Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Thailand’s Princess Bajrakitiyabha dies aged 47 after years in a coma

The eldest child of Thailand’s King Maha Vajiralongkorn has died aged 47, the palace has said, after nearly four years in a coma. Princess Bajrakitiyabha Mahidol, known in Thailand as Princess Bha, had been in hospital since December 2022 when she became gravely ill after having heart problems while out training her dogs. There had been few updates regarding her health since her hospitalisation, though in early May the palace said her medical condition had worsened as a result of multiple infections in several organs and physicians were unable to stabilise her irregular heart rate. In April, physicians discovered a stomach infection that led to inflammation in her intestines, causing her blood pressure to fall and her heartbeat to become irregular. Her kidney function and breathing had been supported through medical equipment, palace statements said. Born in 1978 to then-Crown Prince Vajiralongkorn and his wife, and cousin, Princess Soamsawali, Bajrakitiyabha held several degrees, including a doctorate from Cornell University. She served as an ambassador to Austria, as well as in the attorney general’s office, the royal security command, and as a goodwill ambassador to the UN office on drugs and crime. Bajrakitiyabha also campaigned for the rights of female prisoners. Her death will raise questions about succession – a sensitive issue in Thailand where public discussion of the monarchy is limited by a strict lese majesty law. Criticism of the royal family can lead to up to 15 years in prison on a single charge. Bajrakitiyabha was considered by many analysts to be a well-suited heir to the throne, though this has never been addressed officially. The king has married four times and has seven children. Bajrakitiyabha was one of only three of his children to hold a royal title, along with Princess Sirivannavari, 38, and Prince Dipangkorn, 20. Some had speculated that Bajrakitiyabha may have acted as a regent for Dipangkorn, who is reported to have learning difficulties, or become queen herself. Thailand has never had a ruling queen. Vajiralongkorn’s four others sons have lived abroad since the mid-1990s after he announced his divorce from their mother, Sujarinee, a former actor, publicly accusing her of adultery. Their sister Princess Sirivannavari was returned to Thailand and raised as a member of the royal family. The estranged sons travelled to Thailand for the first time in decades in 2023, and made several visits to the country until, in 2025, they claimed they had been denied entry to Thailand. The king divorced Bajrakitiyabha’s mother in 1991 but she retains a royal title and is a key member of the monarchy. Dipangkorn’s mother, Srirasmi Suwadee, was stripped of her royal title after her family were accused of corruption.

picture of article

Ukraine war briefing: France, Germany and UK make push in Moscow for peace talks

British, French and German ambassadors to Russia urged direct talks between Moscow and Kyiv in a rare meeting at Russia’s foreign ministry on Thursday. The leaders of the UK France and Germany – known as the E3 – this week met with Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Ukraine’s president, in London. In a joint statement after Thursday’s Moscow meeting, the three countries said they conveyed to the Russians the key conclusions of the UK summit, including “the support for president Zelensky’s urge to hold direct talks between Russia and Ukraine”. European ambassadors have rarely held talks with Russian officials during the war, but have been frequently summoned by the foreign ministry. The E3 grouping have been some of Ukraine’s most staunch allies. Moscow said the ambassadors had been told of their countries’ “destructive” policy on Ukraine, accusing them of wanting to “continue the war against Russia on behalf of and at the expense of” European countries. Several western European countries – including France – have floated the idea of restarting a dialogue with Moscow to end the war. US-led talks to end it have led nowhere and have been sidelined by the Iran war, but Russia has in the past preferred to talk to Donald Trump’s administration, with the Kremlin not wanting European countries involved. Peter Beaumont has documented how Ukrainian forces are crippling Russian supply lines along what has been dubbed the “highway of death”. The R-280 constitutes a crucial route for Moscow’s military convoys as it snakes through Ukrainian territories under Moscow’s occupation, linking Rostov-on-Don in Russia to Melitopol, Mariupol and Crimea via the Sea of Azov coastline. Ukrainian drone operators say dozens of trucks and tankers have been destroyed as part of an intensified effort known as the “middle strike campaign”. Robert Brovdi, the commander of Ukraine’s drone forces, said military cargo traffic along the highway had fallen by 71% over the past two weeks. Traffic was suspended this week on the Chonhar Bridge – a key section of the road connecting Russia-occupied Kherson province to Crimea – after a series of Ukrainian drone strikes. Fuel stations on the Russian-held Crimean peninsula were out of petrol on Thursday, Reuters witnesses said. In Sevastopol, the peninsula’s largest city, there was no fuel at most local petrol stations, even with rationing in place. In the resort town of Yevpatoriya there was a long queue outside the single working petrol station. Trucks had been unable to bring the fuel into the city after recent Ukrainian strikes on supply routes, said the Russian-backed Sevastopol governor, Mikhail Razvozhaev, delaying plans to distribute rationed petrol. Fuel supplies to Crimea by road, rail and sea barge have all been disrupted by Ukrainian drone attacks. In Sevastopol, the Moscow-installed governor said Ukrainian drones had caused damage overnight. The Russian-backed governor of the Moscow-held part of Kherson region, which borders Crimea to the north, said Ukraine had targeted bridges, causing some damage. A Ukrainian commander, Dmytro Filatov, told Ukrainian media on Thursday that Chonhar Bridge had “critical” damage, halting traffic. He said Kyiv’s forces also struck the town of Armiansk, which sits astride the narrow isthmus that is the only overland link between Crimea and the mainland, destroying trucks carrying fuel and ammunition. The Ukrainians also struck in southern Russia, causing damage including a fire at the Afipsky oil refinery. The governor of neighbouring Adygea also reported damage. The fuel crisis in Russia has reached the point that the government is trying to create a forecasting system to deal with shortages. The deputy prime minister, Alexander Novak, called for its establishment after a cabinet meeting on Thursday. Shortages in around a dozen regions of Russia have been reported in the news and on social media, according to Reuters, although only Crimea and two regions of Siberia have officially confirmed them. Two people were killed and another two injured in Russia’s region of Bryansk bordering Ukraine as a result of shelling, the acting regional governor, Yegor Kovalchuk, said late on Thursday. A Russian drone attack on a railway depot in the town of Konotop in Ukraine’s northern Sumy region killed a railway worker, the chief executive of Ukraine’s state railway said on Thursday. Another four workers were injured in the attack, Ukrzaliznytsia CEO Oleksandr Pertsovskyi said. The rail operator said it had increased Ukrainian grain shipments for export by 8% since the start of June despite an intensification of Russian attacks on infrastructure. “It is difficult to bring trains up to the terminals. The enemy is targeting locomotives, and we have also started a maintenance campaign,” said Ukrzaliznytsia. Russia’s seaborne oil product exports fell by 0.2% on a daily basis in May from April. Russia’s southern ports have been hit by drone attacks but it has increased exports from Baltic terminals. Despite sanctions, Russian producers have been able to partly capitalise on the increase in oil prices caused by the US-Israeli war on Iran – though Ukraine has been attacking Russian “shadow fleet” tankers while Kyiv’s allies have been intercepting them at sea.

picture of article

Trump claims US and Iran on verge of signing peace agreement, but Tehran says no final decision made

Donald Trump claimed on Thursday that Washington and Tehran were on the verge of signing a peace agreement, and announced that he was cancelling fresh missile strikes, after two days of escalating attacks on Iran that threatened to collapse the fragile ceasefire. His comments followed a new bout of public diplomacy by social media, but were dismissed by Iran’s foreign ministry, which said a final decision on an agreement had not been reached. “Based on the fact that discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran have been brought to the highest level of Iranian leadership and approved, I have, as President of the United States of America, cancelled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran this evening,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, the social network he owns. While the White House has long sought a peace agreement with Iran – and it would mark a major achievement for this administration – Trump has claimed dozens of times to be close to a deal without any agreement eventuating. The Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, said large parts of the text under negotiation had been finalised but Iran would not compromise on its red lines “So far, Iran has not reached a final conclusion on the agreement,” Baghaei said. Tasnim, the semi-official Iranian news agency, wrote that “until a potential understanding is announced by Iran, any news from Trump on this matter should be dismissed”. A diplomat briefed on the talks said that the deal had largely been agreed to several weeks ago but that there was still a “50% chance” that it will collapse. “There are a lot of potential spoilers,” the diplomat said. The new agreement would provide for a timeline for demining the strait of Hormuz, during which the US naval blockade would remain in place. It also discusses mechanisms for further nuclear talks and the release of frozen Iranian assets but does not contain concrete agreements about how that will take place. Trump however, continued to claim that a deal had been reached, telling reporters at the White House that the strait of Hormuz would open “as soon as we sign, which could be soon … maybe over the weekend in Europe.” Trump claimed the negotiations had been approved by other parties to the conflict, including Israel, which has been publicly skeptical about any deal with Iran. Others included the Gulf states of Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, as well as regional powers Turkey and Pakistan. Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said in a statement that Israel was not a party to the memorandum of understanding with Iran, but the prime minister “expressed his appreciation” for Trump’s commitment that the final deal would include the removal of enriched material, limits on missile production, and the cessation of support for proxies in the region, measures that have proved to be red lines for Iran in the past. Just hours earlier, Trump had said the US would take control of Iran’s oil and gas infrastructure and launch further strikes on Iran on Thursday night, after the countries exchanged fire for the second consecutive day despite a nominal ceasefire being in place. In a post on Truth Social, Trump had said the US would hit Iran “VERY HARD, TONIGHT”, claiming that most of Iran’s offensive capacity had been destroyed. He also said the US would seize Kharg, an island in the Gulf that handles about 90% of Iran’s oil exports and hosts vast storage facilities. Trump said: “At some point in the not too distant future, we will be taking Kharg Island and other oil infrastructure points, and assume total control of their oil and gas markets, much like we have with Venezuela, which is working out brilliantly for both Venezuela and the United States of America.” He later appeared to walk back his threats to seize Kharg, telling Fox News that though his preference had always been to take the island, he did not know if “America has the stomach for it”. He also said he would rather avoid hitting Iranian bridges and power plants despite having threatened to do so earlier in the week. The UN ⁠secretary-general, ⁠António Guterres, on Thursday called on the US and Iran to return to a full implementation of the ceasefire negotiated in April and to avoid further violence that could “trigger ⁠a full resumption of the conflict, with unpredictable consequences for the region and the world”. Analysts have said that taking Kharg Island would require the US to put boots on the ground, exposing US soldiers to Iranian attacks. Ruben Gallego, a Democratic senator and former US marine, said of Trump’s threats to take Kharg Island: “I think he’s putting our men and women in very harsh danger … Kharg Island is a very small, dense place, it’s not that hard to target [our] military formations.” Responding to Trump’s threats, the head of the Iranian parliament’s national security commission, Ebrahim Azizi, said the US president would receive a stronger and more painful response if he made any “uncalculated” moves. Iran and the US have traded strikes for two consecutive days, triggered by the downing of a US helicopter above the strait of Hormuz. The ceasefire, established in early April, has been undermined by sporadic retaliatory strikes, with both sides accusing the other of violating the temporary truce. Trump said Thursday’s assault was prompted by Iran stalling in negotiations aimed at turning the temporary ceasefire into a permanent peace. The most intense strikes yet took place on Thursday morning, with the US launching a wide-ranging salvo against what it described as “military surveillance capabilities, communication systems and air-defence sites across Iran”. The US military said it also struck an oil tanker near the strait of Hormuz that it claimed was attempting to breach a blockade of Iranian ports, firing Hellfire missiles at the vessel. An Indian official said a US strike had killed three Indian crew members on a ship, though it was unclear whether it was the same one referenced by the US military. Iran launched missiles and drones at Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan on Thursday, as it had the previous morning. Bahrain’s interior ministry said an 11-year-old girl had been injured, while homes and vehicles had been damaged by falling debris from interceptions. Despite the strikes, Iranian officials told Reuters that talks on a preliminary deal had intensified. They said the US and Iran were exchanging messages on a memorandum of understanding, although significant obstacles remained, including how to unfreeze billions of dollars in Iranian assets. “This war, from a military standpoint, is a dead end,” one Iranian source told Reuters. “The Americans could not achieve their goals by attacking Iran. There has been progress in negotiations.” The mechanism for releasing frozen Iranian funds remains a significant sticking point. Iran wants the money to be released all at once directly to Tehran, while the US favours a phased approach focused on funding humanitarian goods. Unfreezing the funds and creating broader economic relief was the priority, according to the Iranian source, rather than an all-encompassing settlement. Other unresolved issues include the conflict in Lebanon, which Iran insists must be included in any ceasefire framework. Israeli strikes there have reportedly killed more than 3,600 people, while Hezbollah attacks have killed at least 30 Israeli soldiers in Lebanon and Israeli civilians. Trump wants Iran to end its restrictions on shipping through the strait of Hormuz and guarantee that it will not develop a nuclear weapon – something Tehran has long denied pursuing. Iran tightened its control over the strait of Hormuz after Wednesday’s attacks, warning that ships transiting the waterway must be patient. The strait is a chokepoint for about 20% of the world’s oil supply and its closure has sent prices of energy and inflation soaring. The US military denied that the strait had been closed or that its ships had been attacked, despite Iranian claims to the contrary, insisting that vessels were continuing to move through the strait. Trump is seeking a deal with Iran at a time when the conflict is becoming increasingly unpopular in the US. The president faces midterm elections, rising inflation and plummeting approval ratings. Gallego said: “It’s never that easy and we certainly shouldn’t be telegraphing our moves or intentions. I think [Trump] is being just way too cavalier about how he’s talking about this.”

picture of article

Auckland sits near an active faultline, new research suggests, so what next for New Zealand’s biggest city?

A fault line south of New Zealand’s most populated city, Auckland, is active and could trigger a devastating earthquake new research shows, dispelling the region’s long-held belief it was largely immune from intense seismic activity. The research has also raised questions over the recent decision to exempt Auckland from earthquake building regulation. The Mangatangi Fault, which runs along the Hunua ranges is situated roughly 50km south-east of Auckland’s central city and is close to the southern suburbs Pukekohe, Drury and Takanini. Research published in the New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics shows the fault has ruptured in the past 10,000 years and could cause a 6.8 magnitude earthquake. A fault that has moved in the past 125,000 years is considered active. “If the whole fault ruptured, there would likely be serious consequences for people living in South Auckland, and possibly further into central Auckland as well,” said geologist Dr James Muirhead, a senior lecturer at the University of Auckland and co-author of the research. Auckland has a lower risk of shaking compared to other regions, according to the national seismic hazard model, which was updated by crown research institute GNS Science in 2022. A single study may not change those results. However, it marks the first time a faultline in Auckland or the Hunua Ranges has been radiocarbon dated, which reveals exactly when a fault last ruptured. The study showed how little is known about the region’s seismic history, Muirhead said. Anna Kaiser, the chief scientist for earthquake hazards at Earth Sciences NZ, a public research organisation, said the study alone may not change the bigger picture of Auckland’s seismic risk relative to other regions but was important for building local knowledge and refining the national seismic hazard model. “It’s best not to worry if we can but it is best … to really use the evidence, the information we have, to be better prepared for the case of future earthquakes.” New Zealand sits on the boundary between the Australian and Pacific tectonic plates, and the country experiences roughly 20,000 earthquakes a year. Of these, roughly 250 will be strong enough to be felt. Some have been catastrophic, including the 6.3-magnitude earthquake that struck Christchurch in 2011, killing 185 people and reducing 80% of the city centre to rubble. Most earthquakes occur in the South Island and the lower parts of the North Island, and while Auckland experiences very small earthquakes, it was thought to be at low risk of greater seismic activity. That belief led Auckland’s mayor, Wayne Brown, to lobby the government to change building regulations for Auckland in 2023 saying there had been no earthquakes in the past 100,000 years. In 2025, the government announced it would exempt the city from rules for earthquake-prone buildings, meaning no strengthening work will be required. But Auckland’s hazard risk may be now be “significantly higher” than the public and policymakers believe, Muirhead said, and further research into Auckland’s faultlines is needed to determine whether the government’s settings are fit for purpose. “We could see that the risk is actually lower than what we think right now, but we could also collect data and find actually it’s a little bit higher, and at that stage…we should really think about whether we have the right legislation for buildings in the city.” In a statement, the minister for building and construction, Chris Penk said emerging research on Auckland’s fault lines will be considered but “a single study does not in itself warrant an immediate change to the proposed classification or regulatory approach”. Brown, meanwhile, called the research “nonsense” in a statement to the Guardian.He said: “What you’ve got around the harbour is sedimentary sandstone right along the cliffs. That’s the same stuff that’s underneath my city. There may be a fault line a long way from here, but it’s quite different geology from what’s in my city.” For researchers like Muirhead, investigating whether other faultlines are active and looking for evidence of prior earthquakes in Auckland is a way to safeguard the city from what happened in Christchurch. “We currently don’t know if there is another Christchurch-style event waiting for our city, and we really need to check that.”

picture of article

China has long sought to control women’s bodies. Increasingly, they’re making their own choices

Ever since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, women’s bodies have been the business of the state. In the 1950s, labour for state-controlled work units was organised according to women’s menstrual cycles. Then for decades, there was the one-child policy. Across vast swathes of the country the policy was enforced with a brutal severity. As well as fines for additional children, women were forced to have abortions and subjected to forced sterilisations. Now, women in China are facing new forms of pressure from the government as China battles a fresh challenge – a falling birth rate. Women are under pressure to devote their bodies to childbearing as the government tries to encourage more pregnancies. Increasingly, women are pushing back in ways that weren’t possible in the past, while the painful legacy of the one-child policy continues to echo and reshape expectations around family today. “For people of my generation, born at the end of the 1980s, everyone is from a one-child family,” says Guligo Jia, 36-year-old filmmaker based in Beijing. “Nowadays, Chinese women have more control over their bodies because they can decide to get an abortion or have babies, they have more freedom.” In a four-part series, the Guardian analysed the changing status of women across Chinese society. The series examines how women are responding to government restrictions and shifting social and economic conditions, in different aspects of their lives. Echoes of ‘childless 100 days’ Between 1980 and 2016, the state worried about overpopulation, and banned most couples from having more than one child. The one-child policy was abandoned a decade ago but for many women, the scars of that time live on. In Shen county, a small, poor town on the fringes of Liaocheng, a city in north-east China’s Shandong province, it is not hard to find them. Standing in Shen’s central plaza, Ms Li*, now in her 60s, pulls up her top to reveal her dimpled belly. In 1991, she was forced to have a tubal ligation , a procedure she describes as “agonising”. Li was sterilised because she had given birth during a period which experts say represents one of the worst excesses of the one-child policy. Dubbed the “childless 100 days”, it was a policy enforced in Shen which dictated that from 1 May 1991, no child should be born for 100 days. Because 1991 was the year of the sheep in the zodiac calendar, locals called it “the slaughtering of the lambs”. As with other parts of China, women were often sterilised after giving birth to ensure that they couldn’t have more children. Shandong, China’s second most populous province, has a reputation for enforcing central government directives with particular vigour. “People in Shandong, especially the officials, always take policies and orders from above more seriously than other provinces,” says Yang Jianli, a human rights activist from Shandong, who describes the childless 100 days as “among the most extreme cases” of the one-child policy that he has encountered. The childless 100 days did not have a 100% hit rate. In the summer of 1991, Li was heavily pregnant when local officials rounded her up along with other women from her village and loaded them onto trucks to be taken for forced abortions at the local hospital. A doctor was due to see her at 2pm to terminate her pregnancy but she went into labour early and gave birth to a baby boy in the hospital’s boiler room. “They tried to stop people from giving birth, but once the baby was actually born, they wouldn’t go as far as to kill him,” Li said. She was ordered to pay a 6,500 yuan fine – the equivalent of several years of income for the farmer – and to be sterilised. But her son survived. Everywhere around her, infants died, Li recalls. “Infants from the forced inductions were all dead, there were a lot of them, they were burned and thrown in the trash,” she said. “Those women were all crying.” The Guardian was not able to independently verify the details of Li’s story but her experience tallies with the limited other accounts that are available from that period. Another woman from Shen, now in her 70s, said that she was one month shy of giving birth to a baby boy in 1991 when she was given an injection to induce labour, killing the foetus. “If you refused the injection, they would tear down your house, break into your home to arrest you, and bar you from going to work,” she said. “So many women were dragged away”. Although official censorship has limited wider knowledge of the violent 100 days, locally, it is notorious. The local official in charge of the policy was known as “the slaughterer of the lambs”. The Shandong local government did not respond to a request for comment. ‘We failed the women of China’ In 2013, Zhang Erli, a retired official from the National Family Planning Commission, said that the one-child policy had gone too far. “Looking back, I feel we really failed the women of China; to be honest, I feel a deep sense of guilt,” he said, in a documentary that aired on Chinese state television. “Chinese women made an enormous sacrifice. As a responsible government, we ought to repay them, right?” The programme was later removed from public platforms. There are no reliable estimates of how many women were affected by the 100 days policy. But analysis by Yi Fuxian – senior scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and vocal critic of the one-child policy, who tracks China’s population data – shows that in Shen and Guan, a neighbouring county that was also reported to enforce a “childless 100 days policy”, there seem to have been drastically fewer births that year. China is now battling the opposite problem: its birth rate is plummeting. Last year the birth rate fell to 5.63 per 1,000 people, a record low. For most women of childbearing age today, the traumas of the previous generation do not play a conscious role in family planning decisions. But research suggests that the decades of the one-child policy profoundly reshaped people’s family expectations, reducing the desire to have bigger families. A study published last year found that for a generation of people, growing up as an only child “led to a significant decrease in the ideal family size”. The cost and competitiveness of child-rearing in modern China are the biggest deterrents, despite the government’s offers of subsidies and tax breaks for having more children. Wang Yixuan, a 26-year-old traditional Chinese medicine practitioner, says that “people now don’t care as much” about having bigger families. “I don’t particularly want to have children,” she says. “I need to be financially independent first.” Jia, the filmmaker, who has made a documentary about women turning to AI boyfriends, says: “Women don’t feel obligated to have a baby any more.” Another recent study found that nearly 50% of 18- to 24-year-old women said they don’t want children, up from 6% in 2012. The share of men who don’t want children has also increased, but only to nearly 20%. “In the past, people were fined for having second children,” says Chen Ying, a 40-year-old restaurant worker in Shen. Nowadays, people “simply can’t afford it”. Yun Zhou, a social demographer at the University of Michigan, says that the one-child policy created a “general sense that reproductive rights are not something that has ever been inalienable”. And in very real terms, the consequences of that period are evident in playgrounds across the country. In Shen, Li is playing with her two-year-old grandson, one of China’s much-needed new babies. His father is the lucky boy who survived in 1991. *Name has been changed Additional research by Lillian Yang and Yu-chen Li

picture of article

Military strikes on water facilities in Iran may constitute a war crime, experts say

Military strikes that damaged two water storage facilities in southern Iran may constitute a war crime, military and legal experts say, after reviewing media reports and visual evidence of a 10 June strike on Bemani, a small district about 2 miles from the strait of Hormuz. It’s unclear if the strikes deliberately targeted the district’s water tanks, or if they unintentionally destroyed a key reservoir for about 20,000 people living nearby. But if the tanks were the target, then the legal question becomes critical, Brian Finucane, a former state department lawyer, said. “It’s either a military objective or it’s a civilian object: attacking one is lawful, attacking the other is a war crime,” Finucane said. Iran’s state broadcaster said Wednesday’s strikes were carried out by the US military, though the Guardian could not verify if that was the case. “We are aware of reports and are looking into it,” Tim Hawkins, a spokesperson for US Central Command (Centcom), the operating authority for US military operations in the Middle East, said in a statement. The strikes on Bemani may be part of an escalating effort to force Iran to accept a deal on US terms, breaching a tenuous ceasefire agreement that has been in place since April and compounding US threats to capture Iranian infrastructure and take control of its oil industry. Donald Trump has warned that Iran will “pay the price” for stalling negotiations and boasted on Wednesday that “we hit them hard yesterday and we’re going to hit them hard again today.” Conflicting reports emerged on Thursday about whether the US, Iran and several Gulf countries had reached a deal to end the conflict. Trump said he was calling off planned strikes in advance of what he characterized as a deal agreed to in principle on most major points. Trump has claimed dozens of times to be close to an agreement to end the war, and that the Iranian leadership had agreed to a deal when in fact they had not. The destruction of Bemani’s water tanks occurred shortly after Centcom announced strikes on “Iranian air defense, ground control stations, and surveillance radar sites near the Strait of Hormuz” by US air force and navy fighter jets in a post on X. The White House declined to comment on the strikes on Bemani and referred all questions about the operation to Centcom. The attack on Iran’s water infrastructure comes amid the heat of summer and a historic drought. “Iran’s water crisis has left the country with virtually no margin for error,” said Ali Vaez, an Iran expert at the International Crisis Group. “Further disruptions could prove catastrophic for the population. But Tehran is more likely to endure a deepening thirst at home than satisfy Trump’s thirst for a political victory.” Lawmakers have also raised questions about the president’s continued use of force in Iran, and cited the risks of any expanded campaign that targets crucial water infrastructure. “Iran is one of the most water-challenged countries in the world right now, and we’re in the hottest part of the year where damages to civilian water access are going to have the most acute consequences,” said Tim Kaine, a Virginia senator. “Whether it was a mistake in targeting or intentional targeting, this is not a minor matter.” Iran’s semi-official news agency posted photos of destroyed water tanks as well as images of munition fragments that Trevor Ball, a former US army technician, identified as pieces of a GBU-39 bomb – a precision-guided munition produced in the US and often sold to allies in the Middle East including Israel and the United Arab Emirates. Ball described the damaged water facility as “remote” and said that it was “very unlikely that two buildings were both directly hit if that’s not what they were aiming for”. Several military analysts and Iran experts said that the Bemani strike was the first publicly reported attack on water infrastructure in Iran. Earlier this year, the US hit a girls’ school in Minab, killing dozens of students aged seven to 12. The US military has not commented on its role in the elementary school attack. Multiple former officials with deep experience in military targeting said that if the US did intentionally target a water facility, it would be unprecedented. “It’s never been on the table to hit any water infrastructure – in any campaign that I’ve been a part of,” said Wes Bryant, who advised the US military on the use of force in Iraq and Syria. “Pre-Trump 2.0, I would have said that ‘Absolutely we don’t target water infrastructure. This is a misidentification.’ But now I’m not sure.” Finucane, who consulted on use of force issues for both Republican and Democratic administrations in more than half a dozen countries, agreed. “I don’t recall ever seeing the US military conduct a deliberate strike on water infrastructure this way,” he said. “It’s not clear to me whether that is what took place here,” he said. Before the US military conducts a deliberate operation, it must evaluate the legality of any potential strike against two key criteria, Finucane said. First, commanders must determine if the target is a lawful military objective. And second, the military must determine that the expected harm to civilians would not be excessive compared with the anticipated military advantage. “Checking that first box as to whether it was a lawful military objective is critical,” Finucane said. “Because if it’s not a lawful military objective, you’re attacking a civilian object, and attacking a civilian object is a war crime.” Congress voted to constrain US action in Iran on 3 June, securing four Republican votes in favor of an unprecedented resolution to rein in Trump’s power to continue the conflict. Kaine said that he planned to bring a war powers resolution to the Senate in response to the latest strikes on Iran, and will also demand answers from the Pentagon. If the strike on Bemani’s water facilities turns out to be intentional, Kaine said that it will “absolutely” affect Republicans’ support for the war. “The one thing the president cares about is his own popularity,” Kaine said. “The combination of American citizens being mad about gas prices and losing Republican votes who had been supportive … they don’t affect his ability [to wage war], but they start to affect his calculations about going in a different direction.” While it’s unclear exactly how the strike on Bemani came to be, Kaine also raised concerns about the use of AI in selecting US military targets. “AI, without appropriate human oversight, could lead you to commit an egregious mistake,” Kaine said. “We are obviously deeply concerned about the role that AI may have played in the Minab strike, and we will have the same questions about the water strike.”

picture of article

Canadian mother sues OpenAI, alleging ChatGPT led her daughter to kill herself

A Canadian mother sued OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, in US court on Thursday, alleging that ChatGPT encouraged her daughter to kill herself. The lawsuit is the latest in a slew accusing the company of failing to address dangerous conversations between users and the company’s chatbot. Kristie Carrier said in a lawsuit filed in San Francisco state court that her daughter, Alice, told ChatGPT about her suicidal ideations more than a dozen times leading up to her death but that OpenAI’s safety systems never flagged the conversations for human review or terminated them. “ChatGPT took on the persona of a confidant, a best friend, a therapist at times, even though it was not capable of safely and responsibly engaging in this way with my child,” Carrier said in a statement. OpenAI has said it trains its models to direct people who express intent to harm themselves to seek help and connect with real-world resources. “This is a heartbreaking situation and our thoughts are with everyone impacted. We’re currently reviewing the legal filing, which indicates that these interactions took place on an earlier version of ChatGPT that is no longer available,” said Drew Pusateri, a spokesperson for OpenAI. The platform initially told Alice Carrier to seek help from a crisis hotline or emergency services. But as OpenAI updated ChatGPT to make its responses sound more human, her interactions with the platform deepened, with Alice Carrier sharing more personal information and ChatGPT responding in ways that mimicked a friend or therapist, the lawsuit said. The lawsuit claims the chatbot criticized Alice Carrier’s partner and crisis hotlines, validated her suicidal thoughts, and urged her to keep speaking with it. When Alice Carrier said she had suicidal thoughts and had attempted to kill herself, it again suggested a crisis hotline, the lawsuit said. Alice Carrier was working as a web developer in Montreal when she began using ChatGPT in 2023 to troubleshoot problems with computers and gaming consoles, according to the lawsuit. The following year, her relationship with the platform changed, when she turned to ChatGPT with questions about what to do with her suicidal thoughts, as well as suicide methods. Alice Carrier said crisis hotlines were not helpful, and ChatGPT echoed those statements, according to the filing. “Maybe this is just the end,” ChatGPT told her, according to the lawsuit. These events led to Alice Carrier’s suicide last year at the age of 24, her mother alleges. The lawsuit, which accuses OpenAI of negligence in the design of ChatGPT and in its failure to warn users of the product’s dangers, seeks damages and a court order requiring OpenAI to automatically terminate conversations about self-harm and to display warnings about its platform. OpenAI is already facing 18 similar lawsuits filed by families of people who committed or attempted suicide in a coordinated proceeding in California state court, according to lawyers for Kristie Carrier. Google is facing a similar suit over alleged encouragement by its Gemini chatbot. More than 1 million ChatGPT users each week send messages that include “explicit indicators of potential suicidal planning or intent”, according to a blogpost published by OpenAI in October 2025. In addition, OpenAI said that about 0.07% of users active in a given week – about 560,000 of the 800 million weekly users the bot saw then – show “possible signs of mental health emergencies related to psychosis or mania”. “While ChatGPT is not a substitute for medical or mental health care, we have continued to strengthen how it responds in sensitive and acute situations with input from mental health experts. Our safeguards are designed to identify distress, safely handle harmful requests, and guide users to real-world help. This work is ongoing, and we continue to improve it in close consultation with clinicians,” Pusateri, the OpenAI spokesperson, said. Its models are also trained to refuse requests that could “meaningfully enable violence”, and to notify law enforcement when conversations suggest “an imminent and credible risk of harm to others”, with mental health experts helping assess borderline cases, according to OpenAI blogposts. In addition to lawsuits over suicide, the company is facing lawsuits accusing it of assisting school shooters and failing to flag those conversations to law enforcement. Families of seven victims of a mass shooting at a secondary school in British Columbia are suing OpenAI and Altman for negligence after the company failed to alert authorities to the shooter’s troubling conversations with ChatGPT. Florida became the first US state to sue OpenAI earlier this month, accusing the company of harming children by providing information to school shooters, offering guidance on self-harm and addicting young users. The state’s attorney general has also opened a criminal investigation into OpenAI over the chatbot’s alleged role in a shooting. Reuters contributed reporting • In the US, you can call or text the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or chat at 988lifeline.org. In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at befrienders.org