Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Who are the 514 people accused of starting French wildfires and what motivates them?

One is a boy of 15, who threw a burning cigarette into a wood near Bordeaux. Another is a 36-year-old man who set a paper bag of rubbish on fire in bushes near Perpignan. A third is a 50-year-old woman accused of lighting 17 fires south of La Rochelle. According to the French interior ministry, since the start of a summer in which a record 115,000 hectares of forest, scrub and heathland have gone up in flames, 514 people – including 198 minors – have been arrested on suspicion of starting wildfires. Who are they, and what motivates them? Experts say arson is an under-studied field in France. It remains, according to Thierry Toutin, a criminology researcher with the national police, “a mysterious crime, often hard for people to understand”. Two hundred years ago, under Napoleon, deliberately starting a wildfire in France was a crime so grave it carried an automatic death penalty by guillotine. These days, sentences start at 10 years in jail and a €150,000 fine, rising to 15 years if protected forests or reserves burn, and life if someone is killed. Arsonists have “many different profiles”, Toutin said in an essay for The Conversation. Several French departments have set up dedicated arson groups uniting police, forestry board experts and local services to help identify, find and prosecute them, he said, but still: “These are often crimes that are unsolved, or don’t lead to convictions, because the fire has destroyed the evidence.” France’s official statistics classify wildfires by their cause: natural, such as lightning; accidental (say, a vehicle fire or electrical fault); involuntary professional (sparks from a machine); involuntary individual (a cigarette or barbecue) – and voluntary. In practice, as a government PSA has repeated all summer on radio, TV and online, nine out of 10 fires are caused by human activity, with roughly two-thirds classed as involuntary (which, if negligence is proven, carries a jail term of one to five years). That means fully one-third of wildfires in France each year are set deliberately, with the intention of doing harm. In 2025, the last year for which full figures are available, deliberate acts of arson were the biggest single cause of forest fires in France, accounting for 29.4% of blazes. Among those convicted this summer are a 27-year-old man diagnosed with autism and schizophrenia who set fire to a letter to his late daughter in tinder-dry vegetation near Béziers. He was sentenced to four years of detention and treatment. Perpignan court last week sentenced a 51-year-old man to five years in prison for lighting four fires in July and August. In Les Sables d’Olonnes, a volunteer firefighter – reported to police by his superiors – was handed a three-year suspended sentence. In Lyon, a 29-year-old man with a police record for theft, trafficking and domestic violence was convicted of setting a fire that destroyed more than a hectare of land, took 71 firefighters to extinguish and forced the evacuation of 150 people. Those convicted of negligence include a motorist who lit a fire to alert emergency services after he broke down (six months, suspended) and two restaurant owners in the south-west who defied a red fire alert to light a charcoal grill and set off fireworks. An early analysis based on police reports and obtained by Le Figaro showed 97.5 % of arson suspects arrested this year have been men, aged on average 32.5, with 28.7% under 18. More than 95% were French citizens. Of a relatively small sample of 80 suspects, 37 were unemployed. Exactly what drove them to act is often much harder to establish. In principle, criminologists identify four main categories of motivation. Some arson attacks are carried out in the context of a conflict: a dispute with a neighbour; criminal rivalry between gangs; revenge against someone or something. Other arsonists may act for financial gain, such as a false insurance claim, or out of ideological or political conviction. The remainder display some kind of pathology, often psychological – including a small number of genuine pyromaniacs. “Arsonists may be after money, or revenge, or be trying to cover up a crime. They may be under the influence of alcohol or other substances,” said Laurent Layet, a psychiatrist. “A pyromaniac’s sole objective is to set fire to something.” Pyromaniacs “have difficulty organising their personalities”, Layet told France Inter radio. “They are often impulsive, and they have trouble controlling their emotions. Often, they are quite isolated socially.” Classified as an impulse-control disorder, pyromania is characterised by “a fascination with fire, by a mounting tension before the act, and then a feeling of pleasure or relief immediately afterwards”, he said. But pyromaniacs are typically organised, aware of the consequences of their acts, and considered criminally responsible. They also represent barely 5% of the people who deliberately set fires. Another equally small group are firefighters – mostly volunteers, very rarely professionals – who deliberately set fires for the glory that comes from extinguishing them. Over the years, France’s departmental fire services have set up filtering mechanisms to detect such personalities during the recruitment process, including psychological tests. They acknowledge that each year, some slip through the net. But the motivation of most people who deliberately light wildfires is rarely quite so clearcut. For many, it boils down to an ill-defined “act of defiance – to confront the system, and get pleasure from destroying other people’s property”, said Johanna Rozenblum, a clinical psychologist who works with the fire service. A strikingly large proportion of the arsonists she had dealt with had “marked antisocial profiles”, Rozenblum said. And in the case of minors, adolescent impulsiveness and frustration combine with “immaturity and internal revolt” to prevent them fully realising the devastating scale of the damage they risk doing.

picture of article

One dead and more than 30 missing after ferry sinks off Vanuatu coast in rough seas

One person has died and more than 30 are missing after a ferry sank off the coast of Vanuatu, the country’s government says. The vessel, MV Matui, had set sail with more than 40 passengers and crew on Friday from the island of Santo to Ambae island in very rough seas, but did not arrive. “Our hearts and prayers are with the families who have lost loved ones,” Vanuatu prime minister Jotham Napat’s office said in a statement on Sunday. “Search and rescue operations are continuing.” Fifteen of those onboard have been “accounted for alive” and one body has been recovered, the statement said. “Over 30 people remain missing at sea,” it said. “To the survivors, we ⁠pray for your strength and recovery. To the families of those missing and those we have lost, please know that the nation stands with you ‌in this time of grief.” An investigation into potential negligence has been launched. “This loss appears to be the result of strong winds and marine warnings not being heeded, and possibly of negligence including overloading of the vessel,” the statement added. The Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre in New Caledonia said it was assisting with the search, and a French Armed Forces aircraft was deployed on Sunday morning. The centre said 12 people were located on Sunday morning. Matai Seremaiah, the member of parliament for Luganville who is assisting in the search, said efforts would concentrate on the south-east coast where currents may have carried survivors. With Agence France-Presse and Reuters

picture of article

Ukraine war briefing: Nine killed and dozens wounded in Russian strikes as Kyiv braces for harsh winter

Russian airstrikes killed nine people, injured dozens and damaged buildings and infrastructure across Ukraine on Saturday, as Kyiv braces for a “very difficult” winter amid intensified attacks on the country. The civilian death toll has risen sharply in Ukraine over the past two ⁠months as Russia steps up attacks ⁠on power plants and other infrastructure. Ukraine has hit energy facilities and warehouses in distant parts of Russia, and both sides have targeted each other’s shipping. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, writing on Telegram, said Russia had deployed nearly 500 drones against Ukrainian targets since ⁠early morning. “Basically, the Russians have expanded the war away from the front, where they have no success, into the economy, and their tactics are as basic as it gets: destroying every site that could help people cope with the conditions of war,” he wrote. “Russia ⁠wants to kill the Ukrainian economy and break our resistance.” The city council in Kramatorsk, one of Ukraine’s frontline “fortress cities” that Russia wants to capture, said Russian forces attacked private cars, killing three people in three incidents over ‌a 90-minute period. Four people were injured. “These ‌are not military targets,” the council said. “They are ordinary civilian cars. People were going about their business.” The governor of Ukraine’s Zhytomyr region, Vitaliy Bunechko, said ‌a Russian strike on a grocery store killed two people in the town of Zviahel, west of Kyiv. Bunechko said two petrol stations also came under attack. Earlier, Zelenskyy reported attacks on the south-eastern city of Zaporizhzhia and Kryvyi Rih, his home town. The governor of Zaporizhzhia region, Ivan Fedorov, said two people were killed and 11 injured in assaults on Zaporizhzhia and other localities. In Odesa region, governor Oleh Kiper said 37 people, including an infant, were injured in a series of overnight attacks, while two people were missing. Russia’s defence ministry said Russian forces have maintained their strikes on Ukrainian ports, hitting a cargo ship in Odesa that it said was carrying goods ⁠for military use. Ukrainian officials said the country was bracing for a brutal winter as intensified Russian attacks on infrastructure and key export industries compound a ⁠deepening budget crisis. The economy minister, Oleksandr Kravchenko, said damage to infrastructure and fixed assets from Russian airstrikes was estimated at close to $10bn this year, while the broader economic costs of the attacks and ⁠the de facto blockage of its ports had cut 1.5 percentage points of GDP. “We anticipate a very difficult winter in terms of both critical infrastructure, which is being destroyed every day ⁠by Russian attacks, but also in terms of overall economic conditions in the country,” he said. With fighting on the frontline largely stalled, Russia and Ukraine have increasingly ‌targeted logistics networks and other economic assets in an effort to undermine each other’s war effort. For more than two weeks, Russia has carried out near constant attacks on Kyiv using faster jet-powered drones, disrupting life, business and government operations. Moscow has also effectively blocked Ukraine’s Black Sea ports by intensifying its air attacks on the country’s southern regions. Ukraine’s ‌main exports – agricultural products and iron and steel – are shipped via these ports. In Moldova on Ukraine’s western border, authorities closed national airspace for nearly an hour after a drone was detected near the border. Seven border crossings were temporarily closed. Zelenskyy said he would be willing to meet Putin at the G20 summit in Miami for talks on ending the war, in a media interview released Saturday, but the Kremlin immediately ruled it out. “It is impossible,” Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told AFP in New Delhi on Saturday, repeating Moscow’s demand that a meeting can only take place in the Russian capital. The gathering of world leaders takes place on 14-15 December and there has been no confirmation yet as to whether Putin would attend. Putin has repeatedly rejected offers for a face-to-face meeting with Zelenskyy.

picture of article

Number of UK anti-migrant vigilante groups surges in last 18 months

At least 28 anti-migrant vigilante groups have formed in the UK in the last 18 months, ranging from unauthorised street patrols claiming to protect women and children to groups harassing migrants in France and blocking ports. From Belfast to the south coast of England, the number of active groups has surged since the summer of 2025, according to analysis by the Guardian, amid widespread concerns over fresh disorder after black-clad vigilantes, many of them wearing balaclavas, blocked roads in Portsmouth and Dover last weekend. Often arguing that they are filling gaps left by the police or taking action on migration that the government is unable to, the groups range from small-scale community patrols near asylum-seeker accommodation to those attempting to stop migrants crossing the Channel from France. They include Scots Active, which conducts late-night patrols around Glasgow city centre claiming to protect the public from migrants, sometimes wearing balaclavas and stab-proof vests. It says its activities help ensure the safety of women and girls. It was one of two groups banned from TikTok earlier this year after reportedly sharing footage claiming to expose migrant hotels. Another is the British Security Project, a self-styled civilian safety group that has described itself as the “tip of the spear in mass deportation under a Rupert Lowe government”. It recruits “visible deterrent patrol” volunteers via its website and social media platforms, and responds to reports from the public about incidents claiming to involve migrants. It aims to “provide 124,000 security personnel to public spaces by 2035”, according to its Facebook page. When the Guardian contacted the group for comment, a spokesperson said it was neither vigilante nor anti-migrant. “The British Security Project is a developing non-profit community protection organisation committed to lawful, peaceful and accountable volunteer action,” they said. “It has no police or immigration-enforcement powers, does not permit people to be targeted because of their nationality or immigration status, and expressly prohibits vigilantism, intimidation, racism and unlawful discrimination.” Members of another group, Raise the Colours, made several trips to France in 2025 to try to stop migrants crossing the Channel in small boats. They filmed themselves claiming to have slashed dinghies on French beaches. France subsequently banned 10 members from the country. Members of far-right Patriot Platform blocked roads near Dover for several hours last Saturday, disrupting traffic to and from the port. Kent police initially said they had received no warning, but later admitted officers had failed to act on calls made on Friday evening. On Sunday, about 200 black-clad men gathered in Portsmouth after 120 asylum seekers rescued from a dinghy were brought ashore there. They blocked roads and allegedly assaulted several police officers. The home secretary, Shabana Mahmood, urged police on Thursday to curb the activities of such groups, telling senior officers to make full use of their powers. The rise in vigilante groups is a recent phenomenon, overwhelmingly happening in the last year. Of the 31 active groups the Guardian was able to establish initiation dates for, 28 were set up since last summer, with a spike in August 2025 after Raise the Colours’ flag operation and unrest at an asylum hotel in Epping. Setup dates were taken from online activity on Facebook and Instagram, domain name registrations and media reports. To classify as anti-migrant vigilantes, the Guardian considers that a group must have taken the law into its own hands in the name of opposing migrants or asylum seekers. Groups limited to more conventional protests and far-right political parties were not included. In a campaign of intimidation last summer, a vigilante group called the Belfast Nightwatch First Division was involved in targeting dark-skinned males in the city, challenging them to produce identification documents. Dr Julia Ebner, an expert on extremism at the University of Oxford, said the figures showed a rapid shift in the ways anti-migrant activists were mobilising which was particularly striking. “At the heart of most vigilante groups is the claim that the authorities are incapable or unwilling to protect a country’s citizens,” she said. “This is a dangerous dynamic, because when trust in authorities is undermined this can quickly translate into justifications of running their own policing operations or even violent campaigns – all supposedly for a good cause. “Another underlying narrative that is not new but has been amplified across social media is the idea that ‘our’ women and children are threatened by men of migrant backgrounds. There is also a performative aspect of vigilante movements: uniforms, patrols and security equipment can project authority and legitimacy even when the groups themselves are relatively small. “This can help far-right movements recruit new members and produce visually appealing social media content to increase their public profile and expand their followership.” Alex MacKinnon, a researcher at Hope Not Hate, said vigilantism had long been part of far-right activism, but that there had been a dramatic increase in extremists’ grassroots efforts in the last 18 months. “While vigilante groups typically purport to protect the wider community, the majority do not properly vet their members, resulting in several being exposed for their violent criminal histories,” he said. “Furthermore, they regularly engage in intimidatory behaviour, as seen in Patriot Platform’s Dover demonstration. Vigilante groups of this type often promote aggressive anti-migrant agendas, using ‘community protection’ as a cover for racist thuggery.” In response to the Guardian’s analysis, the National Police Chiefs’ Council said it was important for the public to report concerns about crime and safety. “Police officers are specially trained to respond to a wide range of incidents safely and lawfully,” a spokesperson said. “While we understand people may want to protect their communities, taking enforcement into your own hands can be dangerous, and could compromise a police investigation.”

picture of article

Saudi Arabia shuts down key oil pipeline, blaming drones from Iraq

Saudi Arabia has shut down a critical oil pipeline, accusing militants in Iraq of launching drone attacks on the export route being used to bypass the lockdown of the strait of Hormuz. The world’s largest ⁠crude oil exporter has increased its use of the 745-mile (1,200km) pipeline running across the Arabian peninsula, which links Abqaiq, near the Gulf, to the port of Yanbu, on the Red Sea, since the US-Israeli war against Iran began. The Saudi foreign ministry condemned “the targeting of the East-West pipeline in the Riyadh and Medina regions by several drones coming from Iraq, which caused human injuries and damage”. An energy ministry official told the SPA news agency earlier that the pipeline was “stopped as a precaution”. Baghdad is under mounting pressure to prevent militant groups, including those backed by Saudi Arabia’s regional rival Iran, from launching attacks on Gulf countries from Iraqi soil. The US president, Donald Trump, said he believed Tehran was responsible for the aerial attack. “I ‌think they ‌are, probably they are,” Trump told reporters in ‌Dublin during a visit to Ireland. On Saturday, Iraq’s government confirmed the attacks were launched from its territory and ordered an investigation. It condemned “the attacks targeting our brethren in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”, and the office of the Iraqi prime minister, Ali al-Zaidi, said the commander in charge of the southern province of Maysan had been dismissed. Satellite images from Copernicus Sentinel Data taken on Thursday showed black smoke billowing near Medina, along the general route of the East-West pipeline. According to the International Energy Agency, Saudi oil exports through the Red Sea port at the pipeline’s end have more than doubled since the war began. The news comes as Yemen’s Houthi forces have captured the strategic island of Perim in the Bab al-Mandab strait, expanding their control of the narrow waterway, one of the world’s vital shipping routes linking Europe and Asia. Oil prices climbed past $100 (£74) a barrel this week, while average US diesel prices topped $6 for the first time on Friday – a potential headache for Trump before midterm elections in November. A failed attempt by the US and Israel to overthrow the Iranian regime this year has destabilised the Gulf, and Iran and its proxies have now tightened their grip over two crucial shipping routes – the strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea. Trump said ⁠on Saturday ⁠that everything would “work out ⁠just fine” when asked whether he ⁠could help move ‌traffic ‌through the strait ‌of Hormuz in light of fresh concerns about Saudi ‌Arabia. “Everything will work out just fine,” Trump said, speaking in Dublin ⁠after meeting the Irish president, Catherine Connolly. But Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, speaking on the sidelines of a developing nations Brics summit in India, said the Middle East did not need the US to be a “regional policeman”. Saudi Arabia has previously accused Tehran-backed Iraqi militias of targeting its oil infrastructure. It said the kingdom “reserves the right to take all necessary measures to protect its sovereignty, its security, its facilities” and its people. Bahrain, Jordan and Qatar also condemned the attack on the Saudi pipeline, while the Gulf Cooperation Council denounced “a dangerous escalation and an unacceptable threat to the security of the kingdom”. Ed Miliband, the British ⁠foreign secretary, said ⁠on ⁠Saturday that he had spoken ⁠with his Saudi counterpart, Prince Faisal bin ⁠Farhan Al ‌Saud, and ‌discussed the attacks. He added that the UK “stands firmly with ⁠Saudi Arabia and the internationally recognised government of Yemen against ‌these attacks”. Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels announced a maritime blockade in July against Saudi Arabia – which supports the Yemeni government – and attacked its oil tankers in the Red Sea. After taking control of the Yemeni Red Sea coast on Friday, the Houthis said navigation through the Bab al-Mandab strait was “safe” for all but Saudi Arabia.

picture of article

IDF soldier filmed shooting Palestinian in leg amid West Bank settler standoff

An Israeli soldier has shot a Palestinian man, wounding him in the leg, as settlers confronted villagers by grazing livestock on Palestinian-owned land in the town of Faqqua in the occupied West Bank. Witnesses said a group of settlers had entered the area with their livestock, prompting residents to try to stop them. Israeli forces then intervened and, according to men at the scene, opened fire at residents. One of them shot Qassem Hussam, a Palestinian man in his mid-30s, wounding him in the leg. Reached by the Guardian, the IDF confirmed it had received a report of the incident and that the person who fired was one of its soldiers. “Earlier today [Saturday], a report was received regarding friction between Israeli civilians and Palestinians near the area of Faqqua,” the IDF said. “An IDF force that was at the scene fired into the air and toward a Palestinian.” Mohammed al-Sheikh, 34, who was standing next to Hussam, told the Guardian the confrontation began when villagers encountered Israeli settlers grazing livestock on Palestinian-owned land. “Then the Israeli soldiers came,” al-Sheikh said. “They started shooting. One soldier shot Hussam and he fell to the ground. We immediately went to help him and move him away. We couldn’t get an ambulance to the area, so we took him to hospital in a private car.” Hussam was taken to hospital in a light-to-moderate condition, according to the Palestine Red Crescent. The Israeli military said the incident was being reviewed by commanders and that its findings would be forwarded to the relevant authorities for examination. The IDF added that the military was investigating the soldier who shot the Palestinian man, apparently in breach of army protocol, according to the Times of Israel. Video of the incident shows a group of Israeli soldiers and settlers confronting unarmed Palestinian men before shots are fired. The incident is the latest to raise questions over the Israeli government’s ability or willingness to curb violent settlers in the occupied West Bank, where attacks have continued to increase. On 8 September, the UK prime minister, Andy Burnham, said he would “not stand by” as horrific suffering continued, writing in the Guardian that for too long the UK had been hesitant to act, “fearful of being accused of being anti-Israel”. Ed Miliband, the UK’s foreign secretary, said the government would now take the official position that Israel’s occupation of the West Bank was unlawful in its entirety, and announced sweeping sanctions on trade with Israeli settlements. The dramatic shift in the UK’s position came after a summer of intense diplomacy against a backdrop of rising settler violence in the West Bank, which led 12 countries, including France and Canada, to announce sanctions. After Miliband described violent Jewish settler activity in the occupied West Bank as “ethnic cleansing” carried out with the tacit backing of the government of the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s foreign minister, Gideon Sa’ar, announced retaliatory measures including the closure of the consulate and entry bans on several MPs. It marked the latest stage in a rapidly worsening dispute between the two countries, with diplomatic relations at their lowest point in years, even as violence in the West Bank has continued. Israeli forces also carried out raids across Jenin governorate on Saturday, arresting six people and injuring a 14-year-old boy, who suffered a broken hand, according to the Palestinian news agency Wafa. Soldiers also raided several villages around Jenin, while forces entered at least five towns in Bethlehem governorate and set up a checkpoint at Za’atara. East of Ramallah, Israeli settlers attacked the outskirts of Burqa, throwing stones at homes and vehicles. On 4 September, two Palestinian teenagers were shot dead in al-Mughayyir after settlers entered the village under police and military escort and took dozens of sheep from a Palestinian home, residents and Israeli activists said. The victims were Khalil Abu Alia, 16, and Omar al-Nassan, 19. Three other pupils from their 470-strong school had already been killed by Israeli soldiers and settlers this year. According to the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), more than 1,111 Palestinians, including at least 243 children, have been killed in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, since 7 October 2023.