Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Letter: Sir Geoffrey Bindman obituary

For many years Geoffrey Bindman was a keen participant in a Black, Asian and Jewish breakfast group that met in Chalk Farm, north-west London. Across a kitchen table we discussed not only the plight of refugees coming to Britain and the need to strengthen race relations legislation, but also our shared experiences of being minority communities in Britain. In the current climate cohesion is under strain, and we still need the sort of initiatives that Geoffrey helped to encourage.

picture of article

Rejoining Erasmus+ is brilliant news for Britain | Letters

Julian Baggini is right to laud the opportunities for European student exchange activities, with the announcement that the UK will rejoin the Erasmus scheme in 2027 (Britain rejoining Erasmus+ won’t halt the nativist tide – but it’s a step in the right direction, 17 December). Until Brexit, there were diverse chances for students to sample courses, cultures and environments in unfamiliar settings, enriching their experiences in ways that had lasting benefits. As one example, I looked after the UK arm of a consortium of European universities that enabled up to 10 students each year from each of six participating universities from six European countries to attend a 10-day environmental field course in one of these countries. We were able to continue this arrangement without a break for 12 years from 1997, funded almost entirely through Erasmus, so the cost to students was minimal. The field course venue was hosted by rotation, so each university only had to organise the course once every five or six years. Every year, participating students experienced working closely with peers from each country, and were exposed to different ideas and ways of approaching environmental issues, and environments that included the Mediterranean, central Europe and the far north. Lasting international friendships developed that in many cases endured long after the end of the course, and everyone enjoyed the experience, including staff, who developed working collaborations across Europe. These opportunities were only possible through the Erasmus scheme – its reinstatement will allow future students the benefits of similar experiences and life enhancement. Graham Walters Walthamstow, London • The UK needs a globally skilled workforce to negotiate, connect and engage internationally. Student mobility is crucial to achieving this, so it is very welcome news that the government has announced its association with Erasmus+ (UK to rejoin EU’s Erasmus student exchange programme, 16 December). The British Council has a longstanding commitment to supporting international exchange. We were a lead partner in the Erasmus+ UK National Agency from 2014 to 2020, where Erasmus+ made a significant contribution to the UK’s cultural relations activities, funding 4,846 projects, engaging 128,000 UK participants and awarding more than €679m to UK organisations. Erasmus+ has a proven track record in changing lives, opening up new learning experiences, providing insight into different cultures and nurturing the concept of global citizenship, not only among higher education staff and students but also across non-formal education, schools, technical and vocational education and training, and sport. Reassociation with Erasmus+ can only be a good thing for young people throughout the country. Maddalaine Ansell Director education, British Council • It is disappointing to see much of the media fail to recognise that Erasmus has now acquired a “plus”, and it is not solely for higher-education students. The programme might have begun with higher education in 1987 but it now includes schools, youth groups, sports teams, and vocational and adult education. As an organisation supporting schools, we look forward to the reinstatement of eTwinning, teacher job shadowing and in-service programmes, which were taken from the UK in 2020. Indeed, we have already had enquiries from schools in Spain, Denmark and France seeking partner schools in the UK. Ray Kirtley Chair, UK Global Learning Association for Schools • Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

picture of article

Kremlin renews criticism of Europe’s efforts to amend US plan to end Ukraine war

Russia has renewed its criticism of efforts by Europe and Ukraine to amend US proposals to end the war in Ukraine, saying they did not improve prospects for peace. Vladimir Putin’s top foreign policy aide, Yuri Ushakov, told reporters on Sunday that the proposed tweaks to Washington’s plan could prolong the conflict. “I am sure that the proposals that the Europeans and Ukrainians have made or are trying to make definitely do not improve the document and do not improve the possibility of achieving long-term peace,” Ushakov said, adding that he had not seen the exact proposals and that his criticism was “not a forecast”. Ukrainian forces have been battling an attempted Russian breakthrough in the village of Grabovske in the north-eastern Sumy region, Ukraine’s joint taskforce said. It disputed reports that Russian troops had occupied the nearby village of Ryasne. Ukraine’s rights ombudsman said Russian forces forcibly moved about 50 people from Grabovske to Russia. US intelligence believes Putin remains intent on capturing all of Ukraine and reclaiming parts of Europe that belonged to the former Soviet Union, Reuters reported, citing six sources familiar with US intelligence. Last week Putin called Europe’s leaders “little pigs” and said Russia would achieve its goals through diplomacy or force. However, Donald Trump’s lead negotiators, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, are holding talks with Russia’s envoy Kirill Dmitriev in Miami in the belief that a peace deal may be close. Dmitriev told reporters that talks on Saturday had proceeded “constructively” and would continue on Sunday. Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, said he may join the talks. Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said diplomatic efforts were advancing “quite quickly” and that his negotiators in Florida had been working with the American side. The Ukrainian delegation has had separate meetings in the US with American and European diplomats. Zelenskyy backed a US proposal for three-way talks with Washington and Moscow if it facilitated prisoner exchanges and other conditions. However, Ushakov said a proposal for three-way talks had not been seriously discussed. France has welcomed reports that Putin was open to talks with Emmanuel Macron. “As soon as the prospect of a ceasefire and peace negotiations becomes clearer, it becomes useful again to speak with Putin,” the French president’s office said in a statement. “It is welcome that the Kremlin publicly agrees to this approach.” Putin extended the apparent olive branch after EU leaders on Friday agreed to supply €90bn (£79bn) to Ukraine to shore up its economy and military campaign against Russian forces in the run-up to the fourth anniversary of Moscow’s full-scale invasion in 2022. Ukrainian drones hit an oil rig and other facilities at Russia’s Filanovsky oil field in the Caspian Sea, more than 700km (435 miles) from Ukraine’s nearest border, Ukraine’s military general staff said on Saturday.

picture of article

Élysée Palace staff member accused of stealing tableware worth up to €40,000

A silver steward employed at the Élysée Palace in Paris has been arrested for stealing silverware and porcelain, amid a wave of thefts from high-profile French institutions. Investigators arrested the man and two alleged accomplices last week. They are accused of taking the objects from the official Paris residence of the French president and trying to sell them on online auction websites such as Vinted. The head steward at the palace alerted authorities to the missing objects, some of which are deemed items of national heritage. The items are estimated to have a combined value of up to €40,000 (£35,000). Most of the pieces came from the Sèvres Manufactory in Paris, a famed porcelain factory that has been owned by the French state since 1759. Investigators began to question Élysée staff after factory personnel recognised some of the missing items on auction sites. The alleged thefts are an unwelcome encore to a string of robberies from the Louvre and other French museums in recent months that have raised concern about lax safeguards at the country’s cultural institutions. The role of silver steward involves storing and looking after tableware and similar items used by presidents, visiting royalty and other dignitaries. Prosecutors said inventory records made by the arrested steward gave the impression he was planning future thefts. According to investigators, the man’s Vinted account included a plate stamped “French Air Force” and ashtrays marked “Sèvres Manufactory” – items not usually available to the general public. They said they recovered about 100 objects in his home, vehicle and personal locker, including Sèvres porcelain, a René Lalique statuette, Baccarat champagne coupes and copper saucepans. The steward and his alleged accomplices appeared in court on 18 December and will be tried on 26 February. The trio were placed under judicial supervision, banned from contacting one another, prohibited from appearing at auction venues and barred from their professional activities, the Associated Press reported. The recovered items were returned to the Élysée – a happier outcome than at the Louvre, which is still missing crown jewels worth an estimated €88m (£77m) after a daylight raid in October. Four suspects have been arrested in relation to that case. Other French institutions targeted in recent months include Paris’s Natural History Museum and a porcelain museum in Limoges. Both were raided in September, losing six gold nuggets worth about €1.5m (£1.3m) and Chinese porcelain with an estimated combined worth of €6.55m (£5.7m) respectively. In October, around 2,000 gold and silver coins worth about €90,000 (£78,000) were stolen from the Maison des Lumières (House of Enlightenment), a museum in Langres dedicated to the philosopher Denis Diderot.

picture of article

Do prawns feel pain? Why scientists are urging a rethink of Australia’s favoured festive food

Crustaceans are a festive season staple for many families, particularly in Australia where an estimated 18.5m kilograms of prawns and more than 150,000 lobsters are eaten over Christmas and New Year. Globally, trillions are caught and consumed each year. Australia is a major producer, with prawn, lobster and crab industries valued at more than $1bn. It may be an inconvenient truth, but scientists say there is now compelling evidence that these aquatic animals, with their hard shells and soft insides, are sentient, and are able to experience fear, pain and distress. In the season of goodwill to all, should we spare a thought for crustaceans? Prof Lynne Sneddon, who leads the aquatic animal welfare group at Sweden’s University of Gothenburg, says sentience implies an animal has the capacity for positive and negative experiences, the ability to form relationships, learn new skills and make good decisions. There are examples of decapod crustaceans doing all those things, she says. Take the pistol shrimp, a small snapping crustacean with lopsided claws which shares its burrow with a goby fish. The fish guards the doorway on the lookout for predators, while the shrimp is like its clean flatmate, excavating and maintaining their shared quarters. “They live together in harmony,” Sneddon says, one example among many of crustaceans forming relationships. Studies also show crustaceans can learn, remember and solve problems, even though the physical structure of their nervous system is totally different to ours. Crabs can solve mazes to find food, they will remember the way, and when the maze is rejigged will adapt using trial and error. Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton’s Clear Air column as a free newsletter ‘Do they feel pain?’ Crustaceans are a diverse group, encompassing more than 67,000 species – from the tiniest shrimp to Japanese spider crabs the size of a small car. Decapods, the group that most sentience studies refer to, are the ones with 10 limbs – including prawns, shrimp, lobsters, crayfish, bugs and yabbies. Yet despite the accumulating evidence, Sneddon says, people can often find it difficult to engage with the idea of crustaceans having emotional lives. “We empathise with species that look like us,” she says. Humans tend to be very face-oriented, looking for cues about whether people are sad, overjoyed or annoyed, whereas crustaceans can appear expressionless. Robert Elwood, an emeritus professor of animal behaviour at Queen’s University Belfast, began investigating the question of pain and sentience in crustaceans 20 years ago, after a chance meeting with seafood chef Rick Stein at a local pub. “I chatted to him about our mutual interest in crustaceans. And he just asked: ‘Do they feel pain?’” Elwood’s experiments since have revealed behaviour and stress responses consistent with pain – crustaceans giving up valuable resources to avoid unpleasant experiences, and evidence they retain memories of noxious events. It’s difficult to prove pain and sentience in other animals, even in cats and dogs, because they can’t tell you what they’re feeling, Elwood says. But there is a high possibility in crustaceans. “We have lots of evidence that fits the idea of pain,” he says. “Even if you can’t prove it 100%, you should give the animal the benefit of the doubt.” In light of this, many fishing, transport and food preparation practices are cruel. When crabs and lobsters are placed in boiling water, they can remain conscious for more than two minutes. Territorial crabs may be strapped up with cable ties and piled on top of one another for transport or sale, and later dismembered or butchered while alive. Some prawn farms use a method called “eyestalk ablation”, cutting the eyes off female prawns, in a practice that blinds them but increases spawning. Prof Culum Brown of Macquarie University says many things people do to crustaceans as part of the food chain are “horrendous”. He says the standard for vertebrates – sheep and cattle, but also fish – is to stun them in some way before they are killed, so they are unconscious and unaware of what’s going on. There are also pragmatic reasons to consider crustacean welfare, he says. “Even if you don’t think they’re capable of feeling pain, we do know that the accumulation of stress in their body tissues destroys the texture, flavour and longevity of the product.” ‘Have a think about how you treat them’ Scientists and welfare advocates say crustacean welfare should be given a higher priority when the animals are caught, killed or transported, used in experiments, kept as pets and in their natural environment. Many would like to see a ban on live animal sales, exports and on boiling alive. Laws in the UKand New Zealand recognise crustacean sentience. In Australia, protection varies. The Australian Capital Territory considers them sentient beings alongside other animals, while legal protection under animal welfare laws is lacking in South Australia and Tasmania. In many states, welfare rules are limited to animals sold at restaurants or fishmongers. The Australian code that governs how animals are used in science does not currently consider decapod crustaceans as animals. Dr Ben Sturgeon, a veterinarian and chief executive of the UK-based organisation Crustacean Compassion, says changing public and industry attitudes to crustaceans requires a longer conversation. “They’re not fluffy,” he says. “They might pinch your toe.” Consumer demand for sustainable, high-welfare foods is leading to some improvements, he says, such as the increasing adoption of electrical stunning before slaughter. The best thing consumers can do is ask questions, Sturgeon says. Crustaceans sold live or fresh usually involve some sort of welfare compromise. Instead, he suggests seeking out alternatives where animals have been caught and killed quickly, then flash frozen. Melina Tensen, a senior scientific officer with the RSPCA, recommends being informed, supporting best practice and never purchasing live animals. The society opposes the live export and sale of food animals, including crustaceans, she says. “Live crustaceans should not be made available to the general public for purchase and instead be humanely handled and killed by those who are trained and competent to do so, including stunning before slaughter.” Crustaceans are much more intelligent and emotional animals than most people understand, and they are affected by painful experiences, Sneddon says. “Just have a think about how you treat them,” she says. “Think more deeply about ethical choices. When choosing them as food, find out where they’ve come from, what they’ve gone through.”

picture of article

Friedrich Merz wants Berlin to be a geopolitical hub. Will German voters reward him?

Friedrich Merz’s three-month bid to catapult Germany into the role of undisputed leader of Europe has come unstuck. His call for Europe to hand Ukraine access to €201bn (£176bn) in frozen Russian central bank assets via a reparations loan was rejected at a decisive European Council meeting in Brussels. Instead, Ukraine is to be given a €90bn interest-free loan, backed by the EU’s collective budget, covering two-thirds of what Ukraine will need between 2026-27. Merz had been unable to break the resistance of Belgium, which said the raid on the Russian funds, stored mainly in Brussels-based Euroclear, was unlawful. Opposition had also come from France and Italy, who both insisted they would not cover the cost of indemnifying Belgium against legal claims. Going into the summit, Merz had insisted using the Russian assets was the only option, and the defining test of Europe’s ability to act decisively in its own interest. His strong advocacy of using the Russian assets had been a remarkable personal volte-face. As recently as August, he said he feared the measure might discourage other central banks from holding euro-denominated assets. He switched sides in a Financial Times article in September, saying something dramatic was needed to upset Putin’s calculations. France reluctantly appeared to follow suit. Earlier this month Merz flew at short notice to Brussels to try personally to persuade the Flemish nationalist prime minister, Bart De Wever, to end his resistance, to no avail. Despite the reverse, it seems unlikely Merz will back away from the role he sees Germany as required to fulfil, or revert to being the meek partner in an archaic Franco-German motor. A self-confessed disillusioned Atlanticist, Merz is convinced by two principles: that Europe’s security is inextricably allied with Ukraine’s, and that something fundamental has changed in the transatlantic relationship. Last week he quoted, somewhat self-consciously, from the German sociologist Max Weber’s 1919 essay titled Politics as a Vocation, describing the feeling of holding “in one’s hands a nerve fibre of historically important events”. He went on to say that current relations with the US were “not normal fluctuations, the ups and downs of sometimes good, sometimes bad relations. This is not a variation in circumstances – it is a tectonic shift in the centres of political and economic power in the world.” Despite the setbacks, Merz has achieved major objectives by ensuring Europe retains stewardship of the Russian assets and securing a commitment they will not be released until Russia pays reparations, possibly by repaying the loan to the EU. This means Europe retains a stake at the Ukraine bargaining table. The US effort to grab the assets in a carve-up with Russia was seen as indefensible by some German diplomats. Merz himself explained he saw “no possibility of leaving the money we mobilise to the US”. Writing earlier this month in the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, he said: “It is up to us to advance the cause of European sovereignty. If we are serious about this, we cannot leave it to non-European states to decide what happens to the financial resources of an aggressor state that have been lawfully frozen within the jurisdiction of our own rule of law and in our own currency.” The chancellor can also credit himself with persuading the US negotiators Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner to come to Berlin for two days of talks this week to revise a potential peace agreement, including clearer US security guarantees. In Berlin, Merz made the symbolic choice to sit down next to Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and across the table from Witkoff and Kushner. No other European leader was there, although the French president, Emmanuel Macron, the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, and others attended a post-talks dinner. More broadly, Merz has also given the most uncompromising response of any European leader to the claims in the US national security strategy about Europe’s decline. Where Starmer has shunned confrontation, Merz, during a visit to Rhineland-Palatinate, the German region that hosts major American military bases, said: “I see no need for the Americans to now want to save democracy in Europe. If it were to be saved, we could do it ourselves.” In a speech to the CSU party last weekend he openly clashed with Trump’s benign assessment of the threat posed by Russia. “Just as in 1938 the Sudetenland was not enough, Putin will not stop. And those who still believe today that he has had enough should closely analyse his strategies, documents, speeches and public appearances.” He said “the era of Pax Americana was over”, and there was no point being nostalgic for something that would not return. Finally, in a speech to the Bundestag on Wednesday, Merz insisted Germany had to reform in the face of this new world disorder. “We are firmly determined that Germany must not become a victim of these processes. We cannot stand by and watch as the world is reshaped. We are not a pawn of major powers.” As a sign of Germany’s new-found sense of agency, he confirmed defence spending would rise by up to €378bn by 2029, double the budget of the preceding five years. Merz is also moving forward with a form of military conscription. Pressed in the Bundestag by the AfD on whether he was considering sending German troops to a European coalition force operating inside Ukraine, Merz said any such decision was for later. But he added: “We will not – at least as long as I am still able to speak – repeat the mistakes of 2014, when we left Ukraine vulnerable to Russian interference without security guarantees.” By contrast, his SPD predecessor Olaf Scholz in March 2024 said: “To be perfectly clear, as German chancellor I will not send any soldiers from our Bundeswehr [armed forces] to Ukraine.” Merz will face criticism that he bet the farm on a flawed plan, but he won cross-party praise in the Bundestag last week. The SPD foreign policy expert Adis Ahmetovic said: “The chancellor has successfully made Berlin a hub for international diplomacy.” If it is to remain that hub, he may not only have to confront a confident populist far right in Germany, but also its open ideological allies in Russia and the US. The risk of an all-out row with an irascible Trump or a misreading of his own electorate’s priorities are real. A YouGov poll commissioned by the German press agency dpa showed broad German support for Russian state bank assets being seized to help Ukraine, but a separate poll showed 45% of Germans wanted the government to scale back support for Ukraine. The AfD, running neck and neck with the CDU nationally, will try to blame Merz for every battlefield reverse. There is a risk that Merz, consumed by the grandeur of geopolitics, loses touch with what moves most voters. Last week, he said, rather grandly: “One day, we will not be asked, and I say this quite openly and honestly, dear friends, whether we held the safety net in the German pension system for one year less or one year longer. “The question, rather, will be whether we made our contribution, and indeed the maximum contribution we could make, to preserving freedom and peace in an open society, a market economy in the heart of Europe.” Noble sentiments, but voters are not renowned for rewarding politicians for statesmanship.

picture of article

Danish postal service to stop delivering letters after 400 years

The Danish postal service will deliver its last letter on 30 December, ending a more than 400-year-old tradition. Announcing the decision earlier this year to stop delivering letters, PostNord, formed in 2009 in a merger of the Swedish and Danish postal services, said it would cut 1,500 jobs in Denmark and remove 1,500 red postboxes amid the “increasing digitalisation” of Danish society. Describing Denmark as “one of the most digitalised countries in the world”, the company said the demand for letters had “fallen drastically” while online shopping continued to increase, prompting the decision to instead focus on parcels. It took only three hours for 1,000 of the distinctive postboxes, which have already been dismantled, to be bought up when they went on sale earlier this month with a price tag of 2,000 DKK (£235) each for those in good condition and 1,500 DKK (£176) for those a little more well-worn. A further 200 will be auctioned in January. PostNord, which will continue to deliver letters in Sweden, has said it will refund unused Danish stamps for a limited time. Danes will still be able to send letters, using the delivery company Dao, which already delivers letters in Denmark but will expand its services from 1 January from about 30m letters in 2025 to 80m next year. But customers will instead have to go to a Dao shop to post their letters – or pay extra to have it collected from home – and pay for postage either online or via an app. The Danish postal service has been responsible for delivering letters in the country since 1624. In the last 25 years, letter-sending has been in sharp decline in Denmark, with a fall of more than 90%. But evidence suggests a resurgence in letter-writing among younger people could be under way. Dao said its research had found 18- to 34-year-olds send two to three times as many letters as other age groups, citing the trend researcher Mads Arlien-Søborg, who puts the rise down to young people “looking for a counterbalance to digital oversaturation”. Letter-writing, he said, had become a “conscious choice”. According to Danish law, the option to send a letter must exist. This means that if Dao were to stop delivering letters, the government would be obliged to appoint somebody else to do it. A source close to the transport ministry insisted there would not be any “practical difference” in the new year – because people would still be able to send and receive letters, they would simply do so through a different company. Any significance around the change, they said, was purely “sentimental”. But others have said there is an irreversible finality to it. Magnus Restofte, the director of the Enigma postal, the telecommunications and communications museum in Copenhagen, said in the event that it were no longer possible to use digital communications “It’s actually quite difficult to turn back [to physical post]. We can’t go back to what it was. Also, take into consideration we are one of the most digitalised countries in the world.” Under the MitID scheme – Denmark’s national digital ID system, used for everything from online banking to signing documents electronically and booking a doctor’s appointment – all official communications from authorities are automatically sent via “digital post” rather than by mail. While there is the option to opt out and instead receive physical mail, few do. Today, 97% of the Danish population aged 15 and over is enrolled in MitID and only 5% of Danes have opted out of digital post. The Danish public, said Restofte, had been “quite pragmatic” about the change to postal services because very few people received physical letters in their postboxes any more. Some younger people have never sent a physical letter. But the scarcity of physical letters has increased their value. “The funny thing is that actually receiving a physical letter, the value of that is extremely high,” said Restofte. “People know if you write a physical letter and write by hand you have spent time and also spent money.” Announcing their decision earlier this year, Kim Pedersen, the deputy chief executive of PostNord Denmark, said: “We have been the Danish postal service for 400 years, and therefore it is a difficult decision to tie the knot on that part of our history. The Danes have become more and more digital and this means there are very few letters left today, and the decline continues so significantly that the letter market is no longer profitable.”