Relations with US have taken ‘big blow’, says EU foreign policy chief
Transatlantic relations have “taken a big blow over the last week” the EU’s foreign policy chief said, as leaders from the bloc gathered for an emergency summit after weeks of escalating threats from Donald Trump over Greenland that were suddenly rescinded with a vague deal on Arctic security. Summing up the mood, the EU’s foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said the EU was living through a lot of unpredictability: “One day, one way; the other day, again, everything could change.” Relations between Europe and the US “have definitely taken a big blow over the last week”, but Europeans were “not willing to junk 80 years of good relations”, she told reporters. An emergency EU summit was hastily convened earlier this week after the US president announced he would impose 10% tariffs on eight European nations that resisted a US takeover of Greenland, an autonomous territory that is part of Denmark. Although Trump abandoned his tariff threat on Wednesday, EU officials deemed the summit necessary to discuss the wider transatlantic relationship with a volatile and unpredictable US president. Arriving at the summit, Denmark’s prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, hailed EU unity and “our willingness to stand up for ourselves”. Nato states, she said, backed having a permanent presence in the Arctic region including around Greenland. Stressing repeatedly that Danish sovereignty was not up for discussion, she said the US and Denmark “have to work together respectfully without threatening each other”. French president Emmanuel Macron, still wearing the aviator shades that drew global attention in Davos, said Europe need to “remain extremely vigilant and ready to use the instruments at our disposal should we find ourselves the target of threats again”. German chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed Trump’s change of heart: “I am very grateful that President Trump has distanced himself from his original plans to take over Greenland, and I am also grateful that he has refrained from imposing additional tariffs on 1 February.” Several EU leaders stressed determination to maintain the US as an ally. “I still treat the United States as our closest friend,” Lithuanian president Gitanas Nausėda said, referencing the two US battalions deployed in his country. Poland’s prime minister, Donald Tusk, another staunch transatlanticist, said: “Europe should be here absolutely united to protect our relations with our partners on the other side of the Atlantic, even if it is much more difficult than ever before.” But he went on to say that politics needed “trust and respect … not domination and for sure not coercion”. Greenland, which left the EU in 1985, also insisted that its sovereignty be respected. Speaking in Nuuk, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, Greenland’s prime minister, said he did not know what was in the deal but emphasised that the largely self-governing territory wanted a “peaceful dialogue” with the US, and its sovereignty was non-negotiable. If Greenlanders had to choose, he said: “We choose the Kingdom of Denmark, we choose the EU, we choose Nato.”
Meanwhile the European parliament signalled on Thursday it was ready to reconsider its decision to freeze ratification of the EU-US trade deal, one of the bloc’s strongest responses to Trump’s tariff threats so far. MEPs had been expected to vote in February to approve 0% tariffs on many US goods, a key part of the trade agreement signed at Trump’s Turnberry golf resort last summer, but pressed pause on the process on Wednesday in response to tariff threats. The European parliament can now go ahead with discussions on the EU-US trade deal, following Trump’s tariff threat reversal, its president, Roberta Metsola, said. Earlier in the day the head of the European parliament’s trade committee, the German Social Democrat lawmaker Bernd Lange, said his committee would revisit the issue next week, while stressing that the EU needed to remain vigilant. “There is no room for false security,” he wrote on X. “The next threat is sure to come. That’s why it is even more important that we set clear boundaries, use all available legal instruments [and] apply them as appropriate to the situation.” In response to Trump’s tariff threats, the EU had been discussing levying duties on €93bn of US goods, as well as deploying its most powerful economic sanctions weapon, the anti-coercion instrument, which would allow the bloc to impose a broad range of economic penalties on US companies. Even the EU’s most transatlantic-minded governments said such a response could be necessary if the tariffs went ahead. European leaders had watched with growing alarm as Trump insisted on a US takeover of Greenland, a move that threatened to split Nato and the wider western alliance. European governments feared failure to resist a US takeover of Greenland would cast legitimacy over a Chinese seizure of Taiwan or a Russian invasion of the Baltic states, smashing the post-1945 rules-based order. While that threat has subsided, for now, European leaders are also expected to share their concerns about Trump’s proposed “board of peace”, amid fears he is seeking to create a rival to the UN.
Launched in Davos on Thursday, the “board of peace” was initially part of Trump’s peace and reconstruction plan for Gaza, but is morphing into an organisation with a sprawling geopolitical role operating under his direct control. So far, Hungary and Bulgaria are the only EU member states to accept an invitation to join the “board of peace”, while France, Sweden and non-EU Norway and the UK have all declined. “A very large majority [of EU member states] have said they are not in a position to join the board as it stands,” the EU official said, when asked whether European governments could join a “board of peace” that included Vladimir Putin, the Russian leader wanted for war crimes against Ukraine. The Russian leader is yet to confirm whether he intends to accept the US invitation to join, but has suggested he could pay the $1bn fee required for permanent membership using Russian assets that are largely frozen in Europe and earmarked for reparations for Ukraine. Summing up the transatlantic relationship, the official said it was a “very strong, but certainly more complex relationship with the US”, replete with disagreements, tensions and points of cooperation. He added: “We have to live with the new complexity.”