets her. She is poisoned after Taiwan’s military intelligence service discovers that she has been working secretly for China. The plot comes from a new Chinese spy drama co-produced by the Ministry of State Security. Since its premiere on 6 September, it has become a TV hit, with a fictionalised take on a subject rarely treated so directly: the modern history of tensions with Taiwan. The series, which will run for 40 episodes, is officially titled The Long Watch in English or Jiaofeng, meaning clashing or “crossing swords” in Chinese. It follows two decades of spies, double agents and intelligence operations between China and Taiwan from the mid-1990s. Jiaofeng mixes fictional characters and locations with real ones such as Taipei, the capital of Taiwan. Yet it remains difficult for analysts to verify how closely the drama follows real events as new episodes continue to be released. While Taiwan’s intelligence services are portrayed as an adversary capable of obtaining sensitive missile information, the drama casts Chinese state security officers as the heroes defending the country against infiltration and theft. By making these dramas, Chinese authorities are “essentially creating their own historical narrative,” says Li Fu-chung, a historian at Taiwan’s National Chengchi University whose research includes Chinese Communist party history and film history. “Through a dramatic format, people can very easily be brainwashed, not only in China but potentially in Taiwan as well.” Billed as drawing on declassified national-security cases, the series’ writers said they interviewed retired state-security officers and studied 27 case files while developing the script. Within about a week of its premiere, the series topped the daily prime-time drama ratings on China Central Television five times. Online, it surpassed 50m views across platforms within a week, according to Chinese entertainment data provider Maoyan. Chinese viewers have described the series as unusually “bold” for addressing real political figures and depicting details of espionage operations on both sides. “One reason China has been making more dramas on this subject in recent years is simply that espionage makes for good drama. Another is that they want to emphasise patriotism,” says Li. “Since the story involves Taiwan trying to turn Chinese officials into agents, there will be negative and positive characters. That contrast helps show who is patriotic and who is betraying the country,” Li adds. Spies, lies and cross-strait tensions Set in 1994, the first episode opens with a newsreader’s voice playing over a cityscape in China, reporting that Taiwan’s then president Lee Teng-hui had made remarks that “incite separatist sentiment” and “undermine the foundations of cross-strait relations”. “This is seriously bold!!! It’s exciting from every angle and really doesn’t shy away from anything,” one Chinese viewer wrote on the microblogging platform Weibo, surprised at the direct mention of Lee. Taiwan, formally known as the Republic of China, is a self-governed democracy that Beijing claims as its territory despite never having controlled the island. Lee, who later became Taiwan’s first directly elected president, was viewed by Beijing as a major “separatist”. His visit to the United States sparked Chinese missile tests and military exercises that developed into the 1995-96 Taiwan strait crisis, during which the US sent aircraft carrier groups to waters near the island. Jiaofeng, however, is not the first state-backed Chinese spy drama to draw on cross-strait relations. Last year, another TV series called Silent Honor, also made with guidance from the Ministry of State Security, portrayed espionage set against the backdrop of the end of the Chinese civil war. Despite the historical narratives, the shows help play into current events. In a commentary about Jiaofeng, published on 8 September, the state-run Global Times described cross-strait espionage as a “hidden front” and said “the struggle on this front will only truly end when the complete reunification of the motherland is achieved.” On Chinese social media RedNote, one user posted a video saying the drama had taught him a hard lesson about the spy game. “One moment of misplaced trust, one casual conversation or one flash of greed could be enough to pull you into the whole trap,” he said. ‘This is just propaganda’ So far, however, the drama appears to have caused barely a ripple in Taiwan. Little discussion is evident across social media, despite the series being available there through Chinese streaming service Tencent Video and on YouTube. Last year, Taiwan’s own drama about cross-strait security threats performed strongly, becoming the most-watched drama of the year. The government-subsidised series Zero Day Attack imagined a Chinese blockade and invasion, with storylines involving sleeper agents and media infiltration. Annie Hsieh, a 26-year-old Taiwanese postgraduate student, has never heard of Jiaofeng; nor would she be interested in watching it, given the topic. “Who knows what they’ve made out of it,” she says. Another Taiwanese graduate, Liang Tian-jun, says Chinese romance dramas were more popular among his peers, but that “watching dramas wouldn’t make them feel more open or receptive towards China”. A poll conducted last month found that only 7.4% of Taiwanese respondents had a favourable view of the Chinese Communist party, down from 9.6% in July. “Taiwan is, after all, an open and free society, so some people will be influenced by propaganda from across the strait,“ Li says, “But most Taiwanese can see that this is just propaganda.”