Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Russia launches 400 drones and 29 missiles at Ukraine hours before peace talks in Geneva – Europe live

The European Commission is just giving its daily midday press briefing, and it has confirmed plans to adopt the new, 20th, round of sanctions against Russia by 24 February, the fourth anniversary of the full-scale invasion on Ukraine. Foreign affairs spokesperson Anouar El Anouni said: “We keep on working on measures to deprive Russia of the funds, goods and technologies sustaining its war against Ukraine. This indeed includes the 20th package that you have mentioned, and indeed we aim to adopt it … by 24 February, as the High Representative [Kaja Kallas] mentioned at the last foreign affairs council. Member states are discussing it.”

picture of article

Medics in UK and US say they have been barred from Gaza after speaking out

Medics in the UK and US believe they have been denied re-entry to Gaza after speaking out on the conflict. Following reports of rising refusal rates, medical workers and organisationswho have provided humanitarian aid in Gaza have described what they see as arbitrary denials. Under international law Israel is required to allow and facilitate the unimpeded and rapid passage of humanitarian aid. Provided with no reason for being blocked from entry, medics who spoke with the Guardian believed their refusals came after giving first-hand testimony from their time in Gaza. Others said their identity or prior experience in the territory may have influenced decisions to block them. Among those recently denied entry is James Smith, an emergency doctor who has not returned to Gaza since June 2024. On two consecutive occasions in 2025 he was denied entry, with no explanation given. “Not just had I spoken to media outlets but I had spoken in a particular way,” said Smith, mentioning Israel’s registration guidelines for NGOs and foreign staff, which includes considerations such as having called for or participated in a boycott of the state of Israel. “I can only assume that it was elements of my public profile, because I’m otherwise a white, middle-class, British man with no Palestinian heritage, no criminal convictions,” said Smith, who was travelling with the nonprofit Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP). “It’s the expression of my politics that must have rattled them,” he added. After the announcement of a ceasefire in October, the death toll in Gaza continues to grow, and humanitarian organisations have remained critical of barriers to aid and medical evacuations. In August, the World Health Organization (WHO) said the denial rates of international health professionals rose by nearly 50%, with 102 people barred from 18 March. Khaled Dawas, a consultant surgeon, told the Guardian it was clear those who had been outspoken had been denied entry. “I can’t think of anything else,” Dawas said from London. “I’m not military. I don’t carry anything. I’m no different to the colleagues who have gone in. The only difference is that they haven’t spoken up as much.” He was denied entry in August and November with two separate organisations, after travelling to Gaza in 2024. Thaer Ahmad, an emergency physician from Chicago, was denied entry four times, most recently in January. As a Palestinian-American born in the US, he believes his identity is one of the reasons behind his blocked entry, as well his advocacy since travelling to Gaza in 2024. The reason given by Israeli authorities were security concerns. “This idea of weaponising access and weaponising aid, it’s engrained in all of the decisions that we see are being made in Gaza,” said Ahmad, adding that respective governments should assist doctors in appealing against decisions. Fresh concerns over access into Gaza were raised after 37 NGOs active in Gaza were told in December they must cease operations. Among those deregistered was the UK-based MAP (Medical Aid for Palestinians). For the past six months, MAP has not been able to get medical workers or aid into Gaza. For each blocked entry, no reason was given. Steve Cutt, MAP’s chief executive, called the denial of entry a “deliberate measure” taken by Israel authorities, with life-and-death consequences for Palestinians in Gaza. “Israel’s deregistration of international NGOs and restrictions on medical personnel are part of a wider pattern of measures that are cruelly blocking humanitarian assistance and obstructing independent medical witnesses,” said Cutt. It is understood humanitarian organisations share lists of volunteer medics with the WHO before they go to Gaza. Some medics and humanitarian organisations first discovered they had been denied entry close to 24 hours before their entry date after travelling to Jordan. In other cases, they received rejections days before leaving the UK ahead of Israeli holidays. Cogat, the Israeli military agency that controls access to Gaza, called the claims “false and unfounded”. “They stem from ulterior interests of organisations that refuse to operate transparently and to cooperate with Israel’s registration process, which is based on clear professional and security criteria designed to safeguard the integrity of the humanitarian system,” it said. Cogat added: “It should be underscored that Israel continues to act to strengthen the healthcare system in the Gaza Strip.” A UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) spokesperson said the foreign secretary late last year met with medical teams denied entry into Gaza. “Israel must immediately lift restrictions and allow food, medical supplies and fuel to reach those in desperate need, in line with international humanitarian law,” they added. A petition recently filed by lawyers to the Israeli supreme court cites seven cases of alleged illegal refusals of entry, including that of Graeme Groom, an orthopaedic surgeon from London and co-founder of the charity Ideals, who has visited Gaza more than 40 times. Since 7 October, he has been four times, and denied entry on three occasions. Each time he was refused, no explanation was given. “We think it may be because we are bearing witness to what is happening in Gaza,” he said. “Denying us entry is an extension of the policy which has excluded international journalists, and kills Palestinian journalists.” London-based consultant plastic surgeon Victoria Rose, who was denied entry alongside Groom in late 2025, does not necessarily believe that having been outspoken on the number of injuries or paediatric injuries of Gaza was the reason she was blocked from entering. “They don’t want anyone going that knows the system, is useful, that is effective, that’s where it seems to be. I don’t necessarily think they’ve got a handle of what I’ve done or said,” she said. “Maybe.”

picture of article

Kenyan authorities used Israeli tech to crack activist’s phone, report claims

When Boniface Mwangi, the prominent Kenyan pro-democracy activist who plans to run for president in 2027, had his phones returned to him by Kenyan authorities after his controversial arrest last July, he immediately noticed a problem: one of the phones was no longer password protected and could be opened without one. It was Mwangi’s personal phone, which he used to communicate with friends and mentors, and contained photos of private family moments with his wife and children. Knowing that its contents could be in the hands of the Kenyan government made Mwangi – who has described harassment and even torture – feel unsafe and “exposed”, he told the Guardian. A report released on Tuesday by Citizen Lab, which tracks digital threats against civil society, has found with “high confidence” that Kenyan authorities used Israeli technology to break into Mwangi’s phone while he was under arrest last year, when the device was in police custody. Authorities’ use of the technology, made by Cellebrite, “could have enabled the full extraction of all materials from Mwangi’s device, including messages, private materials, personal files, financial information, passwords, and other sensitive information”, Citizen Lab said. The findings, researchers claimed, add to the growing body of evidence that Cellebrite’s technology is being “abused by its government clients, and the company is failing to prevent those abuses from happening”. In a statement to the Guardian, Cellebrite said it maintained a “rigorous process for reviewing allegations of technology misuse” and that it took “decisive action”, including licence termination, when credible and substantiated evidence is presented to the company. “We do not respond to speculation and encourage any organisation with specific, evidence-based concerns to share them with us directly so we can act on them,” the company said. The Guardian reached out to Kenya’s police spokesperson and the Kenyan embassy in Washington for comment but did not receive a response. Amnesty International said last July, after Mwangi’s arrest and charges that he unlawfully possessed ammunition in connection to his role in street protests, that the legal campaign against him appeared to be “part of a broader effort to intimidate lawful dissent and those committed to upholding the rule of law”. Mwangi was released on bond a few days after his arrest and is expected again in court on Wednesday. In an interview, Mwangi said he knew he operated in an environment of constant surveillance. By the time authorities came for him, he said, they had collected information about him from other people’s phones, and “knew my role in the movement”. “We know that I get spied on all the time. I know that my phone calls are monitored and my messages are read,” he said. Last year, a forensic analysis by Citizen Lab found that the FlexiSPY spyware had been installed on phones belonging to Kenyan film-makers Bryan Adagala and Nicholas Wambugu while the devices were in police possession. Police were investigating them in connection with a BBC documentary incriminating security forces in killings during anti-government protests in 2024. The BBC denied the two men were involved in the production. The latest findings by Citizen Lab, Mwangi said, pointed to the role played by “non-state actors” in enabling the surveillance of pro-democracy activists by a government accused of abducting people. “By them giving the government the access to spy on me, they’re putting my life in jeopardy,” he said. Citizen Lab’s latest findings follow a separate report released in January, in which the researchers said authorities in Jordan appeared to be using Cellebrite to extract information from the mobile phones of activists and protesters who had been critical of Israel and spoken out in support of Gaza. In response to the report, Cellebrite said at the time that its technology was used to “access private data only in accordance with legal due process or with appropriate consent to aid investigations legally after an event has occurred”. Cellebrite products have reportedly also been used to target members of civil society in other parts of the world, including in Myanmar and Botswana. There have also been indications of its use in Serbia and Belarus. John Scott-Railton, a senior researcher at Citizen Lab, said: “Your phone holds the keys to your life, and governments shouldn’t be able to help themselves to the contents just because they don’t like what you are saying … When Cellebrite sells their technology to a security service with a track record of abuses, journalists, activists, and people speaking their conscience are at risk.”

picture of article

Russia threatens to deploy navy to protect vessels from ‘western piracy’

A senior Russian official has said Moscow could deploy its navy to protect Russian-linked vessels from potential European seizures, raising the prospect of retaliatory action against European shipping as pressure on the Kremlin’s so-called shadow fleet intensifies. Nikolai Patrushev, a former FSB director who heads Russia’s maritime board, said on Tuesday that the country’s navy should be ready to counter what he described as “western piracy”. “If this situation cannot be resolved peacefully, the navy will break any blockade and move to eliminate it. And let’s not forget that many vessels sail the seas under European flags – we, too, may take an interest in what they are carrying and where they are headed,” he told the Russian newspaper Argumenty i Fakty. Patrushev added that any attempt to impose a maritime blockade on Russia would be illegal under international law, claiming that the EU’s use of the term “shadow fleet” had no legal basis. The term shadow fleet refers to an estimated 1,500 ageing or lightly regulated oil tankers operating under opaque ownership structures to help Russia export crude to buyers such as China and India while circumventing western sanctions. More than 600 vessels have been targeted by sanctions from the EU, UK and US. These measures have helped curb Russian oil revenues. Patrushev’s remarks came as the British defence secretary, John Healey, met European counterparts on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference to discuss possible moves to seize tankers linked to Russia’s shadow fleet. Despite growing political pressure, European governments have struggled to develop a coherent legal mechanism for physically stopping or confiscating the ships, relying instead on sanctions, insurance restrictions and inspections. Western allies have warned that vessels lacking proper documentation may be treated as stateless ships, potentially widening the scope for intervention at sea. Earlier this year, the French navy briefly intercepted a tanker suspected of operating within the shadow fleet before allowing it to continue its journey. The US has, in recent months, moved to physically interdict and seize several tankers linked to shadow fleets carrying sanctioned oil from Russia, Venezuela and Iran. Patrushev’s comments, however, appeared to focus primarily on Europe, suggesting the Kremlin is wary of escalating tensions with Washington while delicate negotiations over Ukraine continue. Senior Ukrainian and Russian officials are expected to meet in Geneva on Tuesday for the latest round of high-stakes talks brokered by the Trump administration, as the fourth anniversary of Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine draws near.

picture of article

Ukraine and Russia to meet for third round of talks as fourth anniversary of war looms

Senior Ukrainian and Russian officials are to meet this week in Switzerland for a third round of talks brokered by the Trump administration, days before the fourth anniversary of Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The two-day meeting, kicking off on Tuesday, is expected to mirror negotiations held earlier this month in Abu Dhabi, with representatives from Washington, Kyiv and Moscow in attendance. Despite renewed US efforts to revive diplomacy, hopes for any sudden breakthrough remain low, with Russia continuing to press maximalist demands on Ukraine. While the Abu Dhabi discussions were largely focused on military ceasefire proposals, the Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, said on Monday the Geneva talks would address a “broader range of issues”, including territorial questions and other demands put forward by Moscow. Vladimir Medinsky, an arch-conservative Putin adviser who has previously questioned Ukrainian sovereignty, will head Russia’s negotiating team. He will be joined by Igor Kostyukov, the chief of Russian military intelligence, and the deputy foreign minister Mikhail Galuzin, among nearly two dozen officials, Moscow has said. Ukraine is expected to send the same delegation as in earlier rounds, to be led in Geneva by Rustem Umerov, secretary of Ukraine’s national security and defence council. The Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said diplomacy would be more effective with “justice and strength”. “Strength of pressure on the Russian Federation – sanctions pressure and steady, rapid support for the Ukrainian army and our air defence,” he wrote on social media. The choice of Switzerland marks the first time the talks will be held on European soil after earlier rounds in Abu Dhabi and Istanbul. The choice of Geneva appears to have been pushed by Washington. The Trump envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, who are expected to lead US engagement with Russia and Ukraine, are scheduled to hold separate meetings with Iranian officials in the city later this week. Trump, who throughout his second presidency has veered between criticising Moscow and Kyiv, reverted this weekend to placing blame on Zelenskyy, suggesting Ukraine was holding up efforts to end the war. “Zelenskyy needs to act. Russia wants to make a deal. He needs to act, otherwise he will miss a great opportunity,” he said in comments to reporters. But his secretary of state, Marco Rubio, speaking at the Munich Security Conference at the weekend, said Washington remained uncertain whether Russia was genuinely serious about ending the war in Ukraine. Ahead of the Geneva meeting, Zelenskyy made clear Ukraine was unwilling to give up territory in the Donbas – a key Kremlin demand. He cited previous Russian land grabs in Chechnya, Georgia and Crimea and said that “allowing the aggressor to take something is a big mistake”. “That is why now I do not want to be a president who will repeat the mistakes of his predecessors or other people … Because Putin cannot be stopped with kisses or flowers. I have never done this, and therefore I do not think that this is right. My advice to everyone: do not do this with Putin.” He said Russia was losing 30,000-35,000 people a month, with its attempt to seize more territory over four years of full-scale war staggeringly costly and mostly unsuccessful. “Can you imagine that in the 21st century? I’m not sure he [Putin] knows that,” Zelenskyy said. There were no expectations in Kyiv that the latest round of trilateral talks would led to a political breakthrough. Speaking in Munich on Saturday, Zelenskyy said his country would not give up the heavily defended north of Donetsk oblast, including the cities of Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, or abandon the 200,000 civilians who live there. He said Ukraine would play a “constructive” role in the trilateral talks but acknowledged there were differences with the US over security guarantees. The Trump administration is offering 15 years, with Ukraine wanting an American commitment lasting 30-50 years. Kyiv hopes the war will end this year, Zelenskyy has indicated. Kyrylo Budanov, the head of the presidential office, posted a photo of his departure by train for the talks with a Ukrainian delegation. He wrote: “On the way to Geneva. The next round of negotiations is ahead. Along the way, we will discuss the lessons of our history with our colleagues and seek the right conclusions. Ukraine’s interests must be protected.” The history reference appeared to be a jibe directed at Medinsky. The former culture minister is believed to have written the 2021 essay attributed to Putin, which argued that Ukraine and Russia were a single people and state, with a common origin in the ninth century. His presence is being interpreted by Kyiv as a sign the Kremlin is not taking the talks seriously. Olexiy Haran, a professor of comparative politics at the Kyiv-Mohyla academy, said Ukrainians were overwhelmingly opposed to growing US-Russian demands that Ukraine hold presidential elections. “The country is not ready for them because there are no security conditions. It would be crazy to conduct them under martial law,” he said. Haran recognised Trump and Putin were putting “huge pressure” on Zelenskyy to hold a poll over the next few months. He said the Kremlin was trying to “destabilise” the situation inside Ukraine and would not agree to a ceasefire. There were numerous legal and practical obstacles to holding a vote, he added, not least the question of how international observers could take part. He said: “Doubts of the government’s legitimacy is a trick of the Kremlin, echoed unfortunately by President Trump. Political renewal is needed, but elections can only take place once the war ends and security conditions allow.” • This article was amended on 17 February 2026 because officials from Ukraine and Russia are set to meet in Geneva for a third round of talks, not second round as an earlier version said.

picture of article

Tuesday briefing: The factors that will shape the future of Scotland

Good morning. The SNP has been in government since 2007, a phenomenal 19-year run, but polling suggests Scottish voters’ trust in its ability to deliver is weakening. In May, Scotland goes to the polls for the seventh Holyrood election since devolution in 1999 – a contest that could significantly realign the nation’s politics. In what some viewed as a desperate attempt to capitalise on the moment, Labour’s leader in Scotland, Anas Sarwar, called on Keir Starmer to resign last week, possibly trying to paint himself as his own man, not attached to a deeply unpopular Westminster government that currently polls third in the run up to May’s elections. Meanwhile, Reform UK’s steady polling numbers show them second to the SNP, which they are hoping to turn into a meaningful elected presence at Holyrood for the first time. With so much in the balance, I spoke to our Scotland correspondent, Libby Brooks, about the prospects for the main parties, the challenges they face, and what could still make the difference between now and polling day. First, here are the headlines. Five big stories UK politics | Ministers have dropped controversial plans to delay 30 local elections this May after receiving legal advice that doing so might not be lawful. Business | UK bank bosses will hold their first meeting to establish a national alternative to Visa and Mastercard, amid growing fears over Donald Trump’s ability to turn off US-owned payment systems. Social media | Keir Starmer has pledged action on young people’s access to social media in “months, not years”, while saying this did not necessarily mean a complete ban on access for under-16s. Sarah Ferguson | Six companies linked to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, are being wound down in the wake of revelations about her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Film | Robert Duvall, the veteran actor who had a string of roles in classic American films including Apocalypse Now, The Godfather, M*A*S*H and To Kill a Mockingbird, has died aged 95. In depth: ‘Scottish voters don’t seem to think they have many decent options’ So far in the Holyrood election contest, no party is campaigning from a position of obvious strength. The SNP remains ahead despite nearly two decades in government, Labour is struggling to escape anger at Westminster, and Reform is polling strongly but with no clear sign it will be able to translate support into seats. “You can’t help but feel that Scottish voters don’t seem to think they have many decent options at the moment,” Libby says. She suggests the election may be decided less by enthusiasm than by resignation – with voters thinking in terms of which parties they trust most not to make things worse. *** The SNP | Dominance without enthusiasm? After almost two decades in power, the SNP is fighting an election in which it is no longer judged on what it promises to do, but on what voters feel it has already done – or, more aptly, what it has failed to do. And while the SNP’s campaign has focused on Scottish independence, their promises have been undermined by a failure to offer voters a plausible route to a second referendum. Taken together, these challenges should place the party in serious difficulty. And yet somehow, the SNP continues to poll favourably. Libby is not convinced, pointing to the wider indicators suggesting declining confidence in the Scottish government. “You’re looking at polls suggesting they’re going to win comfortably,” she says, “at the same time as trust and satisfaction with public services are steadily diminishing.” John Swinney’s arrival has stabilised the parliamentary party after Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf resigned in quick succession. But enthusiasm on the ground appears thinner than in previous campaigns. “My sense is that only the very hardcore people are going to be out leafleting,” Libby says – a telling detail for a party once defined by its activist energy. *** Labour | Opposition in Scotland, government in London Scottish Labour’s problem is simple to describe and hard to solve. It is an opposition party at Holyrood, but it carries the brand damage of a Westminster government. Libby says that when she is out on doorsteps, the anger is “palpable” – directed at Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves, and at decisions around winter fuel payments, the two-child benefit cap and disability benefit cuts. Subsequent U-turns on some of those policies do not appear to have cut through, prompting Sarwar to make his extraordinary cross-border red-on-red attack last week. The fact that no other senior Labour figure joined his call – Starmer’s cabinet instead circled their wagons around the embattled prime minister – has, as our Scotland editor, Severin Carrell, put it in this analysis piece, risked Sarwar looking disloyal and isolated. Where Labour may take comfort is in its organisation. Unlike the SNP, it has money – and a well-honed constituency-by-constituency ground operation. Libby points to the Hamilton byelection as a case study: Reform’s presence felt strong on the ground and frustration with Westminster was obvious, but Labour’s campaigning machine was “really, really well organised”, and it ultimately beat both the SNP and Reform. *** Reform | Making moves in Scotland One early cluster of defections from the Scottish Conservatives to Reform came in the north-east of Scotland – an area with a strong Conservative tradition, farming communities, and Aberdeen as the centre of Scotland’s oil and gas industry. These are not the disaffected faded coastal towns or lapsed Labour voters of the so-called red wall in England. It is, though, the only part of Scotland that voted for Brexit in 2016, and Reform believes it can make gains there, as well as across the post-industrial central belt where they gained their first Scottish electoral success in December, on West Lothian council. Libby also points to focus-group findings suggesting that some voters feel they have been “talked over” by mainstream politicians on issues such as immigration and gender recognition – a sense of grievance Reform is seeking to exploit. Reform has installed a new Scottish leader, the multimillionaire financier Malcolm Offord, who was born in Greenock – an attempt to bolster its Scottish credentials while building an operation capable of campaigning at scale. Libby says the party has earmarked £1m for its Scottish election campaign, and has been hiring staff and mailshotting across the country. The unanswered question is whether that investment converts into seats. *** Smaller parties, bigger leverage? The Scottish Greens are a separate party to their counterparts in England and Wales, and Libby says there has been little sign north of the border of a “Zack bounce” following Polanski’s election. They now have co-leaders, Ross Greer and Gillian Mackay, two MSPs in their early 30s who were elected in August on a promise of fresh ideas and renewed energy. But the party’s difficulty is that their old positioning has become harder to sustain after a spell in government. The Greens cast themselves as radicals holding the SNP’s feet to the fire on climate when they entered their governing partnership, the Bute House agreement, after the last Holyrood election in 2021. But the SNP ditched key climate commitments, Green members revolted and the agreement collapsed, leaving that relationship less clear, and the compromises of power easier for opponents to attack. The Scottish Conservatives, meanwhile, are fighting both a long-running identity crisis and the growing threat from Reform on their right. Libby describes leader Russell Findlay as “an interesting individual with a great backstory” – a former journalist who was once attacked with acid – but argues he has struggled to persuade voters who he is, beyond a politician reacting to Reform. She also notes that it was Ruth Davidson’s centre-right positioning that took the party to its electoral high point in Scotland, a strategy Findlay has not followed. And without the threat of another referendum, they have also lost their appeal as the “stop independence” party – a position that won them consistent electoral gains in recent years. The Liberal Democrats may be watching the arithmetic as much as the atmosphere. In a proportional system, small gains can matter, and there has been speculation they could increase their number of MSPs. If Scotland ends up with another SNP minority government, their leverage – and the shape of any future deals – could become part of the story. *** Tactical voting and the politics of prevention One of Libby’s most striking observations is on the country’s sophisticated electorate, shaped by decades of referendums, different voting systems and tactical behaviour. She points out that the historical structure of its politics matters because, if Reform is seen as a disruptive force, the incentive to vote tactically increases. Libby points to a recent Norstat poll suggesting majorities of both Labour and SNP supporters would be willing to vote against their usual preference – or even for a party they do not naturally align with on the constitution – if it helped keep Reform out. In other words, the most consequential dynamic in the final weeks may not be what parties are selling, but what voters are trying to stop. May’s election is shaping up as a contest in which almost every party is burdened by something – incumbency; Westminster unpopularity that has clearly developed into infighting; organisational weakness; ideological confusion; or a brand that does not quite fit Scottish politics. Between now and polling day, the question is not only whether any party can make a persuasive affirmative case to the electorate – but whether the result will end up being defined more by fear, fatigue and tactical calculation than by hope. What else we’ve been reading I loved Nadia Khomami’s take on the Wuthering Heights debate – particularly her description of the audience around her when she went to watch on Friday night. Poppy Noor, newsletters team In her weekly column, Nesrine Malik congratulates Keir Starmer on his unique political talent: alienating absolutely everyone. Losing staff left and right, losing votes to the left and right … Nesrine asks: what does a Starmer voter look like any more? Charlie Lindlar, newsletters team Maybelle Morgan’s One change that worked, on how finding a £20 note reframed her negative thinking, is a good lesson to us all. Poppy Hawaii’s Kilauea volcano erupted on Sunday, the latest event in a series of intermittent eruptions that kicked off in 2024. Our video team have some truly awe-inspiring clips here. Charlie Emma Beddington’s piece on benches being a great act of civic kindness surprised me, in the best of ways. Poppy Sport Winter Olympics | After Switzerland’s Loïc Meillard took gold in the men’s skiing slalom on Monday, Norwegian hopeful Atle Lie McGrath processed his grief in a novel way: hiding in the woods. Football | Brentford ended Macclesfield’s fairytale run in the FA Cup, winning 1-0 after an unfortunate own goal from Sam Heathcote in the 70th minute. Tennis | Emma Raducanu lost the final six games to fall to a 6-1, 5-7, 6-2 defeat to ‘lucky loser’ Antonia Ruzic in the opening round at the Dubai Tennis Championships. The front pages “Anger as PM abandons plans to delay May elections” leads the Guardian this morning. “Starmer’s plan to delay elections abandoned” is the splash of the Times, while the Telegraph has “Starmer U-turns on cancelled elections” and the Mail says “Starmer forced to face wrath of voters”. The i paper has “Farage forces elections U-turn – triggering next threat to Starmer leadership” and the FT has “Starmer abandons delay of 30 council elections after Reform legal challenge”. The Mirror leads with “Save our next generation”, and calls for Keir Starmer to crack down on social media giants. “Line of Duty ‘H’ bomb” is top story for the Sun, which reports that the BBC drama’s new series will reopen the hunt for the villain. Today in Focus The rise of the cocaine submarine The Guardian journalists Sam Jones and Tom Phillips chart the rise of the narco-sub after a record seizure in the Atlantic. Cartoon of the day | Ben Jennings The Upside A bit of good news to remind you that the world’s not all bad Our recurring series on the pets we’ll never forget is a weekly dose of wonder. This week, Clara Mead-Robson uses the column to tell us about Otto: a cocktail sausage fiend, friend to strangers, and, above all, a very, very good boy. “When he wasn’t acting like a loon, he was also utterly sweet and incapable of walking past a stranger without befriending them,” she writes. “Nothing gave me more immediate happiness than opening the front door to see him thundering down the stairs, tail thrashing vigorously and knocking down countless items in his haste to reunite with me.” Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday Bored at work? And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply

picture of article

Madrid museum shuffles its pack charting decades of rapid change in Spain

The Reina Sofía’s new rehang opens, quite pointedly, with a painting of a detained man sitting, head bowed and wrists shackled, as he waits for the arbitrary hand of institutional bureaucracy to decide his fate. The picture, Document No …, was painted by Juan Genovés in 1975, the year Francisco Franco died and Spain began its transition to democracy after four decades of dictatorship. Genovés’s faceless, everyman victim of the Franco regime’s control and repression is the natural starting point for the Madrid museum’s exploration of the past 50 years of contemporary art in Spain. Through the 403 selected works, the museum’s curators examine how artists from Spain and beyond have chronicled and reacted to socio-historical changes, from the hedonistic explosion of creativity that followed the dictator’s demise to the Aids epidemic, from second-wave feminism to growing environmental awareness, and from decolonisation to global terrorism. According to Ángeles González-Sinde, the president of the Reina Sofía’s board, the rehang – an exercise museums undertake to re-evaluate and reinvigorate their collections – is much more than a simple rejigging. Almost two-thirds of the works on display in the new Contemporary Art: 1975 to the Present collection, which occupies the museum’s fourth floor, have never been exhibited as part of the permanent collection. “More than an exhibition reorganisation, it’s a critical reinterpretation that seeks to contextualise artistic practices in dialogue with the social, political and cultural processes that have marked these five decades,” she told a press conference on Monday. Alongside works by internationally known artists such as Nan Goldin, Hal Fischer, Peter Hujar, Belkis Ayón and Robert Mapplethorpe are pieces that chart a rapidly changing Spanish society. The exiled Argentinian photographer Carlos Bosch used his camera to document key moments of the Transition – the process by which post-Franco Spain returned to democracy – among them Spain’s first gay pride march in 1977. The artist and queer activist José Pérez Ocaña employed altar installations to appropriate and subvert the popular rituals of Andalucían Catholicism. The collection also features items of jewellery by the designer Chus Burés, who has created pieces for two films by Pedro Almodóvar, perhaps the most famous figure of the wild and wildly creative post-Franco underground scene known as the Movida madrileña. The dark and destructive side of the movida is also apparent in Iván Zulueta’s 1979 arthouse horror film Arrebato (Rapture) and in the photographs of Alberto García-Alix. One of the many poignant works on show is García-Alix’s 1988 image En ausencia de Willy (Willy’s Absence), a black and white shot of a western shirt that belonged to the artist’s brother, who died of an overdose in the heroin epidemic that ravaged Spain in the 1980s. The shirt, which sits alongside a pencil sketch of Willy, serves as a potent reminder of the years when, in García-Alix’s words, “nothing was enough”. The advent of another epidemic is memorialised in several pieces, not least in Hujar’s photographs of mummified bodies in the catacombs of Palermo, which unknowingly foreshadow the physical ravages that Aids would inflict on the artist and so many of his friends decades later. Ajuares (Funerary Offerings), an installation by the artist, teacher and researcher Pepe Miralles, offers another musing on the epidemic by collecting together everyday objects linked to the illness and treatment of his friend Juan Guillermo. The items gathered together in a huge glass cabinet include antiretroviral medication, Prozac, gauzes, syringes, pyjamas and soft toys. Manuel Segade, the director of the Reina Sofía, said the 403 works were intended to create a constant dialogue between the past, the present and the future. “The Reina Sofía’s intention isn’t to create a single, unequivocal, closed narrative, but rather to open it up, to socialise these narratives as a possibility and as a way to consider this work for future presentations, so that the Reina Sofía’s collections are permanently open to revision,” he told reporters. The fundamental aim of the three-year-long reorganisation, Segade added, was to ensure that each and every visitor could “grasp the diversity, quality and discursive potential of contemporary Spanish art and the contributions of our artists to culture in general”. Spain’s culture minister, Ernest Urtasun, said the idea was to reflect on the “turning point” year of 1975 but also on wider questions of society, art and democracy. Given the current state of things, he added, such reflections were as vital today as they were 50 years ago. “Just as this floor begins with Juan Genovés – with the aspirations of Spain at that time, with its social aspirations and the role that contemporary art played in shaping perspectives on the various democratic social achievements of recent years – so I believe we must also be aware of the importance that contemporary art will play in the fight for democracy and in the defence of our fundamental values, the values of the Enlightenment,” Urtasun said.

picture of article

Chinese tourists shun Japan over lunar new year holiday as rift deepens

Chinese tourists are continuing to shun Japan in large numbers, with the country falling out of the top 10 destinations for those celebrating the lunar new year with a trip abroad. Japan has had a dramatic drop in the number of Chinese visitors since the end of last year as a diplomatic row between Tokyo and Beijing over the security of Taiwan continues. Chinese tourism to Japan, where a weak currency is helping fuel a tourism boom, almost halved in December compared with the same period in 2025, Japan’s transport ministry said. The trend looks set to continue, months after Japan’s prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, suggested her country’s self-defence forces could be deployed if China attempted to invade Taiwan. China claims the self-governing democracy as part of its own territory and has vowed to unite it with the mainland, by force if necessary. Takaichi’s remarks led to an angry response in China, where officials urged tourists and students not to travel to Japan. South Korea is expected to become the most popular overseas destination for Chinese travellers during the 40-day travel frenzy, with an estimated 250,000 expected to visit, up 1.5 times from the previous year. Japan will welcome fewer people from China than other countries in the region, including Thailand, Singapore, Vietnam and Russia, according to media reports. Instead, the number of Chinese tourists visiting Japan during the lunar new year holidays is expected to fall by up to 60% from the previous year. The dispute over Taiwan has intensified since Takaichi told MPs in November that military involvement was an option if a crisis in the Taiwan Strait posed an “existential” threat to Japan. Her refusal to back down has invited more criticism from China, including its foreign minister, Wang Yi, who this week accused Takaichi of trying to revive Japan’s militarist past. Wang told the Munich Security Conference on Monday: “Japanese people should no longer allow themselves to be manipulated or deceived by those far-right forces, or by those who seek to revive militarism. “All peace-loving countries should send a clear warning to Japan: if it chooses to walk back on this path, it will only be heading toward self-destruction.” In response, Japan protested through diplomatic channels, while the foreign ministry in Tokyo condemned Wang’s claims as “factually incorrect and ungrounded”. “Japan’s efforts to strengthen its defence capabilities are in response to an increasingly severe security environment and are not directed against any specific third country,” the ministry said in a statement. It said there were “countries in the international community that have been rapidly increasing their military capabilities in a non-transparent manner”, but added that “Japan opposes such moves and distances itself from them”. Liu Xiaoming, China’s special representative on Korean peninsula affairs, upped the ante when he said Takaichi’s remarks were proof of Japan’s “unextinguished ambition to invade and colonise Taiwan once again, and the lingering ghost of revived militarism”. In a post on X that referenced Japan’s 1941 surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, Liu added: “The lessons of history are not far away and must be heeded. If Japan refuses to repent and change its ways, it will inevitably repeat the same tragic mistakes.” Officials in Beijing have repeatedly warned travellers they face threats to their safety in Japan, although there have been no reports of incidents targeting tourists from China. On Sunday, the Chinese consulate general in Osaka again urged Chinese nationals to refrain from travelling to Japan after a fatal stabbing in the city. The incident, in which a teenager was stabbed to death and two others injured in a popular tourist area, did not involve Chinese nationals. Not all people have heeded the official travel advice. A Chinese man told the Kyodo news agency it was important to promote goodwill between ordinary people from both countries. Another, a woman from Shanghai, said she still planned to visit Japan with her parents. “The travel alert is aimed at promoting criticism of Japan,” she told Kyodo. “But my family has not been brainwashed.” With Reuters