Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Ukraine hits oil facility in Russia’s Samara region despite pressure from Trump – Europe live

A Russian drone ⁠hit a school in Ukraine’s capital, authorities said, the latest ⁠in a spate ⁠of worsening air attacks on Kyiv, Reuters reported. Mayor Vitali Klitschko said children had been ⁠in the shelter at the moment of the strike, which sparked a fire. He reported ⁠no injuries. The State Emergency Service released images of rescue workers picking through ‌debris and ‌dousing the charred building, whose windows were shattered. Reuters noted that the morning ‌attack came amid intensifying, around-the-clock strikes on Kyiv and other cities with jet-powered drones which Ukraine’s military has struggled to shoot down.

picture of article

‘It’s utter surrealism’: Venezuela’s Chavistas lament government’s embrace of Trump

He was one of the most passionate propagandists for Hugo Chávez’s Bolivarian revolution: a feisty leftist TV personality who spent more than two decades singing the movement’s praises on his state-funded show, The Razorblade. Mario Silva’s devotion was such that he often hosted his programme with Chávez’s portrait behind him and he had El Comandante’s curly signature tattooed on to his left wrist. But nine months after Venezuela’s political landscape was scrambled by Donald Trump’s abduction of Chávez’s heir, Nicolás Maduro, Silva’s show has been cancelled, and its host is livid about the revolution’s direction under Maduro’s former deputy, Delcy Rodríguez. “[I feel] a lot of disappointment – depressed … and sometimes I wake up and feel like the world is collapsing around me,” the 66-year-old said during a rare interview at his home studio in the mountains outside the capital, Caracas. Silva has spent recent weeks railing against Rodríguez’s interim administration on YouTube, his home since his programme on state TV was axed, berating those he blames for Venezuela’s “shameful and utterly illegitimate surrender” to the US. Since January, a parade of high-ranking US officials – including the head of the CIA, the chair of the joint chiefs of staff and the energy secretary, Chris Wright – have visited Caracas, while Trump recently trumpeted striking “the biggest oil deal in world history” with Rodríguez’s regime. Last week, Rodríguez and Trump met on the sidelines of the UN general assembly, posing for a smiley photograph that left diehard Chavistas such as Silva aghast. “I thought it [the photo] was artificial intelligence or something like that. But it’s surrealism, utter surrealism … It’s impossible to understand,” Silva fumed on YouTube as a red flag emblazoned with the faces of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and Vladimir Lenin hung behind him. “They have surrendered this country and surrendered it the most vile and despicable way,” Silva went on. “Honestly, they are dragging the country’s name through the mud. They are dragging Chávez’s name through the mud.” In another broadcast, Silva seethed about the cosy post-Maduro relationship that has developed between one-time anti-imperialist flagbearers in Caracas and Trump officials: “Traitors and lackeys, you will have to answer for this!” Silva is not the only Chavista loyalist struggling to comprehend the ideological U-turn being executed by Rodríguez, who was Maduro’s vice-president but has engineered a historic rapprochement with the US since his rendition on 3 January. Elías Jaua, a vice-president and foreign minister under Chávez, is also up in arms, and claims the feeling is widely shared. “What I hear from comrades across the country is bewilderment, disagreement and indignation,” said Jaua, who believes Trump’s oil deal “amounts to an act of pillage against an entire nation”. Juan Barreto, a former member of the ruling Socialist party (PSUV) and mayor of Caracas, said such an agreement would have been unimaginable when the Bolivarian revolution began after Chávez’s 1998 election. He said Chavistas, who had once vowed “Not a drop of oil to the empire if Venezuela is attacked!”, were now in effect saying: “All of the oil reserves [for the US], for as long as you want!” “The current situation is one of tutelage,” Barreto said. Rodríguez has defended the deal, claiming it will create more than $209bn (£158bn) in revenues that will help improve healthcare and education. “We are thinking of Venezuela’s future,” she said in a recent TV broadcast. Héctor Rodríguez, another prominent Chavista politician, has sought to deflect criticism of Venezuela’s interim government by recalling how Chávez was forced to make a tactical retreat after his failed coup attempt in 1992. “No one can tell me Chávez was a coward. He understood that the balance of power had shifted … and decided to take a step backwards,” Rodríguez said recently. Last week as Delcy Rodríguez met Trump in New York, thousands of people joined a pro-government rally in Caracas, where supporters parroted the slogan “Delcy avanza, tú tienes mi confianza!” (“Move forward, Delcy. I trust in you!”). “No matter how much they kick and scream, there’s nothing they can do to try to cover up the success of President Delcy Rodríguez’s visit to New York,” her interior minister, Diosdado Cabello, told the crowd. Unlike at previous marches, there was scant mention of Maduro and few calls for him to be released. The depth and potential consequences of Chavista anger over Rodríguez’s embrace of Venezuela’s longtime foes in Washington remain unclear. Orlando Pérez, a Latin America expert from the University of North Texas at Dallas, recognised there was indignation at what some considered a sellout of their anti-imperialist ideals. “There are Chavistas that are pissed off, there’s no question about it,” he said. “There are Chavistas who see this as a betrayal of Hugo Chávez and the betrayal of the movement.” But Pérez believed that for many Chavistas who had remained in power after Trump’s invasion, the “pragmatic reality” was that working with Washington was “a necessary evil” if it meant keeping Venezuela’s opposition out of power. “If that means negotiating with Trump, if that means dealing with the CIA etc, it’s fine,” he said. “Beyond whatever ideological position they might have … I suspect most of them are gritting their teeth and just going along with this process as long as they can stay in power and keep their jobs. I think for most it’s as simple as that: it’s about their material wellbeing.” However, Pérez believed Rodríguez’s government would need to demonstrate to supporters “tangible benefits to the cooperation” with the US in order to avoid a backlash. “They’re going to have to show that these things have a material consequence to the lives of their social base … if you don’t deliver, then it is going to get very volatile,” he warned. So far there has been no sign of significant resistance from outraged supporters of Chavismo. But Silva claimed the government’s new direction and economic policies could eventually trigger a social uprising and protests. “Worsening economic conditions will degrade [people’s] quality of life, and that pressure is bound to explode. It has to explode – it’s not just wishful thinking. This isn’t a prediction born of desire, it’s an inevitability,” said the broadcaster, who has claimed he is facing investigation for alleged acts of “aggravated defamation and slander against the interim government”. Silva lit one cigarette after another as he recalled the early hours of 3 January 2026 when, as US troops swept into Venezuela’s capital, he realised the revolution he had spent more than 20 years defending was not going to defend itself. The Chavista broadcaster said he moved from one strategic point to another across Caracas before finally calling the commander at his assigned post. “I said: ‘Hey, what happened? Where are the weapons?’” Silva recalled, his face settling into a sad grin as he remembered the answer. “Go to sleep, Mario,” he was told. Silva pauses. “You have no idea how disappointed I was.”

picture of article

Australian couple on plane diverted after flydubai pilot’s alleged attack on co-pilot

Two Australian citizens onboard a flight to Tel Aviv that was diverted after one of the pilots allegedly stabbed the other in an attack are “safe,” the foreign minister confirmed. The passengers are a Jewish couple from Sydney, the Israeli embassy in Australia confirmed to the Guardian on Thursday. No further details were provided. The flydubai aircraft was travelling from the United Arab Emirates to Israel when it was forced to make an emergency landing in Saudi Arabia. In a post on social media, Penny Wong thanked the “heroes” for thwarting the attack. Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email “Relieved to confirm at least two Australians who were on the Flydubai flight to Israel are safe – thanks to the heroes who thwarted the attack and helped bring the passengers to safety,” she wrote. “We’re thinking of those injured and hope for their full recovery.” One of the pilots, whom Israeli officials said was an Omani citizen, is accused of stabbing his co-pilot. During the alleged attack, the plane plunged about 17,000 feet in just two minutes. Passenger Yaniv Hayoun later recounted how he and other passengers heard screaming and felt pressure as the plane dived before forcing their way into the cockpit and finding the attacker at the instrument panel. “I grabbed the attacker, put him in a chokehold, and dragged him out first,” Hayoun said during a meeting with Netanyahu after the plane had landed safely and the passengers were flown to Israel. “He was trying to destroy the instruments to disable the plane.” Israel’s ambassador to Australia, Hillel Newman, said the incident reminded him of the 11 September attacks. “You have here a very special incident, and due to the real heroism of some people on board, they were saved.” Newman said heightened security alerts had been issued after the attack. “It just shows that … those that hate Israel also hate the peace. “It’s an attempt to hit at the peace itself, at the Abraham Accords, and the relationships which Israel does have with Arab and Muslim countries.” The Abraham Accords normalised relations between the UAE and Israel in 2020. Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said it was too early to tell who was ultimately behind the incident. There are about 12,000 Australian citizens living in Israel and 25,000 in the UAE.

picture of article

‘Where illegal ebikes go to die’: first bikes seized under new laws in NSW crushed

The first illegal ebikes seized under new laws have been crushed in New South Wales, as a major Sydney hospital has warned of a spike in trauma injuries driven by those riding under the influence. The NSW government crushed 23 ebikes at a wrecking yard in western Sydney on Thursday, turning them into scrap metal. NSW police are assessing applications for the return of an additional 13 bikes seized during a joint operation with Transport for NSW in the northern beaches in September. The NSW transport minister, John Graham, told reporters onsite on Thursday “this isn’t a scene from Mad Max. This is where illegal ebikes go to die.” Graham said tough new laws were necessary “because of some of the bad behaviour we’ve seen … on our state’s streets, on the golf courses in Sydney suburbs, even on the Sydney Harbour Bridge”. Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email On the same day, St Vincent’s hospital released figures that showed a 22% spike in legal and illegal ebike injuries, with 42% of those injuries triggering a trauma response and the majority being injured while riding under the influence of alcohol or drugs, riding too fast or without a helmet. It found 361 patients presented to the hospital for ebike injuries between January and July, compared with 296 presentations during the same period last year. Dr Ed Lewis, acting head of rehabilitation medicine, told reporters injuries included fractures, internal bleeding, as well as the “perforation of certain organs”. He said they often included brain injuries from severe head trauma, “as well as milder knocks, like a concussion, which can still have long-term repercussions for patients”. Lewis told Guardian Australia that those contemplating riding an ebike home while intoxicated “need to have a plan B or a backup solution”. “The message that we want to say to people is: enjoy using ebikes, but respect what they are. Respect that they are fast. Wear a helmet and just don’t ride impaired.” Graham said the government was concerned by the number of injuries, but it was “important to keep it in context”. “The number of ebike injuries is still low compared to cars … but is rising,” he said. “If you’re not wearing a helmet, you are dicing with danger.” He stepped aside to allow a giant metal claw pick up a tangle of ebikes, cracking frames in half and popping tyres. They were loaded into a conveyor belt before being crushed and shredded. Graham said batteries had been removed for safe disposal and recycling beforehand. Under powers which came into effect in August, police and transport officers can seize bikes not restricted to 25km/h, whose maximum speed while not pedalling does not exceed 6km/h, and maximum continuous power of 500 watts, due to reduce to 250 watts in March 2029. The government says the bikes crushed include one capable of speeds of more than 90km/h seized from a 14-year-old, a food delivery bike, and bikes with speed restriction settings that had been tampered with. The 36 ebikes seized so far represent a fraction of the estimated 760,000 in the state. The changes were prompted by a surge in injuries and high-profile incidents, including one in which about 40 ebikes swarmed the Sydney Harbour Bridge in February. An expert review on implementing an age limit of between 12 and 16 was due to report back to the government in June. The NSW premier, Chris Minns, appearing on the debut of Kyle Sandilands Live in August, said the government was “examining an … age limit of 12”, but hadn’t finalised the details. On Thursday, Graham would not say if the premier had revealed the planned age limit. “I want to discuss this with my colleagues and also with the public,” he said.

picture of article

Thursday briefing: The long, long wait for a male contraceptive pill may soon be over

Good morning. Since the first vasectomy was performed in the 1890s (imagine being that volunteer), the male contraceptive armoury has barely advanced. The last reversible method was added to this repertoire centuries ago: while rubber condoms hit the mass market in the 1850s, earlier versions date back beyond ancient Egypt. This looks on the cusp of change. In a landmark announcement last week, the World Health Organization said it expects reversible male contraceptives to be available on the market within five to 10 years. But no major medical breakthrough has just been announced - the fundamentals of male hormonal contraceptives have been known for decades. So what is the science, how does it work and why has it taken so long to get here? That’s the subject of today’s First Edition. Before that, this morning’s headlines. Five big stories Politics | Senior Downing Street officials have been reaching out to thinktanks and pollsters as they look to test public support for the UK rejoining the EU. Middle East | One of the pilots of a plane flying from the United Arab Emirates to Israel stabbed his co-pilot and appeared to try to crash the aircraft, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said, as Israeli officials said they were investigating whether the incident was an attempted terror attack on Israelis. UK news | There are “strong indications” that Iran played a role in events in which five men were arrested near RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire as part of a terror investigation, Andy Burnham has said. Immigration and asylum | The UK government’s “one in one out” deal with France, which was supposed to help deter small boat arrivals, is expected to expire on Thursday, as talks stall over French demands for an EU-wide scheme. Television | Esther Rantzen, the Bafta-winning TV presenter and founder of Childline, has died aged 86. In a statement, her family paid tribute to “the most wonderful mother” and “cherished grandmother”. In depth: The ‘agonisingly slow’ wait for male contraceptives It’s estimated that 70% of women in the UK have used the contraceptive pill at some point in their lives, having first been introduced here in 1961 (for married women only). The pace at which the pill proliferated is remarkable - the first trials of hormonal contraception for women began in the United States in the 1950s: by 1960 it was available, and within two years, 1.2 million American women were using it. Despite the pill’s wide uptake and high efficacy, the need for further effective methods of reversible contraception has remained consistent. Nearly half of all global pregnancies are unintended, with many resulting in unsafe abortions. An array of options have been developed for women to use - coils both hormonal and metal; implants, injections, patches, pills and vaginal rings. Men have condoms, and, well, coitus interruptus. Even with these limited options, about 30% of couples already rely on a male method. Male hormonal contraception targets sperm, which are constantly produced. “This requires continuous, steady suppression, suppression all day, every day,” Richard Anderson tells me, “but it is proven to work”. Anderson is a professor of clinical reproductive science at Edinburgh University, and has spent decades in the field. It’s close to 50 years since the first hormonal contraceptives were tested on men, but their development has since been “agonisingly slow,” says Anderson. It’s not that scientific successes weren’t there. “While there have been refinements focused on optimal drug formulations, the fundamentals have remained the same.” *** How do male hormonal contraceptives work? While some research looks to target either sperm function or transport, most male contraceptive science today focuses on sperm production. A testosterone-based treatment can trick the brain into switching sperm creation off, while ensuring bodily hormones remain at a healthy level. In the late 1980s, proof-of-concept clinical trials were conducted by the WHO with weekly testosterone injections. “In the first trial, over 60% of men achieved a zero sperm count and successfully used it as their sole contraceptive for a year,” says Anderson. He was involved in a subsequent trial of 450 couples which confirmed hormonal suppression is “highly effective” in reducing sperm count. By the 1990s, the science was further fine-tuned. With the addition of progestin (a synthetic hormone also widely used in hormone replacement therapy), these male hormonal contraceptives became far more effective, with a success rate equivalent to female hormonal methods. The quantity of testosterone required also decreased with this new formulation, potentially improving long-term patient safety. More recently, the US National Institutes of Health funded a major international study of a testosterone/progestogen gel, with participants rubbing it into their shoulders daily. Trials have been conducted across North and South America, Africa and Europe (Anderson has overseen Edinburgh’s 40–couple cohort), with “surprisingly effective” early results and an “extremely low” pregnancy rate. The global findings are still being reviewed, but Anderson’s patients recorded zero pregnancies. As with any hormonal interventions, side effects such as mood shifts can occur. But worldwide, in this study “participant dropouts due to side effects were extremely low at only a few per cent,” says Anderson. And in Edinburgh, at least, “participants tolerated it exceptionally well, with female partners often thrilled to take a break from birth control.” Crucially, this suppression of fertility proved reversible. “Across all trial follow-ups (typically after up to 18 months of use), sperm counts returned to normal, and many couples have subsequently conceived healthy children.” *** The unequal burden of contraception In her brilliant (and surprisingly funny) new documentary It’s Different For Girls film-maker Billie J D Porter explores the sluggish evolution of hormonal male contraception. Years of filming confirmed what gut instinct told her on day one: “It boils down to corporate greed and systemic misogyny.” After experiencing a series of severe contraception side effects herself, Porter started questioning why there have never been widely available male equivalents. She looked at how business, medicine and culture approached hormonal contraception over decades. “There is a deep-rooted reluctance to tinker with male bodies,” she says, a concern that’s not afforded to women. The WHO classifies combined oral contraceptives for women as a group 1 carcinogen; during 1970s US congressional hearings on the safety of women’s birth control pills, not a single woman who had taken the pill was invited to testify. Powerful male execs have also long projected their own reluctance to take hormonal contraceptives into the market. Take German pharma giant Bayer: despite having run a trial that had proved to be “efficient, with a tolerable side-effect profile”, the multinational cut all funding to male contraceptive research in the early 2000s, because bosses felt that for men, taking the medication would be “inconvenient”. “The physical trauma, health risks, and burden of contraception have been forced entirely onto women’s bodies, while protecting male bodies from potential discomfort,” says Porter. Plus, the female hormonal contraceptive market is worth billions globally, and forecast to hit nearly $30bn by 2034. Male birth control represents disruption and risk. Major clinical trials have therefore historically been run by public health bodies on tight budgets. *** What could change? There’s a nuanced picture here. Women’s bodily autonomy was - and continues to be - hard fought for across the world. Despite the risks and complications women’s contraceptives can create, an alternative timeline, in which men kept a tight grip of the contraceptive keys, isn’t necessarily an ideal outcome. It’s a question of equity and increasing options for everyone. Social attitudes shifted, even if big pharma didn’t. A recent WHO study found nearly 75% (72.3% male, 76.2% female) of respondents across a diverse range of countries reported willingness to use new male contraceptives, with more than 85% of women saying they would trust their male partners to take responsibility for contraception. “Men today are increasingly open to gender equality and sharing contraceptive responsibility,” Dr James Kiarie, who heads up contraception and fertility care at the WHO, tells me. “Concerns about side effects are the leading reason women discontinue birth control,” he says. “Soon, if one partner experiences side effects, the other will be able to try.” The biggest obstacle remains “limited research financing,” says Kiarie. “We urgently call on funders to invest in this area… it is a gamechanger for public health and human relationships.” This couldn’t come at a more opportune time. Globally, 40% of women live in countries with restrictive abortion laws. After overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022, the US supreme court ended the constitutional protection for abortion, with millions of Americans now unable to access safe and legal abortion services and living in contraceptive deserts. In the US, interest in male contraceptives increased from 39% to 49% after the supreme court’s decision. Still, in the era of antivaxers, peptide-injections and crackpot conspiracy theories emanating from the US’s uppermost political echelons, what effect actual scientific evidence will have on uptake if and when male contraceptives reach the market is another question. “The rise of hyper-masculine ‘red pill’ subcultures obsessed with testosterone and sperm retention” is a real concern in the sector, Porter says. During filming, Porter spent time with couples who’d been on recent trials. “The male contraceptive option transformed their relationships,” she says. “It fostered deep mutual respect, relief, and shared responsibility. It offers men a meaningful way to share a burden that women have historically carried alone under immense social judgment.” What else we’ve been enjoying After writing about romantasy for First Edition, I’m super-interested in the expectation-busting that goes on within the genre and these thoughtful reflections from men who read about love. Libby In this week’s Long Wave newsletter (sign up here!), Nesrine Malik has written a loving ode to the “long, long diaspora phone call” at once about “nothing and everything”. Charlie Lindlar, newsletters team If you want to understand why Andy Burnham has yet to convince Scottish Labour colleagues that he gets the scale of his challenge north of the border, read Herald deputy political editor Rebecca McCurdy’s excellent analysis (£). Libby England coach Sarina Wiegman dropped heroes Chloe Kelly and Ella Toone from her next World Cup qualifying squad – Tom Garry has an excellent analysis of why it could be a managerial masterstroke for all involved. Charlie I’ve suffered a serious allergy to coorie (Scots: snuggle, nestle, cuddle) culture for a decade now, so I was intrigued by Lucy Knight’s more forgiving take on the interior decor obsession with Highland cows. Libby Sport Football | The Premier League will face pressure from Manchester City’s rivals to push for a sanction that will result in a prolonged absence from the top flight after the club was found guilty of more than 100 charges of financial rule-breaking. Football | Chelsea claimed a valuable point against OL Lyonnes as they played out a goalless draw in the Women’s Champions League, while Arsenal threw away a two-goal lead to draw 2-2 with Paris FC. Rugby | In a candid and absorbing interview, Irish former professional rugby union player Peter O’Mahony speaks with Donald McRae about allowing his own feelings after excelling in “a game of hard men”. The front pages The Guardian leads with “Pilot attacker tried to crash plane, says Netanyahu”. The Times splashes with “Passengers storm cockpit to head off Israel’s 9/11”, while the Telegraph goes with the “Hero who stopped Israel’s 9/11”, and The i Paper says “Hero passengers storm cockpit to save Israel flight from disaster”. The Daily Mail runs with “Kemi to stop school leavers going straight on the dole” and the Financial Times has “‘Strong indications’ Iran was involved in Fairford incident, warns Burnham”. In tributes to TV presenter Esther Rantzen, the Mirror leads with “Esther: See you on the other side” and the Sun: “That was a great life, Esther.” The Latest Mid-air panic as pilot attacked on Israel-bound flight A commercial flight travelling from Dubai to Israel was forced to make an emergency landing after an apparent brawl between its pilots. The flight was in Jordanian airspace when it diverted to Saudi Arabia, after the plane fell 16,000ft in two minutes during the incident, which raised fears of an attempted hijacking. Authorities are investigating a number of lines of inquiry including a hijacking attempt or a mental health incident. Lucy Hough speaks to the Middle East correspondent Will Christou. Cartoon of the day | Ben Jennings The Upside A bit of good news to remind you that the world’s not all bad The coastline of Achiltibuie, a string of hamlets and villages in Scotland’s Summer Isles, is dotted with beds of maerl – a 9,000-year-old pink seaweed whose coral-like skeleton provide nurseries for scallops and fish. Ten years ago, this biodiverse habitat was being devastated by scallop dredging, until a group of locals successfully fought to have the practice banned in a 600 sq km (150,000 acre) zone – now the biggest protected area in the world for maerl. They have since seen a dramatic revival of marine life, including the recovery of scallop populations and increased sightings of whales, porpoises and dolphins. Sara Nason, founder of Sea Change (later BHA), one of the groups that led the campaign, says the protection of the maerl beds is “beyond priceless … We’ve achieved recovery of the whole ecosystem.” To read more from Karen on how the battle for the maerl beds was won, sign up for Down to Earth, our climate newsletter, before noon today Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday Bored at work? And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply

picture of article

Netanyahu says too early to tell who was behind plane incident as flydubai halts all flights to Israel

Benjamin Netanyahu has said it was too early to tell who was ultimately behind the apparent attempt to crash a ⁠Tel Aviv-bound flydubai flight, even as Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations called the incident a “terror attack”, without apportioning blame. Danny Danon told Fox News on Wednesday night that Israel had “no doubt that it was a terror attack from a radical individual. We still cannot link it to a terror state or terror organisation, but for sure we know there was an intention to bring that plane down.” Flydubai said its flights to and from Israel would be suspended while the investigation takes place and urged all parties “to refrain from premature speculation while authorities gather the facts”. The incident – which began when one pilot stabbed another on the flight deck in an apparent attempt to take control of the aircraft – is under investigation. The flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv had more than 170 people on board, most of them from Israel. In what have been hailed as acts of tremendous bravery, several passenger rushed the cockpit of the flight and wrestled the controls from the alleged attacker even as the plane descended sharply, managing to eventually taking control and stabilising the plane before making an emergency landing in Saudi Arabia. Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, told Fox News host Sean Hannity: “We’ll get to the root of ⁠this attacker, whether he had accomplices” but cautioned that it was “too early to say” when asked whether there was any indication of Iranian involvement. The pilot accused of carrying out the stabbing was being questioned by Saudi authorities, the Israeli prime minister said, adding that he expected he would soon be taken to the UAE, where the flight took off from. Netanyahu said earlier that he had spoken with the UAE’s president, who agreed that Israel would join the interrogation of the suspect. Israeli officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to reporters, said the attacker was an Omani national, but there was no comment from Oman or the UAE. Israel’s foreign ministry later briefed its diplomats around the world that the incident was an “attempted terrorist attack against Israelis, the United Arab Emirates, and the Abraham Accords,” referring to the deal that normalised relations between the two countries in 2020. But on Wednesday evening Donald Trump told reporters the incident remained unclear, after he had spoken to Netanyahu. “It seems as though the co-pilot was perhaps a terrorist or perhaps a whack-job, and he stabbed the pilot,” the US president told reporters in the Oval Office. Netanyahu was among the world leaders celebrating the bravery of the passengers and crew of the flydubai flight on Wednesday. A video shared by the prime minister’s office showed passenger Yaniv Hayoun, a plumber, speaking to Netanyahu at length about how the events on board played out. Hayoun told the prime minister how he and other passengers heard screaming and felt the air pressure change as the plane dived before they forced their way into the cockpit and found the attacker at the instrument panel. “I grabbed the attacker, put him in a chokehold, and dragged him out first,” Hayoun said during the meeting with Netanyahu after the plane had landed safely and the passengers were flown to Israel. As others wrestled with the attacker, Hayoun said he grabbed the controls and pulled them the way he had seen on television. Then other crew members took over. The stabbed pilot was identified as Indian national Captain Smit Machchhar, who was said to have made the emergency call and opened the door to the cockpit, allowing others to rush in and subdue the attacker. In a post on X early on Thursday, Indian prime minister Narendra Modi lauded Machchhar a “hero”. “In the face of the gravest danger and despite being seriously ‌injured, he showed immense courage and an unwavering resolve to protect the lives of others. His valour helped save hundreds of lives and avert a great tragedy,” Modi said. Machchhar, an Indian citizen from Mumbai, is being treated in a hospital in Saudi Arabia’s north-western city of Tabuk, where the plane landed safely.

picture of article

Israelis divided as vote that could oust Netanyahu only weeks away

On the streets of Jerusalem, crowded with secular and ultra-Orthodox Jews, religious nationalists, settlers, Palestinians, and soldiers returning from deployments, uncertainty hangs over an election less than a month away that could mark a turning point for a country profoundly changed after the Hamas attacks of 7 October 2023 and nearly three years of war in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran. The political battle remains on a knife-edge. For over two years most polls have predicted that the coalition of parties led by prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu will collectively slip below the 61-seat threshold needed to form a government. But there is no clear path to power for his main opponent, Gadi Eisenkot, the former chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, even if he maintains current levels of support, because he has ruled out going into coalition with any of the parties led by Palestinian citizens of Israel, who are projected to claim a critical 12 seats. For Netanyahu to stay in power, he would have to either put together a different coalition or pull off an unprecedented election night surprise. Another deeply fragmented Knesset seems likely, in which neither side is close to securing a majority. The latest Channel 13 poll, published last week, captured that deadlock: Jewish Israeli parties opposed to Netanyahu were projected to win 52 seats, against 51 for the prime minister’s bloc, with both falling short of the 61 required for a majority. Eisenkot’s Yashar party topped the poll with 22 seats, while Netanyahu’s Likud was projected to take 18. The lack of clarity over the next government – with both main blocs on the right – is fuelling unease among Israelis, some of whom believe little will change whoever becomes prime minister. “I’m not going to vote because I don’t trust anyone,” said Rachel, 42, an Israeli citizen living in West Jerusalem. “I used to vote for Yair Lapid,” she added, referring to the leader of the centrist Yesh Atid party. “The party’s name means ‘there is a future’. But today, I don’t see any future for this country.” Average public trust across the eight Israeli institutions measured consistently by the Israel Democracy Institute, a statistics body, stood at 34% in 2025, compared with 61% in 2012. An atmosphere of pessimism and indecision is palpable in Jerusalem, where tensions between Palestinians in occupied East Jerusalem – the majority of whom cannot vote in Israeli national elections – and rightwing Jewish Israelis have deepened since 7 October. The Hamas attack is likely to weigh heavily on the ballot: a recent poll by the Israel Democracy Institute found that 68% of Jewish respondents said 7 October would be a central factor in deciding how they voted. “After 7 October, everyone in this government has to take the blame,” said Ilda, who owns a clothing shop on Jaffa Street, one of Jerusalem’s oldest and busiest thoroughfares. Referring to a Haaretz investigation claiming Netanyahu had been warned about the possibility of a major Hamas attack, which he denies, she said: “After journalists exposed what happened, look what they did: they attacked the journalists instead of taking responsibility.” West Jerusalem has long been considered fertile ground for Netanyahu and the Israeli right. Yet Israel’s growing diplomatic isolation and the prospect of seemingly endless conflict on multiple fronts are beginning to worry voters even here, a few steps from the bustling Mahane Yehuda market, where giant election posters for Itamar Ben-Gvir, the far-right national security minister known for his anti-Palestinian rhetoric and championing a racist death penalty law that in practice applies only to Palestinians, loom over the streets. “This country needs radical change. I think I’ll vote for Naftali Bennett,” said Yosef, 26, a religious Israeli, referring to the rightwing former prime minister who now leads the B’Yachad alliance and is one of Netanyahu’s main political rivals. On one side are tens of thousands of Netanyahu supporters – called “Bibi-ists” in reference to the prime minister’s nickname – as well as backers of the far-right ministers Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, who want to return the current coalition to power to “finish the job” in Gaza, Iran, Lebanon and the West Bank. On the other are tens of thousands of voters who believe Israel is losing its standing in the world and needs a change of direction – something many see as embodied by the centre-right Eisenkot. His supporters argue that he would place greater emphasis on education, social policy and the economy, areas they say have been neglected by the current government. “I’ll vote for anyone but the prime minister of 7 October,” said Turgeman as he enjoyed a coffee with his wife at a cafe in Jaffa during the Jewish high holiday season. “I’ve never voted Likud in my life, and I’m certainly not going to start now. I’ll vote for Eisenkot. We need a normal prime minister – someone who also cares about the economy and about prices, which have soared because of the war.” Food prices in Israel have reached record highs amid the regional conflict and supply chain disruption, with food inflation outpacing the broader consumer price index. The cost of food, including fresh fruit and vegetables, has risen by 9.5% over the past two years. “They think about wars, while nobody is dealing with the economic crisis,” Turgeman said. “And what has Netanyahu done? He has continued to provide financial support that benefits the Haredi [ultra-Orthodox] community.” Since 7 October, Israel’s ultra-Orthodox community has been at the centre of a bitter dispute over military conscription. While most Jewish Israelis serve, Haredi men studying in religious seminaries have long been largely exempt. In 2024, amid war and growing pressure on reservists, the supreme court ruled there was no legal basis to continue the exemption, fuelling anti-draft protests, roadblocks and clashes with police. Haredi parties have blamed Netanyahu for failing to pass legislation to protect the exemption. Ultra-Orthodox Jews, who make up about 14% of Israel’s population, have traditionally voted for parties backed by their rabbis, including the two main Haredi parties in Netanyahu’s coalition. But anger among younger Haredim over conscription and the policing of protests could lead some to defy their religious leaders this time. “All the options in this election are junk, but I think I will vote for Eisenkot,” said Pinchas, 24, an ultra-Orthodox student who recently completed his military service. “I have the impression that this time people my age won’t vote according to what the rabbis tell them. Many are angry about the way Netanyahu handled the conscription law, and especially about the crackdown on those who protested against it.” As the Guardian conducted interviews near Jerusalem’s central bus station, an elderly passerby called out: “There is only one prime minister – Bibi!” It was a reminder that, despite the uncertainty and the opposition’s narrow lead in the polls, the Israeli leader retains a loyal base. “I’m sure Netanyahu will win,” said Avraham Levy, 76, a Likud supporter and fruit seller at Mahane Yehuda market. “We’ll have the majority. We need to support Netanyahu because he has to finish the job. If he doesn’t, who will?” he said, referring to Israel’s wars on several fronts. Among those still backing Netanyahu’s coalition partners are supporters of the far right, including Jakub, 23, who was due to begin his military service soon. “I’ll vote for Moshe Feiglin,” he said, referring to an extreme far-right former Israeli Knesset member who declared in 2025 that the conflict in Gaza was not against Hamas but against every child and baby in the territory, and is now running jointly with the far-right Religious Zionist party. “Because he represents my values, and he has never changed his principles,” Jakub said. The field is wide open and the divide is also generational: by 2019, support for a Palestinian state stood at about 20%-30% among the youngest Jewish Israeli cohorts, compared with roughly 40%-55% among older generations, reflecting a longer-term shift towards more hawkish attitudes. No more recent comparable data was available. The difficulty for the anti-Netanyahu camp is that it remains fragmented and has struggled to agree on a coherent political platform or a common strategy capable of uniting its different factions. Parties representing Palestinian citizens, known as Arab parties inside Israel, could push Eisenkot’s coalition over the 61-seat threshold, but amid a campaign of racism and Islamophobia, he has ruled out going into government with them. They could potentially support a minority government. But last week, the Central Elections Committee voted to bar Ra’am and the Joint List, the country’s two main Palestinian parties, from the election, after the far-right Otzma Yehudit party filed a petition arguing that they support terrorism and deny the existence of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. The opposition Democrats party filed a similar petition arguing for Otzma Yehudit to be banned for incitement to racism and negating the existence of Israel as a democratic state, because of racist policies pursued in power under its leader Itamar Ben Gvir. That was not upheld. The decision is being challenged in the supreme court, which has overturned similar bans in past elections. If allowed to run in the elections, the Arab parties will be crucial to the opposition’s prospects of forming a government and to Eisenkot’s chances of replacing Netanyahu. Tensions between Palestinian citizens of Israel and the state have deepened since 7 October amid arrests, interrogations and other legal action against Arab citizens, often over protests or social media posts. For these reasons, Palestinian citizens of Israel are often reluctant to express their voting preferences. In the 2025 Israeli Democracy Index survey, 70% said they preferred to remain silent about their political views in the presence of strangers, up from 45% in 2016 and compared with 53% of Jewish respondents. But Palestinian citizens of Israel remain divided over how best to respond, with many pessimistic that any future government will defend rights they say have too often been denied. The Joint List has maintained a more oppositional stance, signalling it could support an anti-Netanyahu minority government from outside while stopping short of joining a coalition, although it has done so in the past. “These elections are about our strength as an Arab community and our ability to have an influential political voice,” said Amir, 34, from Mashhad in northern Israel, who plans to vote for the Joint List. “We need strong, united Arab representation on equality, discrimination and the Palestinian cause, while cooperating when it benefits our community.” Ra’am, led by Mansour Abbas, has instead made political pragmatism its defining strategy. In 2021 it became the first independent Arab party to join an Israeli governing coalition, seeking budgets, services and greater influence for Palestinian citizens of Israel. “Arab society is being torn apart by crime and violence, while relations with Jewish Israelis are becoming more hostile,” said Abu Mahmoud, 33, from Kafr Kanna, also in the north of the country. “That’s why I’ll vote for Ra’am: negotiate, secure budgets and work with Jewish Israelis where possible.” He added: “I want politics that can actually improve people’s lives.” Jamal Risheq contributed to this report