Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Middle East crisis live: US war on Iran has cost around $29bn, Pentagon says

US defence secretary Pete Hegseth has finished speaking at the congressional hearing in Washington. Here is a quick recap of the main lines: Jules Hurst III, chief financial official for the Pentagon, said the cost of the Iran war has risen to “closer” to $29bn because of the “repair and replacement of equipment” and “general operational costs”. Previously, the Pentagon said the war had cost about $25bn for roughly two months of spending when Hegseth testified two weeks ago. Hegseth hinted that the US could re-escalate the war when asked whether the defence department had any plans to withdraw US troops from the Middle East and protect military assets in the region. “I would say we have a plan for all of that. We have a plan to escalate if necessary. We have a plan to, retrograde, if necessary. We have a plan to shift assets,” the defence secretary said, declining to give specific details on the next steps in Iran. Hegseth said “it’s evident” the ceasefire with Iran remains in effect. “Ceasefire means the fire is ceasing and we know that has occurred while negotiations occur,” he told the hearing.

picture of article

Three-day ceasefire ends with fresh wave of Russian attacks on Ukraine – Europe live

in Athens Meanwhile, Greece’s minister Nikos Dendias has called the discovery of an explosive-packed drone near the shores of the popular Ionian isand of Lefkada in western Greece “a serious issue” saying he will raise it with counterparts at a meeting in Brussels today. Greek government officials have concluded the drone was manufactured in Ukraine following extensive testing of the device by military experts. “I will have the opportunity to inform my colleagues, in the presence of the Ukrainian minister of defence, about the information regarding the drone we detected in Greece,” Dendias told journalists as he arrived for the Brussels meeting. “You understand that the presence of this UAV, the drone, affects freedom of navigation and also affects the safety of navigation. This is an extremely serious issue.” As we reported at the weekend the drone was thought to be carrying up to 100 kg of explosives. It was discovered by a fisherman in a cave in Lefkada last week.

picture of article

Macron seeks allies and a foreign policy less tied to France’s colonial past at Africa summit

A French-African summit held every few years since 1973 is taking place in a non-francophone country for the first time as Emmanuel Macron tries to rebuild France’s role on the continent after setbacks in its former colonies. More than 30 heads of state and government are meeting in Kenya’s capital, Nairobi, for this year’s iteration of the summit. Named Africa Forward, it is being seen by analysts as an attempt by France to court new allies. Speaking at the summit on Tuesday, the French president announced new investments and said sovereignty would be key in the new partnership that France is hoping to build with Africa. Macron said Paris would be respectful of each African country’s independence, adding that “sovereignty and autonomy is shared, and your success is our success”. France’s new strategy, according to Macron, would be based on a shared agenda and that the “days of offering assistance are behind us”. “I’d like to focus on co-investment,” he said. The leaders joined representatives of the African Union, financial institutions and the development sector to discuss themes including energy transition, peace and security and reform of the international financial architecture. The summit was preceded on Monday by networking, matchmaking and workshop events on youth, creative and cultural industries and sport. Organisers say the event represents “a paradigm shift” in the relationship between Africa and France. The Kenyan president, William Ruto, referred to sovereignty eight times in his speech. He reiterated that the days of European dependency were over for Africa in favour of mutual respect between cooperating nations. New partnerships between the African nations and France “must not be built on dependency but on sovereign equality, not on aid or charity but on mutually beneficial investment, and not on extraction or exploitation but on win-win engagements,” he said. France had for decades used a policy called Françafrique in its former colonies to maintain political, economic and military influence. But it has faced repeated setbacks in francophone countries in west and central Africa, where its relations with its former colonies have deteriorated. Coups in the region have been underpinned by anti-France sentiment, with Paris being accused of neocolonialism and of trying to influence military and other affairs. Since 2022, France has been forced to withdraw its troops from countries including Mali, Niger and Chad. Some terminated their defence agreements with Paris and others requested a military withdrawal. Mikhail Nyamweya, an international relations analyst, said holding the summit in a non-francophone country signalled that France was trying to move “beyond its old francophone comfort zone … after losing ground in its traditional sphere of influence”. He added: “France is trying to repackage its Africa policy through an anglophone diplomatic hub, and to present the relationship as broader, more economic, and less tied to its colonial past.” The summit also fits in with Ruto’s ambition to position Kenya as a reliable international partner and a convening hub. During Ruto’s term, Kenya has led a security mission in Haiti and hosted the inaugural Africa Climate Summit. Prof Macharia Munene, a history and international relations scholar, said Macron had been trying to establish himself in a global leadership role and was looking for companions in Africa. “There was a convergence of interests,” he said of Macron and Ruto. France and Kenya entered a defence agreement last year that opposition and civil society groups in the east African country have criticised, saying it compromised sovereignty and gave French soldiers legal immunity. In March, 800 French military personnel arrived in Kenya for training and security exercises. At a joint press briefing with Ruto in Nairobi on Sunday, Macron remarked on the changing dynamics for his country in west Africa, downplaying the absence from the event of leaders from Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger and highlighting the number of academics, artists and entrepreneurs in attendance from those countries. “We can disagree with some of these governments, but we never disagree with people. We love these people,” he said.

picture of article

How Hezbollah’s $300 drones are challenging Israeli military

The three Israeli soldiers clustered by a tank heard the noise before they saw its source. By the time they spotted the drone, it was too late. The video feed goes black as the small fibre-optic first-person-view (FPV) drone explodes next to them, killing one soldier and injuring six more. Footage of the drones hitting Israeli tanks, soldiers and bulldozers in south Lebanon has become increasingly common as Hezbollah puts the weapon at the centre of its guerrilla war against Israel’s occupation of south Lebanon. They are cheap, disposable and hard to evade. Unlike radio-controlled drones, they are connected to their operators by a kilometres-long fibre optic cable that cannot be jammed by electronic warfare defences. And they are a serious challenge for the Israeli military. Hezbollah has killed a bulldozer driver, evaded the trophy defence system on the Israeli Merkava tank and continually targeted soldiers with the drones. Their FPV capabilities, in common with FPV radio-controlled craft, allow an operator to pilot the small, explosive-equipped drones directly from their video feeds and detonate them on impact. An Israeli military official said Israel “recognised the UAV [unmanned aerial vehicle] threat” and that it was working to develop “capabilities for the detection and interception of weapons”. A senior officer was last week tapped to find a solution for Israel, which has also used FPV drones in Lebanon. For Hezbollah, the drones have proved to be an effective way for the non-state group to inflict harm on a better equipped, better funded army and to raise the cost of Israel’s continued military presence in south Lebanon. The increasing reliance on the drones since the 17 April Lebanon-Israel ceasefire reflects not only new battlefield tactics, but the new shape of Hezbollah. The group can no longer rely on weapons being transferred from Iran via a land corridor in Syria, and instead must manufacture its own weapons and munitions on a much smaller budget, a source in Hezbollah explained. “The development is viewed as part of efforts to overcome supply challenges following the disruption of the Syrian supply route after the fall of Bashar al-Assad in late 2024,” the Hezbollah source said. The group has increasingly turned towards low-cost, locally manufactured drones. Each drone costs about $300-$400 (£220-£295) to manufacture, and is produced using 3D-printing and “commercially available electronic components that can be adapted for dual civilian and military use”, the source said. The use of the FPV drone also befits Hezbollah’s return to its guerrilla roots, raising the cost of occupation after it failed to stop the Israeli military entering its southern Lebanese heartland in the last war. The long range of the drones, which are estimated to stretch dozens of kilometres, is forcing Israel to re-evaluate the depth of its buffer zone in south Lebanon. Previous Israeli assessments wanted it to be at least 11km deep, based on the range of guided anti-tank munitions used by Hezbollah, hard-to-intercept weapons that Hezbollah relied on in the last war to harass soldiers and cities in northern Israel. Israel’s multi-billion dollar Iron Dome defence system has so far proved ineffective at stopping the small drones, and in recent videos, Israeli soldiers have resorted to trying to shoot the aircraft down with their service weapons. The Israeli military source said intelligence bodies across military branches were conducting research to develop “more effective alert models” and that advanced weapons research and development was being conducted to find a way to counter the new threat. “Fibre optic cable FPVs can’t be jammed with electronic warfare and it is more difficult to detect them,” explained Rob Lee, a senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute’s Eurasia programme. The Israeli military was not alone in its struggle to stop the drones, he said. Countries around the world had made it a priority to develop systems to counter the “Ukraine-style” use of drones that has expanded across global conflicts. Videos released by Hezbollah show the group becoming more skilled in its use of drones. Footage released earlier in the war showed the UAVs being caught by Israeli tanks’ projectile defence systems, or hitting targets without casualties, but coverage from Hezbollah last week showed one FPV drone heading leisurely towards a tank in Qantara, south Lebanon, while another films from a distance away in order to confirm it hit its target – a tactic borrowed from Ukraine. Fibre optic drones first began appearing in the Ukraine war in late 2024, used by both sides as an experimental response to radio jamming. Their grim effectiveness quickly became clear, and Russia, having better access to the cabling, made particularly effective use of the weapons. The Hezbollah source acknowledged that the group had watched how fibre optic drones were used to devastating effect in the Ukraine war. Armed groups and states across the world are now using cheap offensive drones in all kinds in conflict, including in the recent US-Israeli war against Iran. Footage from FPV drones acts as effective propaganda. Videos of soldiers running terrified in the last moments of their lives in Lebanon have started to proliferate, as they did in Ukraine years earlier. Israel has frequently published footage of FPV drone footage in Lebanon, in one instance showing a lone, exhausted Hezbollah fighter in the southern city of Bint Jbeil covering his face in resignation the moment before a drone killed him. Hezbollah military media this week released FPV footage spliced between clips of a golden eagle hunting its prey, with inspirational music in the background under the title We Will Hunt You Down. “The goal in guerrilla warfare is not a quick victory, but rather the gradual attrition of the enemy,” explained the retired Lebanese Brig Gen Mounir Shehadeh, a former Lebanese government coordinator to Unifil, the UN interim force in Lebanon. “If used intelligently, [FPV drones] are capable of altering the balance of power on the battlefield, especially in asymmetric conflict environments,” Shehadeh said.

picture of article

Israeli MPs back special tribunal with death penalty powers for alleged 7 October attackers

Israeli lawmakers have approved setting up a livestreamed special tribunal with the power to sentence to death Palestinians convicted of taking part in the Hamas attack on 7 October 2023 that triggered the war in Gaza. The measure was passed by 93 votes to none in the 120-seat Knesset, Israel’s parliament, reflecting widespread support among Israel’s Jewish majority for punishing those found responsible for the deadliest single attack in Israel’s history. The remaining 27 lawmakers were absent or abstained from voting. The bill is separate from a law passed in March that approved use of the death penalty for Palestinians convicted of murdering Israelis, a measure harshly condemned by the international community and rights groups as discriminatory and inhumane. The October 2023 attack, led by elite “Nukhba” force fighters of Hamas, was the worst attack on Jews since the Holocaust. At least 1,200 people were killed, the majority of them civilians. During the attack and in its aftermath, Israeli forces captured about 300 alleged attackers inside Israel, who have been held since then. Under the new legislation, the tribunal will be able to charge the alleged assailants under Israel’s 1950 law for the prevention of genocide, which carries the death penalty. Rights groups have criticised the measure, saying it makes the death penalty too easy to impose while also doing away with procedures safeguarding the right to a fair trial. Defendants can appeal against their sentences but the appeals have to be heard by a separate, special appeals court rather than regular appeals courts. Ya’ara Mordecai, an international law expert at Yale Law School, said the new law raised some concerns about due process, given the military court setting, as well as a risk of atrocity proceedings turning into politicised or symbolic “show trials”. Because the bill empowers a panel of judges to hand down the death penalty by a majority vote, and requires the trials to be conducted in a livestreamed Jerusalem courtroom, it has drawn comparisons to the 1962 trial of the Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann, which was broadcast live on television and in which Eichmann was sentenced to death in a civilian court. Eichmann’s execution was the last time the death penalty was carried out in Israel, though capital punishment remains on the books for acts of genocide, espionage during wartime and certain terror offences. While military courts theoretically retained the ability to hand down a death sentence, a legacy of British colonial regulations, it was handed down just once, to a member of the Palestine Liberation Organisation, and then commuted. Instead, as Smadar Ben-Natan, an Israeli and international legal scholar, pointed out in an essay for Haaretz before the vote, the Eichmann case was seen as an example of “a unique historical injustice” to which no other crime could be compared. That framing has changed for some in Israel’s coalition government who depict Hamas as the “new Nazis”. Opponents of the bill also say livestreaming the proceedings before guilt is established risks turning the trials into a spectacle. They have raised questions about the reliability of the evidence that may be presented, saying it could have been extracted by harsh interrogation methods. Simcha Rothman, one of the bill’s sponsors, said the overwhelming consensus for the bill in the Knesset showed Israeli lawmakers could come together “around a common mission”. Several Israeli rights groups including HaMoked, Adalah and the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel said on Monday that while “justice for the victims of October 7 is a legitimate and urgent imperative,” any accountability for the crimes “must be pursued through a process which includes rather than abandons the principles of justice”. A Hamas spokesperson, Hazem Qassem, said the new law “serves as a cover for the war crimes committed by Israel in Gaza”. The international criminal court is investigating Israel’s conduct in the Gaza war and has issued arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and the former defence minister Yoav Gallant, as well as for three Hamas leaders who have all since been killed by Israel. Israel is also fighting a genocide case at the international court of justice. It rejects the allegations as politically motivated and has argued that its war is against Hamas, not the Palestinian people. Reuters and Associated Press contributed to this report

picture of article

In the 1979 hostage crisis, why did Iran free 10 Black Americans before the others?

Since the United States launched a joint military campaign with Israel on Iran in February, many commentators and historians have revisted a chapter of modern history: the 1979 Iran hostage crisis. On 4 November, a student demonstration outside the US embassy in Tehran erupted into an all-out assault on the compound, and 66 Americans were taken hostage. It was the culmination of decades of tension, beginning with the US and Britain’s role in installing the Shah of Iran to safeguard energy interests, and ending with a popular uprising that toppled his oppressive regime and drove him into exile. As many recalled this chapter, one detail has taken on renewed resonance: 16 days into the standoff, 13 hostages, including three white women, four Black women and six Black men, were released. Why were 10 black hostages released early and what were the global political strains that fed into that moment? James Hughes, then a 30-year-old air force staff sergeant assigned to the embassy, was one of those released hostages. In an interview with the Guardian, he reflects on those fraught days in captivity and how they connect to the current US conflict in Iran today. *** Tall with a thin salt-and-pepper goatee covering his otherwise smooth profile, Hughes cuts a dignified, avuncular figure at age 76. His voice is warm, his words well-measured and softly spoken – a careful calibration honed over a lifetime of military service. A New Orleans native, Hughes came of age during Jim Crow. “I went to a segregated school, had to get off the sidewalk when white people coming,” he says. “I’ve lived through racism and prejudice my whole life.” Hughes served in Vietnam during a moment when Black freedom was being recast as an international project as Martin Luther King, Angela Davis and other civil rights activists were linking racial justice in the United States to anti-imperial struggles abroad. Fresh off his Vietnam service, Hughes arrived in Tehran in the fall of 1979 with little reason to suspect he would become a pawn in an axis-tilting standoff. “I just liked the idea of traveling and seeing different cultures,” he says. “The Iranians I was around when I would go to a bazaar or a bowling alley were real nice people. It was a beautiful country with good food and the best pistachios in the world.” “Boring” is how Hughes describes his job as an administrative manager. That changed on the cool, drizzly Sunday morning of 4 November, a day after his 30th birthday. Anti-American student demonstrations outside the embassy, a constant presence during his first month on the job, had grown more rancorous after news that the Shah was receiving cancer treatment in the United States. Even as the protests built on the other side of the embassy wall, Hughes assumed they would never make it inside. “I just didn’t think it was going to happen because most countries protect their embassies,” he says, “right to the max.” But then the crowd started spilling over. For three hours, a small contingent of marine guards held back the demonstrators with teargas – just enough time for classified documents to be destroyed. Ultimately, they were overrun, and the protesters took over the embassy as the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and local police stood by. “They blindfolded me, tied my hands behind my back and sat me down on the floor,” Hughes recalls of his apprehension. “I realized: this is not a joke.” Hughes remembers spending his days tied to a chair, measuring time by the “death to America” chants leaking through the newspaper-covered windows and surviving on rice, water and goat cheese – which he can’t stomach now after having it forced on him for breakfast each morning in captivity. At one point, he says: “I felt someone touching my skin and my hair. And the thing that went through my mind was they’ve never really seen a real Black person.” Initial restraint toward the American hostages soon gave way to rougher treatment. In one interrogation session, Hughes remembers a pistol pressed against his temple, the hammer cocked, and thinking ‘this is the end of my life’ – and that he might never see his wife and young son again. What was meant to be a formative trip to the cradle of religion instead brought on a crisis of faith. “I was disappointed,” he says, “like, where’s God when you need him?” *** It was what happened next, the release of 13 hostages including Hughes, that saw Iran’s theocratic regime claiming to stand in solidarity with America’s marginalized classes. “Blacks for a long time have lived under oppression and pressure in America and may have been sent [to Iran under duress],” the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini said in a statement. The clear intent was to put pressure on the US and bolster the revolution’s legitimacy. A month later, a spokesperson for Iran’s foreign ministry said Khomeini was receiving letters from “American Blacks [and] African Blacks [for his] pro-Black actions”. But in the end the move only further underscored how Black American history is repurposed for political uprisings abroad. These days, the cultural exchange cuts both ways – with Black activism invoking the freedom struggles of Palestine and the wider Arab world, and hip-hop often serving as a soundtrack for protest movements across the region. But the back and forth sits uneasily alongside the Islamic Republic’s own undeniable history of repression against its own people. This month alone, Iran has been the backdrop for a wave of near-daily hangings as authorities seek to quash protests amid war with US and Israel. In 2026, however, some Black Americans on social media appear less engaged in conversation about Iran than with Iran. “First and foremost, as-salamu alaykum and happy Ramadan,” said Atlanta-based content creator Jamila Bell. “I’m just here to speak on behalf of my people: we ain’t never had an issue with y’all.” Other users circulated claims of an official Iranian policy to “spare” Black American combatants, an unsubstantiated rumor. Videos of Black Americans wearing keffiyehs and dancing to Arab trap beats have trended across TikTok and Instagram. Some even feature Black service members in skits mocking deployment fears and group dance routines filmed on foreign bases, as misinformation circulates online about Black enlisters expressing regret over their service after receiving Iran-related orders. Iranian social media, meanwhile, has responded through its own stream of viral posts and memes. One widely shared image shows an Iranian Shahed 136 drone bearing the likeness of Tupac Shakur, alongside the words “In memory of Tupac” and “Killuminati”, a reference drawn from the conspiracy-tinged mythology that has long surrounded the rapper’s critiques of American power and control. In another video, an Iranian creator lectures on Malcolm X and other Black American civil rights activists against a desert backdrop. Historically, Iran has long appeared most deliberate in its engagement. The Iranian Revolution’s successful overthrow of the Shah chimed with some on the Black American left who saw it both as a model of resistance and a potential ideological ally. In 1980, when Miami residents took to the streets after four police officers were acquitted in the death of an unarmed Black marine, Iranian state media and officials organized solidarity demonstrations across the country, including a mass rally in Tehran that drew an estimated 200,000 people calling for social justice for Black Americans. In 1984, to mark the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the Islamic Republic issued a Malcolm X commemorative postage stamp – 15 years before the United States. In 1980, after the hostage crisis ended, a message appeared on a wall outside the US embassy in Tehran, a graffiti postscript: “Dear American minority, brothers and sisters (Blacks and Indians), study the holy Qu’ran and start a revolution against US discrimination. God and Iranian Muslim people are supporting you. Down with Reagan.” During a 1984 tour of Syria, Libya and Algeria, Iranian president Ali Khamenei promoted the Afro-American Human Rights Watch Committee, an Iran-led initiative intended to address racism in the United States, Israel and apartheid South Africa. But the effort never moved beyond rhetoric. “The Islamic Republic in 1979 and even into the early 80s was kind of a Rorschach test,” says Benjamin R Young, a political scientist at Fayetteville State University. “It took in all these political elements at the time – Islam, anti-imperialism, Persian intellectualism – that many African American activists were particularly attracted to. But the Islamic Republic changed a lot. A lot of that early hope got squashed.” Louis Farrakhan, the polarizing Nation of Islam chief, was a passionate advocate for the Islamic Republic and made regular trips to Iran. On a 1996 visit to Tehran for the 17th anniversary of the Iranian Revolution, he was invited to address the Iranian parliament, a permission that is rarely granted to foreign heads of state. An Iranian newspaper quoted him calling the US by the Ayatollah’s preferred nickname, “the great Satan”, and further saying that “God will destroy America at the hands of Moslems”. In response, the US state department criticized Farrakhan for “cavorting” with those who “support international terrorism”. Of course, not all Black Americans see Iranians as comrades in a shared struggle against US imperialism, or find it easy to look past the civil rights abuses of both the Shah and the Islamic Republic. During the 1979 crisis, Vernon Jordan, then president of the National Urban League and later a trusted confidante of Bill Clinton, argued that the Black American hostages should have remained in Iran until all Americans were released – a view that aligned with longstanding resistance to Pan-African-style internationalism among Black conservatives since the beginning of the movement. Jordan believed the Black hostages would have been welcomed as heroes if they had stayed. Many Americans viewed their release less as a merciful gesture than an act of betrayal – and Hughes heard from scores of them. “All kinds of hate mail would come to me saying: ‘You should’ve stayed. You’re a coward. Black people never stay true,’” he recalls. “[But] I was handcuffed, under armed guard and taken out of the embassy to the airport. It wasn’t like I walked out of my own free will.” Over the years, US geopolitical rivals have exploited Black Americans’ legitimate grievances to counter American lectures on human rights. During the cold war, Maoist China and North Korea cultivated ties with Black internationalists viewed by US authorities as subversives. In 2016, Russian operatives amplified racial divisions through social media posts denouncing the Black Lives Matter movement – part of a longer tradition stretching back to 1930s propaganda campaigns that spotlighted lynchings in the US to deflect criticism of Stalin-era abuses. “It’s all a very shallow calculation,” says Young. “These kinds of regimes are very self-interested and know that race is a very delicate issue in America that is sensitive to pinpricks.” But the appeal of these tactics has always been uneven. The Iranian students behind the embassy takeover were not always unified in their support for Khomeini’s decision. Charles Jones Jr, a Black American communications specialist, remained in detention amid rumors among his captors that he was a spy – an allegation he denied until his death in 2015. *** In his own case, Hughes remembers being marched into a room with his 12 fellow captives and told they were being released early. The message, he recalls, came through figures associated with Khomeini’s office, including his son Ahmad Khomeini, a forceful critic of the United States – but the decision, he recalls, was delayed twice before it was finally carried out. From there, they were taken under armed guard to Tehran airport and flown to Paris, where Hughes was officially received, his ordeal over after 16 days; after a stopover at Wiesbaden air base for treatment, he was transported to Andrews air force base in time for Thanksgiving. But with 52 Americans still held hostage, the ticker tape parades down Washington DC’s Pennsylvania Avenue and New York City’s Canyon of Heroes would have to hold for another 14 months until the hostage crisis was fully resolved. Algerian diplomats mediated the negotiations between the US and Iran, while the CIA mounted a covert operation to rescue six Americans who had escaped the embassy – a mission dramatized in the 2012 film Argo. The Algiers Accords were signed on 19 January 1981, bringing an official end to the 444-day hostage crisis just as Ronald Reagan began his presidency. Eight days later, all 66 freed hostages were honored in a White House ceremony – but only the hostages in the final group of 52 that was released were feted in New York and DC parades that turned out hundreds of thousands.In 2015, Congress passed a spending bill awarding the hostages who were held for the full 444 days up to $4.4m each in government restitution; those who were freed after 16 days received nothing. “It still bothers me,” Hughes says of the treatment – an echo, perhaps, of separate-but-equal logic. “I felt like that was a little racist.” Hughes says the ordeal left him with crippling PTSD that contributed to the breakdown of his first marriage and strained his second. “I started to withdraw from the people around me,” he remembers. “I saw a [Veterans Affairs] psychologist for three years. I had no energy to do anything. I told myself I had a magic key, that when I started feeling things, I could just turn the key and be OK. But then my wife, Jodi, would tell me: ‘There’s no such thing as a magic key.’ Even now. When I start to go into a dark hole, she’ll pull me out.” In 2003, the Pentagon began awarding PoW medals to Iran hostages after years of advocacy efforts on behalf of noncombatant recipients. The final 53 hostages often received medals in more timely, formal settings, while the remaining 13 faced bureaucratic delays and neglect. Hughes’s medal arrived without warning in 2012, delivered by UPS to his Denver-area home – and left on the porch. It was only after the major general of the Colorado national guard learned of the delivery that Hughes was ultimately honored in an official ceremony at Fort Logan, the Veterans Affairs cemetery where he worked as an administrator before retiring from military service. It meant the world for Hughes to close the chapter with Jodi and their daughter, Kalee, beside him. “They treated them like they were special,” he says. “That made me feel good in the end.” *** A recent NPR/PBS/Marist poll found that Black Americans oppose the Iran conflict at higher rates than other racial groups. The Trump administration’s broader overhaul of military leadership and rollback of diversity initiatives has only deepened that sense of unease, including the removal of senior Black officers from key positions. Black Americans have served in every US conflict and make up 18% of the Department of Defense’s total military force. From the Buffalo Soldiers to the Tuskegee Airmen, military participation has been shaped as much by duty to country as by the promise of upward mobility. At each turn, they’ve faced a familiar bind: balancing service to a nation that has often failed to fully include them with awareness of the wars they are asked to fight. Asked about the current Iran crisis, Hughes remains ever the good soldier, respectful of the chain of command. “Whether I think we should’ve gone to war with Iran or not, it’s just another opinion,” he says. “I don’t make policy and I don’t decide what’s going to happen in the world, I just do what I can to vote and leave it at that.” What he will allow is that young people want to know what happened, that young Black Americans “are embracing Black history more than they have in the past, as it’s being erased by a government that’s trying to ‘fix’ history”, he says. “When I see people wearing Make America Great Again [garb], I always ask myself: ‘How far back do they want to go?’”

picture of article

WHO head tells countries to prepare for more hantavirus cases

The head of the World Health Organization has told countries to prepare for more hantavirus cases after the outbreak onboard the MV Hondius, and thanked Spain for the “compassion and solidarity” it had shown by taking in the stricken cruise ship and evacuating its passengers and crew. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus urged authorities to follow the WHO’s advice and recommendations, which include a 42-day quarantine and constant monitoring of high-risk contacts. “At the moment, there is no sign that we are seeing the start of a larger outbreak, but of course the situation could change and, given the long incubation period of the virus, it’s possible we might see more cases in the coming weeks,” he told a press conference in Madrid on Tuesday. The MV Hondius, which was sailing from Argentina to Cape Verde, found itself at the centre of the outbreak after three passengers – a Dutch couple and a German national – died from the virus. Although usually spread by wild rodents, hantavirus can be transmitted person-to-person in rare cases of close contact. The WHO has so far confirmed nine cases of the Andes variant of the virus, among them a French woman and a US national who tested positive after being evacuated from the ship. The Spanish health ministry said on Tuesday that one of the 14 Spaniards evacuated from the ship and put in quarantine at a military hospital in Madrid had tested positive for hantavirus and was showing symptoms. “The patient who tested provisionally positive yesterday has been confirmed positive for hantavirus,” it said in a statement. “The patient presented with a low-grade fever and mild respiratory symptoms yesterday, but is currently stable and shows no evident clinical deterioration.” Tedros, who was speaking alongside Spain’s prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, said more cases were likely to appear because of the degree of interaction between the passengers onboard the ship before the alarm was raised and the first case confirmed in a passenger on 2 May. “We would expect more cases because, as you may remember, the index case – the first case in the ship was on 6 April … [and] there was a lot of interaction, actually, with the passengers. And as you know, the incubation period is also six to eight weeks. “So because of the interaction while they were still in the ship – especially before they started taking some infectious prevention measures – because of the interaction, we would expect more cases because of some of what happened during the travel.” Tedros said individual countries were now responsible for their citizens after the evacuation, adding: “I hope they will take care of the patients and the passengers, helping them and also protecting their citizens as well. That’s what we expect.” The WHO chief also paid tribute to the Spanish government and the people of Spain for responding to the plight of those onboard the ship after authorities in Cape Verde refused it permission to dock. More than 120 passengers and crew members were evacuated from Tenerife in a carefully coordinated operation on Sunday and Monday. “I’d like to thank Spain and, especially, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, for the outstanding leadership and coordination,” he said. “I know this is a model – and I hope other countries also learn from this – not just the obligation part but the compassion and solidarity that Spain has shown.” In a “divided and divisive world”, he added, “kindness and taking care of each other” were important. Sánchez echoed the sentiment, saying: “This world doesn’t need more selfishness, nor more fear. What it needs is countries that show solidarity and want to move forward.” The prime minister also offered his condolences once again to the family of a Guardia Civil officer who died of a heart attack while taking part in the evacuation on Sunday. Despite objections from the regional government of the Canary Islands, Spain’s central government allowed the MV Hondius to anchor in port in Tenerife – and then, briefly, to dock – as it oversaw the evacuation operation. The final two planes carrying passengers and crew left the Canary island on Monday night and arrived in the Netherlands early on Tuesday. The MV Hondius, which refuelled and restocked in Tenerife, is now sailing back to port in Rotterdam with a crew of 25 as well as a doctor and nurse.