Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Ukraine war live: Trump envoy Steve Witkoff set to meet Vladimir Putin in Moscow amid US push for peace deal

Ahead of Putin-Witkoff meeting in Moscow, lots of attention is focusing on the Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk, an important logistics hub in the eastern Donetsk region, which Moscow claimed to have captured, AFP noted. But the Ukrainian military says the fighting in the city continues, with Ukrainians reportedly controlling the northern part of the city, and Russians – the souther part. “Search and assault operations and the elimination of the enemy in urban areas continue in Pokrovsk,” the Ukrainian military’s eastern command wrote on social media, claiming Russian troops that planted a flag in the town’s centre had been beaten back. The fight over the city comes amid Russian attempts to argue that its forces are making inevitable progress on the battlefield, putting more pressure on Kyiv to agree to a peace deal. Reuters noted that Russia wants to take the whole of the Donbas region, which comprises the Luhansk and Donetsk provinces. Ukraine still controls about 10% of Donbas – an area of about 5,000 sq km (1,930 sq miles) in mostly northern Donetsk. Capturing Pokrovsk and Kostiantynivka to its northeast, which Russian forces are also trying to envelop, would give Moscow a platform to drive north towards the two biggest remaining Ukrainian-controlled cities in Donetsk – Kramatorsk and Sloviansk. The agency noted that Pokrovsk would be Moscow’s most important single territorial gain inside Ukraine since it took the ruined city of Avdiivka in early 2024. But Russia has been threatening Pokrovsk for more than a year. Instead of its full-frontal assaults in earlier battles, such as the bloody campaign for the similar-sized city of Bakhmut, Russia’s military has been using a pincer movement to gradually encircle Pokrovsk and threaten Ukrainian supply lines, Reuters noted.

picture of article

Death toll from Indonesia floods passes 750 as one million evacuated

The number of people killed by floods and landslides on Indonesia’s Sumatra island rose to 753 on Tuesday, the disaster agency said, with 504 people missing. The toll was a sharp increase from the 604 dead reported by the agency on Monday. Heavy monsoon rains and tropical cyclones have devastated parts of Asia this week, including Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Southern Thailand, killing more than 1,300 people across the region, destroying infrastructure and inundating towns. In Indonesia alone, 3.2 million people have been affected by the floods, while 2,600 have been injured. One million people have been evacuated from high-risk areas. Aid workers and response teams are racing to reach survivors, but have been hampered by blocked roads and broken bridges, and some areas of northern Sumatra remain inaccessible by road. In Aceh, one of the hardest hit areas, markets are running out of rice, vegetables and other essentials, and prices have tripled, according to Islamic Relief, which is sending 12 tons of emergency food aid. “Communities across Aceh are at severe risk of food shortages and hunger if supply lines are not re-established in the next seven days,” the charity said. The Indonesian government said on Monday it was sending 34,000 tons of rice and 6.8m litres of cooking oil to Aceh, as well as the provinces North Sumatra and West Sumatra. The World Health Organization said it was deploying rapid response teams and critical supplies to the region, and strengthening disease surveillance. The agency’s chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told reporters in Geneva that it was “another reminder of how climate change is driving more frequent and more extreme weather events, with disastrous effects”. Survivors, many of whom are staying in evacuation shelters, have described how powerful currents of water arrived rapidly and submerged villages. “We didn’t think we would survive that night because the situation was so chaotic. Everyone was thinking about saving themselves. There was no prior warning whatsoever before the water came,” said Gahitsa Zahira Cahyani, 17, a student at an Islamic boarding school. Hundreds of students from the school ran out in the night to flee to safety, some of them clinging to trees and the mosque’s roof. The season’s monsoons often bring heavy rains that can trigger landslides and floods, but this year’s downpours were compounded by a rare tropical storm formed in the Malacca Strait, devastating parts of Sumatra and Southern Thailand, where 181 people were killed. Sri Lanka has also faced catastrophic flooding and landslides, caused by a separate storm Cyclone Ditwah. It has killed 410, while another 336 remain missing. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has declared a state of emergency to deal with what he called the “most challenging natural disaster in our history”. Rains have eased across the country, but landslide alerts remain in force across most of the hardest-hit central region, officials said. AFP contributed to this report.

picture of article

‘We have to rebuild from scratch’: Sri Lankans relive the devastation of Cyclone Ditwah

When the rains began, Layani Rasika Niroshani was not worried. The 36-year-old mother of two was used to the heavy monsoon showers that drench Sri Lanka’s hilly central region of Badulla every year. But as it kept pounding down without stopping, the family started to feel jittery. Some relocated to a relative’s house, but her brother and his wife decided to stay behind to collect the valuables. As they were inside, a landslide hit the family home. “By some miracle, my brother managed to pull her out of the house through a broken window,” said Niroshani. “They weren’t able to take a single thing out. We were all very scared.” The house was destroyed as it was engulfed with mud and debris, taking all their family possessions with it; one of hundreds of thousands of homes destroyed by Cyclone Ditwah, the worst natural disaster to hit Sri Lanka in decades. By Tuesday, the death toll across the island was confirmed as 410. In Badulla alone, 71 people were confirmed dead and a further 53 were still missing. “Our home was buried under the earth,” said Niroshani. She and fellow villagers had spent the past two days digging in the mud, trying to salvage any of their belongings, but only managing to retrieve a few kitchen pots and some clothes. “My family is in shock. We have to rebuild from scratch. Sometimes that’s even worse than living,” she said. The scale of the damage caused by Cyclone Ditwah is still unclear, but in a speech on Sunday night, Sri Lanka’s president, Anura Kumara Dissanayake, described it as the “largest and most challenging natural disaster in our history”. Villages across the island were decimated and many homes, schools and businesses still remained under water on Monday, including across the capital Colombo. Helicopters were dispatched to the worst-affected areas to try to drop food and other essential supplies to those stranded. According to the country’s Disaster Management Centre, more than 1.1 million people had been affected by the cyclone’s impact. As the country’s emergency and rescue services were overwhelmed, the military was deployed to help rescue efforts. Kantharuban Prashanth, 32, a school teacher, said he was helping to shelter more than 125 families at a school in Badulla who had been displaced in the flooding since Thursday. “They are very vulnerable and in need of help for about four days now,” he said. “All we received were dry rations that we cook here in the school. All of them share just one toilet. But these families can’t return to their homes because it is not safe. There are cracks in their homes, it is very risky to go back there. We need help.” The damage wrought on Sri Lanka was particularly devastating for the island of 22 million people, which is still recovering from economic collapse in 2022 that left the country bankrupt and restricted access to even basic foods and medicine. Sri Lanka also relies heavily on western tourism as a vital source of income and the industry seems likely to have been hit hard by the impact of the cyclone. Officials have warned that the death toll could still rise, with more than 360 people still missing and some areas still yet to be accessed by rescue teams. Further rain is also forecast for this week, which could further exacerbate the flooding. Siriyalatha Adhikari, a 74-year-old living in Biyagama in western Sri Lanka, said she had lost everything in the cyclone. “We didn’t have time to remove anything from the house. Everything happened so fast. Our whole house was under water, we didn’t think it would flood so quickly,” she said. In Ratnapura, a city in a southern district which was among the areas worst hit, small rescue boats traversed the flood waters, helping people stranded on rooftops and trees. Many complained they had been given no warning to evacuate, despite the threat of rising rivers as the cyclone brought on heavy rains. JA Nilanthi, 45, said her family had watched as the Kalu river in Ratnapura started to rise dangerously on Thursday, until it broke its banks. She said they had received no warning from officials or orders to relocate, even as the water hit dangerously high levels. “We didn’t sleep the whole night because it was raining continuously. No one told us to evacuate. Around six in the morning when families in the village started packing and leaving their homes we did too,” she said. The only thing her family managed to move from the house before it flooded was the fridge. For the next two days, they all sheltered on the roof of an empty house. “We were on the top of this house for two days with flood water on either side of the house. We were trapped there. We didn’t have anything to eat, not even a drop of water,” she said. “I have never been this scared my whole life.” The water started to subside on Sunday and Nilanthi’s family went back to see what remained of their home. When they arrived, they were horrified. “We went home, nothing was left. Our sofa, cupboards, plates, and even our clothes – all covered in thick mud,” said Nilanthi. “Life ahead is tough but I am thankful we managed to get to safety in time.”

picture of article

Tuesday briefing: What’s next for the resurgent space race?

Good morning. This week Glasgow hosts one of the UK’s largest ever gatherings of the space industry at Space-Comm. With representatives of Nasa, the UK and Scottish governments and the UK space agency among 2,000 space leaders gathering there, it is a chance for people in the commercial supply chain of the space exploration industry to meet policy makers and space agencies. It comes at a crucial moment in the exploration – and exploitation – of space. For almost three decades the International Space Station (ISS) has bound the US and Russia into cooperation and shared interests. That project is nearing its end, and we can expect to see a realignment of missions and goals – which may bring states and scientists into conflict. For today’s newsletter, I spoke to Ian Sample, the Guardian’s science editor, to find out what the next few years of a resurgent and competitive space race might look like, why humans seem set on going back to the moon, and why all that is making some scientists angry. But first, the headlines. Five big stories Politics | Britain’s budget watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility, has said the early leak of its budget documents before Rachel Reeves made her speech last week, was the “worst failure” in its 15-year history, as its chair resigned and it emerged a similar leak had happened earlier this year. Health | The World Health Organization has urged countries to make weight loss drugs more accessible and pharmaceutical companies to lower their prices, saying jabs including Mounjaro represent a “new chapter” in the fight against obesity. Ukraine | The coming days may be “pivotal” for talks to end the war in Ukraine, the EU’s top diplomat said, as Volodymyr Zelenskyy met Emmanuel Macron in Paris on Monday and the US envoy Steve Witkoff flew out to meet Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Tuesday. Donald Trump | Donald Trump said he “wouldn’t have wanted” a second strike that the US military reportedly conducted on a boat in the Caribbean that it believed to be ferrying drugs, killing survivors of an initial missile attack. The UN human rights chief, Volker Türk, has urged Washington to investigate, saying there was “strong evidence” of “extrajudicial” killings. Asia-Pacific | Sri Lanka and Indonesia have deployed military personnel to help victims of the torrential floods that have killed 1,100 in four countries in Asia. Heavy cyclones and tropical monsoon rains have hit the region in recent days. In depth: ‘We really are in new territory’ When I was a child, as well as my space Lego – which I still have (pictured above) – I owned a battered paperback with transcripts of the Apollo 11 mission comms and a potted history of the space race. I pored over it again and again, admiring the bravery and derring-do of the likes of Yuri Gagarin, Valentina Tereshkova, Alan Shepard, Alexei Leonov and, of course, the poor dog Laika. “I think this new post-ISS world is going to be really interesting,” Ian Sample told me. “We really are in new territory.” The shift is fundamental. Decades of enforced cooperation – astronauts sharing cramped modules, jointly performing joint repairs and representing two superpowers dependent on one another’s rockets – are coming to an end as the ISS retires. What replaces it isn’t yet clear, but it will not be a single international project but a splintering into parallel alliances with competing goals. *** The new space alliances shaping up With the ISS programme drawing to a close in 2030 – and with diplomatic fault lines caused by the invasion of Ukraine among other topics – Russia is turning away from its cooperation with Nasa and towards working with the Chinese. “Russia has got the rocket capability,” Ian explained, “while China has been doing some amazing stuff. They are super-competent.” The two countries are now presenting themselves as a single lunar power bloc, planning joint missions, joint infrastructure and even a shared lunar research station. On the other side sit the US, Europe, Canada and Japan, who are developing their own orbiting platform and surface programmes under the Artemis umbrella. Donald Trump has been urging Nasa to return Americans to the moon as quickly as possible, and recently declared that the US space programme is about “building strength, expanding freedom, and ensuring that the American flag remains the ultimate symbol of leadership across the final frontier”. It is chiefly geopolitics, not science, behind the wheel. The striking thing, Ian said, is that both coalitions are broadly attempting the same thing – a permanent human presence on and around the moon – but will do it separately, with separate stations, separate landing sites and separate rules of engagement. *** Man’s return to the moon Ian said both sides are working towards the same basic architecture: an orbiting lunar way station where crews can dock, swap in and out, and descend to the surface. “You fly to the moon, you dock there, put your new crew in,” he said. “They go down to the surface. You take the old crew back.” It does all sound a little like the journeys to the moon in the future world portrayed in Arthur C Clarke and Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey – just several decades later. On the surface itself, nations are weighing up everything from inflatable habitats to simple structures built by heating and compressing lunar soil. “You could pile up loads of lunar soil to make a sort of igloo,” Ian said, “or try to make bricks. Or you take inflatable structures and just pop them up when you get there.” Much of this would be prepared in advance by robotic missions that deliver equipment and assemble infrastructure long before any astronauts arrive. *** The ‘vague’ commercial incentive The moon is far away and expensive to get to, and people will want to see a return on investment. So, at the risk of sounding foolish, I asked Ian what are the commercial opportunities people see with the moon. He said the economic case is still “vague”, but several ideas are driving interest. One is the extraction of minerals such as rare earth elements, which are essential for electronics and clean-energy technologies. But the immediate commercial push, he said, is really regarding logistics. “Nasa is funding loads of companies to send stuff to the moon so there’s a private sector that can do lunar missions.” Lower launch costs could eventually make extraction or manufacturing viable – but “that’s the long game”. *** Isn’t this all just a self-indulgent waste of carbon? In an era of fossil-fuelled climate crisis, there are questions about whether space exploration is the right investment for the planet – especially when someone like pop singer Katy Perry (above) is being briefly hoisted to the edge of space by Jeff Bezos for publicity. Ian said the counterargument from scientists and agencies is that investment in space technology has often produced breakthroughs with environmental benefits on Earth – from more efficient solar cells to satellite climate monitoring. Some even argue that the moon’s resources could eventually support cleaner energy systems at home. One isotope, Helium-3, is rare on Earth but in abundance on the moon, and some scientists have theorised it could provide safer nuclear energy in a fusion reactor, since it is not radioactive. This is all still in the realms of theory though. Another reason countries are willing to expend this carbon centres on the question of how do you divide up territory on the moon. It could end up similar to the governance of the Antarctic – which is collectively maintained by the Atlantic treaty, with nobody owning it outright, but nations having designated spheres of influence where they can carry out scientific work. “Whatever rules will be drawn up on apportioning resources, who gets to work where, what permissions there are, how you carve up the moon, you’ve got to be there to be taken seriously in those debates,” Ian said. “That’s why China and Russia and the US are really keen to get there, so they can demonstrate they have a stake and set the agenda.” *** Why is all this making some scientists uneasy? “There’s some really interesting science to do on the moon, but those locations could get destroyed,” Ian said. He cited ancient and pristine bits of the moon where we might learn interesting things about the makeup and formation of our only natural satellite. “Or what is probably more interesting is if they want to build instruments up there. If you build a radio telescope on the far side of the moon, you’re using the moon to shield all the radio wave noise from Earth. You can then point your telescope into space and it is in what they call a radio quiet environment. You’d be able to detect really sensitive stuff.” “But obviously,” he said “it’s a real drag if someone then lands next to you and starts drilling or building a lunar theme park.” When I was reading that battered paperback about the heady days of the 1950s and 1960s space race, that younger version of me firmly believed that we would be able to fly to the moon on commercial space liners by 2025. That possibility seems a long way off yet. But it does seem that, after an absence of more than 50 years, that child may still have grown up and lived to see people walking on the moon once more. What else we’ve been reading I can’t stop thinking about this conversation with Cara Hunter (pictured above), the Irish politician targeted by a malicious deepfake video in 2022. Hunter tells Anna Moore of the “horrific” emotional turmoil she suffered, and her decision to go public with her experience to campaign for legislation against deepfake intimate image abuse. Karen For Vice, Caleb Catlin recalls one of the most prominent Black voices in the 90s gangsta rap moral panic, that of C Delores Tucker. Martin Fossil fuel and mining firms are bringing a record number of cases challenging governments attempts to halt climate breakdown via secretive offshore courts, writes George Monbiot, citing a case against Britain, after the quashing of a Cumbrian coalmine proposal. Karen One winter, I realised I could hate December every year for the rest of my life, or just throw myself into the Christmas spirit. If you are struggling with that, our writers have 25 tips for you. Martin I loved Irvine Welsh’s tribute to the fashion designer Pam Hogg. The “groundbreaking” artist, who died last week, once took pity on her fellow Scot, by getting Welsh into Soho’s Wag Club in the 1980s, thus kickstarting a friendship forged through clubbing, touring and partying. Karen Sport Grand Prix | Mercedes driver Kimi Antonelli has received an apology from Red Bull after being subject to death threats amid a torrent of online abuse following suggestions from some members of the Red Bull team that the teenager moved over to allow Lando Norris through at the Qatar GP. Football | Premier League clubs and sports bodies have expressed fears they will be forced to pay millions more in policing costs after being called in for consultations with the Home Office this week. Cricket | Will Jacks is in surprise contention for the day-night second Ashes test against Australia. The front pages “OBR chair quits after inquiry into early release of budget document” – that’s the Guardian and it’s in the Times as well: “OBR boss quits as PM’s budget leak rebuke”. The i has “OBR chief forced out after contradicting chancellor over budget black hole”. The Mail’s slant is not hard to predict: “The fall guy for Reeves’ budget lies” while the Telegraph says “Reeves clings on as OBR chief silenced”. The Financial Times has simply “OBR chief resigns after review blames budget leak on regulator’s leadership”. The Express runs with “Now PM admits seeking ‘closer’ links to EU”. “Justice for the lost victims” – a piece on the Post Office Horizon scandal is the lead in the Mirror. “Striker clashes with right winger” is the Metro’s take on what it straplines as “Lineker v Robinson”, the latter mentioned being the racial demagogue Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. Today in Focus Your Party: leaderless or just hopeless? Geraldine McKelvie reports from the ground at the inaugural Your Party conference, while Peter Walker talks to insiders about the divisions that have beset the party. Cartoon of the day | Ben Jennings The Upside A bit of good news to remind you that the world’s not all bad Two years ago, while at work, Tam Patachako received a notification that his pay had landed in his bank account. Within an hour he’d spent £90 on clothes, decorative items and a “completely useless” weighted blanket he never ended up using. It wasn’t unusual behaviour: whenever he felt stressed, or bored, he found himself scrolling through shopping apps. He justified every impulsive purchase as “only £5”, but soon these amounts soon increased. In this reflective essay for the series The one change that worked, Patachako traces how years of compulsive spending – shaped partly by growing up poor – finally shifted when he adopted a simple rule: placing items in his virtual shopping basket and waiting 24 hours before deciding to buy. The pause forced him to reconsider a prospective purchase. While he admits to the occasional slip, the act of stopping before shopping feels, to him, liberating and radical. Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday Bored at work? And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply

picture of article

‘I wish I could say I kept my cool’: my maddening experience with the NHS wheelchair service

I was lying on my back in an east London hospital, sometime in August 2023. I don’t know what day it was, exactly; by that point I’d mostly given up caring. My phone rang. I managed to answer, even though I had largely lost the use of my hands. (Luckily, a member of staff had left it lying on my chest.) Also, I wasn’t feeling great. In the early stages of coming to terms with the fact I was paralysed, I had just been informed that the doctors wanted to drill a hole directly into my guts, inserting a plastic tube to drain away my urine, effectively making my penis redundant. It was proving quite a lot to take in. Nonetheless, I answered. The person on the other end said they were calling from my local wheelchair service. I sort of registered this was important. By this point, I’d started to get my head around the fact I was never going to walk again. Wheelchairs were going to be a big part of my life. But given I wasn’t going to be discharged from hospital for at least six months, I figured the local wheelchair service could wait until I was a bit more up for the conversation. I apologised, probably somewhat incoherently, and said I wasn’t able to talk right then. I assumed they would understand it wasn’t a good time, and call back later. I assumed wrong. A month or so went by. My mum was down from Merseyside, staying in my old flat in north-east London while I remained in hospital. (I never saw that flat again. The stairs made it just another inaccessible location for me, my former home part of a cut-off world.) She checked the post and found a letter from AJM Healthcare’s Waltham Forest wheelchair service, a regional subsidiary of AJ Mobility Ltd – described in its annual report as “leading integrated wheelchair service provider for the NHS, delivering services to a population base of over 8.1 million people”. The letter stated that because AJM had been “unsuccessful in our attempts to contact you … your referral has now been closed”. In other words, because I had failed to engage on the phone the one time that it called me, I had been removed from the waiting list for a wheelchair. Just to spell that out: I was in hospital, paralysed. I could not leave hospital until I had a wheelchair. The local wheelchair service notified me that I wouldn’t be getting a wheelchair, after speaking to me on the phone for less than 30 seconds. It did so by writing to my home address. Which I could not reach, because I was in a hospital. Without a wheelchair. So began my involvement with England’s wheelchair services, the patchwork of private companies contracted by the NHS to provide disability equipment to some of the people who need it most. It would prove to be quite a ride. * * * The rock climbing accident that left me paralysed from the collarbones down happened in June 2023. It took a lot away from me. Continence (both kinds), sexual function, the ability to wash, dress and feed myself and basically anything that requires the proper use of hands (I’m writing this using voice dictation). And yes, most obviously, it also took away my ability to walk. But it also gave me some new things. Like a sudden introduction to being dependent on bureaucratic entities, to whom you are just another annoying statistic, clogging up the phone lines. Before the accident, I was a very fit and healthy 36-year-old man, in gainful employment as a university lecturer. I owned my own home, drove my own car and was happily cruising along in a world that made life easy for me. I did not yet know what it meant to be driven mad by the Department for Work and Pensions’ hold music for an hour, before the government computer hangs up because the phone lines are too busy. (I was calling in response to a threatening letter that said if I didn’t talk to them, I could expect my application for disability benefit, the personal independence payment, to be dismissed.) I did not yet know what it meant to try to organise wheelchair ambulances through G4S (yes, the security firm – don’t ask, because I don’t know). I did not yet know that local wheelchair services are a lottery, in which some of the most vulnerable people in society roll the dice. A lottery in which the taxpayer acts as permanent lender of last resort – while private companies profit. * * * ‘The thing with wheelchair services is that they massively vary in England – it depends on your postcode,” Sarah told me. She is a physiotherapist who has been working with people with spinal cord injury for more than 20 years. “Some are good, but some are just awful.” Many of her clients are discharged from hospital in heavy manual wheelchairs that an able-bodied person would struggle to push. Frequently, they are the wrong type or size, and are at the very least uncomfortable. “Often,” she said, “people who have impaired function in their upper limbs cannot push these wheelchairs themselves, and become effectively housebound, in some cases confined to their bed. Sometimes, they develop complications from poorly prescribed wheelchairs, and it lands them back in hospital.” On average, she adds, people have to wait at least 10 months between being discharged and being assessed, let alone getting the wheelchair that is right for them. Often this is because local wheelchair services will refuse to assess a patient until they have left hospital and are back at home. Specifics vary depending on which company has the contract for a given area, but this can either involve a home visit at the convenience of wheelchair services, or a patient having to travel to the local depot to be measured and assessed. This often takes months after hospital discharge, with the result that people who, more than anything, just want to get on with their lives, are stranded in limbo. Ben, 37, was, like me, injured in a sports accident in the summer of 2023. Like most quadriplegics, he left rehab in a heavy manual wheelchair he could not push outdoors by himself. One afternoon, he asked his live-in care worker to push him down the street so that he could at least go outside. At 65kg he isn’t especially heavy, but the care worker hurt her wrist trying to get him up a slope. She complained to the agency that employs her, and the agency forbade any of Ben’s care workers from pushing him in the manual chair. “From that point on I was basically under house arrest,” Ben tells me. “It was 10 months before I got my power chair from wheelchair services – even though it was clear long before I was discharged from hospital that I was going to need one.” And even that wasn’t straightforward. “The crazy thing is, a wheelchair service’s mandate is only to make sure you can mobilise indoors, in your home. On a flat smooth surface, I can do that in a manual wheelchair. But outside, on rough and angled surfaces, I lack the hand and upper body strength.” As a result, he faced being issued with a wheelchair that would have kept him housebound. “My aim was to go back to work, rebuild my life,” he says. “But to do that, I had to lie to wheelchair services and make out I was more disabled than I am, so that I could get a power chair and access the outdoors.” It was either lie, or give up on having any kind of a life. “Am I not disabled enough? Surely I should not have to pretend to be even more disabled, just to get something as basic as a wheelchair I can go outside in.” * * * Like Ben, I waited about 10 months for my prescription wheelchair to be ready. Collecting it meant visiting an industrial estate in Leytonstone, about a 20-minute bus ride away. It was then a 15-minute schlep to the AJM offices. My live-in carer accompanied me, as is now required for me to go pretty much anywhere. When we got there, I met the clinical lead. He was relatively new to the job, but we managed. Moving into the side room where the new wheelchair would be set up, he asked me to get out of the one I was in, and position myself on the nearby plinth. I explained I couldn’t do that, because I’m a quadriplegic, and require hoisting in situations like this. He looked somewhat concerned. Hoisting? I gestured with my useless hand at the nearby wall, where an array of hoist slings were hanging. And then at the ceiling, which had a mechanical track hoist attached to it. Using a special mechanical contraption. Hoisting. He excused himself and got a colleague, who then directed the clinical lead through the hoisting process. It struck me as quite odd that the clinical lead at a wheelchair service didn’t seem to be familiar with hoisting. But I opted to say nothing. It took a while for my new chair to be set up, but when I was in it the lead asked: “Do you feel comfortable?” Now, this is a tricky question. You see, I don’t feel anything below my collarbones. It is just a dead zone. Although I can roughly work out when my hips aren’t straight, or my bum is too far forwards, this is a deductive process that I was taught to do in spinal rehab. Strictly speaking, I rely on a trained professional to look at me and determine whether my posture is correct, or whether things need adjusting. And this really matters. Postural mispositioning, if uncorrected, leads to pressure ulcers, scoliosis (twisting of the spine) and a host of musculoskeletal deformities. Still, these guys were the professionals, right? The new chair certainly felt weird. But new wheelchairs normally do. I figured I’d just have to get used to it. After all, if things weren’t set up correctly, how was I to know? Surely, they would tell me. Once the chair was apparently set up to the clinical lead’s satisfaction, it was time to head home. Unfortunately, the heavens had opened and I didn’t fancy the 15-minute slog back to the bus stop in the tipping rain. Annoyingly, no taxis were accepting my booking on the various apps I was trying. I asked the desk staff if they could call me a wheelchair-accessible taxi. They said they didn’t have any numbers. I tried the apps a little longer. In the end, I just got wet. * * * Sitting on the bus home, it increasingly felt like something was wrong with the chair. My legs were jutting out at a weird angle, bashing into things when I moved. Breathing felt much harder than it normally did, my diaphragm struggling even more than usual to make up for my emaciated intercostal muscles. Still, I told myself, I’d just have to keep trying. I used to be an athlete; I used to know how to train. Different context, same principle. You have to tolerate the suffering until it becomes easy. A few days later, my private physiotherapist came round to do my weekly rehab session. She took one look and ordered me out of the chair – with strict instructions not to sit in it again until an engineer had been out to make it safe. At present, she said, I was running the risk of getting pressure sores and muscle damage. She hoisted me on to my bed, and spent most of our session writing down the measurements required to adjust the wheelchair to fit my body. If I hadn’t had her, who knows how long I would have spent in a chair that could have landed me back in hospital? It was becoming apparent that – just like everywhere else – in the world of wheelchairs, having a bit of money makes life a hell of a lot easier. In many ways, I am lucky. I was able to keep my job teaching at a university, including a generous year of paid sick leave after the accident. I also had climbing insurance, which meant I got a lump sum payment through the British Mountaineering Council. This wasn’t megabucks, but it helped pay for things such as home adaptations to make my new flat accessible. Also, friends and family clubbed together to raise extra money through GoFundMe, enabling me to buy a high-spec private wheelchair that the NHS would never have agreed to pay for. I still need the NHS one provided by AJM. Kind of like shoes, one needs different wheelchairs for different purposes – especially when they break down (which they do). But because I was lucky to have a bit of money behind me, I was able to get by without using the AJM chair until it was properly set up. Without it, and without my private physio, I might not have had the issues fixed before finding myself back in hospital. Obviously, that wouldn’t have been great for me. But also, not great for taxpayers, given that the going rate for a hospital bed is now about £900 per day. Meanwhile, AJM recently reported that its turnover in the financial year to April 2024 increased significantly, to £36.2m (up 29% from 2023). Profit, after tax, was £5.8m. * * * In last year’s strategic report, AJM listed “reliance on NHS contracts” as a risk to its financial sustainability. I struggle hard to take such a statement at face value. Because how much of a risk is it, really? As the political commentator Sam Freedman has pointed out in his book Failed State, a great deal of public service provision in the UK is going wrong because it has been farmed out under the mantra of privatisation, even in cases where privatisation makes no economic sense. Wheelchair services very much fall under this rubric. To see why, consider where privatisation does make sense. Take, for example, contracting a private company to do the cleaning at NHS hospitals. It is straightforwardly the case that a private company can do this more efficiently, and therefore more cheaply, than keeping the operation in-house as part of the sprawling NHS behemoth. But more than that, if a contracted company starts failing to do the cleaning properly, it is easy for the NHS to get an alternative company in, virtually the next day, to do exactly the same job. Competition, here, works. Rival firms have to offer generally competitive prices and services to the NHS, because if they don’t, the NHS can easily go elsewhere. Here is a case where privatisation is good for the taxpayer, and in turn, good for the NHS. Compare this with wheelchair services. Suppose NHS managers somehow became aware of, and dissatisfied with, the performance of AJM in Waltham Forest. It is not like they can just suddenly bring in an alternative wheelchair provider. This is not simply because the NHS is locked into a contract with AJM that would probably prove very costly, even just in legal fees, to get out of. It is also because of the immense difficulty of replacing one wheelchair provider with another. Just think of the immense disruption involved in handing over the confidential details of thousands of disabled people to a different company, while also overseeing a complete change in stock provisions of expensive and complex medical equipment, much of which is now scattered around the local community. AJM may describe reliance on NHS contracts as a “risk”, but to an outside observer it looks more like the safest bet imaginable. Hence, indeed, why a company that employed under 350 people could post nearly £6m in profit last year. The result is a strange situation. Insofar as there really is privatisation, it consists of people like me, with enough money in the bank, bypassing local wheelchair services to ensure they get the medical equipment they need. After all, if I want to go through the NHS, I must use AJM, simply because of where I live. AJM have the contract for Waltham Forest wheelchair service provision, so if like me you’re registered with a GP in this borough, they are the only option (unless you want to pay entirely out of your own pocket, which of course most people can’t afford). Patients find themselves at the mercy of whichever business their local council has employed. The result is an inevitable doom loop. Because when private companies effectively enjoy state-backed local monopolies, and when they are subject to no meaningful competition, they lack any incentives to improve the services they offer, or to provide value for money. This is a situation that no straight-thinking person should be OK with. Well, unless you’re LivingBridge, the private equity firm that owns AJM, I suppose. Last year, it posted £13.4m in operating profit. (“As a national provider, AJM offers excellent value to our NHS partners through our significant procurement economies of scale,” a spokesperson for AJM told the Guardian. “Our NHS contracts are all fixed budget, with clear and measurable KPIs focused on achieving positive outcomes for patients. AJM contracts are all awarded as a result of competitive tendering, following an NHS procurement process which determines both quality and value for money. Our performance is consistently above the national average.”) * * * A few weeks after AJM finally sent out an engineer to resize my chair, I got a call from the clinical lead. He said that he needed a barcode number from the chair I’d gone home with, which he’d forgotten to note down. Could I please get out of the chair, crouch down on the floor and read out the number off the bottom? I wish I could say I kept my cool. But I was never very good at that, even before my accident. Instead, I raised my voice. I used words I shouldn’t have. Do I regret it? Not really. Because by that point, I knew I wasn’t an outlier. Take a look at the publicly viewable Google reviews page for AJM Waltham Forest. One comment describes an elderly woman being made to wait more than 19 weeks for a wheelchair. Another is written by a frustrated father whose daughter’s wheelchair is so unsafe that her day centre refuses to take her out in it. The most recent begins: “AVOID AVOID AVOID!!!” It is presumably for reasons like these that the parliamentary ombudsman wrote to AJM in May 2024, raising concerns after a rise in complaints reported by wheelchair users. In October 2025, the government was forced to acknowledge these complaints – though, rather uselessly, it then advised those with concerns to contact “the relevant integrated care boards”. What amuses me about the Google reviews is not their content, but the fact that under most of them someone from AJM has offered a reply. It’s the usual mealy mouthed corporate stuff: “Thank you for taking the time to leave a review”; “We are sorry about your experience”; “We always want to find ways to improve our service”. The reason it amuses me is because after the clinical lead called me up and asked me to get out of my wheelchair, I sent a formal written complaint to AJM Waltham Forest. I never received any reply – not even an acknowledgment of receipt. I later escalated this to the AJM head office, and got the predictable polite fobbing off. (“You have our assurance that [we] have undertaken an internal investigation and managed the matter through the appropriate AJM Healthcare conduct policy and procedure. In accordance with those, staff disciplinary outcomes remain confidential.”) Still, at least they bothered to reply. AJM also sent a short statement in response to the claims in this article. It began: “While we cannot comment on individual cases, we are actively supporting those affected to prevent any further delays or miscommunication.” It continued: “We are proud to exceed NHS averages, with 97.4% of 12,830 Friends and Family Test responses rating our service as good or very good. We also recognise the crucial role wheelchair services play in people’s independence, which is why every case matters and we remain focused on continually improving our performance and communication.” * * * As you’ve probably guessed, by this point I try to have as little to do with AJM as possible. I mostly use the privately bought wheelchair that my friends helped me afford, and rely on the excellent small business Beyond Mobility for help with engineering and maintenance. Still, there’s one thing that continues to bug me. As a quadriplegic, I am at constant risk of developing pressure ulcers. This is more than just an inconvenience. When pressure ulcers go bad, at best they leave a person bedridden for weeks. If the skin breaks down, a sufferer can end up back in hospital needing surgery, followed by months of inpatient recovery. In the worst cases, the surgery doesn’t work and infection from the ulcer penetrates underlying bones, eventually killing the patient. This is what ultimately saw off the actor Christopher Reeve. To try to prevent this, the NHS has prescribed me a special pressure-relieving wheelchair cushion. Due to being utterly paranoid about developing pressure ulcers, I long ago bought one for myself. (A cool £650, since you asked. Yes, for a cushion.) Still, it would be very handy to have a spare. Not least because I sometimes shit myself (the delights of spinal cord injury), and I can’t use the privately bought one when the cover is in the wash. When AJM finally came through with my NHS wheelchair, the cushion I was sent wasn’t right. I asked if the correct make and model could be provided. OK, I was told. That was in October 2024. I called up every so often, to check on its status, and kept being told it was “on order”. Until May this year, when the chap on the phone denied any knowledge, or record, of me ever having ordered any such cushion. After a few days of tense calls, I was once again assured that the right cushion was “on order”. It is now December 2025. I called up again the other day. The pressure-relieving cushion, the one to make sure that I don’t end up back in hospital, costing the NHS yet more money, or potentially even dead? Still on order. An earlier version of this article appeared in Dispatch. • The best stories take time. From politics to philosophy, personal stories to true crime, discover a selection of the Guardian’s finest longform journalism, in one beautiful edition. In the new Guardian Long Read Magazine, you’ll find pieces on how MrBeast became the world’s biggest YouTube star, how Emmanuel Macron deals with Donald Trump, and shocking revelations at the British Museum. Order your copy today at the Guardian bookshop. • Listen to our podcasts here and sign up to the long read weekly email here.

picture of article

Man charged with theft after allegedly swallowing Fabergé pendant in jewellery store

A New Zealand man has been charged with theft after allegedly swallowing a Fabergé James Bond Octopussy egg pendant worth more than $33,500 (US$19,200). Police were called to a central Auckland jewellery store, Partridge Jewellers, on Friday afternoon after staff reported a man had allegedly picked up the pendant and swallowed it, said Grae Anderson, the city’s central area commander. “The Auckland city beat team responded minutes later, arresting the man inside the store,” Anderson said. Charge sheets, seen by the Guardian, confirm a 32-year-old man was charged with theft on 29 November for allegedly stealing the Fabergé x 007 Special Edition Octopussy Egg Surprise Locket, valued at $33,585. Fabergé is one of the most renowned jewellers in the world, known for its imperial Russian eggs. According to Fabergé’s website, the pendant is made from 18-karat yellow gold and decorated with green guilloché enamel. It is set with 60 white diamonds and 15 blue sapphires. The egg locket “offers a surprise” – inside contains a miniature 18k gold octopus with two black diamond eyes. The police could not offer any photos of the object as it “has not yet been recovered”. The man was also charged with allegedly stealing an iPad from the same jewellery store on 12 November and, the following day, stealing cat litter and flea treatment, worth $100, from a private address. He has been remanded in custody and will reappear in the district court on 8 December.

picture of article

Japan PM’s pledge to ‘work, work, work, work, and work’ wins catchphrase of year

It is not, perhaps, a word many people in Japan will want to hear as they prepare for the bonenkai office party season and some well-earned time off over the new year. But the promise made by Japan’s new prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, that she would “work, work, work, work, and work” on behalf of her country has clearly struck a chord. Her vow, made just before she took office in October, has been chosen as Japan’s catchphrase of the year, beating more than two dozen other candidates. Takaichi drew criticism after she implored her fellow Liberal Democratic party (LDP) MPs to follow her lead. “I will have everyone work like a horse,” she said, adding that she would abandon the concept of a work-life balance in her own life. Her remarks did not go down well in a country notorious for its long working hours, while lawyers representing people who have died from karoshi – death from overwork – described them as unhelpful. Some have expressed concern for Takaichi’s health after she told parliament that she slept between two and four hours a night, following reports she had summoned officials to a 3am meeting at her residence. Accepting her award this week, Takaichi said her comments had been misinterpreted. “I had no intention of encouraging people to overwork or suggesting that working long hours is a virtue,” she said, adding she was simply trying to communicate her determination to be an effective leader. The organisers of the annual award said the shortlist had included other phrases that best captured Japan’s zeitgeist in 2025: “First female prime minister” was the second most popular; others included “Trump’s tariffs”, “bear damage” and “old, old, old rice” – a reference to the release of stockpiled grain from the 2021 crop in an attempt to rein in soaring prices. A committee picks the winning phrase from a shortlisted top 10, which comes from a provisional list from the publisher of Japan’s Yearbook of Contemporary Society. Takaichi is the fourth politician to have received the award. The last, Yukio Hatoyama, won in 2009 for “change of government”, after his party ousted the LDP from office for only the second time since the mid-1950s. On Monday, Takaichi’s choice of language was in the spotlight as she told a Saudi-organised economic forum to “shut your mouths” – not out of rudeness, but delivering a line from a well-known manga comic. “I understand that Japanese manga and anime are extremely popular in Saudi Arabia. Titles like Captain Tsubasa, One Piece, and Demon Slayer come to mind,” she told the event. “But today, I’d like to borrow a famous line from Attack on Titan to conclude my speech. ‘Just shut your mouths. And invest everything in me!!’,” she said. Takaichi was speaking at the FII Priority Asia 2025 conference, a spin-off of the annual Future Investment Initiative in Saudi Arabia that is dubbed “Davos in the Desert”. Takaichi is under pressure to attract investment to boost the world’s fourth-largest economy, which contracted in the third quarter. With Agence France-Presse

picture of article

What are scam centres – explained in 30 seconds

Scam centres are compounds often linked to transnational criminal networks that are part of a global, multibillion dollar online fraud industry that has proliferated in south-east Asia in recent years. Countries such as Myanmar, Cambodia and Laos have become havens for the criminal activity, which spans online fraud, human trafficking, slavery and money laundering. Lawless border areas in the region have become particular areas of concern, with satellite imagery and research showing that scam operations have more than doubled along the Thai-Myanmar border since Myanmar’s junta seized power in 2021. Hundreds of thousands of people have been trafficked and forced to work at scam compounds, with at least 120,000 people in Myanmar and 100,000 in Cambodia likely forced to work in the centres, data fromthe United Nations shows. “South-east Asia is the ground zero for the global scamming industry,” said Benedikt Hofmann, from the UN agency to combat drugs and crime, UNODC. The industry is global, with people from Africa, Asia, the Middle East and South America lured by the false promise of an office job and forced to scam people around the globe. On arrival they are held against their will and forced to generate income through carrying out online scams, using social media and messaging apps to target victims. Inside the compounds, workers are trapped, and sometimes tortured, with well documented reports of beatings and electric shocks. Thailand has launched a crackdown on the scam centre industry by cutting off electricity, fuel and internet. Myanmar’s military has reportedly raided a major scam centre, where troops detained more than 2,100 people and seized Starlink satellite internet terminals.